Determinants of Perceived Health Nonimprovement in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With Favorable Treatment Outcomes

Objective To explore the association between achieving favorable clinical outcomes and patients’ perceived change in overall health status after 12 months of treat‐to‐target in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to identify determinants of subjective nonimprovement. Methods Baseline a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthritis care & research (2010) 2018-04, Vol.70 (4), p.510-515
Hauptverfasser: Steunebrink, L. M. M., Oude Voshaar, M. A. H., Taal, E., Vonkeman, H. E., Zijlstra, T. R., Laar, M. A. F. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 515
container_issue 4
container_start_page 510
container_title Arthritis care & research (2010)
container_volume 70
creator Steunebrink, L. M. M.
Oude Voshaar, M. A. H.
Taal, E.
Vonkeman, H. E.
Zijlstra, T. R.
Laar, M. A. F. J.
description Objective To explore the association between achieving favorable clinical outcomes and patients’ perceived change in overall health status after 12 months of treat‐to‐target in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to identify determinants of subjective nonimprovement. Methods Baseline and 12‐month data of patients included in the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring remission induction cohort study with at least a moderate response (by European League Against Rheumatism criteria) after 1 year were selected for analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with nonimproved perceived overall health status at 12 months. Results At 12 months, 75 of 210 patients (35%) did not consider their health to have improved despite having achieved favorable clinical outcomes. Relative change from baseline in pain (Wald = 20.20; P < 0.01) and fatigue (Wald = 5.58; P = 0.02) was independently associated with nonimproved perceived overall health status. The results were similar when only patients with ≤1 swollen joint were analyzed. An improvement of 55% in pain measured on a visual analog scale was found to discriminate reasonably well between patients who considered their health to have improved versus patients who did not, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.61–0.78). Conclusion These results demonstrate that clinical improvements do not equate with improved subjective health for all patients. The association of nonimprovement with changes in pain and fatigue suggest that it might be worthwhile to monitor and address pain and fatigue in addition to and independently of disease activity in early RA.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/acr.23305
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1910797345</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2019591158</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-cfa23c89807f7ddb41bdd8fb3a7e7ff6f0aa8c945d6c160f6666d1ad5b0d846f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1P3DAQhq2KChDlwB-oLHGBw4I_4sQ5rhYolVBBCNTeLMcea42SGGxnYf99DUs5VGIunsMzj2b8InRAyQklhJ1qE08Y50R8QbuMCjqraiG3Pvrqzw7aT-mBlOJMSt5uox0ma8aqmu2ilzPIEAc_6jEnHBy-gWjAr8DiS9B9XuJfYfTDYwwrGGDM2I_4XMd-jW-XMA06B2_xPOZl9NknfKOzh1fTb19GL_QqRN31gO8i6Pw2fz1lEwZI39BXp_sE--_vHrq_OL9bXM6urn_8XMyvZoZLKWbGacaNbCVpXGNtV9HOWuk6rhtonKsd0VqathK2NrQmri5lqbaiI1ZWteN76GjjLSc8TZCyGnwy0Pd6hDAlRVtKmrbhlSjo4X_oQ5jiWLZTjNBWtJQKWajjDWViSCmCU4_RDzquFSXqNRFVElFviRT2-7tx6gawH-S__y_A6QZ49j2sPzep-eJ2o_wLzMqWwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2019591158</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determinants of Perceived Health Nonimprovement in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With Favorable Treatment Outcomes</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Steunebrink, L. M. M. ; Oude Voshaar, M. A. H. ; Taal, E. ; Vonkeman, H. E. ; Zijlstra, T. R. ; Laar, M. A. F. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Steunebrink, L. M. M. ; Oude Voshaar, M. A. H. ; Taal, E. ; Vonkeman, H. E. ; Zijlstra, T. R. ; Laar, M. A. F. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To explore the association between achieving favorable clinical outcomes and patients’ perceived change in overall health status after 12 months of treat‐to‐target in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to identify determinants of subjective nonimprovement. Methods Baseline and 12‐month data of patients included in the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring remission induction cohort study with at least a moderate response (by European League Against Rheumatism criteria) after 1 year were selected for analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with nonimproved perceived overall health status at 12 months. Results At 12 months, 75 of 210 patients (35%) did not consider their health to have improved despite having achieved favorable clinical outcomes. Relative change from baseline in pain (Wald = 20.20; P &lt; 0.01) and fatigue (Wald = 5.58; P = 0.02) was independently associated with nonimproved perceived overall health status. The results were similar when only patients with ≤1 swollen joint were analyzed. An improvement of 55% in pain measured on a visual analog scale was found to discriminate reasonably well between patients who considered their health to have improved versus patients who did not, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.61–0.78). Conclusion These results demonstrate that clinical improvements do not equate with improved subjective health for all patients. The association of nonimprovement with changes in pain and fatigue suggest that it might be worthwhile to monitor and address pain and fatigue in addition to and independently of disease activity in early RA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2151-464X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-4658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acr.23305</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28622462</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Clinical outcomes ; Fatigue ; Health risk assessment ; Pain ; Patients ; Remission ; Rheumatoid arthritis</subject><ispartof>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010), 2018-04, Vol.70 (4), p.510-515</ispartof><rights>2017, American College of Rheumatology</rights><rights>2017, American College of Rheumatology.</rights><rights>2018 American College of Rheumatology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-cfa23c89807f7ddb41bdd8fb3a7e7ff6f0aa8c945d6c160f6666d1ad5b0d846f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-cfa23c89807f7ddb41bdd8fb3a7e7ff6f0aa8c945d6c160f6666d1ad5b0d846f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Facr.23305$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Facr.23305$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28622462$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steunebrink, L. M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oude Voshaar, M. A. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taal, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vonkeman, H. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zijlstra, T. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laar, M. A. F. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Determinants of Perceived Health Nonimprovement in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With Favorable Treatment Outcomes</title><title>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010)</title><addtitle>Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)</addtitle><description>Objective To explore the association between achieving favorable clinical outcomes and patients’ perceived change in overall health status after 12 months of treat‐to‐target in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to identify determinants of subjective nonimprovement. Methods Baseline and 12‐month data of patients included in the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring remission induction cohort study with at least a moderate response (by European League Against Rheumatism criteria) after 1 year were selected for analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with nonimproved perceived overall health status at 12 months. Results At 12 months, 75 of 210 patients (35%) did not consider their health to have improved despite having achieved favorable clinical outcomes. Relative change from baseline in pain (Wald = 20.20; P &lt; 0.01) and fatigue (Wald = 5.58; P = 0.02) was independently associated with nonimproved perceived overall health status. The results were similar when only patients with ≤1 swollen joint were analyzed. An improvement of 55% in pain measured on a visual analog scale was found to discriminate reasonably well between patients who considered their health to have improved versus patients who did not, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.61–0.78). Conclusion These results demonstrate that clinical improvements do not equate with improved subjective health for all patients. The association of nonimprovement with changes in pain and fatigue suggest that it might be worthwhile to monitor and address pain and fatigue in addition to and independently of disease activity in early RA.</description><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Remission</subject><subject>Rheumatoid arthritis</subject><issn>2151-464X</issn><issn>2151-4658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1P3DAQhq2KChDlwB-oLHGBw4I_4sQ5rhYolVBBCNTeLMcea42SGGxnYf99DUs5VGIunsMzj2b8InRAyQklhJ1qE08Y50R8QbuMCjqraiG3Pvrqzw7aT-mBlOJMSt5uox0ma8aqmu2ilzPIEAc_6jEnHBy-gWjAr8DiS9B9XuJfYfTDYwwrGGDM2I_4XMd-jW-XMA06B2_xPOZl9NknfKOzh1fTb19GL_QqRN31gO8i6Pw2fz1lEwZI39BXp_sE--_vHrq_OL9bXM6urn_8XMyvZoZLKWbGacaNbCVpXGNtV9HOWuk6rhtonKsd0VqathK2NrQmri5lqbaiI1ZWteN76GjjLSc8TZCyGnwy0Pd6hDAlRVtKmrbhlSjo4X_oQ5jiWLZTjNBWtJQKWajjDWViSCmCU4_RDzquFSXqNRFVElFviRT2-7tx6gawH-S__y_A6QZ49j2sPzep-eJ2o_wLzMqWwA</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Steunebrink, L. M. M.</creator><creator>Oude Voshaar, M. A. H.</creator><creator>Taal, E.</creator><creator>Vonkeman, H. E.</creator><creator>Zijlstra, T. R.</creator><creator>Laar, M. A. F. J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Determinants of Perceived Health Nonimprovement in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With Favorable Treatment Outcomes</title><author>Steunebrink, L. M. M. ; Oude Voshaar, M. A. H. ; Taal, E. ; Vonkeman, H. E. ; Zijlstra, T. R. ; Laar, M. A. F. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-cfa23c89807f7ddb41bdd8fb3a7e7ff6f0aa8c945d6c160f6666d1ad5b0d846f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Remission</topic><topic>Rheumatoid arthritis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steunebrink, L. M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oude Voshaar, M. A. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taal, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vonkeman, H. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zijlstra, T. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laar, M. A. F. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steunebrink, L. M. M.</au><au>Oude Voshaar, M. A. H.</au><au>Taal, E.</au><au>Vonkeman, H. E.</au><au>Zijlstra, T. R.</au><au>Laar, M. A. F. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determinants of Perceived Health Nonimprovement in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With Favorable Treatment Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010)</jtitle><addtitle>Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>510</spage><epage>515</epage><pages>510-515</pages><issn>2151-464X</issn><eissn>2151-4658</eissn><abstract>Objective To explore the association between achieving favorable clinical outcomes and patients’ perceived change in overall health status after 12 months of treat‐to‐target in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to identify determinants of subjective nonimprovement. Methods Baseline and 12‐month data of patients included in the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring remission induction cohort study with at least a moderate response (by European League Against Rheumatism criteria) after 1 year were selected for analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with nonimproved perceived overall health status at 12 months. Results At 12 months, 75 of 210 patients (35%) did not consider their health to have improved despite having achieved favorable clinical outcomes. Relative change from baseline in pain (Wald = 20.20; P &lt; 0.01) and fatigue (Wald = 5.58; P = 0.02) was independently associated with nonimproved perceived overall health status. The results were similar when only patients with ≤1 swollen joint were analyzed. An improvement of 55% in pain measured on a visual analog scale was found to discriminate reasonably well between patients who considered their health to have improved versus patients who did not, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.61–0.78). Conclusion These results demonstrate that clinical improvements do not equate with improved subjective health for all patients. The association of nonimprovement with changes in pain and fatigue suggest that it might be worthwhile to monitor and address pain and fatigue in addition to and independently of disease activity in early RA.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28622462</pmid><doi>10.1002/acr.23305</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2151-464X
ispartof Arthritis care & research (2010), 2018-04, Vol.70 (4), p.510-515
issn 2151-464X
2151-4658
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1910797345
source Wiley Journals
subjects Clinical outcomes
Fatigue
Health risk assessment
Pain
Patients
Remission
Rheumatoid arthritis
title Determinants of Perceived Health Nonimprovement in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With Favorable Treatment Outcomes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T11%3A18%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determinants%20of%20Perceived%20Health%20Nonimprovement%20in%20Early%20Rheumatoid%20Arthritis%20Patients%20With%20Favorable%20Treatment%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=Arthritis%20care%20&%20research%20(2010)&rft.au=Steunebrink,%20L.%20M.%20M.&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=510&rft.epage=515&rft.pages=510-515&rft.issn=2151-464X&rft.eissn=2151-4658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acr.23305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2019591158%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2019591158&rft_id=info:pmid/28622462&rfr_iscdi=true