Understanding perspectives on major system change: A comparative case study of public engagement and the implementation of urgent and emergency care system reconfiguration
Highlights • Public engagement activities can influence public opinion of health service reconfiguration. • Inadequate engagement can foster public opposition to changes, potentially hampering implementation. • Interactive, genuine and ongoing engagement can address public concerns and facilitate im...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Health policy (Amsterdam) 2017-07, Vol.121 (7), p.800-808 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 808 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 800 |
| container_title | Health policy (Amsterdam) |
| container_volume | 121 |
| creator | Foley, Conor Droog, Elsa Healy, Orla McHugh, Sheena Buckley, Claire Browne, John Patrick |
| description | Highlights • Public engagement activities can influence public opinion of health service reconfiguration. • Inadequate engagement can foster public opposition to changes, potentially hampering implementation. • Interactive, genuine and ongoing engagement can address public concerns and facilitate implementation. • Opposition to change is typically localised in character. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.05.009 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1906145500</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168851017301471</els_id><sourcerecordid>1941384551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-fa6507ffea76a6c31d62ab330cb888d6b231112d3d1fc5a01c7a5483138cc3133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1u1DAUhSMEotPCK4AlNmwyXMfjxGWBNKooIFViAV1bHucm45DYwU4qzTPxktx0OkXqipX_vnOufY-z7C2HNQdefujWezT9tB9Dvy6AV2uQa4DLZ9mKq6rIS5Cb59mKSJUryeEsO0-pA4BKiPJldlYoWSklYJX9ufU1xjQZXzvfspHmI9rJ3WFiwbPBdCGydEgTDszujW_xI9syG4bRRLNgzJqELE1zfWChYeO8651l6FvT4oB-YuTMpj0yN4z9_Q7JyJnYObYngA6WhT2QXcRTwYg2-Ma1c7zXvMpeNKZP-PphvMhurz__vPqa33z_8u1qe5NbCWLKG1NKqJoGTVWa0gpel4XZCQF2p5Sqy10hOOdFLWreWGmA28rIjRJcKEu0EBfZ-6PvGMPvGdOkB5cs9r3xGOak-SWUfCMlAKHvnqBdmKOn2xG1IUfCOFHVkbIxpBSx0WN0g4kHzUEveepOP-aplzw1SE15kvLNg_-8G7B-1J0CJGB7BJAacucw6mQdNRJrR92bdB3cfxT59MTD9s47a_pfeMD070U6FRr0j-VbLb-KVwL4puLiL6icznc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1941384551</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding perspectives on major system change: A comparative case study of public engagement and the implementation of urgent and emergency care system reconfiguration</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Foley, Conor ; Droog, Elsa ; Healy, Orla ; McHugh, Sheena ; Buckley, Claire ; Browne, John Patrick</creator><creatorcontrib>Foley, Conor ; Droog, Elsa ; Healy, Orla ; McHugh, Sheena ; Buckley, Claire ; Browne, John Patrick</creatorcontrib><description>Highlights • Public engagement activities can influence public opinion of health service reconfiguration. • Inadequate engagement can foster public opposition to changes, potentially hampering implementation. • Interactive, genuine and ongoing engagement can address public concerns and facilitate implementation. • Opposition to change is typically localised in character.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-8510</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6054</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.05.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28578830</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Ambulatory Care - organization & administration ; Changes ; Community Participation - methods ; Comparative analysis ; Delivery of Health Care - organization & administration ; Delivery of healthcare ; Emergency Medical Services - organization & administration ; Emergency services ; Health administration ; Health services research ; Humans ; Implementation ; Interest groups ; Internal Medicine ; Ireland ; Planning ; Public interest ; Public Opinion ; Qualitative Research ; Reconfiguration ; Regions ; Services ; Stakeholder Participation ; Stakeholders</subject><ispartof>Health policy (Amsterdam), 2017-07, Vol.121 (7), p.800-808</ispartof><rights>The Author(s)</rights><rights>2017 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-fa6507ffea76a6c31d62ab330cb888d6b231112d3d1fc5a01c7a5483138cc3133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-fa6507ffea76a6c31d62ab330cb888d6b231112d3d1fc5a01c7a5483138cc3133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851017301471$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27843,27901,27902,30976,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28578830$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Foley, Conor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Droog, Elsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healy, Orla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McHugh, Sheena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckley, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browne, John Patrick</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding perspectives on major system change: A comparative case study of public engagement and the implementation of urgent and emergency care system reconfiguration</title><title>Health policy (Amsterdam)</title><addtitle>Health Policy</addtitle><description>Highlights • Public engagement activities can influence public opinion of health service reconfiguration. • Inadequate engagement can foster public opposition to changes, potentially hampering implementation. • Interactive, genuine and ongoing engagement can address public concerns and facilitate implementation. • Opposition to change is typically localised in character.</description><subject>Ambulatory Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Changes</subject><subject>Community Participation - methods</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Delivery of healthcare</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - organization & administration</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health services research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Ireland</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Public interest</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Reconfiguration</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Services</subject><subject>Stakeholder Participation</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><issn>0168-8510</issn><issn>1872-6054</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1u1DAUhSMEotPCK4AlNmwyXMfjxGWBNKooIFViAV1bHucm45DYwU4qzTPxktx0OkXqipX_vnOufY-z7C2HNQdefujWezT9tB9Dvy6AV2uQa4DLZ9mKq6rIS5Cb59mKSJUryeEsO0-pA4BKiPJldlYoWSklYJX9ufU1xjQZXzvfspHmI9rJ3WFiwbPBdCGydEgTDszujW_xI9syG4bRRLNgzJqELE1zfWChYeO8651l6FvT4oB-YuTMpj0yN4z9_Q7JyJnYObYngA6WhT2QXcRTwYg2-Ma1c7zXvMpeNKZP-PphvMhurz__vPqa33z_8u1qe5NbCWLKG1NKqJoGTVWa0gpel4XZCQF2p5Sqy10hOOdFLWreWGmA28rIjRJcKEu0EBfZ-6PvGMPvGdOkB5cs9r3xGOak-SWUfCMlAKHvnqBdmKOn2xG1IUfCOFHVkbIxpBSx0WN0g4kHzUEveepOP-aplzw1SE15kvLNg_-8G7B-1J0CJGB7BJAacucw6mQdNRJrR92bdB3cfxT59MTD9s47a_pfeMD070U6FRr0j-VbLb-KVwL4puLiL6icznc</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Foley, Conor</creator><creator>Droog, Elsa</creator><creator>Healy, Orla</creator><creator>McHugh, Sheena</creator><creator>Buckley, Claire</creator><creator>Browne, John Patrick</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Understanding perspectives on major system change: A comparative case study of public engagement and the implementation of urgent and emergency care system reconfiguration</title><author>Foley, Conor ; Droog, Elsa ; Healy, Orla ; McHugh, Sheena ; Buckley, Claire ; Browne, John Patrick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-fa6507ffea76a6c31d62ab330cb888d6b231112d3d1fc5a01c7a5483138cc3133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Changes</topic><topic>Community Participation - methods</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Delivery of healthcare</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - organization & administration</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health services research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Ireland</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Public interest</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Reconfiguration</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Services</topic><topic>Stakeholder Participation</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Foley, Conor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Droog, Elsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healy, Orla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McHugh, Sheena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckley, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browne, John Patrick</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health policy (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Foley, Conor</au><au>Droog, Elsa</au><au>Healy, Orla</au><au>McHugh, Sheena</au><au>Buckley, Claire</au><au>Browne, John Patrick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding perspectives on major system change: A comparative case study of public engagement and the implementation of urgent and emergency care system reconfiguration</atitle><jtitle>Health policy (Amsterdam)</jtitle><addtitle>Health Policy</addtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>800</spage><epage>808</epage><pages>800-808</pages><issn>0168-8510</issn><eissn>1872-6054</eissn><abstract>Highlights • Public engagement activities can influence public opinion of health service reconfiguration. • Inadequate engagement can foster public opposition to changes, potentially hampering implementation. • Interactive, genuine and ongoing engagement can address public concerns and facilitate implementation. • Opposition to change is typically localised in character.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28578830</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.05.009</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0168-8510 |
| ispartof | Health policy (Amsterdam), 2017-07, Vol.121 (7), p.800-808 |
| issn | 0168-8510 1872-6054 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1906145500 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Ambulatory Care - organization & administration Changes Community Participation - methods Comparative analysis Delivery of Health Care - organization & administration Delivery of healthcare Emergency Medical Services - organization & administration Emergency services Health administration Health services research Humans Implementation Interest groups Internal Medicine Ireland Planning Public interest Public Opinion Qualitative Research Reconfiguration Regions Services Stakeholder Participation Stakeholders |
| title | Understanding perspectives on major system change: A comparative case study of public engagement and the implementation of urgent and emergency care system reconfiguration |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T07%3A46%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20perspectives%20on%20major%20system%20change:%20A%20comparative%20case%20study%20of%20public%20engagement%20and%20the%20implementation%20of%20urgent%20and%20emergency%20care%20system%20reconfiguration&rft.jtitle=Health%20policy%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Foley,%20Conor&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=800&rft.epage=808&rft.pages=800-808&rft.issn=0168-8510&rft.eissn=1872-6054&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.05.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1941384551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1941384551&rft_id=info:pmid/28578830&rft_els_id=S0168851017301471&rfr_iscdi=true |