Public attitudes toward child undervaccination: A randomized experiment on evaluations, stigmatizing orientations, and support for policies
Child undervaccination is a complex public health problem and a contentious social and political issue. Efforts to increase vaccination coverage require understanding how the public evaluates different reasons for child undervaccination, which may influence attitudes, stigmatizing behaviors, and sup...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social science & medicine (1982) 2017-07, Vol.185, p.127-136 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 136 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 127 |
container_title | Social science & medicine (1982) |
container_volume | 185 |
creator | Carpiano, Richard M. Fitz, Nicholas S. |
description | Child undervaccination is a complex public health problem and a contentious social and political issue. Efforts to increase vaccination coverage require understanding how the public evaluates different reasons for child undervaccination, which may influence attitudes, stigmatizing behaviors, and support for vaccination policies. We conducted a vignette experiment with a United States national online sample (n = 1469) to investigate how and why different undervaccination actions shape evaluations (blame, anger, sympathy, differentness, credibility, dangerousness), stigmatizing orientations (social distance, discrimination), and support for particular policies (e.g., research funding, belief exemptions, fines). Each participant was randomly assigned to read one of four vignettes that described a mother who either refused vaccines, delayed vaccines, encountered social barriers to obtaining vaccines, or was up-to-date on vaccines for her child. Compared to the up-to-date condition, each undervaccination action predicted significantly more negative evaluations and stigmatizing orientations. Vaccine refusal was the most negatively appraised. Differences in social distance and discrimination were explained by negative evaluations about the parent. These evaluations and orientations predicted support for a range of policies. Negative parental evaluations were associated with increased support for more severe policies. We discuss the implications of these findings for addressing undervaccination and informing health scholarship on stigma.
•Generally, respondents negatively evaluated each reason for child undervaccination.•Vaccine refusal (vs. delay and time barriers) was the reason viewed most negatively.•Distancing attitudes were greater towards the undervaccinated child vs. the mother.•Evaluations mediated the effects of undervaccination reason on stigma.•Evaluations and stigma attitudes correlate with vaccination policy preference. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1906142831</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953617303088</els_id><sourcerecordid>1906142831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-635d310cfed82df07a9a6da860b8d79ad228f80a218213379ff55b6e517a59ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2OFCEUhYnROO3oKyiJGxdWeSmagnLXmfiXTKILXRMabo10qqEEqtV5BV9a2p524cYVIfc7h8M9hDxj0DJg_atdm6PN1u_RtR0w2YJoga3vkRVTkjeCr-V9soJOymYQvL8gj3LeAQADxR-Si04JqToGK_Lr07KdvKWmFF8Wh5mW-N0kR-1XPzm6BIfpYKz1wRQfw2u6ockEF_f-Fh3FHzOmGiIUGgPFg5mWP1h-SXPxN_t6ufXhhsbkK3MeVT3NyzzHVOgYE51jTeAxPyYPRjNlfHJ3XpIvb998vnrfXH989-Fqc91YPgyl6blwnIEd0anOjSDNYHpnVA9b5eRgXNepUYHpWP0i53IYRyG2PQomjRjQ8kvy4uQ7p_htwVz03meL02QCxiVrNkDP1p3irKLP_0F3cUmhpqvUmnHVrxVUSp4om2LOCUc9162Y9FMz0Me-9E7_7Usf-9IgdO2rKp_e-S_b4-ysOxdUgc0JwLqQg8ekqwsGi84ntEW76P_7yG-s2649</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1941386480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Public attitudes toward child undervaccination: A randomized experiment on evaluations, stigmatizing orientations, and support for policies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Carpiano, Richard M. ; Fitz, Nicholas S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Carpiano, Richard M. ; Fitz, Nicholas S.</creatorcontrib><description>Child undervaccination is a complex public health problem and a contentious social and political issue. Efforts to increase vaccination coverage require understanding how the public evaluates different reasons for child undervaccination, which may influence attitudes, stigmatizing behaviors, and support for vaccination policies. We conducted a vignette experiment with a United States national online sample (n = 1469) to investigate how and why different undervaccination actions shape evaluations (blame, anger, sympathy, differentness, credibility, dangerousness), stigmatizing orientations (social distance, discrimination), and support for particular policies (e.g., research funding, belief exemptions, fines). Each participant was randomly assigned to read one of four vignettes that described a mother who either refused vaccines, delayed vaccines, encountered social barriers to obtaining vaccines, or was up-to-date on vaccines for her child. Compared to the up-to-date condition, each undervaccination action predicted significantly more negative evaluations and stigmatizing orientations. Vaccine refusal was the most negatively appraised. Differences in social distance and discrimination were explained by negative evaluations about the parent. These evaluations and orientations predicted support for a range of policies. Negative parental evaluations were associated with increased support for more severe policies. We discuss the implications of these findings for addressing undervaccination and informing health scholarship on stigma.
•Generally, respondents negatively evaluated each reason for child undervaccination.•Vaccine refusal (vs. delay and time barriers) was the reason viewed most negatively.•Distancing attitudes were greater towards the undervaccinated child vs. the mother.•Evaluations mediated the effects of undervaccination reason on stigma.•Evaluations and stigma attitudes correlate with vaccination policy preference.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28578210</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anger ; Anti-Vaccination Movement - psychology ; Attitude to Health ; Attitudes ; Blame ; Children ; Credibility ; Delayed ; Discrimination ; Female ; Fines ; Fines and penalties ; Health care policy ; Health Policy - trends ; Health problems ; Humans ; Immunization ; Internet ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mothers ; Parents & parenting ; Policy ; Public attitudes ; Public health ; Public Opinion ; Refusal ; Research funding ; Social Distance ; Social Stigma ; Stigma ; Survey-embedded experiment ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Sympathy ; United States ; Vaccination - psychology ; Vaccinations ; Vaccine hesitancy ; Vaccines ; Vignette experiment ; Vignettes</subject><ispartof>Social science & medicine (1982), 2017-07, Vol.185, p.127-136</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Jul 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-635d310cfed82df07a9a6da860b8d79ad228f80a218213379ff55b6e517a59ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-635d310cfed82df07a9a6da860b8d79ad228f80a218213379ff55b6e517a59ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953617303088$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27843,27901,27902,33751,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28578210$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carpiano, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitz, Nicholas S.</creatorcontrib><title>Public attitudes toward child undervaccination: A randomized experiment on evaluations, stigmatizing orientations, and support for policies</title><title>Social science & medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>Child undervaccination is a complex public health problem and a contentious social and political issue. Efforts to increase vaccination coverage require understanding how the public evaluates different reasons for child undervaccination, which may influence attitudes, stigmatizing behaviors, and support for vaccination policies. We conducted a vignette experiment with a United States national online sample (n = 1469) to investigate how and why different undervaccination actions shape evaluations (blame, anger, sympathy, differentness, credibility, dangerousness), stigmatizing orientations (social distance, discrimination), and support for particular policies (e.g., research funding, belief exemptions, fines). Each participant was randomly assigned to read one of four vignettes that described a mother who either refused vaccines, delayed vaccines, encountered social barriers to obtaining vaccines, or was up-to-date on vaccines for her child. Compared to the up-to-date condition, each undervaccination action predicted significantly more negative evaluations and stigmatizing orientations. Vaccine refusal was the most negatively appraised. Differences in social distance and discrimination were explained by negative evaluations about the parent. These evaluations and orientations predicted support for a range of policies. Negative parental evaluations were associated with increased support for more severe policies. We discuss the implications of these findings for addressing undervaccination and informing health scholarship on stigma.
•Generally, respondents negatively evaluated each reason for child undervaccination.•Vaccine refusal (vs. delay and time barriers) was the reason viewed most negatively.•Distancing attitudes were greater towards the undervaccinated child vs. the mother.•Evaluations mediated the effects of undervaccination reason on stigma.•Evaluations and stigma attitudes correlate with vaccination policy preference.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anger</subject><subject>Anti-Vaccination Movement - psychology</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Blame</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Delayed</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fines</subject><subject>Fines and penalties</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health Policy - trends</subject><subject>Health problems</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Public attitudes</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Refusal</subject><subject>Research funding</subject><subject>Social Distance</subject><subject>Social Stigma</subject><subject>Stigma</subject><subject>Survey-embedded experiment</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Sympathy</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Vaccination - psychology</subject><subject>Vaccinations</subject><subject>Vaccine hesitancy</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Vignette experiment</subject><subject>Vignettes</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2OFCEUhYnROO3oKyiJGxdWeSmagnLXmfiXTKILXRMabo10qqEEqtV5BV9a2p524cYVIfc7h8M9hDxj0DJg_atdm6PN1u_RtR0w2YJoga3vkRVTkjeCr-V9soJOymYQvL8gj3LeAQADxR-Si04JqToGK_Lr07KdvKWmFF8Wh5mW-N0kR-1XPzm6BIfpYKz1wRQfw2u6ockEF_f-Fh3FHzOmGiIUGgPFg5mWP1h-SXPxN_t6ufXhhsbkK3MeVT3NyzzHVOgYE51jTeAxPyYPRjNlfHJ3XpIvb998vnrfXH989-Fqc91YPgyl6blwnIEd0anOjSDNYHpnVA9b5eRgXNepUYHpWP0i53IYRyG2PQomjRjQ8kvy4uQ7p_htwVz03meL02QCxiVrNkDP1p3irKLP_0F3cUmhpqvUmnHVrxVUSp4om2LOCUc9162Y9FMz0Me-9E7_7Usf-9IgdO2rKp_e-S_b4-ysOxdUgc0JwLqQg8ekqwsGi84ntEW76P_7yG-s2649</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Carpiano, Richard M.</creator><creator>Fitz, Nicholas S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Public attitudes toward child undervaccination: A randomized experiment on evaluations, stigmatizing orientations, and support for policies</title><author>Carpiano, Richard M. ; Fitz, Nicholas S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-635d310cfed82df07a9a6da860b8d79ad228f80a218213379ff55b6e517a59ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anger</topic><topic>Anti-Vaccination Movement - psychology</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Blame</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Delayed</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fines</topic><topic>Fines and penalties</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health Policy - trends</topic><topic>Health problems</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Public attitudes</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Refusal</topic><topic>Research funding</topic><topic>Social Distance</topic><topic>Social Stigma</topic><topic>Stigma</topic><topic>Survey-embedded experiment</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Sympathy</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Vaccination - psychology</topic><topic>Vaccinations</topic><topic>Vaccine hesitancy</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Vignette experiment</topic><topic>Vignettes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carpiano, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitz, Nicholas S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carpiano, Richard M.</au><au>Fitz, Nicholas S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Public attitudes toward child undervaccination: A randomized experiment on evaluations, stigmatizing orientations, and support for policies</atitle><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>185</volume><spage>127</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>127-136</pages><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><abstract>Child undervaccination is a complex public health problem and a contentious social and political issue. Efforts to increase vaccination coverage require understanding how the public evaluates different reasons for child undervaccination, which may influence attitudes, stigmatizing behaviors, and support for vaccination policies. We conducted a vignette experiment with a United States national online sample (n = 1469) to investigate how and why different undervaccination actions shape evaluations (blame, anger, sympathy, differentness, credibility, dangerousness), stigmatizing orientations (social distance, discrimination), and support for particular policies (e.g., research funding, belief exemptions, fines). Each participant was randomly assigned to read one of four vignettes that described a mother who either refused vaccines, delayed vaccines, encountered social barriers to obtaining vaccines, or was up-to-date on vaccines for her child. Compared to the up-to-date condition, each undervaccination action predicted significantly more negative evaluations and stigmatizing orientations. Vaccine refusal was the most negatively appraised. Differences in social distance and discrimination were explained by negative evaluations about the parent. These evaluations and orientations predicted support for a range of policies. Negative parental evaluations were associated with increased support for more severe policies. We discuss the implications of these findings for addressing undervaccination and informing health scholarship on stigma.
•Generally, respondents negatively evaluated each reason for child undervaccination.•Vaccine refusal (vs. delay and time barriers) was the reason viewed most negatively.•Distancing attitudes were greater towards the undervaccinated child vs. the mother.•Evaluations mediated the effects of undervaccination reason on stigma.•Evaluations and stigma attitudes correlate with vaccination policy preference.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28578210</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.014</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-9536 |
ispartof | Social science & medicine (1982), 2017-07, Vol.185, p.127-136 |
issn | 0277-9536 1873-5347 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1906142831 |
source | MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Anger Anti-Vaccination Movement - psychology Attitude to Health Attitudes Blame Children Credibility Delayed Discrimination Female Fines Fines and penalties Health care policy Health Policy - trends Health problems Humans Immunization Internet Male Middle Aged Mothers Parents & parenting Policy Public attitudes Public health Public Opinion Refusal Research funding Social Distance Social Stigma Stigma Survey-embedded experiment Surveys and Questionnaires Sympathy United States Vaccination - psychology Vaccinations Vaccine hesitancy Vaccines Vignette experiment Vignettes |
title | Public attitudes toward child undervaccination: A randomized experiment on evaluations, stigmatizing orientations, and support for policies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A51%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Public%20attitudes%20toward%20child%20undervaccination:%20A%20randomized%20experiment%20on%20evaluations,%20stigmatizing%20orientations,%20and%20support%20for%20policies&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=Carpiano,%20Richard%20M.&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=185&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=127-136&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1906142831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1941386480&rft_id=info:pmid/28578210&rft_els_id=S0277953617303088&rfr_iscdi=true |