‘Double et divers’: Writing Doubly in Montaigne's Essais
‘Je peins principalement mes cogitations’, wrote Montaigne, ‘subject informe.’ But what form of writing is capable of such depiction? Starting with his description of ‘nostre entendement’ as ‘double et divers’, I argue that Montaigne takes two models of thinking about irresolution, one stretching ac...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Modern language review 2017-04, Vol.112 (2), p.320-340 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 340 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 320 |
container_title | The Modern language review |
container_volume | 112 |
creator | Luke O'Sullivan |
description | ‘Je peins principalement mes cogitations’, wrote Montaigne, ‘subject informe.’ But what form of writing is capable of such depiction? Starting with his description of ‘nostre entendement’ as ‘double et divers’, I argue that Montaigne takes two models of thinking about irresolution, one stretching across a diversity of opinion, the other proposing an at least hypothetically endless project of writing, only to collapse them both. I suggest that, in remoulding these linear forms of irresolution, he forges a way of writing ‘doubly’ and making his text simultaneously diverse. Using ‘Nos affections s'emportent au-delà de nous’ (i. 3), I show this in practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5699/modelangrevi.112.2.0320 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1909682649</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.5699/modelangrevi.112.2.0320</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.5699/modelangrevi.112.2.0320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2450-bb3d6fbbed6a851af55ff5689d25c7de71f01ebfb955f52b2c1b8a1ab6b804973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkL1OwzAURi0EEqXwDHiDJcF2YidGLKiUH6mIBcRo2YlduUrj4ptW6tbHgNfrk5BSBkbucofvO1e6B6FzSlIupLyah9o2up1Gu_IppSxlKckYOUAD1k-SZ1QeogEhTCSFzIpjdAIwI4QImecDdLPdfN6FpWksth2u_cpG2G6-rvF79J1vp_gnXGPf4ufQdtpPW3sBeAygPZyiI6cbsGe_e4je7sevo8dk8vLwNLqdJBXLOUmMyWrhjLG10CWn2nHuHBelrBmvitoW1BFqjTOyDzgzrKKm1FQbYUqSyyIbosv93UUMH0sLnZp7qGzTv23DEhSVRIqSiVz21WJfrWIAiNapRfRzHdeKErXzpf76Ur0vxdTOV0_me3IGXYj_xr4BZG518Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1909682649</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>‘Double et divers’: Writing Doubly in Montaigne's Essais</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Luke O'Sullivan</creator><creatorcontrib>Luke O'Sullivan</creatorcontrib><description>‘Je peins principalement mes cogitations’, wrote Montaigne, ‘subject informe.’ But what form of writing is capable of such depiction? Starting with his description of ‘nostre entendement’ as ‘double et divers’, I argue that Montaigne takes two models of thinking about irresolution, one stretching across a diversity of opinion, the other proposing an at least hypothetically endless project of writing, only to collapse them both. I suggest that, in remoulding these linear forms of irresolution, he forges a way of writing ‘doubly’ and making his text simultaneously diverse. Using ‘Nos affections s'emportent au-delà de nous’ (i. 3), I show this in practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-7937</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2222-4319</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5699/modelangrevi.112.2.0320</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Modern Humanities Research Association</publisher><subject>Anatomy ; Aristotelianism ; English language learners ; Essayists ; Literary criticism ; Punctuation ; Simultaneity ; Writing ; Writing processes ; Written composition</subject><ispartof>The Modern language review, 2017-04, Vol.112 (2), p.320-340</ispartof><rights>2017 Modern Humanities Research Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luke O'Sullivan</creatorcontrib><title>‘Double et divers’: Writing Doubly in Montaigne's Essais</title><title>The Modern language review</title><description>‘Je peins principalement mes cogitations’, wrote Montaigne, ‘subject informe.’ But what form of writing is capable of such depiction? Starting with his description of ‘nostre entendement’ as ‘double et divers’, I argue that Montaigne takes two models of thinking about irresolution, one stretching across a diversity of opinion, the other proposing an at least hypothetically endless project of writing, only to collapse them both. I suggest that, in remoulding these linear forms of irresolution, he forges a way of writing ‘doubly’ and making his text simultaneously diverse. Using ‘Nos affections s'emportent au-delà de nous’ (i. 3), I show this in practice.</description><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Aristotelianism</subject><subject>English language learners</subject><subject>Essayists</subject><subject>Literary criticism</subject><subject>Punctuation</subject><subject>Simultaneity</subject><subject>Writing</subject><subject>Writing processes</subject><subject>Written composition</subject><issn>0026-7937</issn><issn>2222-4319</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkL1OwzAURi0EEqXwDHiDJcF2YidGLKiUH6mIBcRo2YlduUrj4ptW6tbHgNfrk5BSBkbucofvO1e6B6FzSlIupLyah9o2up1Gu_IppSxlKckYOUAD1k-SZ1QeogEhTCSFzIpjdAIwI4QImecDdLPdfN6FpWksth2u_cpG2G6-rvF79J1vp_gnXGPf4ufQdtpPW3sBeAygPZyiI6cbsGe_e4je7sevo8dk8vLwNLqdJBXLOUmMyWrhjLG10CWn2nHuHBelrBmvitoW1BFqjTOyDzgzrKKm1FQbYUqSyyIbosv93UUMH0sLnZp7qGzTv23DEhSVRIqSiVz21WJfrWIAiNapRfRzHdeKErXzpf76Ur0vxdTOV0_me3IGXYj_xr4BZG518Q</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Luke O'Sullivan</creator><general>Modern Humanities Research Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>‘Double et divers’: Writing Doubly in Montaigne's Essais</title><author>Luke O'Sullivan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2450-bb3d6fbbed6a851af55ff5689d25c7de71f01ebfb955f52b2c1b8a1ab6b804973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Aristotelianism</topic><topic>English language learners</topic><topic>Essayists</topic><topic>Literary criticism</topic><topic>Punctuation</topic><topic>Simultaneity</topic><topic>Writing</topic><topic>Writing processes</topic><topic>Written composition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luke O'Sullivan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>The Modern language review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luke O'Sullivan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>‘Double et divers’: Writing Doubly in Montaigne's Essais</atitle><jtitle>The Modern language review</jtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>320</spage><epage>340</epage><pages>320-340</pages><issn>0026-7937</issn><eissn>2222-4319</eissn><abstract>‘Je peins principalement mes cogitations’, wrote Montaigne, ‘subject informe.’ But what form of writing is capable of such depiction? Starting with his description of ‘nostre entendement’ as ‘double et divers’, I argue that Montaigne takes two models of thinking about irresolution, one stretching across a diversity of opinion, the other proposing an at least hypothetically endless project of writing, only to collapse them both. I suggest that, in remoulding these linear forms of irresolution, he forges a way of writing ‘doubly’ and making his text simultaneously diverse. Using ‘Nos affections s'emportent au-delà de nous’ (i. 3), I show this in practice.</abstract><pub>Modern Humanities Research Association</pub><doi>10.5699/modelangrevi.112.2.0320</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0026-7937 |
ispartof | The Modern language review, 2017-04, Vol.112 (2), p.320-340 |
issn | 0026-7937 2222-4319 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1909682649 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Anatomy Aristotelianism English language learners Essayists Literary criticism Punctuation Simultaneity Writing Writing processes Written composition |
title | ‘Double et divers’: Writing Doubly in Montaigne's Essais |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T05%3A27%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%98Double%20et%20divers%E2%80%99:%20Writing%20Doubly%20in%20Montaigne's%20Essais&rft.jtitle=The%20Modern%20language%20review&rft.au=Luke%20O'Sullivan&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=320&rft.epage=340&rft.pages=320-340&rft.issn=0026-7937&rft.eissn=2222-4319&rft_id=info:doi/10.5699/modelangrevi.112.2.0320&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.5699/modelangrevi.112.2.0320%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1909682649&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.5699/modelangrevi.112.2.0320&rfr_iscdi=true |