Efficacy of peloid therapy in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis: a randomized, controlled, single blind study
The aim of this study was to assess the effect of peloid on pain, functionality, daily life activities, and quality of life of lateral epicondylitis (LE) patients. In this randomized, controlled, single-blind study, 75 patients who were diagnosed with chronic LE were enrolled to the study. Patients...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of biometeorology 2017-11, Vol.61 (11), p.1965-1972 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1972 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 1965 |
| container_title | International journal of biometeorology |
| container_volume | 61 |
| creator | Ökmen, Burcu Metin Eröksüz, Rıza Altan, Lale Aksoy, Meliha Kasapoğlu |
| description | The aim of this study was to assess the effect of peloid on pain, functionality, daily life activities, and quality of life of lateral epicondylitis (LE) patients. In this randomized, controlled, single-blind study, 75 patients who were diagnosed with chronic LE were enrolled to the study. Patients were randomized into two groups using the random number table. The patients in the first group (group 1) (
n
= 33), were given lateral epicondylitis band (LEB) (during the day for 6 weeks) + peloid therapy (five consecutive days a week for 2 weeks), and the second group (group 2) (
n
= 32), received LEB treatment alone. The patients were assessed by using Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). The data were obtained before treatment (W0), immediately after treatment (W2), and 1 month after treatment (W6). In analysis of the collected data, the Wilcoxon signed rank test for intra-group comparisons and Mann–Whitney
U
test for comparisons between groups were used. Both in groups 1 and 2, there was a statistically significant improvement in all the evaluation parameters at W2 and W6 when compared to W0 (
p
0.05), a statistically significant difference was found in favor of group 1 for all the evaluation parameters at W6 (
p
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00484-017-1386-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1910797798</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1965552670</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-dd86eaee7acee7ab5c73541c2f9e0a995e473cf56804c51ec5d2d65972021a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1r3DAQhkVpaLbb_oBeiqCXHupkJFuS3VsI6QcEcsndaKVxVkEruZJMcH99tWxaSqGXmYF55pXgIeQdgwsGoC4zQNd3DTDVsLaXDXtBNqxrecO46F6SDQCHRjHen5PXOT9CvemlekXOeS85SKU25OlmmpzRZqVxojP66Cwte0x6XqkLdNbFYSiZPrmyp2afYnCGel0q4SnOzsRgV--Ky5-ppkkHGw_uJ9pPtG5Kit4f5-zCg0e68y5Ymsti1zfkbNI-49vnviX3X27ur781t3dfv19f3TamVbw01vYSNaLS5lh2wqhWdMzwaUDQwyCwU62ZhOyhM4KhEZZbKQbFgTMt2i35eIqdU_yxYC7jwWWD3uuAcckjGxioQamhr-iHf9DHuKRQP1cpKYTgUkGl2IkyKeaccBrn5A46rSOD8ShlPEkZq5TxKKWWLXn_nLzsDmj_XPy2UAF-AnJdhQdMfz3939RfL5aYqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1965552670</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of peloid therapy in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis: a randomized, controlled, single blind study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Ökmen, Burcu Metin ; Eröksüz, Rıza ; Altan, Lale ; Aksoy, Meliha Kasapoğlu</creator><creatorcontrib>Ökmen, Burcu Metin ; Eröksüz, Rıza ; Altan, Lale ; Aksoy, Meliha Kasapoğlu</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to assess the effect of peloid on pain, functionality, daily life activities, and quality of life of lateral epicondylitis (LE) patients. In this randomized, controlled, single-blind study, 75 patients who were diagnosed with chronic LE were enrolled to the study. Patients were randomized into two groups using the random number table. The patients in the first group (group 1) (
n
= 33), were given lateral epicondylitis band (LEB) (during the day for 6 weeks) + peloid therapy (five consecutive days a week for 2 weeks), and the second group (group 2) (
n
= 32), received LEB treatment alone. The patients were assessed by using Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). The data were obtained before treatment (W0), immediately after treatment (W2), and 1 month after treatment (W6). In analysis of the collected data, the Wilcoxon signed rank test for intra-group comparisons and Mann–Whitney
U
test for comparisons between groups were used. Both in groups 1 and 2, there was a statistically significant improvement in all the evaluation parameters at W2 and W6 when compared to W0 (
p
< 0.05). In comparison of difference scores between groups, although there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups at W2 when compared to W0 (
p
> 0.05), a statistically significant difference was found in favor of group 1 for all the evaluation parameters at W6 (
p
< 0.05). Our results have shown that peloid treatment could be effective in providing improvement in pain relief, function, daily life activities, and quality of life in LE patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7128</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1254</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00484-017-1386-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28620677</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Animal Physiology ; Biological and Medical Physics ; Biophysics ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Elbow ; Elbow (anatomy) ; Environment ; Environmental Health ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Meteorology ; Middle Aged ; Mud Therapy ; Original Paper ; Pain ; Pain Management ; Patients ; Plant Physiology ; Quality of life ; Random numbers ; Randomization ; Single-Blind Method ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical significance ; Tennis ; Tennis Elbow - therapy ; Therapy ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>International journal of biometeorology, 2017-11, Vol.61 (11), p.1965-1972</ispartof><rights>ISB 2017</rights><rights>International Journal of Biometeorology is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-dd86eaee7acee7ab5c73541c2f9e0a995e473cf56804c51ec5d2d65972021a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-dd86eaee7acee7ab5c73541c2f9e0a995e473cf56804c51ec5d2d65972021a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00484-017-1386-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00484-017-1386-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28620677$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ökmen, Burcu Metin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eröksüz, Rıza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altan, Lale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aksoy, Meliha Kasapoğlu</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of peloid therapy in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis: a randomized, controlled, single blind study</title><title>International journal of biometeorology</title><addtitle>Int J Biometeorol</addtitle><addtitle>Int J Biometeorol</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to assess the effect of peloid on pain, functionality, daily life activities, and quality of life of lateral epicondylitis (LE) patients. In this randomized, controlled, single-blind study, 75 patients who were diagnosed with chronic LE were enrolled to the study. Patients were randomized into two groups using the random number table. The patients in the first group (group 1) (
n
= 33), were given lateral epicondylitis band (LEB) (during the day for 6 weeks) + peloid therapy (five consecutive days a week for 2 weeks), and the second group (group 2) (
n
= 32), received LEB treatment alone. The patients were assessed by using Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). The data were obtained before treatment (W0), immediately after treatment (W2), and 1 month after treatment (W6). In analysis of the collected data, the Wilcoxon signed rank test for intra-group comparisons and Mann–Whitney
U
test for comparisons between groups were used. Both in groups 1 and 2, there was a statistically significant improvement in all the evaluation parameters at W2 and W6 when compared to W0 (
p
< 0.05). In comparison of difference scores between groups, although there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups at W2 when compared to W0 (
p
> 0.05), a statistically significant difference was found in favor of group 1 for all the evaluation parameters at W6 (
p
< 0.05). Our results have shown that peloid treatment could be effective in providing improvement in pain relief, function, daily life activities, and quality of life in LE patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Animal Physiology</subject><subject>Biological and Medical Physics</subject><subject>Biophysics</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Elbow</subject><subject>Elbow (anatomy)</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mud Therapy</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain Management</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Random numbers</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical significance</subject><subject>Tennis</subject><subject>Tennis Elbow - therapy</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0020-7128</issn><issn>1432-1254</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1r3DAQhkVpaLbb_oBeiqCXHupkJFuS3VsI6QcEcsndaKVxVkEruZJMcH99tWxaSqGXmYF55pXgIeQdgwsGoC4zQNd3DTDVsLaXDXtBNqxrecO46F6SDQCHRjHen5PXOT9CvemlekXOeS85SKU25OlmmpzRZqVxojP66Cwte0x6XqkLdNbFYSiZPrmyp2afYnCGel0q4SnOzsRgV--Ky5-ppkkHGw_uJ9pPtG5Kit4f5-zCg0e68y5Ymsti1zfkbNI-49vnviX3X27ur781t3dfv19f3TamVbw01vYSNaLS5lh2wqhWdMzwaUDQwyCwU62ZhOyhM4KhEZZbKQbFgTMt2i35eIqdU_yxYC7jwWWD3uuAcckjGxioQamhr-iHf9DHuKRQP1cpKYTgUkGl2IkyKeaccBrn5A46rSOD8ShlPEkZq5TxKKWWLXn_nLzsDmj_XPy2UAF-AnJdhQdMfz3939RfL5aYqw</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Ökmen, Burcu Metin</creator><creator>Eröksüz, Rıza</creator><creator>Altan, Lale</creator><creator>Aksoy, Meliha Kasapoğlu</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Efficacy of peloid therapy in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis: a randomized, controlled, single blind study</title><author>Ökmen, Burcu Metin ; Eröksüz, Rıza ; Altan, Lale ; Aksoy, Meliha Kasapoğlu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-dd86eaee7acee7ab5c73541c2f9e0a995e473cf56804c51ec5d2d65972021a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Animal Physiology</topic><topic>Biological and Medical Physics</topic><topic>Biophysics</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Elbow</topic><topic>Elbow (anatomy)</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mud Therapy</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain Management</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Random numbers</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical significance</topic><topic>Tennis</topic><topic>Tennis Elbow - therapy</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ökmen, Burcu Metin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eröksüz, Rıza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altan, Lale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aksoy, Meliha Kasapoğlu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of biometeorology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ökmen, Burcu Metin</au><au>Eröksüz, Rıza</au><au>Altan, Lale</au><au>Aksoy, Meliha Kasapoğlu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of peloid therapy in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis: a randomized, controlled, single blind study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of biometeorology</jtitle><stitle>Int J Biometeorol</stitle><addtitle>Int J Biometeorol</addtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1965</spage><epage>1972</epage><pages>1965-1972</pages><issn>0020-7128</issn><eissn>1432-1254</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to assess the effect of peloid on pain, functionality, daily life activities, and quality of life of lateral epicondylitis (LE) patients. In this randomized, controlled, single-blind study, 75 patients who were diagnosed with chronic LE were enrolled to the study. Patients were randomized into two groups using the random number table. The patients in the first group (group 1) (
n
= 33), were given lateral epicondylitis band (LEB) (during the day for 6 weeks) + peloid therapy (five consecutive days a week for 2 weeks), and the second group (group 2) (
n
= 32), received LEB treatment alone. The patients were assessed by using Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). The data were obtained before treatment (W0), immediately after treatment (W2), and 1 month after treatment (W6). In analysis of the collected data, the Wilcoxon signed rank test for intra-group comparisons and Mann–Whitney
U
test for comparisons between groups were used. Both in groups 1 and 2, there was a statistically significant improvement in all the evaluation parameters at W2 and W6 when compared to W0 (
p
< 0.05). In comparison of difference scores between groups, although there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups at W2 when compared to W0 (
p
> 0.05), a statistically significant difference was found in favor of group 1 for all the evaluation parameters at W6 (
p
< 0.05). Our results have shown that peloid treatment could be effective in providing improvement in pain relief, function, daily life activities, and quality of life in LE patients.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28620677</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00484-017-1386-1</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0020-7128 |
| ispartof | International journal of biometeorology, 2017-11, Vol.61 (11), p.1965-1972 |
| issn | 0020-7128 1432-1254 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1910797798 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
| subjects | Adult Animal Physiology Biological and Medical Physics Biophysics Earth and Environmental Science Elbow Elbow (anatomy) Environment Environmental Health Female Humans Male Meteorology Middle Aged Mud Therapy Original Paper Pain Pain Management Patients Plant Physiology Quality of life Random numbers Randomization Single-Blind Method Statistical analysis Statistical significance Tennis Tennis Elbow - therapy Therapy Treatment Outcome |
| title | Efficacy of peloid therapy in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis: a randomized, controlled, single blind study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T15%3A51%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20peloid%20therapy%20in%20patients%20with%20chronic%20lateral%20epicondylitis:%20a%20randomized,%20controlled,%20single%20blind%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20biometeorology&rft.au=%C3%96kmen,%20Burcu%20Metin&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1965&rft.epage=1972&rft.pages=1965-1972&rft.issn=0020-7128&rft.eissn=1432-1254&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00484-017-1386-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1965552670%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1965552670&rft_id=info:pmid/28620677&rfr_iscdi=true |