Readmissions to Different Hospitals After Common Surgical Procedures and Consequences for Implementation of Perioperative Surgical Home Programs

BACKGROUND:We consider whether there should be greater priority of information sharing about postacute surgical resources used(1) at skilled nursing facilities or inpatient rehabilitation hospitals to which patients are transferred upon discharge (when applicable) versus (2) at different hospitals w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia and analgesia 2017-09, Vol.125 (3), p.943-951
Hauptverfasser: Dexter, Franklin, Epstein, Richard H., Sun, Eric C., Lubarsky, David A., Dexter, Elisabeth U.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 951
container_issue 3
container_start_page 943
container_title Anesthesia and analgesia
container_volume 125
creator Dexter, Franklin
Epstein, Richard H.
Sun, Eric C.
Lubarsky, David A.
Dexter, Elisabeth U.
description BACKGROUND:We consider whether there should be greater priority of information sharing about postacute surgical resources used(1) at skilled nursing facilities or inpatient rehabilitation hospitals to which patients are transferred upon discharge (when applicable) versus (2) at different hospitals where readmissions occur. Obtaining and storing data electronically from these 2 sources for Perioperative Surgical Home initiatives are dissimilar; both can be challenging depending on the country and health system. METHODS:Using the 2013 US Nationwide Readmissions Database, we studied discharges of surgical diagnosis-related group (DRG) with US national median length of stay (LOS) ≥ 3 days and ≥ 10 hospitals each with ≥ 100 discharges for the Medicare Severity DRG. RESULTS:Nationwide, 16.15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.14%–17.22%) of discharges were with a disposition of “not to home” (ie, transfer to a skilled nursing facility or an inpatient rehabilitation hospital). Within 30 days, 0.88% of discharges (0.82%–0.95%) were followed by readmission and to a different hospital than the original hospital where the surgery was performed. Among all discharges, disposition “not to home” versus “to home” was associated with greater odds that the patient would have readmission within 30 days and to a different hospital than where the surgery was performed (2.11, 95% CI, 1.96–2.27; P < .0001). In part, this was because disposition “not to home” was associated with greater odds of readmission to any hospital (1.90, 95% CI, 1.82–1.98; P < .0001). In addition, among the subset of discharges with readmission within 30 days, disposition “not to home” versus “to home” was associated with greater odds that the readmission was to a different hospital than where the surgery was performed (1.20, 95% CI, 1.11–1.31; P < .0001). There was no association between the hospitals’ median LOS for the DRG and the odds that readmission was to a different hospital (P = .82). The odds ratio per each 1 day decrease in the hospital median LOS was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.91–1.12). CONCLUSIONS:Departments and hospitals wishing to demonstrate the value of their Perioperative Surgical Home initiatives, or to calculate risk assumption contracts, should ensure that their informatics priorities include obtaining accurate data on resource use at postacute care facilities such as skilled nursing facilities. Although approximately a quarter of readmissions are to different hospitals than where surgery was p
doi_str_mv 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1908434728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1908434728</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4017-edabad7aae7e955a925e5500a9f535a65624320f4b97fd17ba8a18495d2d20073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhi1ERZfCP0DIRy5p_bmJj6ulsJUqqAqco9l43AaSONhJK_4FP5nZbvlQD9QXa14_8449Y8ZeSXEsldQnqw-nx-KfpYQsn7CFtGpZlNZVT9mCVF0o59whe57zVwqlqJbP2KGqCHBKL9jPSwTftzm3cch8ivxtGwImHCa-iXlsJ-gyX4UJE1_Hvo8D_zSnq7aBjl-k2KCfE2YOg6fjIeP3GYeGhBATP-vHDntygonMeQz8AlMbR0wk3OBfo03sced2laDPL9hBoJr48n4_Yl_enX5eb4rzj-_P1qvzojH00AI9bMGXAFiisxacsmitEOCC1RaWdqmMViKYrSuDl-UWKpCVcdYrr4Qo9RF7s_cdU6Rb56mmLjTYdTBgnHMtnaiMNqWqCDV7tEkx54ShHlPbQ_pRS1HvZlHTLOqHs6C01_cV5m2P_k_S7-YTUO2B29hRg_O3br7FVF8jdNP1Y97mP6l3nNWu2LHCUVDsvoLRvwDTYae5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1908434728</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Readmissions to Different Hospitals After Common Surgical Procedures and Consequences for Implementation of Perioperative Surgical Home Programs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Dexter, Franklin ; Epstein, Richard H. ; Sun, Eric C. ; Lubarsky, David A. ; Dexter, Elisabeth U.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dexter, Franklin ; Epstein, Richard H. ; Sun, Eric C. ; Lubarsky, David A. ; Dexter, Elisabeth U.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:We consider whether there should be greater priority of information sharing about postacute surgical resources used(1) at skilled nursing facilities or inpatient rehabilitation hospitals to which patients are transferred upon discharge (when applicable) versus (2) at different hospitals where readmissions occur. Obtaining and storing data electronically from these 2 sources for Perioperative Surgical Home initiatives are dissimilar; both can be challenging depending on the country and health system. METHODS:Using the 2013 US Nationwide Readmissions Database, we studied discharges of surgical diagnosis-related group (DRG) with US national median length of stay (LOS) ≥ 3 days and ≥ 10 hospitals each with ≥ 100 discharges for the Medicare Severity DRG. RESULTS:Nationwide, 16.15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.14%–17.22%) of discharges were with a disposition of “not to home” (ie, transfer to a skilled nursing facility or an inpatient rehabilitation hospital). Within 30 days, 0.88% of discharges (0.82%–0.95%) were followed by readmission and to a different hospital than the original hospital where the surgery was performed. Among all discharges, disposition “not to home” versus “to home” was associated with greater odds that the patient would have readmission within 30 days and to a different hospital than where the surgery was performed (2.11, 95% CI, 1.96–2.27; P &lt; .0001). In part, this was because disposition “not to home” was associated with greater odds of readmission to any hospital (1.90, 95% CI, 1.82–1.98; P &lt; .0001). In addition, among the subset of discharges with readmission within 30 days, disposition “not to home” versus “to home” was associated with greater odds that the readmission was to a different hospital than where the surgery was performed (1.20, 95% CI, 1.11–1.31; P &lt; .0001). There was no association between the hospitals’ median LOS for the DRG and the odds that readmission was to a different hospital (P = .82). The odds ratio per each 1 day decrease in the hospital median LOS was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.91–1.12). CONCLUSIONS:Departments and hospitals wishing to demonstrate the value of their Perioperative Surgical Home initiatives, or to calculate risk assumption contracts, should ensure that their informatics priorities include obtaining accurate data on resource use at postacute care facilities such as skilled nursing facilities. Although approximately a quarter of readmissions are to different hospitals than where surgery was performed, provided that is recognized, obtaining those missing data is of less importance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-7598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28598923</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: International Anesthesia Research Society</publisher><subject>Databases, Factual - trends ; Elective Surgical Procedures - methods ; Elective Surgical Procedures - trends ; Hospitals - trends ; Humans ; Length of Stay - trends ; Patient Discharge - trends ; Patient Readmission - trends ; Patient-Centered Care - methods ; Patient-Centered Care - trends ; Perioperative Care - methods ; Perioperative Care - trends ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 2017-09, Vol.125 (3), p.943-951</ispartof><rights>International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><rights>2017 International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4017-edabad7aae7e955a925e5500a9f535a65624320f4b97fd17ba8a18495d2d20073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4017-edabad7aae7e955a925e5500a9f535a65624320f4b97fd17ba8a18495d2d20073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf><![CDATA[$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&PDF=y&D=ovft&AN=00000539-201709000-00034$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H]]></linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;NEWS=n&amp;CSC=Y&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;D=ovft&amp;AN=00000539-201709000-00034$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4609,27924,27925,64666,65461</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28598923$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dexter, Franklin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Richard H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Eric C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubarsky, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dexter, Elisabeth U.</creatorcontrib><title>Readmissions to Different Hospitals After Common Surgical Procedures and Consequences for Implementation of Perioperative Surgical Home Programs</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:We consider whether there should be greater priority of information sharing about postacute surgical resources used(1) at skilled nursing facilities or inpatient rehabilitation hospitals to which patients are transferred upon discharge (when applicable) versus (2) at different hospitals where readmissions occur. Obtaining and storing data electronically from these 2 sources for Perioperative Surgical Home initiatives are dissimilar; both can be challenging depending on the country and health system. METHODS:Using the 2013 US Nationwide Readmissions Database, we studied discharges of surgical diagnosis-related group (DRG) with US national median length of stay (LOS) ≥ 3 days and ≥ 10 hospitals each with ≥ 100 discharges for the Medicare Severity DRG. RESULTS:Nationwide, 16.15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.14%–17.22%) of discharges were with a disposition of “not to home” (ie, transfer to a skilled nursing facility or an inpatient rehabilitation hospital). Within 30 days, 0.88% of discharges (0.82%–0.95%) were followed by readmission and to a different hospital than the original hospital where the surgery was performed. Among all discharges, disposition “not to home” versus “to home” was associated with greater odds that the patient would have readmission within 30 days and to a different hospital than where the surgery was performed (2.11, 95% CI, 1.96–2.27; P &lt; .0001). In part, this was because disposition “not to home” was associated with greater odds of readmission to any hospital (1.90, 95% CI, 1.82–1.98; P &lt; .0001). In addition, among the subset of discharges with readmission within 30 days, disposition “not to home” versus “to home” was associated with greater odds that the readmission was to a different hospital than where the surgery was performed (1.20, 95% CI, 1.11–1.31; P &lt; .0001). There was no association between the hospitals’ median LOS for the DRG and the odds that readmission was to a different hospital (P = .82). The odds ratio per each 1 day decrease in the hospital median LOS was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.91–1.12). CONCLUSIONS:Departments and hospitals wishing to demonstrate the value of their Perioperative Surgical Home initiatives, or to calculate risk assumption contracts, should ensure that their informatics priorities include obtaining accurate data on resource use at postacute care facilities such as skilled nursing facilities. Although approximately a quarter of readmissions are to different hospitals than where surgery was performed, provided that is recognized, obtaining those missing data is of less importance.</description><subject>Databases, Factual - trends</subject><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures - trends</subject><subject>Hospitals - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay - trends</subject><subject>Patient Discharge - trends</subject><subject>Patient Readmission - trends</subject><subject>Patient-Centered Care - methods</subject><subject>Patient-Centered Care - trends</subject><subject>Perioperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Perioperative Care - trends</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0003-2999</issn><issn>1526-7598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhi1ERZfCP0DIRy5p_bmJj6ulsJUqqAqco9l43AaSONhJK_4FP5nZbvlQD9QXa14_8449Y8ZeSXEsldQnqw-nx-KfpYQsn7CFtGpZlNZVT9mCVF0o59whe57zVwqlqJbP2KGqCHBKL9jPSwTftzm3cch8ivxtGwImHCa-iXlsJ-gyX4UJE1_Hvo8D_zSnq7aBjl-k2KCfE2YOg6fjIeP3GYeGhBATP-vHDntygonMeQz8AlMbR0wk3OBfo03sced2laDPL9hBoJr48n4_Yl_enX5eb4rzj-_P1qvzojH00AI9bMGXAFiisxacsmitEOCC1RaWdqmMViKYrSuDl-UWKpCVcdYrr4Qo9RF7s_cdU6Rb56mmLjTYdTBgnHMtnaiMNqWqCDV7tEkx54ShHlPbQ_pRS1HvZlHTLOqHs6C01_cV5m2P_k_S7-YTUO2B29hRg_O3br7FVF8jdNP1Y97mP6l3nNWu2LHCUVDsvoLRvwDTYae5</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Dexter, Franklin</creator><creator>Epstein, Richard H.</creator><creator>Sun, Eric C.</creator><creator>Lubarsky, David A.</creator><creator>Dexter, Elisabeth U.</creator><general>International Anesthesia Research Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Readmissions to Different Hospitals After Common Surgical Procedures and Consequences for Implementation of Perioperative Surgical Home Programs</title><author>Dexter, Franklin ; Epstein, Richard H. ; Sun, Eric C. ; Lubarsky, David A. ; Dexter, Elisabeth U.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4017-edabad7aae7e955a925e5500a9f535a65624320f4b97fd17ba8a18495d2d20073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Databases, Factual - trends</topic><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures - trends</topic><topic>Hospitals - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay - trends</topic><topic>Patient Discharge - trends</topic><topic>Patient Readmission - trends</topic><topic>Patient-Centered Care - methods</topic><topic>Patient-Centered Care - trends</topic><topic>Perioperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Perioperative Care - trends</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dexter, Franklin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Richard H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Eric C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubarsky, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dexter, Elisabeth U.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dexter, Franklin</au><au>Epstein, Richard H.</au><au>Sun, Eric C.</au><au>Lubarsky, David A.</au><au>Dexter, Elisabeth U.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Readmissions to Different Hospitals After Common Surgical Procedures and Consequences for Implementation of Perioperative Surgical Home Programs</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>943</spage><epage>951</epage><pages>943-951</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><eissn>1526-7598</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:We consider whether there should be greater priority of information sharing about postacute surgical resources used(1) at skilled nursing facilities or inpatient rehabilitation hospitals to which patients are transferred upon discharge (when applicable) versus (2) at different hospitals where readmissions occur. Obtaining and storing data electronically from these 2 sources for Perioperative Surgical Home initiatives are dissimilar; both can be challenging depending on the country and health system. METHODS:Using the 2013 US Nationwide Readmissions Database, we studied discharges of surgical diagnosis-related group (DRG) with US national median length of stay (LOS) ≥ 3 days and ≥ 10 hospitals each with ≥ 100 discharges for the Medicare Severity DRG. RESULTS:Nationwide, 16.15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.14%–17.22%) of discharges were with a disposition of “not to home” (ie, transfer to a skilled nursing facility or an inpatient rehabilitation hospital). Within 30 days, 0.88% of discharges (0.82%–0.95%) were followed by readmission and to a different hospital than the original hospital where the surgery was performed. Among all discharges, disposition “not to home” versus “to home” was associated with greater odds that the patient would have readmission within 30 days and to a different hospital than where the surgery was performed (2.11, 95% CI, 1.96–2.27; P &lt; .0001). In part, this was because disposition “not to home” was associated with greater odds of readmission to any hospital (1.90, 95% CI, 1.82–1.98; P &lt; .0001). In addition, among the subset of discharges with readmission within 30 days, disposition “not to home” versus “to home” was associated with greater odds that the readmission was to a different hospital than where the surgery was performed (1.20, 95% CI, 1.11–1.31; P &lt; .0001). There was no association between the hospitals’ median LOS for the DRG and the odds that readmission was to a different hospital (P = .82). The odds ratio per each 1 day decrease in the hospital median LOS was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.91–1.12). CONCLUSIONS:Departments and hospitals wishing to demonstrate the value of their Perioperative Surgical Home initiatives, or to calculate risk assumption contracts, should ensure that their informatics priorities include obtaining accurate data on resource use at postacute care facilities such as skilled nursing facilities. Although approximately a quarter of readmissions are to different hospitals than where surgery was performed, provided that is recognized, obtaining those missing data is of less importance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>International Anesthesia Research Society</pub><pmid>28598923</pmid><doi>10.1213/ANE.0000000000002017</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2999
ispartof Anesthesia and analgesia, 2017-09, Vol.125 (3), p.943-951
issn 0003-2999
1526-7598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1908434728
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Databases, Factual - trends
Elective Surgical Procedures - methods
Elective Surgical Procedures - trends
Hospitals - trends
Humans
Length of Stay - trends
Patient Discharge - trends
Patient Readmission - trends
Patient-Centered Care - methods
Patient-Centered Care - trends
Perioperative Care - methods
Perioperative Care - trends
United States - epidemiology
title Readmissions to Different Hospitals After Common Surgical Procedures and Consequences for Implementation of Perioperative Surgical Home Programs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T07%3A00%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Readmissions%20to%20Different%20Hospitals%20After%20Common%20Surgical%20Procedures%20and%20Consequences%20for%20Implementation%20of%20Perioperative%20Surgical%20Home%20Programs&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Dexter,%20Franklin&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=943&rft.epage=951&rft.pages=943-951&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft.eissn=1526-7598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1908434728%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1908434728&rft_id=info:pmid/28598923&rfr_iscdi=true