Comparative cost-benefit analysis of tele-homecare for community-dwelling elderly in Japan: Non-Government versus Government Supported Funding Models
Highlights • Both non-government and government supported funding models for enabling tele-homecare for community dwelling elders in Japan are cost saving but factors such as incorporation of service fees and non-reliance on government subsidy for start-up costs may drive more efficient outcomes. •...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland) Ireland), 2017-08, Vol.104, p.1-9 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 9 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland) |
| container_volume | 104 |
| creator | Akiyama, Miki Abraham, Chon |
| description | Highlights • Both non-government and government supported funding models for enabling tele-homecare for community dwelling elders in Japan are cost saving but factors such as incorporation of service fees and non-reliance on government subsidy for start-up costs may drive more efficient outcomes. • Rural municipalities with scarce financial and medical resources tend to rely on funding from the national government but large initial costs and low willingness to pay (WTP) in the government supported model tend to worsen the benefit-to-cost ratio. • Government guidelines are needed to ensure prudent spending practices by local municipalities and healthcare providers regarding health information technology (IT) procurement. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.04.017 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1908428202</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1386505617301053</els_id><sourcerecordid>1908428202</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-143337e9626731890161d550b164928408ba1c7d72e573f365a53fe36a2ae3263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUk1v1TAQjBCIlsJfqHzkkuCP2HE4INBTW6gKHApny8_ZgENiB9t5KD-E_4uj11aIC6ddeWdmNZ4tinOCK4KJeDVUdpigs66vKCZNhesql0fFKZENLSWt2ePcMylKjrk4KZ7FOOCMwLx-WpxQydtWEnxa_N75adZBJ3sAZHxM5R4c9DYh7fS4RhuR71GCEcrvfgKjA6DehwydpsXZtJbdLxhH674hGDsI44qsQ9d61u41-uRdeeUPENwELqHcxCWiv15ul3n2IUGHLhfXbSIffQdjfF486fUY4cVdPSu-Xl582b0vbz5ffdi9uylNTVkqSc0Ya6AVVDSMyDZ_DOk4x3si6pbKGsu9JqbpGgq8YT0TXHPWAxOaamBUsLPi5VF3Dv7nAjGpyUaT_WgHfomKtFjWVFJMM1QcoSb4GAP0ag520mFVBKstEjWo-0jUFonCtcolE8_vdiz7PH6g3WeQAW-PgGwcDhaCisaCM1kqgEmq8_b_O978I2FyJNbo8QesEAe_hJxm9qMiVVjdboex3UWmYoI5Y38AUsa3Lw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1908428202</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative cost-benefit analysis of tele-homecare for community-dwelling elderly in Japan: Non-Government versus Government Supported Funding Models</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Akiyama, Miki ; Abraham, Chon</creator><creatorcontrib>Akiyama, Miki ; Abraham, Chon</creatorcontrib><description>Highlights • Both non-government and government supported funding models for enabling tele-homecare for community dwelling elders in Japan are cost saving but factors such as incorporation of service fees and non-reliance on government subsidy for start-up costs may drive more efficient outcomes. • Rural municipalities with scarce financial and medical resources tend to rely on funding from the national government but large initial costs and low willingness to pay (WTP) in the government supported model tend to worsen the benefit-to-cost ratio. • Government guidelines are needed to ensure prudent spending practices by local municipalities and healthcare providers regarding health information technology (IT) procurement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-5056</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8243</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.04.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28599810</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cohort Studies ; Cost saving ; Cost-benefit ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Economic evaluation ; Elderly care ; Female ; Government ; Home Care Services - economics ; Home Care Services - organization & administration ; Home Care Services - utilization ; Humans ; Independent Living ; Internal Medicine ; Japan ; Male ; Models, Theoretical ; Monte Carlo Method ; Other ; Rural health ; Tele-homecare ; Telemedicine - economics ; Telemedicine - organization & administration ; Telemedicine - utilization ; United States</subject><ispartof>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland), 2017-08, Vol.104, p.1-9</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-143337e9626731890161d550b164928408ba1c7d72e573f365a53fe36a2ae3263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-143337e9626731890161d550b164928408ba1c7d72e573f365a53fe36a2ae3263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.04.017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28599810$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akiyama, Miki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Chon</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative cost-benefit analysis of tele-homecare for community-dwelling elderly in Japan: Non-Government versus Government Supported Funding Models</title><title>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland)</title><addtitle>Int J Med Inform</addtitle><description>Highlights • Both non-government and government supported funding models for enabling tele-homecare for community dwelling elders in Japan are cost saving but factors such as incorporation of service fees and non-reliance on government subsidy for start-up costs may drive more efficient outcomes. • Rural municipalities with scarce financial and medical resources tend to rely on funding from the national government but large initial costs and low willingness to pay (WTP) in the government supported model tend to worsen the benefit-to-cost ratio. • Government guidelines are needed to ensure prudent spending practices by local municipalities and healthcare providers regarding health information technology (IT) procurement.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Cost saving</subject><subject>Cost-benefit</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Economic evaluation</subject><subject>Elderly care</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Home Care Services - economics</subject><subject>Home Care Services - organization & administration</subject><subject>Home Care Services - utilization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Independent Living</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Other</subject><subject>Rural health</subject><subject>Tele-homecare</subject><subject>Telemedicine - economics</subject><subject>Telemedicine - organization & administration</subject><subject>Telemedicine - utilization</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1386-5056</issn><issn>1872-8243</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUk1v1TAQjBCIlsJfqHzkkuCP2HE4INBTW6gKHApny8_ZgENiB9t5KD-E_4uj11aIC6ddeWdmNZ4tinOCK4KJeDVUdpigs66vKCZNhesql0fFKZENLSWt2ePcMylKjrk4KZ7FOOCMwLx-WpxQydtWEnxa_N75adZBJ3sAZHxM5R4c9DYh7fS4RhuR71GCEcrvfgKjA6DehwydpsXZtJbdLxhH674hGDsI44qsQ9d61u41-uRdeeUPENwELqHcxCWiv15ul3n2IUGHLhfXbSIffQdjfF486fUY4cVdPSu-Xl582b0vbz5ffdi9uylNTVkqSc0Ya6AVVDSMyDZ_DOk4x3si6pbKGsu9JqbpGgq8YT0TXHPWAxOaamBUsLPi5VF3Dv7nAjGpyUaT_WgHfomKtFjWVFJMM1QcoSb4GAP0ag520mFVBKstEjWo-0jUFonCtcolE8_vdiz7PH6g3WeQAW-PgGwcDhaCisaCM1kqgEmq8_b_O978I2FyJNbo8QesEAe_hJxm9qMiVVjdboex3UWmYoI5Y38AUsa3Lw</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Akiyama, Miki</creator><creator>Abraham, Chon</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Comparative cost-benefit analysis of tele-homecare for community-dwelling elderly in Japan: Non-Government versus Government Supported Funding Models</title><author>Akiyama, Miki ; Abraham, Chon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-143337e9626731890161d550b164928408ba1c7d72e573f365a53fe36a2ae3263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Cost saving</topic><topic>Cost-benefit</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Economic evaluation</topic><topic>Elderly care</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Home Care Services - economics</topic><topic>Home Care Services - organization & administration</topic><topic>Home Care Services - utilization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Independent Living</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Other</topic><topic>Rural health</topic><topic>Tele-homecare</topic><topic>Telemedicine - economics</topic><topic>Telemedicine - organization & administration</topic><topic>Telemedicine - utilization</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akiyama, Miki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Chon</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akiyama, Miki</au><au>Abraham, Chon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative cost-benefit analysis of tele-homecare for community-dwelling elderly in Japan: Non-Government versus Government Supported Funding Models</atitle><jtitle>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland)</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Med Inform</addtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>104</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>1386-5056</issn><eissn>1872-8243</eissn><abstract>Highlights • Both non-government and government supported funding models for enabling tele-homecare for community dwelling elders in Japan are cost saving but factors such as incorporation of service fees and non-reliance on government subsidy for start-up costs may drive more efficient outcomes. • Rural municipalities with scarce financial and medical resources tend to rely on funding from the national government but large initial costs and low willingness to pay (WTP) in the government supported model tend to worsen the benefit-to-cost ratio. • Government guidelines are needed to ensure prudent spending practices by local municipalities and healthcare providers regarding health information technology (IT) procurement.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28599810</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.04.017</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1386-5056 |
| ispartof | International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland), 2017-08, Vol.104, p.1-9 |
| issn | 1386-5056 1872-8243 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1908428202 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Aged Cohort Studies Cost saving Cost-benefit Cost-Benefit Analysis Economic evaluation Elderly care Female Government Home Care Services - economics Home Care Services - organization & administration Home Care Services - utilization Humans Independent Living Internal Medicine Japan Male Models, Theoretical Monte Carlo Method Other Rural health Tele-homecare Telemedicine - economics Telemedicine - organization & administration Telemedicine - utilization United States |
| title | Comparative cost-benefit analysis of tele-homecare for community-dwelling elderly in Japan: Non-Government versus Government Supported Funding Models |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T11%3A27%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20cost-benefit%20analysis%20of%20tele-homecare%20for%20community-dwelling%20elderly%20in%20Japan:%20Non-Government%20versus%20Government%20Supported%20Funding%20Models&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20medical%20informatics%20(Shannon,%20Ireland)&rft.au=Akiyama,%20Miki&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=104&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=1386-5056&rft.eissn=1872-8243&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.04.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1908428202%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1908428202&rft_id=info:pmid/28599810&rft_els_id=S1386505617301053&rfr_iscdi=true |