Evolution from Percutaneous nephrolithotomy to Mini-PCNL in supine position on the treatment of complex renal calculi: feasibility study.

Mini-PCNL is a potentially less invasive technique than standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We present our experience and results comparing both approaches in large burden complex renal calculi. Prospective non randomized study comparing PCNL (24/26F nephroscope; Group A) and Mini-PCNL (15...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archivos españoles de urología 2017-06, Vol.70 (5), p.542-549
Hauptverfasser: de Fata-Chillón, Fernando Ramón, Gimbernat-Díaz, Helena, Redondo-Redondo, Cristina, Meilán-Hernández, Elisa, Mateo-Martínez, Erika
Format: Artikel
Sprache:spa
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 549
container_issue 5
container_start_page 542
container_title Archivos españoles de urología
container_volume 70
creator de Fata-Chillón, Fernando Ramón
Gimbernat-Díaz, Helena
Redondo-Redondo, Cristina
Meilán-Hernández, Elisa
Mateo-Martínez, Erika
description Mini-PCNL is a potentially less invasive technique than standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We present our experience and results comparing both approaches in large burden complex renal calculi. Prospective non randomized study comparing PCNL (24/26F nephroscope; Group A) and Mini-PCNL (15/18F; Group B) perioperative and postoperative results, in 40 (20 each group) consecutive patients between 2013 and 2014. We analyze demographic data, hemoglobin drop, urine culture, stone characteristics, operative time, puncture, number and size of the tract, disintegration energy sources, nephrostomy placement, hospital stay, stone free rate and Clavien-Dindo complications. Evolution has shown growth for Mini-PNL, with the last 17 consecutive cases performed by this approach. No preoperative differences in laterality, age, gender or ASA were found; but there were differences in BMI (median Group A: 26.35 kg/m2; Median Group B: 33.05 kg/m2, p = 0.008). Median calculi surface area (SA = length × width × π × 0.25) was higher for mini-PNL (6.69 cm2 vs 14.14; p=0.003). The operative time was longer for mini-PNL (120 vs 162.5 min, p = 0.03). Only one case (5%) required transfusion in NLP 24/26F. Mini-PCNL was associated with tubeless technique (55%) (p = 0.022), which explains lower 24 h postoperative pain, after surgery, measured by VAS (p =0.0004). The hospital stay was equivalent (median: 2 days; p=0.8). Both techniques showed efficacy (SFR at 3 months 80%). There were no statistically significant differences between the number and severity of complications between groups (Group A: 15%, 66.7% Clavien II, Group B: 15%; 66.7% Clavien II, p = 1). Mini-NLP can manage kidney stones and even large staghorn calculi without nephrostomy in a high percentage of patients. The technical evolution towards a small caliber approach maintains the effectiveness of the procedure without impacting its safety, with benefits perceived by patients such as less postoperative pain.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1909738725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1909738725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-1abc3f45e570d3c6adfe5756fd68d3b29672899caa1058eb69e85f4fade272353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kL1OwzAcxDOAaCm8AvLIEmTHsZOwoapQpAIdYI4c52_VyLGDPxB5BN6aQot00t1w-kl3J9kcY1zmmJNylp2H8I4xrQljZ9msqDmhBebz7Hv16UyK2lmkvBvQFrxMUVhwKSAL4847o-PORTdMKDr0pK3Ot8vnDdIWhTRqC2h0Qf8R9oo7QNGDiAPYiJxC0g2jgS_kwQqDpDAyGX2LFIigO71nTyjE1E83F9mpEibA5dEX2dv96nW5zjcvD4_Lu00-kpLEnIhOUlUyYBXuqeSiV_vIuOp53dOuaHhV1E0jhSCY1dDxBmqmSiV6KKqCMrrIrg_c0buPBCG2gw4SjDmMbkmDm4rWVfFbvTpWUzdA345eD8JP7f999AflK24s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1909738725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evolution from Percutaneous nephrolithotomy to Mini-PCNL in supine position on the treatment of complex renal calculi: feasibility study.</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>de Fata-Chillón, Fernando Ramón ; Gimbernat-Díaz, Helena ; Redondo-Redondo, Cristina ; Meilán-Hernández, Elisa ; Mateo-Martínez, Erika</creator><creatorcontrib>de Fata-Chillón, Fernando Ramón ; Gimbernat-Díaz, Helena ; Redondo-Redondo, Cristina ; Meilán-Hernández, Elisa ; Mateo-Martínez, Erika</creatorcontrib><description>Mini-PCNL is a potentially less invasive technique than standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We present our experience and results comparing both approaches in large burden complex renal calculi. Prospective non randomized study comparing PCNL (24/26F nephroscope; Group A) and Mini-PCNL (15/18F; Group B) perioperative and postoperative results, in 40 (20 each group) consecutive patients between 2013 and 2014. We analyze demographic data, hemoglobin drop, urine culture, stone characteristics, operative time, puncture, number and size of the tract, disintegration energy sources, nephrostomy placement, hospital stay, stone free rate and Clavien-Dindo complications. Evolution has shown growth for Mini-PNL, with the last 17 consecutive cases performed by this approach. No preoperative differences in laterality, age, gender or ASA were found; but there were differences in BMI (median Group A: 26.35 kg/m2; Median Group B: 33.05 kg/m2, p = 0.008). Median calculi surface area (SA = length × width × π × 0.25) was higher for mini-PNL (6.69 cm2 vs 14.14; p=0.003). The operative time was longer for mini-PNL (120 vs 162.5 min, p = 0.03). Only one case (5%) required transfusion in NLP 24/26F. Mini-PCNL was associated with tubeless technique (55%) (p = 0.022), which explains lower 24 h postoperative pain, after surgery, measured by VAS (p =0.0004). The hospital stay was equivalent (median: 2 days; p=0.8). Both techniques showed efficacy (SFR at 3 months 80%). There were no statistically significant differences between the number and severity of complications between groups (Group A: 15%, 66.7% Clavien II, Group B: 15%; 66.7% Clavien II, p = 1). Mini-NLP can manage kidney stones and even large staghorn calculi without nephrostomy in a high percentage of patients. The technical evolution towards a small caliber approach maintains the effectiveness of the procedure without impacting its safety, with benefits perceived by patients such as less postoperative pain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-0614</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28613206</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><subject>Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney Calculi - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nephrostomy, Percutaneous - methods ; Patient Positioning ; Prospective Studies ; Supine Position</subject><ispartof>Archivos españoles de urología, 2017-06, Vol.70 (5), p.542-549</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28613206$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Fata-Chillón, Fernando Ramón</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gimbernat-Díaz, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redondo-Redondo, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meilán-Hernández, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateo-Martínez, Erika</creatorcontrib><title>Evolution from Percutaneous nephrolithotomy to Mini-PCNL in supine position on the treatment of complex renal calculi: feasibility study.</title><title>Archivos españoles de urología</title><addtitle>Arch Esp Urol</addtitle><description>Mini-PCNL is a potentially less invasive technique than standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We present our experience and results comparing both approaches in large burden complex renal calculi. Prospective non randomized study comparing PCNL (24/26F nephroscope; Group A) and Mini-PCNL (15/18F; Group B) perioperative and postoperative results, in 40 (20 each group) consecutive patients between 2013 and 2014. We analyze demographic data, hemoglobin drop, urine culture, stone characteristics, operative time, puncture, number and size of the tract, disintegration energy sources, nephrostomy placement, hospital stay, stone free rate and Clavien-Dindo complications. Evolution has shown growth for Mini-PNL, with the last 17 consecutive cases performed by this approach. No preoperative differences in laterality, age, gender or ASA were found; but there were differences in BMI (median Group A: 26.35 kg/m2; Median Group B: 33.05 kg/m2, p = 0.008). Median calculi surface area (SA = length × width × π × 0.25) was higher for mini-PNL (6.69 cm2 vs 14.14; p=0.003). The operative time was longer for mini-PNL (120 vs 162.5 min, p = 0.03). Only one case (5%) required transfusion in NLP 24/26F. Mini-PCNL was associated with tubeless technique (55%) (p = 0.022), which explains lower 24 h postoperative pain, after surgery, measured by VAS (p =0.0004). The hospital stay was equivalent (median: 2 days; p=0.8). Both techniques showed efficacy (SFR at 3 months 80%). There were no statistically significant differences between the number and severity of complications between groups (Group A: 15%, 66.7% Clavien II, Group B: 15%; 66.7% Clavien II, p = 1). Mini-NLP can manage kidney stones and even large staghorn calculi without nephrostomy in a high percentage of patients. The technical evolution towards a small caliber approach maintains the effectiveness of the procedure without impacting its safety, with benefits perceived by patients such as less postoperative pain.</description><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrostomy, Percutaneous - methods</subject><subject>Patient Positioning</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Supine Position</subject><issn>0004-0614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kL1OwzAcxDOAaCm8AvLIEmTHsZOwoapQpAIdYI4c52_VyLGDPxB5BN6aQot00t1w-kl3J9kcY1zmmJNylp2H8I4xrQljZ9msqDmhBebz7Hv16UyK2lmkvBvQFrxMUVhwKSAL4847o-PORTdMKDr0pK3Ot8vnDdIWhTRqC2h0Qf8R9oo7QNGDiAPYiJxC0g2jgS_kwQqDpDAyGX2LFIigO71nTyjE1E83F9mpEibA5dEX2dv96nW5zjcvD4_Lu00-kpLEnIhOUlUyYBXuqeSiV_vIuOp53dOuaHhV1E0jhSCY1dDxBmqmSiV6KKqCMrrIrg_c0buPBCG2gw4SjDmMbkmDm4rWVfFbvTpWUzdA345eD8JP7f999AflK24s</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>de Fata-Chillón, Fernando Ramón</creator><creator>Gimbernat-Díaz, Helena</creator><creator>Redondo-Redondo, Cristina</creator><creator>Meilán-Hernández, Elisa</creator><creator>Mateo-Martínez, Erika</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Evolution from Percutaneous nephrolithotomy to Mini-PCNL in supine position on the treatment of complex renal calculi: feasibility study.</title><author>de Fata-Chillón, Fernando Ramón ; Gimbernat-Díaz, Helena ; Redondo-Redondo, Cristina ; Meilán-Hernández, Elisa ; Mateo-Martínez, Erika</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-1abc3f45e570d3c6adfe5756fd68d3b29672899caa1058eb69e85f4fade272353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrostomy, Percutaneous - methods</topic><topic>Patient Positioning</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Supine Position</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Fata-Chillón, Fernando Ramón</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gimbernat-Díaz, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redondo-Redondo, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meilán-Hernández, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateo-Martínez, Erika</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archivos españoles de urología</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Fata-Chillón, Fernando Ramón</au><au>Gimbernat-Díaz, Helena</au><au>Redondo-Redondo, Cristina</au><au>Meilán-Hernández, Elisa</au><au>Mateo-Martínez, Erika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evolution from Percutaneous nephrolithotomy to Mini-PCNL in supine position on the treatment of complex renal calculi: feasibility study.</atitle><jtitle>Archivos españoles de urología</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Esp Urol</addtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>542</spage><epage>549</epage><pages>542-549</pages><issn>0004-0614</issn><abstract>Mini-PCNL is a potentially less invasive technique than standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We present our experience and results comparing both approaches in large burden complex renal calculi. Prospective non randomized study comparing PCNL (24/26F nephroscope; Group A) and Mini-PCNL (15/18F; Group B) perioperative and postoperative results, in 40 (20 each group) consecutive patients between 2013 and 2014. We analyze demographic data, hemoglobin drop, urine culture, stone characteristics, operative time, puncture, number and size of the tract, disintegration energy sources, nephrostomy placement, hospital stay, stone free rate and Clavien-Dindo complications. Evolution has shown growth for Mini-PNL, with the last 17 consecutive cases performed by this approach. No preoperative differences in laterality, age, gender or ASA were found; but there were differences in BMI (median Group A: 26.35 kg/m2; Median Group B: 33.05 kg/m2, p = 0.008). Median calculi surface area (SA = length × width × π × 0.25) was higher for mini-PNL (6.69 cm2 vs 14.14; p=0.003). The operative time was longer for mini-PNL (120 vs 162.5 min, p = 0.03). Only one case (5%) required transfusion in NLP 24/26F. Mini-PCNL was associated with tubeless technique (55%) (p = 0.022), which explains lower 24 h postoperative pain, after surgery, measured by VAS (p =0.0004). The hospital stay was equivalent (median: 2 days; p=0.8). Both techniques showed efficacy (SFR at 3 months 80%). There were no statistically significant differences between the number and severity of complications between groups (Group A: 15%, 66.7% Clavien II, Group B: 15%; 66.7% Clavien II, p = 1). Mini-NLP can manage kidney stones and even large staghorn calculi without nephrostomy in a high percentage of patients. The technical evolution towards a small caliber approach maintains the effectiveness of the procedure without impacting its safety, with benefits perceived by patients such as less postoperative pain.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>28613206</pmid><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-0614
ispartof Archivos españoles de urología, 2017-06, Vol.70 (5), p.542-549
issn 0004-0614
language spa
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1909738725
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Kidney Calculi - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Nephrostomy, Percutaneous - methods
Patient Positioning
Prospective Studies
Supine Position
title Evolution from Percutaneous nephrolithotomy to Mini-PCNL in supine position on the treatment of complex renal calculi: feasibility study.
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T21%3A58%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evolution%20from%20Percutaneous%20nephrolithotomy%20to%20Mini-PCNL%20in%20supine%20position%20on%20the%20treatment%20of%20complex%20renal%20calculi:%20feasibility%20study.&rft.jtitle=Archivos%20espa%C3%B1oles%20de%20urolog%C3%ADa&rft.au=de%20Fata-Chill%C3%B3n,%20Fernando%20Ram%C3%B3n&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=542&rft.epage=549&rft.pages=542-549&rft.issn=0004-0614&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1909738725%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1909738725&rft_id=info:pmid/28613206&rfr_iscdi=true