One minute sit‐to‐stand test is an alternative to 6MWT to measure functional exercise performance in COPD patients

Introduction Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is frequently associated with a reduced functional exercise performance. Even if this parameter is routinely evaluated using 6‐minute walking test (6MWT), new field tests are regularly investigated as alternative tests. The aim of this study...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Clinical Respiratory Journal 2018-03, Vol.12 (3), p.1247-1256
Hauptverfasser: Reychler, Gregory, Boucard, Eliott, Peran, Loïc, Pichon, Romain, Le Ber‐Moy, Catherine, Ouksel, Hakima, Liistro, Giuseppe, Chambellan, Arnaud, Beaumont, Marc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1256
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1247
container_title The Clinical Respiratory Journal
container_volume 12
creator Reychler, Gregory
Boucard, Eliott
Peran, Loïc
Pichon, Romain
Le Ber‐Moy, Catherine
Ouksel, Hakima
Liistro, Giuseppe
Chambellan, Arnaud
Beaumont, Marc
description Introduction Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is frequently associated with a reduced functional exercise performance. Even if this parameter is routinely evaluated using 6‐minute walking test (6MWT), new field tests are regularly investigated as alternative tests. The aim of this study was to compare functional exercise performance evaluation by sit‐to‐stand test (STST) and 6MWT and to evaluate reliability and repeatability of the STST in COPD patients. Method Forty‐two COPD patients performed randomly two tests: 6MWT and STST. Each test was repeated two times. Distance (6MWD) and number of repetitions were measured. Cardiorespiratory parameters, dyspnea and lower limb fatigue (Borg) were recorded before and after the tests. Results Sit‐to‐stand repetitions (19 ± 6) and 6MWD (441 ± 104 m) were correlated (r = .716; P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/crj.12658
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1910797727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1910797727</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3878-2ba9c7ba855c518f5ccae37b002527ad09c9fc549f4d9e20346582834e5071c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9uVCEUh4nR2Fpd-AKGxI0upuXP5QLLZmxtzZgxpkZ3hGHOjUzuhSlwp-3OR_AZfZIyTh0TE1lwCPnyHTg_hF5SckzrOnFpdUxZK9QjdEilYJNW62-P92dFD9CznFeECCW5eIoOmGoZJVQfos08AB58GAvg7MuvHz9LrFsuNixxgVywz9gGbPsCKdjiN4BLxO3Hr1fbOoDNYwLcjcEVH4PtMdxCcj4DXkPqYhpscIB9wNP5p3d4XQ0QSn6OnnS2z_DioR6hL-dnV9OLyWz-_nJ6Ops4rqSasIXVTi6sEsIJqjrhnAUuF4QwwaRdEu1050Sju2apgRHe1CEwxRsQRFJH-RF6u_N-t71ZJz_YdGei9ebidGa2d4RzXvl2s2Xf7Nh1itdj_boZfHbQ9zZAHLOhmhKppWSyoq__QVdxrOPps2GEylZK2vC_zV2KOSfo9i-gxGyDMzU48zu4yr56MI6LAZZ78k9SFTjZATe-h7v_m8z084ed8h6Xt6Kc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2017677143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>One minute sit‐to‐stand test is an alternative to 6MWT to measure functional exercise performance in COPD patients</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><creator>Reychler, Gregory ; Boucard, Eliott ; Peran, Loïc ; Pichon, Romain ; Le Ber‐Moy, Catherine ; Ouksel, Hakima ; Liistro, Giuseppe ; Chambellan, Arnaud ; Beaumont, Marc</creator><creatorcontrib>Reychler, Gregory ; Boucard, Eliott ; Peran, Loïc ; Pichon, Romain ; Le Ber‐Moy, Catherine ; Ouksel, Hakima ; Liistro, Giuseppe ; Chambellan, Arnaud ; Beaumont, Marc</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is frequently associated with a reduced functional exercise performance. Even if this parameter is routinely evaluated using 6‐minute walking test (6MWT), new field tests are regularly investigated as alternative tests. The aim of this study was to compare functional exercise performance evaluation by sit‐to‐stand test (STST) and 6MWT and to evaluate reliability and repeatability of the STST in COPD patients. Method Forty‐two COPD patients performed randomly two tests: 6MWT and STST. Each test was repeated two times. Distance (6MWD) and number of repetitions were measured. Cardiorespiratory parameters, dyspnea and lower limb fatigue (Borg) were recorded before and after the tests. Results Sit‐to‐stand repetitions (19 ± 6) and 6MWD (441 ± 104 m) were correlated (r = .716; P &lt; .001). Good repeatability was found for STST and 6MWT. Good reliability was observed for STST (ICC = 0.902). Variations of heart rate and pulsed oxygen saturation were significantly different between these two tests (23% ± 17% vs 13% ± 11%; P = .022 and −7.6% ± 4.6% vs −0.7% ± 2.7%; P &lt; .001 for 6MWT and STST, respectively). Variations of dyspnea and lower limb fatigue were similar between both tests (P = .827 and P = .467). Conclusion The one minute sit‐to‐stand test is a valuable alternative to 6MWT to estimate functional exercise performance in COPD patients. The cardiorespiratory demand is different between both tests although the variation of dypsnea is similar. No learning effect was observed for STST.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1752-6981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-699X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/crj.12658</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28621019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged Blood Pressure / physiology Exercise Test / methods Exercise Tolerance / physiology Female Heart Rate / physiology Humans Male Muscle Strength / physiology Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / diagnosis Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / physiopathology Quality of Life Reproducibility of Results Respiratory Function Tests / methods Severity of Illness Index Walking / physiology ; Blood Pressure - physiology ; chest ; chronic bronchitis ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; clinical respiratory medicine ; COPD ; Dyspnea ; exercise ; Exercise Test - methods ; Exercise Tolerance - physiology ; Female ; Heart Rate - physiology ; Human health and pathology ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Muscle Strength - physiology ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - diagnosis ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - physiopathology ; pulmonary rehabilitation ; Quality of Life ; rehabilitation ; Reproducibility of Results ; Respiratory Function Tests - methods ; Respiratory therapy ; Severity of Illness Index ; Walking - physiology</subject><ispartof>The Clinical Respiratory Journal, 2018-03, Vol.12 (3), p.1247-1256</ispartof><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3878-2ba9c7ba855c518f5ccae37b002527ad09c9fc549f4d9e20346582834e5071c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3878-2ba9c7ba855c518f5ccae37b002527ad09c9fc549f4d9e20346582834e5071c13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7674-1150 ; 0000-0003-2354-349X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcrj.12658$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcrj.12658$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,881,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fcrj.12658$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28621019$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03338346$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reychler, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boucard, Eliott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peran, Loïc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pichon, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Ber‐Moy, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouksel, Hakima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liistro, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chambellan, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaumont, Marc</creatorcontrib><title>One minute sit‐to‐stand test is an alternative to 6MWT to measure functional exercise performance in COPD patients</title><title>The Clinical Respiratory Journal</title><addtitle>Clin Respir J</addtitle><description>Introduction Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is frequently associated with a reduced functional exercise performance. Even if this parameter is routinely evaluated using 6‐minute walking test (6MWT), new field tests are regularly investigated as alternative tests. The aim of this study was to compare functional exercise performance evaluation by sit‐to‐stand test (STST) and 6MWT and to evaluate reliability and repeatability of the STST in COPD patients. Method Forty‐two COPD patients performed randomly two tests: 6MWT and STST. Each test was repeated two times. Distance (6MWD) and number of repetitions were measured. Cardiorespiratory parameters, dyspnea and lower limb fatigue (Borg) were recorded before and after the tests. Results Sit‐to‐stand repetitions (19 ± 6) and 6MWD (441 ± 104 m) were correlated (r = .716; P &lt; .001). Good repeatability was found for STST and 6MWT. Good reliability was observed for STST (ICC = 0.902). Variations of heart rate and pulsed oxygen saturation were significantly different between these two tests (23% ± 17% vs 13% ± 11%; P = .022 and −7.6% ± 4.6% vs −0.7% ± 2.7%; P &lt; .001 for 6MWT and STST, respectively). Variations of dyspnea and lower limb fatigue were similar between both tests (P = .827 and P = .467). Conclusion The one minute sit‐to‐stand test is a valuable alternative to 6MWT to estimate functional exercise performance in COPD patients. The cardiorespiratory demand is different between both tests although the variation of dypsnea is similar. No learning effect was observed for STST.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged Blood Pressure / physiology Exercise Test / methods Exercise Tolerance / physiology Female Heart Rate / physiology Humans Male Muscle Strength / physiology Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / diagnosis Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / physiopathology Quality of Life Reproducibility of Results Respiratory Function Tests / methods Severity of Illness Index Walking / physiology</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - physiology</subject><subject>chest</subject><subject>chronic bronchitis</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</subject><subject>clinical respiratory medicine</subject><subject>COPD</subject><subject>Dyspnea</subject><subject>exercise</subject><subject>Exercise Test - methods</subject><subject>Exercise Tolerance - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Rate - physiology</subject><subject>Human health and pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - physiopathology</subject><subject>pulmonary rehabilitation</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>rehabilitation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Respiratory Function Tests - methods</subject><subject>Respiratory therapy</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Walking - physiology</subject><issn>1752-6981</issn><issn>1752-699X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9uVCEUh4nR2Fpd-AKGxI0upuXP5QLLZmxtzZgxpkZ3hGHOjUzuhSlwp-3OR_AZfZIyTh0TE1lwCPnyHTg_hF5SckzrOnFpdUxZK9QjdEilYJNW62-P92dFD9CznFeECCW5eIoOmGoZJVQfos08AB58GAvg7MuvHz9LrFsuNixxgVywz9gGbPsCKdjiN4BLxO3Hr1fbOoDNYwLcjcEVH4PtMdxCcj4DXkPqYhpscIB9wNP5p3d4XQ0QSn6OnnS2z_DioR6hL-dnV9OLyWz-_nJ6Ops4rqSasIXVTi6sEsIJqjrhnAUuF4QwwaRdEu1050Sju2apgRHe1CEwxRsQRFJH-RF6u_N-t71ZJz_YdGei9ebidGa2d4RzXvl2s2Xf7Nh1itdj_boZfHbQ9zZAHLOhmhKppWSyoq__QVdxrOPps2GEylZK2vC_zV2KOSfo9i-gxGyDMzU48zu4yr56MI6LAZZ78k9SFTjZATe-h7v_m8z084ed8h6Xt6Kc</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Reychler, Gregory</creator><creator>Boucard, Eliott</creator><creator>Peran, Loïc</creator><creator>Pichon, Romain</creator><creator>Le Ber‐Moy, Catherine</creator><creator>Ouksel, Hakima</creator><creator>Liistro, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Chambellan, Arnaud</creator><creator>Beaumont, Marc</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7674-1150</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2354-349X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>One minute sit‐to‐stand test is an alternative to 6MWT to measure functional exercise performance in COPD patients</title><author>Reychler, Gregory ; Boucard, Eliott ; Peran, Loïc ; Pichon, Romain ; Le Ber‐Moy, Catherine ; Ouksel, Hakima ; Liistro, Giuseppe ; Chambellan, Arnaud ; Beaumont, Marc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3878-2ba9c7ba855c518f5ccae37b002527ad09c9fc549f4d9e20346582834e5071c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged Blood Pressure / physiology Exercise Test / methods Exercise Tolerance / physiology Female Heart Rate / physiology Humans Male Muscle Strength / physiology Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / diagnosis Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / physiopathology Quality of Life Reproducibility of Results Respiratory Function Tests / methods Severity of Illness Index Walking / physiology</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - physiology</topic><topic>chest</topic><topic>chronic bronchitis</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</topic><topic>clinical respiratory medicine</topic><topic>COPD</topic><topic>Dyspnea</topic><topic>exercise</topic><topic>Exercise Test - methods</topic><topic>Exercise Tolerance - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Rate - physiology</topic><topic>Human health and pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - physiopathology</topic><topic>pulmonary rehabilitation</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>rehabilitation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Respiratory Function Tests - methods</topic><topic>Respiratory therapy</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Walking - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reychler, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boucard, Eliott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peran, Loïc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pichon, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Ber‐Moy, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouksel, Hakima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liistro, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chambellan, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaumont, Marc</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>The Clinical Respiratory Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reychler, Gregory</au><au>Boucard, Eliott</au><au>Peran, Loïc</au><au>Pichon, Romain</au><au>Le Ber‐Moy, Catherine</au><au>Ouksel, Hakima</au><au>Liistro, Giuseppe</au><au>Chambellan, Arnaud</au><au>Beaumont, Marc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>One minute sit‐to‐stand test is an alternative to 6MWT to measure functional exercise performance in COPD patients</atitle><jtitle>The Clinical Respiratory Journal</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Respir J</addtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1247</spage><epage>1256</epage><pages>1247-1256</pages><issn>1752-6981</issn><eissn>1752-699X</eissn><abstract>Introduction Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is frequently associated with a reduced functional exercise performance. Even if this parameter is routinely evaluated using 6‐minute walking test (6MWT), new field tests are regularly investigated as alternative tests. The aim of this study was to compare functional exercise performance evaluation by sit‐to‐stand test (STST) and 6MWT and to evaluate reliability and repeatability of the STST in COPD patients. Method Forty‐two COPD patients performed randomly two tests: 6MWT and STST. Each test was repeated two times. Distance (6MWD) and number of repetitions were measured. Cardiorespiratory parameters, dyspnea and lower limb fatigue (Borg) were recorded before and after the tests. Results Sit‐to‐stand repetitions (19 ± 6) and 6MWD (441 ± 104 m) were correlated (r = .716; P &lt; .001). Good repeatability was found for STST and 6MWT. Good reliability was observed for STST (ICC = 0.902). Variations of heart rate and pulsed oxygen saturation were significantly different between these two tests (23% ± 17% vs 13% ± 11%; P = .022 and −7.6% ± 4.6% vs −0.7% ± 2.7%; P &lt; .001 for 6MWT and STST, respectively). Variations of dyspnea and lower limb fatigue were similar between both tests (P = .827 and P = .467). Conclusion The one minute sit‐to‐stand test is a valuable alternative to 6MWT to estimate functional exercise performance in COPD patients. The cardiorespiratory demand is different between both tests although the variation of dypsnea is similar. No learning effect was observed for STST.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>28621019</pmid><doi>10.1111/crj.12658</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7674-1150</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2354-349X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1752-6981
ispartof The Clinical Respiratory Journal, 2018-03, Vol.12 (3), p.1247-1256
issn 1752-6981
1752-699X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1910797727
source Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles
subjects Aged
Aged Blood Pressure / physiology Exercise Test / methods Exercise Tolerance / physiology Female Heart Rate / physiology Humans Male Muscle Strength / physiology Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / diagnosis Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / physiopathology Quality of Life Reproducibility of Results Respiratory Function Tests / methods Severity of Illness Index Walking / physiology
Blood Pressure - physiology
chest
chronic bronchitis
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
clinical respiratory medicine
COPD
Dyspnea
exercise
Exercise Test - methods
Exercise Tolerance - physiology
Female
Heart Rate - physiology
Human health and pathology
Humans
Life Sciences
Male
Muscle Strength - physiology
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - diagnosis
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - physiopathology
pulmonary rehabilitation
Quality of Life
rehabilitation
Reproducibility of Results
Respiratory Function Tests - methods
Respiratory therapy
Severity of Illness Index
Walking - physiology
title One minute sit‐to‐stand test is an alternative to 6MWT to measure functional exercise performance in COPD patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T18%3A44%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=One%20minute%20sit%E2%80%90to%E2%80%90stand%20test%20is%20an%20alternative%20to%206MWT%20to%20measure%20functional%20exercise%20performance%20in%20COPD%20patients&rft.jtitle=The%20Clinical%20Respiratory%20Journal&rft.au=Reychler,%20Gregory&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1247&rft.epage=1256&rft.pages=1247-1256&rft.issn=1752-6981&rft.eissn=1752-699X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/crj.12658&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_24P%3E1910797727%3C/proquest_24P%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2017677143&rft_id=info:pmid/28621019&rfr_iscdi=true