Intraoperative Imaging Changes Management in Orbital Fracture Repair

Abstract Purpose Intraoperative imaging is gaining widespread use in the management of facial fracture repair. The aim of this study is to determine if intraoperative imaging changes the management of orbital fracture repair. Methods A retrospective case series was performed for all cases of orbital...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2017-09, Vol.75 (9), p.1932-1940
Hauptverfasser: Borad, Vedant, MD, Lacey, Martin S., MD, FRCS(C), Hamlar, David D., MD, DDS, Dresner, Harley S., MD, Yadava, Girijesh K., PhD, DABR, Schubert, Warren, MD, FACS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1940
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1932
container_title Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
container_volume 75
creator Borad, Vedant, MD
Lacey, Martin S., MD, FRCS(C)
Hamlar, David D., MD, DDS
Dresner, Harley S., MD
Yadava, Girijesh K., PhD, DABR
Schubert, Warren, MD, FACS
description Abstract Purpose Intraoperative imaging is gaining widespread use in the management of facial fracture repair. The aim of this study is to determine if intraoperative imaging changes the management of orbital fracture repair. Methods A retrospective case series was performed for all cases of orbital fracture repair from 2008 to 2015 in which the intraoperative O-arm was used at Regions Hospital, a level I trauma center. The primary outcome variable was if a change in management occurred, ranging from orbital plate repositioning to proceeding with orbital floor exploration. Results The study sample was composed of 101 patients with a mean age of 40 +/- 15 years. Approximately 75% (76/101) of patients were male, and 25% (25/101) female. All cases were secondary to assault, motor vehicle accident, fall, or gunshot wounds. The use of the O-arm resulted in a change in management in 44% (44/101) of cases. In 48% (21/44) of these cases in which intraoperative imaging resulted in a change in management, the orbital plate was repositioned to optimize repair. In 16% (7/44) of these cases, the orbital plate was exchanged for a different size and/or type of plate. In 7% (3/44) of these cases, the orbital plate was reshaped by bending to improve contour for the repair. In another 7% (3/44) of these cases, the orbital plate was reshaped by trimming the plate to optimize the length and/or width of the plate for repair. In 7% of these cases, the orbital floor required exploration based on intraoperative imaging. In 5% of these cases, the orbital floor was found to be adequately reduced after zygoma reduction based on intraoperative imaging, and did not require exploration. Conclusions The use of intraoperative imaging allows the surgeon to make real-time changes in operative management ranging from orbital plate repositioning to deciding whether to proceed with orbital floor exploration. This not only allows for immediate optimization of repair, but may also decrease the need for revision procedures, reducing patient morbidity and improving patient outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.joms.2017.05.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1908428071</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278239117305025</els_id><sourcerecordid>1908428071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-1824e7da3a8debaed052da62ab246e9b5083d3f2c27d3492e55e87ebd160a1c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2L1EAQhhtR3HH1D3iQHL0kVnWn8wEiyKyrAysLfpybSnfN2GPSGbuThf33JszqwYOnujzvC_W8QrxEKBCwenMsjuOQCglYF6ALAPlIbFArzDVo9VhsQNZNLlWLF-JZSkcARF1XT8WFbHTbolQbcbULU6TxxJEmf8fZbqCDD4ds-4PCgVP2mQIdeOAwZT5kt7HzE_XZdSQ7zZGzL3wiH5-LJ3vqE794uJfi-_WHb9tP-c3tx932_U1uS8Qpx0aWXDtS1DjuiB1o6aiS1Mmy4rbT0Cin9tLK2qmylaw1NzV3DisgtK26FK_Pvac4_po5TWbwyXLfU-BxTgZbaErZQI0LKs-ojWNKkffmFP1A8d4gmNWeOZrVnlntGdBmsbeEXj30z93A7m_kj64FeHsGePnyznM0yXoOlp2PbCfjRv___nf_xG3vg7fU_-R7TsdxjmHxZ9AkacB8Xfdb58NagQap1W89MJVY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1908428071</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intraoperative Imaging Changes Management in Orbital Fracture Repair</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Borad, Vedant, MD ; Lacey, Martin S., MD, FRCS(C) ; Hamlar, David D., MD, DDS ; Dresner, Harley S., MD ; Yadava, Girijesh K., PhD, DABR ; Schubert, Warren, MD, FACS</creator><creatorcontrib>Borad, Vedant, MD ; Lacey, Martin S., MD, FRCS(C) ; Hamlar, David D., MD, DDS ; Dresner, Harley S., MD ; Yadava, Girijesh K., PhD, DABR ; Schubert, Warren, MD, FACS</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose Intraoperative imaging is gaining widespread use in the management of facial fracture repair. The aim of this study is to determine if intraoperative imaging changes the management of orbital fracture repair. Methods A retrospective case series was performed for all cases of orbital fracture repair from 2008 to 2015 in which the intraoperative O-arm was used at Regions Hospital, a level I trauma center. The primary outcome variable was if a change in management occurred, ranging from orbital plate repositioning to proceeding with orbital floor exploration. Results The study sample was composed of 101 patients with a mean age of 40 +/- 15 years. Approximately 75% (76/101) of patients were male, and 25% (25/101) female. All cases were secondary to assault, motor vehicle accident, fall, or gunshot wounds. The use of the O-arm resulted in a change in management in 44% (44/101) of cases. In 48% (21/44) of these cases in which intraoperative imaging resulted in a change in management, the orbital plate was repositioned to optimize repair. In 16% (7/44) of these cases, the orbital plate was exchanged for a different size and/or type of plate. In 7% (3/44) of these cases, the orbital plate was reshaped by bending to improve contour for the repair. In another 7% (3/44) of these cases, the orbital plate was reshaped by trimming the plate to optimize the length and/or width of the plate for repair. In 7% of these cases, the orbital floor required exploration based on intraoperative imaging. In 5% of these cases, the orbital floor was found to be adequately reduced after zygoma reduction based on intraoperative imaging, and did not require exploration. Conclusions The use of intraoperative imaging allows the surgeon to make real-time changes in operative management ranging from orbital plate repositioning to deciding whether to proceed with orbital floor exploration. This not only allows for immediate optimization of repair, but may also decrease the need for revision procedures, reducing patient morbidity and improving patient outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-2391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.05.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28599123</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Child ; Dentistry ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Intraoperative Care ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Orbital Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Orbital Fractures - etiology ; Orbital Fractures - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Trauma Centers ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2017-09, Vol.75 (9), p.1932-1940</ispartof><rights>2017 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-1824e7da3a8debaed052da62ab246e9b5083d3f2c27d3492e55e87ebd160a1c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-1824e7da3a8debaed052da62ab246e9b5083d3f2c27d3492e55e87ebd160a1c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.05.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28599123$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borad, Vedant, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacey, Martin S., MD, FRCS(C)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamlar, David D., MD, DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dresner, Harley S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadava, Girijesh K., PhD, DABR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Warren, MD, FACS</creatorcontrib><title>Intraoperative Imaging Changes Management in Orbital Fracture Repair</title><title>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose Intraoperative imaging is gaining widespread use in the management of facial fracture repair. The aim of this study is to determine if intraoperative imaging changes the management of orbital fracture repair. Methods A retrospective case series was performed for all cases of orbital fracture repair from 2008 to 2015 in which the intraoperative O-arm was used at Regions Hospital, a level I trauma center. The primary outcome variable was if a change in management occurred, ranging from orbital plate repositioning to proceeding with orbital floor exploration. Results The study sample was composed of 101 patients with a mean age of 40 +/- 15 years. Approximately 75% (76/101) of patients were male, and 25% (25/101) female. All cases were secondary to assault, motor vehicle accident, fall, or gunshot wounds. The use of the O-arm resulted in a change in management in 44% (44/101) of cases. In 48% (21/44) of these cases in which intraoperative imaging resulted in a change in management, the orbital plate was repositioned to optimize repair. In 16% (7/44) of these cases, the orbital plate was exchanged for a different size and/or type of plate. In 7% (3/44) of these cases, the orbital plate was reshaped by bending to improve contour for the repair. In another 7% (3/44) of these cases, the orbital plate was reshaped by trimming the plate to optimize the length and/or width of the plate for repair. In 7% of these cases, the orbital floor required exploration based on intraoperative imaging. In 5% of these cases, the orbital floor was found to be adequately reduced after zygoma reduction based on intraoperative imaging, and did not require exploration. Conclusions The use of intraoperative imaging allows the surgeon to make real-time changes in operative management ranging from orbital plate repositioning to deciding whether to proceed with orbital floor exploration. This not only allows for immediate optimization of repair, but may also decrease the need for revision procedures, reducing patient morbidity and improving patient outcomes.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Intraoperative Care</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orbital Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Orbital Fractures - etiology</subject><subject>Orbital Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Trauma Centers</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0278-2391</issn><issn>1531-5053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2L1EAQhhtR3HH1D3iQHL0kVnWn8wEiyKyrAysLfpybSnfN2GPSGbuThf33JszqwYOnujzvC_W8QrxEKBCwenMsjuOQCglYF6ALAPlIbFArzDVo9VhsQNZNLlWLF-JZSkcARF1XT8WFbHTbolQbcbULU6TxxJEmf8fZbqCDD4ds-4PCgVP2mQIdeOAwZT5kt7HzE_XZdSQ7zZGzL3wiH5-LJ3vqE794uJfi-_WHb9tP-c3tx932_U1uS8Qpx0aWXDtS1DjuiB1o6aiS1Mmy4rbT0Cin9tLK2qmylaw1NzV3DisgtK26FK_Pvac4_po5TWbwyXLfU-BxTgZbaErZQI0LKs-ojWNKkffmFP1A8d4gmNWeOZrVnlntGdBmsbeEXj30z93A7m_kj64FeHsGePnyznM0yXoOlp2PbCfjRv___nf_xG3vg7fU_-R7TsdxjmHxZ9AkacB8Xfdb58NagQap1W89MJVY</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Borad, Vedant, MD</creator><creator>Lacey, Martin S., MD, FRCS(C)</creator><creator>Hamlar, David D., MD, DDS</creator><creator>Dresner, Harley S., MD</creator><creator>Yadava, Girijesh K., PhD, DABR</creator><creator>Schubert, Warren, MD, FACS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Intraoperative Imaging Changes Management in Orbital Fracture Repair</title><author>Borad, Vedant, MD ; Lacey, Martin S., MD, FRCS(C) ; Hamlar, David D., MD, DDS ; Dresner, Harley S., MD ; Yadava, Girijesh K., PhD, DABR ; Schubert, Warren, MD, FACS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-1824e7da3a8debaed052da62ab246e9b5083d3f2c27d3492e55e87ebd160a1c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Intraoperative Care</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orbital Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Orbital Fractures - etiology</topic><topic>Orbital Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Trauma Centers</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borad, Vedant, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacey, Martin S., MD, FRCS(C)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamlar, David D., MD, DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dresner, Harley S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadava, Girijesh K., PhD, DABR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Warren, MD, FACS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borad, Vedant, MD</au><au>Lacey, Martin S., MD, FRCS(C)</au><au>Hamlar, David D., MD, DDS</au><au>Dresner, Harley S., MD</au><au>Yadava, Girijesh K., PhD, DABR</au><au>Schubert, Warren, MD, FACS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intraoperative Imaging Changes Management in Orbital Fracture Repair</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1932</spage><epage>1940</epage><pages>1932-1940</pages><issn>0278-2391</issn><eissn>1531-5053</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose Intraoperative imaging is gaining widespread use in the management of facial fracture repair. The aim of this study is to determine if intraoperative imaging changes the management of orbital fracture repair. Methods A retrospective case series was performed for all cases of orbital fracture repair from 2008 to 2015 in which the intraoperative O-arm was used at Regions Hospital, a level I trauma center. The primary outcome variable was if a change in management occurred, ranging from orbital plate repositioning to proceeding with orbital floor exploration. Results The study sample was composed of 101 patients with a mean age of 40 +/- 15 years. Approximately 75% (76/101) of patients were male, and 25% (25/101) female. All cases were secondary to assault, motor vehicle accident, fall, or gunshot wounds. The use of the O-arm resulted in a change in management in 44% (44/101) of cases. In 48% (21/44) of these cases in which intraoperative imaging resulted in a change in management, the orbital plate was repositioned to optimize repair. In 16% (7/44) of these cases, the orbital plate was exchanged for a different size and/or type of plate. In 7% (3/44) of these cases, the orbital plate was reshaped by bending to improve contour for the repair. In another 7% (3/44) of these cases, the orbital plate was reshaped by trimming the plate to optimize the length and/or width of the plate for repair. In 7% of these cases, the orbital floor required exploration based on intraoperative imaging. In 5% of these cases, the orbital floor was found to be adequately reduced after zygoma reduction based on intraoperative imaging, and did not require exploration. Conclusions The use of intraoperative imaging allows the surgeon to make real-time changes in operative management ranging from orbital plate repositioning to deciding whether to proceed with orbital floor exploration. This not only allows for immediate optimization of repair, but may also decrease the need for revision procedures, reducing patient morbidity and improving patient outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28599123</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joms.2017.05.002</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-2391
ispartof Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2017-09, Vol.75 (9), p.1932-1940
issn 0278-2391
1531-5053
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1908428071
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Child
Dentistry
Female
Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Intraoperative Care
Male
Middle Aged
Orbital Fractures - diagnostic imaging
Orbital Fractures - etiology
Orbital Fractures - surgery
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Trauma Centers
Treatment Outcome
title Intraoperative Imaging Changes Management in Orbital Fracture Repair
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T08%3A24%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraoperative%20Imaging%20Changes%20Management%20in%20Orbital%20Fracture%20Repair&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Borad,%20Vedant,%20MD&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1932&rft.epage=1940&rft.pages=1932-1940&rft.issn=0278-2391&rft.eissn=1531-5053&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joms.2017.05.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1908428071%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1908428071&rft_id=info:pmid/28599123&rft_els_id=S0278239117305025&rfr_iscdi=true