Quantitative comparison of diffusion weighted image in liver at two field strengths for chronic hepatitis B

To evaluate whether there were differences between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values derived from 3.0 T and 1.5 T MR diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in liver of patients with chronic hepatitis B. From January 2016 to November 2016, a total of 40 chronic hepatitis B prospectively underwent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zhong hua yi xue za zhi 2017-06, Vol.97 (21), p.1638-1642
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Y, Dong, J H, An, W M, Ren, H W, Ye, H Y
Format: Artikel
Sprache:chi
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1642
container_issue 21
container_start_page 1638
container_title Zhong hua yi xue za zhi
container_volume 97
creator Liu, Y
Dong, J H
An, W M
Ren, H W
Ye, H Y
description To evaluate whether there were differences between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values derived from 3.0 T and 1.5 T MR diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in liver of patients with chronic hepatitis B. From January 2016 to November 2016, a total of 40 chronic hepatitis B prospectively underwent both 1.5 T and 3.0 T DWI before liver biopsy, the interval between two scans was within 15 minutes, the protocol was respiratory-triggered DWI(RT-DWI). The ADC values were measured at both field strengths using ROI method. Bland-Altman tests and paired -tests were used to compare ADC values obtained at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. The ADC values of different b values for patients with mild inflammation at 1.5 T were(1.22-1.48(1.35±0.08)×10(-3) mm(2)/s), the ADC values of different b values for patients with mild inflammation at 3.0 T were(1.18-1.45(1.30±0.08)×10(-3) mm(2)/s); the ADC values of different b values for patients with moderate to severe inflammation at 1.5 T were(1.11-1.37(1.25±0.06)×10(-3) mm(2)/s), the ADC value
doi_str_mv 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.21.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1909228575</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1909228575</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p126t-4123c94207c74c4f2bc3bcb72a77a2d962bb7034dc045f46302ce6eae04e85323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LxDAYhHNQ3GXdvyA57qU1eZM226MufsGCCHouafpmG-2XSeriv7fg6mmY4WFghpANZ6lQObs2nU7fUxdCn7I5SEAWPAXGVQo8Zaw4I8v_fEHWIbiKSSUKYMAvyAK2Ocsh40vy8TLpPrqoo_tCaoZu1N6FoaeDpbWzdgpuNkd0hyZiTV2nD0hdT9sZ91RHGo8DtQ7bmobosT_EJlA7eGoaP_TO0AbHuTu6QG8vybnVbcD1SVfk7f7udfeY7J8fnnY3-2TkkMdEchCmkMCUUdJIC5URlakUaKU01EUOVaWYkLVhMrMyFwwM5qiRSdxmAsSKbH57Rz98Thhi2blgsG11j8MUSl6wAmCbqWxGr07oVHVYl6OfF_rv8u8g8QOre2yW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1909228575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative comparison of diffusion weighted image in liver at two field strengths for chronic hepatitis B</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Liu, Y ; Dong, J H ; An, W M ; Ren, H W ; Ye, H Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Y ; Dong, J H ; An, W M ; Ren, H W ; Ye, H Y</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate whether there were differences between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values derived from 3.0 T and 1.5 T MR diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in liver of patients with chronic hepatitis B. From January 2016 to November 2016, a total of 40 chronic hepatitis B prospectively underwent both 1.5 T and 3.0 T DWI before liver biopsy, the interval between two scans was within 15 minutes, the protocol was respiratory-triggered DWI(RT-DWI). The ADC values were measured at both field strengths using ROI method. Bland-Altman tests and paired -tests were used to compare ADC values obtained at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. The ADC values of different b values for patients with mild inflammation at 1.5 T were(1.22-1.48(1.35±0.08)×10(-3) mm(2)/s), the ADC values of different b values for patients with mild inflammation at 3.0 T were(1.18-1.45(1.30±0.08)×10(-3) mm(2)/s); the ADC values of different b values for patients with moderate to severe inflammation at 1.5 T were(1.11-1.37(1.25±0.06)×10(-3) mm(2)/s), the ADC value</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-2491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.21.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28606251</identifier><language>chi</language><publisher>China</publisher><subject>Diffusion ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Hepatitis B, Chronic - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Zhong hua yi xue za zhi, 2017-06, Vol.97 (21), p.1638-1642</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28606251$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>An, W M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, H W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, H Y</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative comparison of diffusion weighted image in liver at two field strengths for chronic hepatitis B</title><title>Zhong hua yi xue za zhi</title><addtitle>Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi</addtitle><description>To evaluate whether there were differences between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values derived from 3.0 T and 1.5 T MR diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in liver of patients with chronic hepatitis B. From January 2016 to November 2016, a total of 40 chronic hepatitis B prospectively underwent both 1.5 T and 3.0 T DWI before liver biopsy, the interval between two scans was within 15 minutes, the protocol was respiratory-triggered DWI(RT-DWI). The ADC values were measured at both field strengths using ROI method. Bland-Altman tests and paired -tests were used to compare ADC values obtained at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. The ADC values of different b values for patients with mild inflammation at 1.5 T were(1.22-1.48(1.35±0.08)×10(-3) mm(2)/s), the ADC values of different b values for patients with mild inflammation at 3.0 T were(1.18-1.45(1.30±0.08)×10(-3) mm(2)/s); the ADC values of different b values for patients with moderate to severe inflammation at 1.5 T were(1.11-1.37(1.25±0.06)×10(-3) mm(2)/s), the ADC value</description><subject>Diffusion</subject><subject>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Hepatitis B, Chronic - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>0376-2491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1LxDAYhHNQ3GXdvyA57qU1eZM226MufsGCCHouafpmG-2XSeriv7fg6mmY4WFghpANZ6lQObs2nU7fUxdCn7I5SEAWPAXGVQo8Zaw4I8v_fEHWIbiKSSUKYMAvyAK2Ocsh40vy8TLpPrqoo_tCaoZu1N6FoaeDpbWzdgpuNkd0hyZiTV2nD0hdT9sZ91RHGo8DtQ7bmobosT_EJlA7eGoaP_TO0AbHuTu6QG8vybnVbcD1SVfk7f7udfeY7J8fnnY3-2TkkMdEchCmkMCUUdJIC5URlakUaKU01EUOVaWYkLVhMrMyFwwM5qiRSdxmAsSKbH57Rz98Thhi2blgsG11j8MUSl6wAmCbqWxGr07oVHVYl6OfF_rv8u8g8QOre2yW</recordid><startdate>20170606</startdate><enddate>20170606</enddate><creator>Liu, Y</creator><creator>Dong, J H</creator><creator>An, W M</creator><creator>Ren, H W</creator><creator>Ye, H Y</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170606</creationdate><title>Quantitative comparison of diffusion weighted image in liver at two field strengths for chronic hepatitis B</title><author>Liu, Y ; Dong, J H ; An, W M ; Ren, H W ; Ye, H Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p126t-4123c94207c74c4f2bc3bcb72a77a2d962bb7034dc045f46302ce6eae04e85323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Diffusion</topic><topic>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Hepatitis B, Chronic - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>An, W M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, H W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, H Y</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Zhong hua yi xue za zhi</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Y</au><au>Dong, J H</au><au>An, W M</au><au>Ren, H W</au><au>Ye, H Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative comparison of diffusion weighted image in liver at two field strengths for chronic hepatitis B</atitle><jtitle>Zhong hua yi xue za zhi</jtitle><addtitle>Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi</addtitle><date>2017-06-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>1638</spage><epage>1642</epage><pages>1638-1642</pages><issn>0376-2491</issn><abstract>To evaluate whether there were differences between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values derived from 3.0 T and 1.5 T MR diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in liver of patients with chronic hepatitis B. From January 2016 to November 2016, a total of 40 chronic hepatitis B prospectively underwent both 1.5 T and 3.0 T DWI before liver biopsy, the interval between two scans was within 15 minutes, the protocol was respiratory-triggered DWI(RT-DWI). The ADC values were measured at both field strengths using ROI method. Bland-Altman tests and paired -tests were used to compare ADC values obtained at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. The ADC values of different b values for patients with mild inflammation at 1.5 T were(1.22-1.48(1.35±0.08)×10(-3) mm(2)/s), the ADC values of different b values for patients with mild inflammation at 3.0 T were(1.18-1.45(1.30±0.08)×10(-3) mm(2)/s); the ADC values of different b values for patients with moderate to severe inflammation at 1.5 T were(1.11-1.37(1.25±0.06)×10(-3) mm(2)/s), the ADC value</abstract><cop>China</cop><pmid>28606251</pmid><doi>10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.21.009</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0376-2491
ispartof Zhong hua yi xue za zhi, 2017-06, Vol.97 (21), p.1638-1642
issn 0376-2491
language chi
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1909228575
source MEDLINE; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Diffusion
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Hepatitis B, Chronic - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Reproducibility of Results
title Quantitative comparison of diffusion weighted image in liver at two field strengths for chronic hepatitis B
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A17%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20comparison%20of%20diffusion%20weighted%20image%20in%20liver%20at%20two%20field%20strengths%20for%20chronic%20hepatitis%20B&rft.jtitle=Zhong%20hua%20yi%20xue%20za%20zhi&rft.au=Liu,%20Y&rft.date=2017-06-06&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=1638&rft.epage=1642&rft.pages=1638-1642&rft.issn=0376-2491&rft_id=info:doi/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.21.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1909228575%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1909228575&rft_id=info:pmid/28606251&rfr_iscdi=true