Evolution from Percutaneous nephrolithotomy to Mini-PCNL in supine position on the treatment of complex renal calculi: feasibility study.
Mini-PCNL is a potentially less invasive technique than standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We present our experience and results comparing both approaches in large burden complex renal calculi. Prospective non randomized study comparing PCNL (24/26F nephroscope; Group A) and Mini-PCNL (15...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archivos españoles de urología 2017-06, Vol.70 (5), p.542-549 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | spa |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 549 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 542 |
container_title | Archivos españoles de urología |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | de Fata-Chillón, Fernando Ramón Gimbernat-Díaz, Helena Redondo-Redondo, Cristina Meilán-Hernández, Elisa Mateo-Martínez, Erika |
description | Mini-PCNL is a potentially less invasive technique than standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We present our experience and results comparing both approaches in large burden complex renal calculi.
Prospective non randomized study comparing PCNL (24/26F nephroscope; Group A) and Mini-PCNL (15/18F; Group B) perioperative and postoperative results, in 40 (20 each group) consecutive patients between 2013 and 2014. We analyze demographic data, hemoglobin drop, urine culture, stone characteristics, operative time, puncture, number and size of the tract, disintegration energy sources, nephrostomy placement, hospital stay, stone free rate and Clavien-Dindo complications.
Evolution has shown growth for Mini-PNL, with the last 17 consecutive cases performed by this approach. No preoperative differences in laterality, age, gender or ASA were found; but there were differences in BMI (median Group A: 26.35 kg/m2; Median Group B: 33.05 kg/m2, p = 0.008). Median calculi surface area (SA = length × width × π × 0.25) was higher for mini-PNL (6.69 cm2 vs 14.14; p=0.003). The operative time was longer for mini-PNL (120 vs 162.5 min, p = 0.03). Only one case (5%) required transfusion in NLP 24/26F. Mini-PCNL was associated with tubeless technique (55%) (p = 0.022), which explains lower 24 h postoperative pain, after surgery, measured by VAS (p =0.0004). The hospital stay was equivalent (median: 2 days; p=0.8). Both techniques showed efficacy (SFR at 3 months 80%). There were no statistically significant differences between the number and severity of complications between groups (Group A: 15%, 66.7% Clavien II, Group B: 15%; 66.7% Clavien II, p = 1).
Mini-NLP can manage kidney stones and even large staghorn calculi without nephrostomy in a high percentage of patients. The technical evolution towards a small caliber approach maintains the effectiveness of the procedure without impacting its safety, with benefits perceived by patients such as less postoperative pain. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1909738725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1909738725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-1abc3f45e570d3c6adfe5756fd68d3b29672899caa1058eb69e85f4fade272353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kL1OwzAcxDOAaCm8AvLIEmTHsZOwoapQpAIdYI4c52_VyLGDPxB5BN6aQot00t1w-kl3J9kcY1zmmJNylp2H8I4xrQljZ9msqDmhBebz7Hv16UyK2lmkvBvQFrxMUVhwKSAL4847o-PORTdMKDr0pK3Ot8vnDdIWhTRqC2h0Qf8R9oo7QNGDiAPYiJxC0g2jgS_kwQqDpDAyGX2LFIigO71nTyjE1E83F9mpEibA5dEX2dv96nW5zjcvD4_Lu00-kpLEnIhOUlUyYBXuqeSiV_vIuOp53dOuaHhV1E0jhSCY1dDxBmqmSiV6KKqCMrrIrg_c0buPBCG2gw4SjDmMbkmDm4rWVfFbvTpWUzdA345eD8JP7f999AflK24s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1909738725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evolution from Percutaneous nephrolithotomy to Mini-PCNL in supine position on the treatment of complex renal calculi: feasibility study.</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>de Fata-Chillón, Fernando Ramón ; Gimbernat-Díaz, Helena ; Redondo-Redondo, Cristina ; Meilán-Hernández, Elisa ; Mateo-Martínez, Erika</creator><creatorcontrib>de Fata-Chillón, Fernando Ramón ; Gimbernat-Díaz, Helena ; Redondo-Redondo, Cristina ; Meilán-Hernández, Elisa ; Mateo-Martínez, Erika</creatorcontrib><description>Mini-PCNL is a potentially less invasive technique than standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We present our experience and results comparing both approaches in large burden complex renal calculi.
Prospective non randomized study comparing PCNL (24/26F nephroscope; Group A) and Mini-PCNL (15/18F; Group B) perioperative and postoperative results, in 40 (20 each group) consecutive patients between 2013 and 2014. We analyze demographic data, hemoglobin drop, urine culture, stone characteristics, operative time, puncture, number and size of the tract, disintegration energy sources, nephrostomy placement, hospital stay, stone free rate and Clavien-Dindo complications.
Evolution has shown growth for Mini-PNL, with the last 17 consecutive cases performed by this approach. No preoperative differences in laterality, age, gender or ASA were found; but there were differences in BMI (median Group A: 26.35 kg/m2; Median Group B: 33.05 kg/m2, p = 0.008). Median calculi surface area (SA = length × width × π × 0.25) was higher for mini-PNL (6.69 cm2 vs 14.14; p=0.003). The operative time was longer for mini-PNL (120 vs 162.5 min, p = 0.03). Only one case (5%) required transfusion in NLP 24/26F. Mini-PCNL was associated with tubeless technique (55%) (p = 0.022), which explains lower 24 h postoperative pain, after surgery, measured by VAS (p =0.0004). The hospital stay was equivalent (median: 2 days; p=0.8). Both techniques showed efficacy (SFR at 3 months 80%). There were no statistically significant differences between the number and severity of complications between groups (Group A: 15%, 66.7% Clavien II, Group B: 15%; 66.7% Clavien II, p = 1).
Mini-NLP can manage kidney stones and even large staghorn calculi without nephrostomy in a high percentage of patients. The technical evolution towards a small caliber approach maintains the effectiveness of the procedure without impacting its safety, with benefits perceived by patients such as less postoperative pain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-0614</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28613206</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><subject>Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney Calculi - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nephrostomy, Percutaneous - methods ; Patient Positioning ; Prospective Studies ; Supine Position</subject><ispartof>Archivos españoles de urología, 2017-06, Vol.70 (5), p.542-549</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28613206$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Fata-Chillón, Fernando Ramón</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gimbernat-Díaz, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redondo-Redondo, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meilán-Hernández, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateo-Martínez, Erika</creatorcontrib><title>Evolution from Percutaneous nephrolithotomy to Mini-PCNL in supine position on the treatment of complex renal calculi: feasibility study.</title><title>Archivos españoles de urología</title><addtitle>Arch Esp Urol</addtitle><description>Mini-PCNL is a potentially less invasive technique than standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We present our experience and results comparing both approaches in large burden complex renal calculi.
Prospective non randomized study comparing PCNL (24/26F nephroscope; Group A) and Mini-PCNL (15/18F; Group B) perioperative and postoperative results, in 40 (20 each group) consecutive patients between 2013 and 2014. We analyze demographic data, hemoglobin drop, urine culture, stone characteristics, operative time, puncture, number and size of the tract, disintegration energy sources, nephrostomy placement, hospital stay, stone free rate and Clavien-Dindo complications.
Evolution has shown growth for Mini-PNL, with the last 17 consecutive cases performed by this approach. No preoperative differences in laterality, age, gender or ASA were found; but there were differences in BMI (median Group A: 26.35 kg/m2; Median Group B: 33.05 kg/m2, p = 0.008). Median calculi surface area (SA = length × width × π × 0.25) was higher for mini-PNL (6.69 cm2 vs 14.14; p=0.003). The operative time was longer for mini-PNL (120 vs 162.5 min, p = 0.03). Only one case (5%) required transfusion in NLP 24/26F. Mini-PCNL was associated with tubeless technique (55%) (p = 0.022), which explains lower 24 h postoperative pain, after surgery, measured by VAS (p =0.0004). The hospital stay was equivalent (median: 2 days; p=0.8). Both techniques showed efficacy (SFR at 3 months 80%). There were no statistically significant differences between the number and severity of complications between groups (Group A: 15%, 66.7% Clavien II, Group B: 15%; 66.7% Clavien II, p = 1).
Mini-NLP can manage kidney stones and even large staghorn calculi without nephrostomy in a high percentage of patients. The technical evolution towards a small caliber approach maintains the effectiveness of the procedure without impacting its safety, with benefits perceived by patients such as less postoperative pain.</description><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrostomy, Percutaneous - methods</subject><subject>Patient Positioning</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Supine Position</subject><issn>0004-0614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kL1OwzAcxDOAaCm8AvLIEmTHsZOwoapQpAIdYI4c52_VyLGDPxB5BN6aQot00t1w-kl3J9kcY1zmmJNylp2H8I4xrQljZ9msqDmhBebz7Hv16UyK2lmkvBvQFrxMUVhwKSAL4847o-PORTdMKDr0pK3Ot8vnDdIWhTRqC2h0Qf8R9oo7QNGDiAPYiJxC0g2jgS_kwQqDpDAyGX2LFIigO71nTyjE1E83F9mpEibA5dEX2dv96nW5zjcvD4_Lu00-kpLEnIhOUlUyYBXuqeSiV_vIuOp53dOuaHhV1E0jhSCY1dDxBmqmSiV6KKqCMrrIrg_c0buPBCG2gw4SjDmMbkmDm4rWVfFbvTpWUzdA345eD8JP7f999AflK24s</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>de Fata-Chillón, Fernando Ramón</creator><creator>Gimbernat-Díaz, Helena</creator><creator>Redondo-Redondo, Cristina</creator><creator>Meilán-Hernández, Elisa</creator><creator>Mateo-Martínez, Erika</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Evolution from Percutaneous nephrolithotomy to Mini-PCNL in supine position on the treatment of complex renal calculi: feasibility study.</title><author>de Fata-Chillón, Fernando Ramón ; Gimbernat-Díaz, Helena ; Redondo-Redondo, Cristina ; Meilán-Hernández, Elisa ; Mateo-Martínez, Erika</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-1abc3f45e570d3c6adfe5756fd68d3b29672899caa1058eb69e85f4fade272353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrostomy, Percutaneous - methods</topic><topic>Patient Positioning</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Supine Position</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Fata-Chillón, Fernando Ramón</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gimbernat-Díaz, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redondo-Redondo, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meilán-Hernández, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateo-Martínez, Erika</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archivos españoles de urología</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Fata-Chillón, Fernando Ramón</au><au>Gimbernat-Díaz, Helena</au><au>Redondo-Redondo, Cristina</au><au>Meilán-Hernández, Elisa</au><au>Mateo-Martínez, Erika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evolution from Percutaneous nephrolithotomy to Mini-PCNL in supine position on the treatment of complex renal calculi: feasibility study.</atitle><jtitle>Archivos españoles de urología</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Esp Urol</addtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>542</spage><epage>549</epage><pages>542-549</pages><issn>0004-0614</issn><abstract>Mini-PCNL is a potentially less invasive technique than standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We present our experience and results comparing both approaches in large burden complex renal calculi.
Prospective non randomized study comparing PCNL (24/26F nephroscope; Group A) and Mini-PCNL (15/18F; Group B) perioperative and postoperative results, in 40 (20 each group) consecutive patients between 2013 and 2014. We analyze demographic data, hemoglobin drop, urine culture, stone characteristics, operative time, puncture, number and size of the tract, disintegration energy sources, nephrostomy placement, hospital stay, stone free rate and Clavien-Dindo complications.
Evolution has shown growth for Mini-PNL, with the last 17 consecutive cases performed by this approach. No preoperative differences in laterality, age, gender or ASA were found; but there were differences in BMI (median Group A: 26.35 kg/m2; Median Group B: 33.05 kg/m2, p = 0.008). Median calculi surface area (SA = length × width × π × 0.25) was higher for mini-PNL (6.69 cm2 vs 14.14; p=0.003). The operative time was longer for mini-PNL (120 vs 162.5 min, p = 0.03). Only one case (5%) required transfusion in NLP 24/26F. Mini-PCNL was associated with tubeless technique (55%) (p = 0.022), which explains lower 24 h postoperative pain, after surgery, measured by VAS (p =0.0004). The hospital stay was equivalent (median: 2 days; p=0.8). Both techniques showed efficacy (SFR at 3 months 80%). There were no statistically significant differences between the number and severity of complications between groups (Group A: 15%, 66.7% Clavien II, Group B: 15%; 66.7% Clavien II, p = 1).
Mini-NLP can manage kidney stones and even large staghorn calculi without nephrostomy in a high percentage of patients. The technical evolution towards a small caliber approach maintains the effectiveness of the procedure without impacting its safety, with benefits perceived by patients such as less postoperative pain.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>28613206</pmid><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0004-0614 |
ispartof | Archivos españoles de urología, 2017-06, Vol.70 (5), p.542-549 |
issn | 0004-0614 |
language | spa |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1909738725 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Feasibility Studies Female Humans Kidney Calculi - surgery Male Middle Aged Nephrostomy, Percutaneous - methods Patient Positioning Prospective Studies Supine Position |
title | Evolution from Percutaneous nephrolithotomy to Mini-PCNL in supine position on the treatment of complex renal calculi: feasibility study. |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T21%3A58%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evolution%20from%20Percutaneous%20nephrolithotomy%20to%20Mini-PCNL%20in%20supine%20position%20on%20the%20treatment%20of%20complex%20renal%20calculi:%20feasibility%20study.&rft.jtitle=Archivos%20espa%C3%B1oles%20de%20urolog%C3%ADa&rft.au=de%20Fata-Chill%C3%B3n,%20Fernando%20Ram%C3%B3n&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=542&rft.epage=549&rft.pages=542-549&rft.issn=0004-0614&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1909738725%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1909738725&rft_id=info:pmid/28613206&rfr_iscdi=true |