‘Double et divers’: Writing Doubly in Montaigne's Essais

‘Je peins principalement mes cogitations’, wrote Montaigne, ‘subject informe.’ But what form of writing is capable of such depiction? Starting with his description of ‘nostre entendement’ as ‘double et divers’, I argue that Montaigne takes two models of thinking about irresolution, one stretching ac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Modern language review 2017-04, Vol.112 (2), p.320-340
1. Verfasser: Luke O'Sullivan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 340
container_issue 2
container_start_page 320
container_title The Modern language review
container_volume 112
creator Luke O'Sullivan
description ‘Je peins principalement mes cogitations’, wrote Montaigne, ‘subject informe.’ But what form of writing is capable of such depiction? Starting with his description of ‘nostre entendement’ as ‘double et divers’, I argue that Montaigne takes two models of thinking about irresolution, one stretching across a diversity of opinion, the other proposing an at least hypothetically endless project of writing, only to collapse them both. I suggest that, in remoulding these linear forms of irresolution, he forges a way of writing ‘doubly’ and making his text simultaneously diverse. Using ‘Nos affections s'emportent au-delà de nous’ (i. 3), I show this in practice.
doi_str_mv 10.5699/modelangrevi.112.2.0320
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1909682649</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.5699/modelangrevi.112.2.0320</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.5699/modelangrevi.112.2.0320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2450-bb3d6fbbed6a851af55ff5689d25c7de71f01ebfb955f52b2c1b8a1ab6b804973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkL1OwzAURi0EEqXwDHiDJcF2YidGLKiUH6mIBcRo2YlduUrj4ptW6tbHgNfrk5BSBkbucofvO1e6B6FzSlIupLyah9o2up1Gu_IppSxlKckYOUAD1k-SZ1QeogEhTCSFzIpjdAIwI4QImecDdLPdfN6FpWksth2u_cpG2G6-rvF79J1vp_gnXGPf4ufQdtpPW3sBeAygPZyiI6cbsGe_e4je7sevo8dk8vLwNLqdJBXLOUmMyWrhjLG10CWn2nHuHBelrBmvitoW1BFqjTOyDzgzrKKm1FQbYUqSyyIbosv93UUMH0sLnZp7qGzTv23DEhSVRIqSiVz21WJfrWIAiNapRfRzHdeKErXzpf76Ur0vxdTOV0_me3IGXYj_xr4BZG518Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1909682649</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>‘Double et divers’: Writing Doubly in Montaigne's Essais</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Luke O'Sullivan</creator><creatorcontrib>Luke O'Sullivan</creatorcontrib><description>‘Je peins principalement mes cogitations’, wrote Montaigne, ‘subject informe.’ But what form of writing is capable of such depiction? Starting with his description of ‘nostre entendement’ as ‘double et divers’, I argue that Montaigne takes two models of thinking about irresolution, one stretching across a diversity of opinion, the other proposing an at least hypothetically endless project of writing, only to collapse them both. I suggest that, in remoulding these linear forms of irresolution, he forges a way of writing ‘doubly’ and making his text simultaneously diverse. Using ‘Nos affections s'emportent au-delà de nous’ (i. 3), I show this in practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-7937</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2222-4319</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5699/modelangrevi.112.2.0320</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Modern Humanities Research Association</publisher><subject>Anatomy ; Aristotelianism ; English language learners ; Essayists ; Literary criticism ; Punctuation ; Simultaneity ; Writing ; Writing processes ; Written composition</subject><ispartof>The Modern language review, 2017-04, Vol.112 (2), p.320-340</ispartof><rights>2017 Modern Humanities Research Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luke O'Sullivan</creatorcontrib><title>‘Double et divers’: Writing Doubly in Montaigne's Essais</title><title>The Modern language review</title><description>‘Je peins principalement mes cogitations’, wrote Montaigne, ‘subject informe.’ But what form of writing is capable of such depiction? Starting with his description of ‘nostre entendement’ as ‘double et divers’, I argue that Montaigne takes two models of thinking about irresolution, one stretching across a diversity of opinion, the other proposing an at least hypothetically endless project of writing, only to collapse them both. I suggest that, in remoulding these linear forms of irresolution, he forges a way of writing ‘doubly’ and making his text simultaneously diverse. Using ‘Nos affections s'emportent au-delà de nous’ (i. 3), I show this in practice.</description><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Aristotelianism</subject><subject>English language learners</subject><subject>Essayists</subject><subject>Literary criticism</subject><subject>Punctuation</subject><subject>Simultaneity</subject><subject>Writing</subject><subject>Writing processes</subject><subject>Written composition</subject><issn>0026-7937</issn><issn>2222-4319</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkL1OwzAURi0EEqXwDHiDJcF2YidGLKiUH6mIBcRo2YlduUrj4ptW6tbHgNfrk5BSBkbucofvO1e6B6FzSlIupLyah9o2up1Gu_IppSxlKckYOUAD1k-SZ1QeogEhTCSFzIpjdAIwI4QImecDdLPdfN6FpWksth2u_cpG2G6-rvF79J1vp_gnXGPf4ufQdtpPW3sBeAygPZyiI6cbsGe_e4je7sevo8dk8vLwNLqdJBXLOUmMyWrhjLG10CWn2nHuHBelrBmvitoW1BFqjTOyDzgzrKKm1FQbYUqSyyIbosv93UUMH0sLnZp7qGzTv23DEhSVRIqSiVz21WJfrWIAiNapRfRzHdeKErXzpf76Ur0vxdTOV0_me3IGXYj_xr4BZG518Q</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Luke O'Sullivan</creator><general>Modern Humanities Research Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>‘Double et divers’: Writing Doubly in Montaigne's Essais</title><author>Luke O'Sullivan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2450-bb3d6fbbed6a851af55ff5689d25c7de71f01ebfb955f52b2c1b8a1ab6b804973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Aristotelianism</topic><topic>English language learners</topic><topic>Essayists</topic><topic>Literary criticism</topic><topic>Punctuation</topic><topic>Simultaneity</topic><topic>Writing</topic><topic>Writing processes</topic><topic>Written composition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luke O'Sullivan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>The Modern language review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luke O'Sullivan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>‘Double et divers’: Writing Doubly in Montaigne's Essais</atitle><jtitle>The Modern language review</jtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>320</spage><epage>340</epage><pages>320-340</pages><issn>0026-7937</issn><eissn>2222-4319</eissn><abstract>‘Je peins principalement mes cogitations’, wrote Montaigne, ‘subject informe.’ But what form of writing is capable of such depiction? Starting with his description of ‘nostre entendement’ as ‘double et divers’, I argue that Montaigne takes two models of thinking about irresolution, one stretching across a diversity of opinion, the other proposing an at least hypothetically endless project of writing, only to collapse them both. I suggest that, in remoulding these linear forms of irresolution, he forges a way of writing ‘doubly’ and making his text simultaneously diverse. Using ‘Nos affections s'emportent au-delà de nous’ (i. 3), I show this in practice.</abstract><pub>Modern Humanities Research Association</pub><doi>10.5699/modelangrevi.112.2.0320</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-7937
ispartof The Modern language review, 2017-04, Vol.112 (2), p.320-340
issn 0026-7937
2222-4319
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1909682649
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Anatomy
Aristotelianism
English language learners
Essayists
Literary criticism
Punctuation
Simultaneity
Writing
Writing processes
Written composition
title ‘Double et divers’: Writing Doubly in Montaigne's Essais
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T05%3A27%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%98Double%20et%20divers%E2%80%99:%20Writing%20Doubly%20in%20Montaigne's%20Essais&rft.jtitle=The%20Modern%20language%20review&rft.au=Luke%20O'Sullivan&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=320&rft.epage=340&rft.pages=320-340&rft.issn=0026-7937&rft.eissn=2222-4319&rft_id=info:doi/10.5699/modelangrevi.112.2.0320&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.5699/modelangrevi.112.2.0320%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1909682649&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.5699/modelangrevi.112.2.0320&rfr_iscdi=true