Variation in Definition of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation

Consistency of definitional criteria for terminology applied to describe subject cohorts receiving mechanical ventilation within ICU and post-acute care settings is important for understanding prevalence, risk stratification, effectiveness of interventions, and projections for resource allocation. O...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory care 2017-10, Vol.62 (10), p.1324-1332
Hauptverfasser: Rose, Louise, McGinlay, Michael, Amin, Reshma, Burns, Karen Ea, Connolly, Bronwen, Hart, Nicholas, Jouvet, Philippe, Katz, Sherri, Leasa, David, Mawdsley, Cathy, McAuley, Danny F, Schultz, Marcus J, Blackwood, Bronagh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1332
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1324
container_title Respiratory care
container_volume 62
creator Rose, Louise
McGinlay, Michael
Amin, Reshma
Burns, Karen Ea
Connolly, Bronwen
Hart, Nicholas
Jouvet, Philippe
Katz, Sherri
Leasa, David
Mawdsley, Cathy
McAuley, Danny F
Schultz, Marcus J
Blackwood, Bronagh
description Consistency of definitional criteria for terminology applied to describe subject cohorts receiving mechanical ventilation within ICU and post-acute care settings is important for understanding prevalence, risk stratification, effectiveness of interventions, and projections for resource allocation. Our objective was to quantify the application and definition of terms for prolonged mechanical ventilation. We conducted a scoping review of studies (all designs except single-case study) reporting a study population (adult and pediatric) using the term prolonged mechanical ventilation or a synonym. We screened 5,331 references, reviewed 539 full-text references, and excluded 120. Of the 419 studies (representing 38 countries) meeting inclusion criteria, 297 (71%) reported data on a heterogeneous subject cohort, and 66 (16%) included surgical subjects only (46 of those 66, 70% cardiac surgery). Other studies described COPD (16, 4%), trauma (22, 5%), neuromuscular (17, 4%), and sepsis (1, 0.2%) cohorts. A total of 741 terms were used to refer to the 419 study cohorts. The most common terms were: prolonged mechanical ventilation (253, 60%), admission to specialized unit (107, 26%), and long-term mechanical ventilation (79, 19%). Some authors (282, 67%) defined their cohorts based on duration of mechanical ventilation, with 154 studies (55%) using this as the sole criterion. We identified 37 different durations of ventilation ranging from 5 h to 1 y, with > 21 d being the most common (28 of 282, 7%). For studies describing a surgical cohort, minimum ventilation duration required for inclusion was ≥ 24 h for 20 of 66 studies (30%). More than half of all studies (237, 57%) did not provide a reason/rationale for definitional criteria used, with only 28 studies (7%) referring to a consensus definition. We conclude that substantial variation exists in the terminology and definitional criteria for cohorts of subjects receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation. Standardization of terminology and definitional criteria is required for study data to be maximally informative.
doi_str_mv 10.4187/respcare.05485
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1909745097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A509397602</galeid><sourcerecordid>A509397602</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-dcd6b1ac057389e596bf80dbe10b7b288b941ae75aecedc7c1642a8b542431a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkctLBDEMxosouj6uHmVAEC-z9jkzxdPiGxQ9qNfS6WTcSrdd29mD_73d9YGCBBISfl8g-RDaJ3jMSVOfREhzoyOMseCNWEMjIjkrWSX4OhphTHFJGOVbaDul19xWXMhNtEWbihBK5QidPuto9WCDL6wvzqG33q660BcPMbjgX6Ar7sBMtbdGu-IZ_GDdSrGLNnrtEux91R30dHnxeHZd3t5f3ZxNbkvDGRvKznRVS7TBomaNBCGrtm9w1wLBbd3SpmklJxpqocFAZ2pDKk510wpOOSOasR10_Ll3HsPbAtKgZjYZcE57CIukiMSy5iKnjB5-oi_agbK-D0PUZomrSQaYrCtMMzX-h8rRwcya4PMX8vyP4OiXYAraDdMU3GL5hfTvZhNDShF6NY92puO7IlgtDVPfhqmVYVlw8HXbop1B94N_O8Q-AMF3kIE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1909745097</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation in Definition of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Rose, Louise ; McGinlay, Michael ; Amin, Reshma ; Burns, Karen Ea ; Connolly, Bronwen ; Hart, Nicholas ; Jouvet, Philippe ; Katz, Sherri ; Leasa, David ; Mawdsley, Cathy ; McAuley, Danny F ; Schultz, Marcus J ; Blackwood, Bronagh</creator><creatorcontrib>Rose, Louise ; McGinlay, Michael ; Amin, Reshma ; Burns, Karen Ea ; Connolly, Bronwen ; Hart, Nicholas ; Jouvet, Philippe ; Katz, Sherri ; Leasa, David ; Mawdsley, Cathy ; McAuley, Danny F ; Schultz, Marcus J ; Blackwood, Bronagh</creatorcontrib><description>Consistency of definitional criteria for terminology applied to describe subject cohorts receiving mechanical ventilation within ICU and post-acute care settings is important for understanding prevalence, risk stratification, effectiveness of interventions, and projections for resource allocation. Our objective was to quantify the application and definition of terms for prolonged mechanical ventilation. We conducted a scoping review of studies (all designs except single-case study) reporting a study population (adult and pediatric) using the term prolonged mechanical ventilation or a synonym. We screened 5,331 references, reviewed 539 full-text references, and excluded 120. Of the 419 studies (representing 38 countries) meeting inclusion criteria, 297 (71%) reported data on a heterogeneous subject cohort, and 66 (16%) included surgical subjects only (46 of those 66, 70% cardiac surgery). Other studies described COPD (16, 4%), trauma (22, 5%), neuromuscular (17, 4%), and sepsis (1, 0.2%) cohorts. A total of 741 terms were used to refer to the 419 study cohorts. The most common terms were: prolonged mechanical ventilation (253, 60%), admission to specialized unit (107, 26%), and long-term mechanical ventilation (79, 19%). Some authors (282, 67%) defined their cohorts based on duration of mechanical ventilation, with 154 studies (55%) using this as the sole criterion. We identified 37 different durations of ventilation ranging from 5 h to 1 y, with &gt; 21 d being the most common (28 of 282, 7%). For studies describing a surgical cohort, minimum ventilation duration required for inclusion was ≥ 24 h for 20 of 66 studies (30%). More than half of all studies (237, 57%) did not provide a reason/rationale for definitional criteria used, with only 28 studies (7%) referring to a consensus definition. We conclude that substantial variation exists in the terminology and definitional criteria for cohorts of subjects receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation. Standardization of terminology and definitional criteria is required for study data to be maximally informative.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1324</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4187/respcare.05485</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28611229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Daedalus Enterprises, Inc</publisher><subject>Humans ; Mechanical ventilation ; Respiration, Artificial - methods ; Terminology as Topic ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Respiratory care, 2017-10, Vol.62 (10), p.1324-1332</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 by Daedalus Enterprises.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-dcd6b1ac057389e596bf80dbe10b7b288b941ae75aecedc7c1642a8b542431a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-dcd6b1ac057389e596bf80dbe10b7b288b941ae75aecedc7c1642a8b542431a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28611229$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rose, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGinlay, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amin, Reshma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, Karen Ea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Bronwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jouvet, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Sherri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leasa, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mawdsley, Cathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAuley, Danny F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Marcus J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackwood, Bronagh</creatorcontrib><title>Variation in Definition of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation</title><title>Respiratory care</title><addtitle>Respir Care</addtitle><description>Consistency of definitional criteria for terminology applied to describe subject cohorts receiving mechanical ventilation within ICU and post-acute care settings is important for understanding prevalence, risk stratification, effectiveness of interventions, and projections for resource allocation. Our objective was to quantify the application and definition of terms for prolonged mechanical ventilation. We conducted a scoping review of studies (all designs except single-case study) reporting a study population (adult and pediatric) using the term prolonged mechanical ventilation or a synonym. We screened 5,331 references, reviewed 539 full-text references, and excluded 120. Of the 419 studies (representing 38 countries) meeting inclusion criteria, 297 (71%) reported data on a heterogeneous subject cohort, and 66 (16%) included surgical subjects only (46 of those 66, 70% cardiac surgery). Other studies described COPD (16, 4%), trauma (22, 5%), neuromuscular (17, 4%), and sepsis (1, 0.2%) cohorts. A total of 741 terms were used to refer to the 419 study cohorts. The most common terms were: prolonged mechanical ventilation (253, 60%), admission to specialized unit (107, 26%), and long-term mechanical ventilation (79, 19%). Some authors (282, 67%) defined their cohorts based on duration of mechanical ventilation, with 154 studies (55%) using this as the sole criterion. We identified 37 different durations of ventilation ranging from 5 h to 1 y, with &gt; 21 d being the most common (28 of 282, 7%). For studies describing a surgical cohort, minimum ventilation duration required for inclusion was ≥ 24 h for 20 of 66 studies (30%). More than half of all studies (237, 57%) did not provide a reason/rationale for definitional criteria used, with only 28 studies (7%) referring to a consensus definition. We conclude that substantial variation exists in the terminology and definitional criteria for cohorts of subjects receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation. Standardization of terminology and definitional criteria is required for study data to be maximally informative.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mechanical ventilation</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - methods</subject><subject>Terminology as Topic</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0020-1324</issn><issn>1943-3654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkctLBDEMxosouj6uHmVAEC-z9jkzxdPiGxQ9qNfS6WTcSrdd29mD_73d9YGCBBISfl8g-RDaJ3jMSVOfREhzoyOMseCNWEMjIjkrWSX4OhphTHFJGOVbaDul19xWXMhNtEWbihBK5QidPuto9WCDL6wvzqG33q660BcPMbjgX6Ar7sBMtbdGu-IZ_GDdSrGLNnrtEux91R30dHnxeHZd3t5f3ZxNbkvDGRvKznRVS7TBomaNBCGrtm9w1wLBbd3SpmklJxpqocFAZ2pDKk510wpOOSOasR10_Ll3HsPbAtKgZjYZcE57CIukiMSy5iKnjB5-oi_agbK-D0PUZomrSQaYrCtMMzX-h8rRwcya4PMX8vyP4OiXYAraDdMU3GL5hfTvZhNDShF6NY92puO7IlgtDVPfhqmVYVlw8HXbop1B94N_O8Q-AMF3kIE</recordid><startdate>201710</startdate><enddate>201710</enddate><creator>Rose, Louise</creator><creator>McGinlay, Michael</creator><creator>Amin, Reshma</creator><creator>Burns, Karen Ea</creator><creator>Connolly, Bronwen</creator><creator>Hart, Nicholas</creator><creator>Jouvet, Philippe</creator><creator>Katz, Sherri</creator><creator>Leasa, David</creator><creator>Mawdsley, Cathy</creator><creator>McAuley, Danny F</creator><creator>Schultz, Marcus J</creator><creator>Blackwood, Bronagh</creator><general>Daedalus Enterprises, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201710</creationdate><title>Variation in Definition of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation</title><author>Rose, Louise ; McGinlay, Michael ; Amin, Reshma ; Burns, Karen Ea ; Connolly, Bronwen ; Hart, Nicholas ; Jouvet, Philippe ; Katz, Sherri ; Leasa, David ; Mawdsley, Cathy ; McAuley, Danny F ; Schultz, Marcus J ; Blackwood, Bronagh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-dcd6b1ac057389e596bf80dbe10b7b288b941ae75aecedc7c1642a8b542431a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mechanical ventilation</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - methods</topic><topic>Terminology as Topic</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rose, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGinlay, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amin, Reshma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, Karen Ea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Bronwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jouvet, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Sherri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leasa, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mawdsley, Cathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAuley, Danny F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Marcus J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackwood, Bronagh</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Respiratory care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rose, Louise</au><au>McGinlay, Michael</au><au>Amin, Reshma</au><au>Burns, Karen Ea</au><au>Connolly, Bronwen</au><au>Hart, Nicholas</au><au>Jouvet, Philippe</au><au>Katz, Sherri</au><au>Leasa, David</au><au>Mawdsley, Cathy</au><au>McAuley, Danny F</au><au>Schultz, Marcus J</au><au>Blackwood, Bronagh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation in Definition of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation</atitle><jtitle>Respiratory care</jtitle><addtitle>Respir Care</addtitle><date>2017-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1324</spage><epage>1332</epage><pages>1324-1332</pages><issn>0020-1324</issn><eissn>1943-3654</eissn><abstract>Consistency of definitional criteria for terminology applied to describe subject cohorts receiving mechanical ventilation within ICU and post-acute care settings is important for understanding prevalence, risk stratification, effectiveness of interventions, and projections for resource allocation. Our objective was to quantify the application and definition of terms for prolonged mechanical ventilation. We conducted a scoping review of studies (all designs except single-case study) reporting a study population (adult and pediatric) using the term prolonged mechanical ventilation or a synonym. We screened 5,331 references, reviewed 539 full-text references, and excluded 120. Of the 419 studies (representing 38 countries) meeting inclusion criteria, 297 (71%) reported data on a heterogeneous subject cohort, and 66 (16%) included surgical subjects only (46 of those 66, 70% cardiac surgery). Other studies described COPD (16, 4%), trauma (22, 5%), neuromuscular (17, 4%), and sepsis (1, 0.2%) cohorts. A total of 741 terms were used to refer to the 419 study cohorts. The most common terms were: prolonged mechanical ventilation (253, 60%), admission to specialized unit (107, 26%), and long-term mechanical ventilation (79, 19%). Some authors (282, 67%) defined their cohorts based on duration of mechanical ventilation, with 154 studies (55%) using this as the sole criterion. We identified 37 different durations of ventilation ranging from 5 h to 1 y, with &gt; 21 d being the most common (28 of 282, 7%). For studies describing a surgical cohort, minimum ventilation duration required for inclusion was ≥ 24 h for 20 of 66 studies (30%). More than half of all studies (237, 57%) did not provide a reason/rationale for definitional criteria used, with only 28 studies (7%) referring to a consensus definition. We conclude that substantial variation exists in the terminology and definitional criteria for cohorts of subjects receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation. Standardization of terminology and definitional criteria is required for study data to be maximally informative.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Daedalus Enterprises, Inc</pub><pmid>28611229</pmid><doi>10.4187/respcare.05485</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-1324
ispartof Respiratory care, 2017-10, Vol.62 (10), p.1324-1332
issn 0020-1324
1943-3654
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1909745097
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Humans
Mechanical ventilation
Respiration, Artificial - methods
Terminology as Topic
Time Factors
title Variation in Definition of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T10%3A47%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20in%20Definition%20of%20Prolonged%20Mechanical%20Ventilation&rft.jtitle=Respiratory%20care&rft.au=Rose,%20Louise&rft.date=2017-10&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1324&rft.epage=1332&rft.pages=1324-1332&rft.issn=0020-1324&rft.eissn=1943-3654&rft_id=info:doi/10.4187/respcare.05485&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA509397602%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1909745097&rft_id=info:pmid/28611229&rft_galeid=A509397602&rfr_iscdi=true