Disparities in compliance with the Oncotype DX breast cancer test in the United States: A National Cancer Data Base assessment

Abstract Background Oncotype DX (ODX) is a multi-gene tumor assay for breast cancer patients. Our objective is to assess whether eligible ODX patients received the test and whether recommendations were followed based on respective risk. Methods We retrospectively analyzed testing in patients deemed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgery 2018-04, Vol.215 (4), p.686-692
Hauptverfasser: Kozick, Zachary, Hashmi, Ammar, Dove, James, Hunsinger, Marie, Arora, Tania, Wild, Jeffrey, Shabahang, Mohsen, Blansfield, Joseph
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 692
container_issue 4
container_start_page 686
container_title The American journal of surgery
container_volume 215
creator Kozick, Zachary
Hashmi, Ammar
Dove, James
Hunsinger, Marie
Arora, Tania
Wild, Jeffrey
Shabahang, Mohsen
Blansfield, Joseph
description Abstract Background Oncotype DX (ODX) is a multi-gene tumor assay for breast cancer patients. Our objective is to assess whether eligible ODX patients received the test and whether recommendations were followed based on respective risk. Methods We retrospectively analyzed testing in patients deemed eligible for ODX using the National Cancer Data Base. Results A total of 158,235 patients met ODX eligibility criteria. Sixty-four percent of eligible patients did not receive the test. Non-testing rose with age. White patients were more likely to be tested (56%) versus black patients (46%, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.05.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1909220766</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961017305706</els_id><sourcerecordid>2017296169</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-3720cede6e62fc329b2cd0d2fe6fdcf1eaec7e1535f1d0adf93ed867dbb10f653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkktv1DAUhS0EokPhJ4AssWGTcO1M7IQFqMzwkiq6KJXYWY59Qz3khe1QzYbfXocZuuiGlR_6zrXvOZeQ5wxyBky83uW634XZ_8g5MJlDmQNUD8iKVbLOWFUVD8kKAHhWCwYn5EkIu3RkbF08Jie8EiAkyBX5s3Vh0t5Fh4G6gZqxnzqnB4P0xsVrGq-RXgxmjPsJ6fY7bTzqEKlZCE8jpn1SLdTV4CJaehl1un1Dz-hXHd046I5uDvBWR03f64BUh4Ah9DjEp-RRq7uAz47rKbn6-OHb5nN2fvHpy-bsPDPrdRWzQnIwaFGg4K0peN1wY8HyFkVrTctQo5HIyqJsmQVt27pAWwlpm4ZBK8rilLw61J38-GtOv1a9Cwa7Tg84zkGxGmrOQQqR0Jf30N04-9RHUIvTPPkp6kSVB8r4MQSPrZq867XfKwZqCUjt1DGgvzIFpUoBJd2LY_W56dHeqf4lkoB3BwCTHb8dehWMw2SgdR5NVHZ0_33i7b0KpnODM7r7iXsMd90wFbgCdblMyTIkTBZQShDFLYQDunY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2017296169</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Disparities in compliance with the Oncotype DX breast cancer test in the United States: A National Cancer Data Base assessment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Kozick, Zachary ; Hashmi, Ammar ; Dove, James ; Hunsinger, Marie ; Arora, Tania ; Wild, Jeffrey ; Shabahang, Mohsen ; Blansfield, Joseph</creator><creatorcontrib>Kozick, Zachary ; Hashmi, Ammar ; Dove, James ; Hunsinger, Marie ; Arora, Tania ; Wild, Jeffrey ; Shabahang, Mohsen ; Blansfield, Joseph</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Oncotype DX (ODX) is a multi-gene tumor assay for breast cancer patients. Our objective is to assess whether eligible ODX patients received the test and whether recommendations were followed based on respective risk. Methods We retrospectively analyzed testing in patients deemed eligible for ODX using the National Cancer Data Base. Results A total of 158,235 patients met ODX eligibility criteria. Sixty-four percent of eligible patients did not receive the test. Non-testing rose with age. White patients were more likely to be tested (56%) versus black patients (46%, p &lt; 0.0001). Testing was highest at academic facilities (40%). Privately insured patients were more likely to get the test compared to uninsured (45 versus 34%, p &lt; 0.0001). Those in the highest income quartile were more likely to be tested (p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions ODX is under-utilized, with racial and socio-economic factors influencing testing. Further studies are necessary to identify ways to remove disparities and increase testing when appropriate. Summary This study uses the National Cancer Data Base to analyze compliance with the NCCN guidelines for Oncotype DX. Compliance with testing was thirty-six percent. Several factors influenced testing in our study, including facility type, racial and socio-economic factors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.05.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28606707</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biomarkers ; Biomarkers, Tumor ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Breast Neoplasms - ethnology ; Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Cancer therapies ; Chemotherapy ; Clinical medicine ; Compliance ; Databases, Factual ; Decision making ; Disparities ; Economic factors ; Endocrine therapy ; Epidermal growth factor ; Female ; Gene expression ; Gene Expression Profiling - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Guideline Adherence ; Healthcare Disparities - ethnology ; Healthcare Disparities - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Lymphatic system ; Middle Aged ; Oncotype DX ; Patients ; Population ; Population Surveillance ; Professionals ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk analysis ; Social factors ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Surgery ; Systematic review ; United States</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2018-04, Vol.215 (4), p.686-692</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Apr 1, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-3720cede6e62fc329b2cd0d2fe6fdcf1eaec7e1535f1d0adf93ed867dbb10f653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-3720cede6e62fc329b2cd0d2fe6fdcf1eaec7e1535f1d0adf93ed867dbb10f653</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6660-2037 ; 0000-0002-7778-2130</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961017305706$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28606707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kozick, Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashmi, Ammar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dove, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunsinger, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arora, Tania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wild, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shabahang, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blansfield, Joseph</creatorcontrib><title>Disparities in compliance with the Oncotype DX breast cancer test in the United States: A National Cancer Data Base assessment</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Oncotype DX (ODX) is a multi-gene tumor assay for breast cancer patients. Our objective is to assess whether eligible ODX patients received the test and whether recommendations were followed based on respective risk. Methods We retrospectively analyzed testing in patients deemed eligible for ODX using the National Cancer Data Base. Results A total of 158,235 patients met ODX eligibility criteria. Sixty-four percent of eligible patients did not receive the test. Non-testing rose with age. White patients were more likely to be tested (56%) versus black patients (46%, p &lt; 0.0001). Testing was highest at academic facilities (40%). Privately insured patients were more likely to get the test compared to uninsured (45 versus 34%, p &lt; 0.0001). Those in the highest income quartile were more likely to be tested (p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions ODX is under-utilized, with racial and socio-economic factors influencing testing. Further studies are necessary to identify ways to remove disparities and increase testing when appropriate. Summary This study uses the National Cancer Data Base to analyze compliance with the NCCN guidelines for Oncotype DX. Compliance with testing was thirty-six percent. Several factors influenced testing in our study, including facility type, racial and socio-economic factors.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - ethnology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Disparities</subject><subject>Economic factors</subject><subject>Endocrine therapy</subject><subject>Epidermal growth factor</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Gene Expression Profiling - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Healthcare Disparities - ethnology</subject><subject>Healthcare Disparities - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oncotype DX</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population Surveillance</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkktv1DAUhS0EokPhJ4AssWGTcO1M7IQFqMzwkiq6KJXYWY59Qz3khe1QzYbfXocZuuiGlR_6zrXvOZeQ5wxyBky83uW634XZ_8g5MJlDmQNUD8iKVbLOWFUVD8kKAHhWCwYn5EkIu3RkbF08Jie8EiAkyBX5s3Vh0t5Fh4G6gZqxnzqnB4P0xsVrGq-RXgxmjPsJ6fY7bTzqEKlZCE8jpn1SLdTV4CJaehl1un1Dz-hXHd046I5uDvBWR03f64BUh4Ah9DjEp-RRq7uAz47rKbn6-OHb5nN2fvHpy-bsPDPrdRWzQnIwaFGg4K0peN1wY8HyFkVrTctQo5HIyqJsmQVt27pAWwlpm4ZBK8rilLw61J38-GtOv1a9Cwa7Tg84zkGxGmrOQQqR0Jf30N04-9RHUIvTPPkp6kSVB8r4MQSPrZq867XfKwZqCUjt1DGgvzIFpUoBJd2LY_W56dHeqf4lkoB3BwCTHb8dehWMw2SgdR5NVHZ0_33i7b0KpnODM7r7iXsMd90wFbgCdblMyTIkTBZQShDFLYQDunY</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Kozick, Zachary</creator><creator>Hashmi, Ammar</creator><creator>Dove, James</creator><creator>Hunsinger, Marie</creator><creator>Arora, Tania</creator><creator>Wild, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Shabahang, Mohsen</creator><creator>Blansfield, Joseph</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6660-2037</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7778-2130</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Disparities in compliance with the Oncotype DX breast cancer test in the United States: A National Cancer Data Base assessment</title><author>Kozick, Zachary ; Hashmi, Ammar ; Dove, James ; Hunsinger, Marie ; Arora, Tania ; Wild, Jeffrey ; Shabahang, Mohsen ; Blansfield, Joseph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-3720cede6e62fc329b2cd0d2fe6fdcf1eaec7e1535f1d0adf93ed867dbb10f653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - ethnology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Disparities</topic><topic>Economic factors</topic><topic>Endocrine therapy</topic><topic>Epidermal growth factor</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Gene Expression Profiling - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Healthcare Disparities - ethnology</topic><topic>Healthcare Disparities - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oncotype DX</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population Surveillance</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kozick, Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashmi, Ammar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dove, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunsinger, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arora, Tania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wild, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shabahang, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blansfield, Joseph</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kozick, Zachary</au><au>Hashmi, Ammar</au><au>Dove, James</au><au>Hunsinger, Marie</au><au>Arora, Tania</au><au>Wild, Jeffrey</au><au>Shabahang, Mohsen</au><au>Blansfield, Joseph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Disparities in compliance with the Oncotype DX breast cancer test in the United States: A National Cancer Data Base assessment</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>215</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>686</spage><epage>692</epage><pages>686-692</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Oncotype DX (ODX) is a multi-gene tumor assay for breast cancer patients. Our objective is to assess whether eligible ODX patients received the test and whether recommendations were followed based on respective risk. Methods We retrospectively analyzed testing in patients deemed eligible for ODX using the National Cancer Data Base. Results A total of 158,235 patients met ODX eligibility criteria. Sixty-four percent of eligible patients did not receive the test. Non-testing rose with age. White patients were more likely to be tested (56%) versus black patients (46%, p &lt; 0.0001). Testing was highest at academic facilities (40%). Privately insured patients were more likely to get the test compared to uninsured (45 versus 34%, p &lt; 0.0001). Those in the highest income quartile were more likely to be tested (p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions ODX is under-utilized, with racial and socio-economic factors influencing testing. Further studies are necessary to identify ways to remove disparities and increase testing when appropriate. Summary This study uses the National Cancer Data Base to analyze compliance with the NCCN guidelines for Oncotype DX. Compliance with testing was thirty-six percent. Several factors influenced testing in our study, including facility type, racial and socio-economic factors.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28606707</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.05.008</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6660-2037</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7778-2130</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9610
ispartof The American journal of surgery, 2018-04, Vol.215 (4), p.686-692
issn 0002-9610
1879-1883
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1909220766
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Aged
Biomarkers
Biomarkers, Tumor
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology
Breast Neoplasms - ethnology
Breast Neoplasms - genetics
Cancer therapies
Chemotherapy
Clinical medicine
Compliance
Databases, Factual
Decision making
Disparities
Economic factors
Endocrine therapy
Epidermal growth factor
Female
Gene expression
Gene Expression Profiling - statistics & numerical data
Guideline Adherence
Healthcare Disparities - ethnology
Healthcare Disparities - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Lymphatic system
Middle Aged
Oncotype DX
Patients
Population
Population Surveillance
Professionals
Retrospective Studies
Risk analysis
Social factors
Socioeconomic Factors
Surgery
Systematic review
United States
title Disparities in compliance with the Oncotype DX breast cancer test in the United States: A National Cancer Data Base assessment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T21%3A02%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disparities%20in%20compliance%20with%20the%20Oncotype%20DX%20breast%20cancer%20test%20in%20the%20United%20States:%20A%20National%20Cancer%20Data%20Base%20assessment&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Kozick,%20Zachary&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=215&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=686&rft.epage=692&rft.pages=686-692&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.05.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2017296169%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2017296169&rft_id=info:pmid/28606707&rft_els_id=S0002961017305706&rfr_iscdi=true