Public attitudes toward child undervaccination: A randomized experiment on evaluations, stigmatizing orientations, and support for policies

Child undervaccination is a complex public health problem and a contentious social and political issue. Efforts to increase vaccination coverage require understanding how the public evaluates different reasons for child undervaccination, which may influence attitudes, stigmatizing behaviors, and sup...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social science & medicine (1982) 2017-07, Vol.185, p.127-136
Hauptverfasser: Carpiano, Richard M., Fitz, Nicholas S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 136
container_issue
container_start_page 127
container_title Social science & medicine (1982)
container_volume 185
creator Carpiano, Richard M.
Fitz, Nicholas S.
description Child undervaccination is a complex public health problem and a contentious social and political issue. Efforts to increase vaccination coverage require understanding how the public evaluates different reasons for child undervaccination, which may influence attitudes, stigmatizing behaviors, and support for vaccination policies. We conducted a vignette experiment with a United States national online sample (n = 1469) to investigate how and why different undervaccination actions shape evaluations (blame, anger, sympathy, differentness, credibility, dangerousness), stigmatizing orientations (social distance, discrimination), and support for particular policies (e.g., research funding, belief exemptions, fines). Each participant was randomly assigned to read one of four vignettes that described a mother who either refused vaccines, delayed vaccines, encountered social barriers to obtaining vaccines, or was up-to-date on vaccines for her child. Compared to the up-to-date condition, each undervaccination action predicted significantly more negative evaluations and stigmatizing orientations. Vaccine refusal was the most negatively appraised. Differences in social distance and discrimination were explained by negative evaluations about the parent. These evaluations and orientations predicted support for a range of policies. Negative parental evaluations were associated with increased support for more severe policies. We discuss the implications of these findings for addressing undervaccination and informing health scholarship on stigma. •Generally, respondents negatively evaluated each reason for child undervaccination.•Vaccine refusal (vs. delay and time barriers) was the reason viewed most negatively.•Distancing attitudes were greater towards the undervaccinated child vs. the mother.•Evaluations mediated the effects of undervaccination reason on stigma.•Evaluations and stigma attitudes correlate with vaccination policy preference.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1906142831</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953617303088</els_id><sourcerecordid>1906142831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-635d310cfed82df07a9a6da860b8d79ad228f80a218213379ff55b6e517a59ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2OFCEUhYnROO3oKyiJGxdWeSmagnLXmfiXTKILXRMabo10qqEEqtV5BV9a2p524cYVIfc7h8M9hDxj0DJg_atdm6PN1u_RtR0w2YJoga3vkRVTkjeCr-V9soJOymYQvL8gj3LeAQADxR-Si04JqToGK_Lr07KdvKWmFF8Wh5mW-N0kR-1XPzm6BIfpYKz1wRQfw2u6ockEF_f-Fh3FHzOmGiIUGgPFg5mWP1h-SXPxN_t6ufXhhsbkK3MeVT3NyzzHVOgYE51jTeAxPyYPRjNlfHJ3XpIvb998vnrfXH989-Fqc91YPgyl6blwnIEd0anOjSDNYHpnVA9b5eRgXNepUYHpWP0i53IYRyG2PQomjRjQ8kvy4uQ7p_htwVz03meL02QCxiVrNkDP1p3irKLP_0F3cUmhpqvUmnHVrxVUSp4om2LOCUc9162Y9FMz0Me-9E7_7Usf-9IgdO2rKp_e-S_b4-ysOxdUgc0JwLqQg8ekqwsGi84ntEW76P_7yG-s2649</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1941386480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public attitudes toward child undervaccination: A randomized experiment on evaluations, stigmatizing orientations, and support for policies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Carpiano, Richard M. ; Fitz, Nicholas S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Carpiano, Richard M. ; Fitz, Nicholas S.</creatorcontrib><description>Child undervaccination is a complex public health problem and a contentious social and political issue. Efforts to increase vaccination coverage require understanding how the public evaluates different reasons for child undervaccination, which may influence attitudes, stigmatizing behaviors, and support for vaccination policies. We conducted a vignette experiment with a United States national online sample (n = 1469) to investigate how and why different undervaccination actions shape evaluations (blame, anger, sympathy, differentness, credibility, dangerousness), stigmatizing orientations (social distance, discrimination), and support for particular policies (e.g., research funding, belief exemptions, fines). Each participant was randomly assigned to read one of four vignettes that described a mother who either refused vaccines, delayed vaccines, encountered social barriers to obtaining vaccines, or was up-to-date on vaccines for her child. Compared to the up-to-date condition, each undervaccination action predicted significantly more negative evaluations and stigmatizing orientations. Vaccine refusal was the most negatively appraised. Differences in social distance and discrimination were explained by negative evaluations about the parent. These evaluations and orientations predicted support for a range of policies. Negative parental evaluations were associated with increased support for more severe policies. We discuss the implications of these findings for addressing undervaccination and informing health scholarship on stigma. •Generally, respondents negatively evaluated each reason for child undervaccination.•Vaccine refusal (vs. delay and time barriers) was the reason viewed most negatively.•Distancing attitudes were greater towards the undervaccinated child vs. the mother.•Evaluations mediated the effects of undervaccination reason on stigma.•Evaluations and stigma attitudes correlate with vaccination policy preference.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28578210</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anger ; Anti-Vaccination Movement - psychology ; Attitude to Health ; Attitudes ; Blame ; Children ; Credibility ; Delayed ; Discrimination ; Female ; Fines ; Fines and penalties ; Health care policy ; Health Policy - trends ; Health problems ; Humans ; Immunization ; Internet ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mothers ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Policy ; Public attitudes ; Public health ; Public Opinion ; Refusal ; Research funding ; Social Distance ; Social Stigma ; Stigma ; Survey-embedded experiment ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Sympathy ; United States ; Vaccination - psychology ; Vaccinations ; Vaccine hesitancy ; Vaccines ; Vignette experiment ; Vignettes</subject><ispartof>Social science &amp; medicine (1982), 2017-07, Vol.185, p.127-136</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Jul 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-635d310cfed82df07a9a6da860b8d79ad228f80a218213379ff55b6e517a59ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-635d310cfed82df07a9a6da860b8d79ad228f80a218213379ff55b6e517a59ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953617303088$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27843,27901,27902,33751,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28578210$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carpiano, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitz, Nicholas S.</creatorcontrib><title>Public attitudes toward child undervaccination: A randomized experiment on evaluations, stigmatizing orientations, and support for policies</title><title>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>Child undervaccination is a complex public health problem and a contentious social and political issue. Efforts to increase vaccination coverage require understanding how the public evaluates different reasons for child undervaccination, which may influence attitudes, stigmatizing behaviors, and support for vaccination policies. We conducted a vignette experiment with a United States national online sample (n = 1469) to investigate how and why different undervaccination actions shape evaluations (blame, anger, sympathy, differentness, credibility, dangerousness), stigmatizing orientations (social distance, discrimination), and support for particular policies (e.g., research funding, belief exemptions, fines). Each participant was randomly assigned to read one of four vignettes that described a mother who either refused vaccines, delayed vaccines, encountered social barriers to obtaining vaccines, or was up-to-date on vaccines for her child. Compared to the up-to-date condition, each undervaccination action predicted significantly more negative evaluations and stigmatizing orientations. Vaccine refusal was the most negatively appraised. Differences in social distance and discrimination were explained by negative evaluations about the parent. These evaluations and orientations predicted support for a range of policies. Negative parental evaluations were associated with increased support for more severe policies. We discuss the implications of these findings for addressing undervaccination and informing health scholarship on stigma. •Generally, respondents negatively evaluated each reason for child undervaccination.•Vaccine refusal (vs. delay and time barriers) was the reason viewed most negatively.•Distancing attitudes were greater towards the undervaccinated child vs. the mother.•Evaluations mediated the effects of undervaccination reason on stigma.•Evaluations and stigma attitudes correlate with vaccination policy preference.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anger</subject><subject>Anti-Vaccination Movement - psychology</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Blame</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Delayed</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fines</subject><subject>Fines and penalties</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health Policy - trends</subject><subject>Health problems</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Public attitudes</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Refusal</subject><subject>Research funding</subject><subject>Social Distance</subject><subject>Social Stigma</subject><subject>Stigma</subject><subject>Survey-embedded experiment</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Sympathy</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Vaccination - psychology</subject><subject>Vaccinations</subject><subject>Vaccine hesitancy</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Vignette experiment</subject><subject>Vignettes</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2OFCEUhYnROO3oKyiJGxdWeSmagnLXmfiXTKILXRMabo10qqEEqtV5BV9a2p524cYVIfc7h8M9hDxj0DJg_atdm6PN1u_RtR0w2YJoga3vkRVTkjeCr-V9soJOymYQvL8gj3LeAQADxR-Si04JqToGK_Lr07KdvKWmFF8Wh5mW-N0kR-1XPzm6BIfpYKz1wRQfw2u6ockEF_f-Fh3FHzOmGiIUGgPFg5mWP1h-SXPxN_t6ufXhhsbkK3MeVT3NyzzHVOgYE51jTeAxPyYPRjNlfHJ3XpIvb998vnrfXH989-Fqc91YPgyl6blwnIEd0anOjSDNYHpnVA9b5eRgXNepUYHpWP0i53IYRyG2PQomjRjQ8kvy4uQ7p_htwVz03meL02QCxiVrNkDP1p3irKLP_0F3cUmhpqvUmnHVrxVUSp4om2LOCUc9162Y9FMz0Me-9E7_7Usf-9IgdO2rKp_e-S_b4-ysOxdUgc0JwLqQg8ekqwsGi84ntEW76P_7yG-s2649</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Carpiano, Richard M.</creator><creator>Fitz, Nicholas S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Public attitudes toward child undervaccination: A randomized experiment on evaluations, stigmatizing orientations, and support for policies</title><author>Carpiano, Richard M. ; Fitz, Nicholas S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-635d310cfed82df07a9a6da860b8d79ad228f80a218213379ff55b6e517a59ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anger</topic><topic>Anti-Vaccination Movement - psychology</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Blame</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Delayed</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fines</topic><topic>Fines and penalties</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health Policy - trends</topic><topic>Health problems</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Public attitudes</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Refusal</topic><topic>Research funding</topic><topic>Social Distance</topic><topic>Social Stigma</topic><topic>Stigma</topic><topic>Survey-embedded experiment</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Sympathy</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Vaccination - psychology</topic><topic>Vaccinations</topic><topic>Vaccine hesitancy</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Vignette experiment</topic><topic>Vignettes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carpiano, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitz, Nicholas S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carpiano, Richard M.</au><au>Fitz, Nicholas S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public attitudes toward child undervaccination: A randomized experiment on evaluations, stigmatizing orientations, and support for policies</atitle><jtitle>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>185</volume><spage>127</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>127-136</pages><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><abstract>Child undervaccination is a complex public health problem and a contentious social and political issue. Efforts to increase vaccination coverage require understanding how the public evaluates different reasons for child undervaccination, which may influence attitudes, stigmatizing behaviors, and support for vaccination policies. We conducted a vignette experiment with a United States national online sample (n = 1469) to investigate how and why different undervaccination actions shape evaluations (blame, anger, sympathy, differentness, credibility, dangerousness), stigmatizing orientations (social distance, discrimination), and support for particular policies (e.g., research funding, belief exemptions, fines). Each participant was randomly assigned to read one of four vignettes that described a mother who either refused vaccines, delayed vaccines, encountered social barriers to obtaining vaccines, or was up-to-date on vaccines for her child. Compared to the up-to-date condition, each undervaccination action predicted significantly more negative evaluations and stigmatizing orientations. Vaccine refusal was the most negatively appraised. Differences in social distance and discrimination were explained by negative evaluations about the parent. These evaluations and orientations predicted support for a range of policies. Negative parental evaluations were associated with increased support for more severe policies. We discuss the implications of these findings for addressing undervaccination and informing health scholarship on stigma. •Generally, respondents negatively evaluated each reason for child undervaccination.•Vaccine refusal (vs. delay and time barriers) was the reason viewed most negatively.•Distancing attitudes were greater towards the undervaccinated child vs. the mother.•Evaluations mediated the effects of undervaccination reason on stigma.•Evaluations and stigma attitudes correlate with vaccination policy preference.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28578210</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.014</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-9536
ispartof Social science & medicine (1982), 2017-07, Vol.185, p.127-136
issn 0277-9536
1873-5347
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1906142831
source MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Anger
Anti-Vaccination Movement - psychology
Attitude to Health
Attitudes
Blame
Children
Credibility
Delayed
Discrimination
Female
Fines
Fines and penalties
Health care policy
Health Policy - trends
Health problems
Humans
Immunization
Internet
Male
Middle Aged
Mothers
Parents & parenting
Policy
Public attitudes
Public health
Public Opinion
Refusal
Research funding
Social Distance
Social Stigma
Stigma
Survey-embedded experiment
Surveys and Questionnaires
Sympathy
United States
Vaccination - psychology
Vaccinations
Vaccine hesitancy
Vaccines
Vignette experiment
Vignettes
title Public attitudes toward child undervaccination: A randomized experiment on evaluations, stigmatizing orientations, and support for policies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A51%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%20attitudes%20toward%20child%20undervaccination:%20A%20randomized%20experiment%20on%20evaluations,%20stigmatizing%20orientations,%20and%20support%20for%20policies&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=Carpiano,%20Richard%20M.&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=185&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=127-136&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1906142831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1941386480&rft_id=info:pmid/28578210&rft_els_id=S0277953617303088&rfr_iscdi=true