Catatonia in an inpatient gerontopsychiatric population
Abstract There are limited data on the prevalence of catatonia in the elderly. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of catatonia in elderly patients (=/>65 years) acutely admitted to the psychiatric unit of a general hospital. All patients aged 65 years and above admitted to a ge...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychiatry research 2017-09, Vol.255, p.215-218 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 218 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 215 |
container_title | Psychiatry research |
container_volume | 255 |
creator | Takács, R Asztalos, M Ungvari, GS Gazdag, G |
description | Abstract There are limited data on the prevalence of catatonia in the elderly. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of catatonia in elderly patients (=/>65 years) acutely admitted to the psychiatric unit of a general hospital. All patients aged 65 years and above admitted to a general hospital psychiatric unit over a 4-month period were screened for catatonia with the 14-item Bush-Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument (BFCSI). Patients with a minimum of 2 symptoms on the BFCSI were rated with the 23-item Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS). Catatonia was simultaneously evaluated according to DSM-5 criteria. Clinical diagnoses were established using the validated Hungarian versions of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Disorders, the Mini Mental State Examination and the Clock Drawing Test. Ninety-eight (28.1%) of the 342 patients admitted to the psychiatric unit during the study period were above 65 years of age; 11 (11.22%) and 6 (6.12%) patients were classified as having catatonia according to the BFCRS and DSM-5 criteria, respectively. The majority of the patients had catatonia due to a medical condition. A significant minority of gerontopsychiatric inpatients present with catatonia. Dementia was not a risk factor for catatonia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.05.039 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1906142557</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0165178116317802</els_id><sourcerecordid>1906142557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-4bf1a54e49793c5d3c8c79b7918fe3fb2241ea2cb2b49c3891655a0af5aa92ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1vGyEQhlHVqHGS_gXLx152w8BilkvVysqXFCmHJGfE4tkWdw1bYCP53wfXcQ-55DIjDe_MOzxDyBxoDRSWl5t6TDv7O2KqGQVZU1FTrj6RGbSSVRIY_0xmRSgqkC2ckrOUNpRSBkp9IaesFaXawozIlckmB-_MwvmF8SWOJjv0efELY_A5_PNxJkdnF2MYp6E8B39BTnozJPz6ls_J8_XV0-q2un-4uVv9vK9sw3iumq4HIxpslFTcijW3rZWqkwraHnnfMdYAGmY71jXK8laVjYWhphfGKIaWn5Nvh7ljDH8nTFlvXbI4DMZjmJIGRZfQMCFkkS4PUhtDShF7PUa3NXGngeo9NL3RR2h6D01ToQu00jh_85i6La7_tx0pFcGPgwDLT18cRp1sQWRx7SLarNfBfezx_d0IOzjvrBn-4A7TJkzRF44adGKa6sf96faXgyUviTL-Clmklr0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1906142557</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Catatonia in an inpatient gerontopsychiatric population</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Takács, R ; Asztalos, M ; Ungvari, GS ; Gazdag, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Takács, R ; Asztalos, M ; Ungvari, GS ; Gazdag, G</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract There are limited data on the prevalence of catatonia in the elderly. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of catatonia in elderly patients (=/>65 years) acutely admitted to the psychiatric unit of a general hospital. All patients aged 65 years and above admitted to a general hospital psychiatric unit over a 4-month period were screened for catatonia with the 14-item Bush-Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument (BFCSI). Patients with a minimum of 2 symptoms on the BFCSI were rated with the 23-item Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS). Catatonia was simultaneously evaluated according to DSM-5 criteria. Clinical diagnoses were established using the validated Hungarian versions of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Disorders, the Mini Mental State Examination and the Clock Drawing Test. Ninety-eight (28.1%) of the 342 patients admitted to the psychiatric unit during the study period were above 65 years of age; 11 (11.22%) and 6 (6.12%) patients were classified as having catatonia according to the BFCRS and DSM-5 criteria, respectively. The majority of the patients had catatonia due to a medical condition. A significant minority of gerontopsychiatric inpatients present with catatonia. Dementia was not a risk factor for catatonia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-1781</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7123</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.05.039</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28578181</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Catatonia - diagnosis ; Catatonia - psychology ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ; Female ; Geriatric Assessment - methods ; Hospitalization - trends ; Hospitals, General - trends ; Humans ; Inpatients - psychology ; Male ; Psychiatry</subject><ispartof>Psychiatry research, 2017-09, Vol.255, p.215-218</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-4bf1a54e49793c5d3c8c79b7918fe3fb2241ea2cb2b49c3891655a0af5aa92ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-4bf1a54e49793c5d3c8c79b7918fe3fb2241ea2cb2b49c3891655a0af5aa92ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.05.039$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28578181$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Takács, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asztalos, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ungvari, GS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazdag, G</creatorcontrib><title>Catatonia in an inpatient gerontopsychiatric population</title><title>Psychiatry research</title><addtitle>Psychiatry Res</addtitle><description>Abstract There are limited data on the prevalence of catatonia in the elderly. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of catatonia in elderly patients (=/>65 years) acutely admitted to the psychiatric unit of a general hospital. All patients aged 65 years and above admitted to a general hospital psychiatric unit over a 4-month period were screened for catatonia with the 14-item Bush-Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument (BFCSI). Patients with a minimum of 2 symptoms on the BFCSI were rated with the 23-item Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS). Catatonia was simultaneously evaluated according to DSM-5 criteria. Clinical diagnoses were established using the validated Hungarian versions of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Disorders, the Mini Mental State Examination and the Clock Drawing Test. Ninety-eight (28.1%) of the 342 patients admitted to the psychiatric unit during the study period were above 65 years of age; 11 (11.22%) and 6 (6.12%) patients were classified as having catatonia according to the BFCRS and DSM-5 criteria, respectively. The majority of the patients had catatonia due to a medical condition. A significant minority of gerontopsychiatric inpatients present with catatonia. Dementia was not a risk factor for catatonia.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Catatonia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Catatonia - psychology</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Hospitalization - trends</subject><subject>Hospitals, General - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatients - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><issn>0165-1781</issn><issn>1872-7123</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1vGyEQhlHVqHGS_gXLx152w8BilkvVysqXFCmHJGfE4tkWdw1bYCP53wfXcQ-55DIjDe_MOzxDyBxoDRSWl5t6TDv7O2KqGQVZU1FTrj6RGbSSVRIY_0xmRSgqkC2ckrOUNpRSBkp9IaesFaXawozIlckmB-_MwvmF8SWOJjv0efELY_A5_PNxJkdnF2MYp6E8B39BTnozJPz6ls_J8_XV0-q2un-4uVv9vK9sw3iumq4HIxpslFTcijW3rZWqkwraHnnfMdYAGmY71jXK8laVjYWhphfGKIaWn5Nvh7ljDH8nTFlvXbI4DMZjmJIGRZfQMCFkkS4PUhtDShF7PUa3NXGngeo9NL3RR2h6D01ToQu00jh_85i6La7_tx0pFcGPgwDLT18cRp1sQWRx7SLarNfBfezx_d0IOzjvrBn-4A7TJkzRF44adGKa6sf96faXgyUviTL-Clmklr0</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Takács, R</creator><creator>Asztalos, M</creator><creator>Ungvari, GS</creator><creator>Gazdag, G</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Catatonia in an inpatient gerontopsychiatric population</title><author>Takács, R ; Asztalos, M ; Ungvari, GS ; Gazdag, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-4bf1a54e49793c5d3c8c79b7918fe3fb2241ea2cb2b49c3891655a0af5aa92ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Catatonia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Catatonia - psychology</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Hospitalization - trends</topic><topic>Hospitals, General - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatients - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takács, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asztalos, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ungvari, GS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gazdag, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychiatry research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takács, R</au><au>Asztalos, M</au><au>Ungvari, GS</au><au>Gazdag, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Catatonia in an inpatient gerontopsychiatric population</atitle><jtitle>Psychiatry research</jtitle><addtitle>Psychiatry Res</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>255</volume><spage>215</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>215-218</pages><issn>0165-1781</issn><eissn>1872-7123</eissn><abstract>Abstract There are limited data on the prevalence of catatonia in the elderly. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of catatonia in elderly patients (=/>65 years) acutely admitted to the psychiatric unit of a general hospital. All patients aged 65 years and above admitted to a general hospital psychiatric unit over a 4-month period were screened for catatonia with the 14-item Bush-Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument (BFCSI). Patients with a minimum of 2 symptoms on the BFCSI were rated with the 23-item Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS). Catatonia was simultaneously evaluated according to DSM-5 criteria. Clinical diagnoses were established using the validated Hungarian versions of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Disorders, the Mini Mental State Examination and the Clock Drawing Test. Ninety-eight (28.1%) of the 342 patients admitted to the psychiatric unit during the study period were above 65 years of age; 11 (11.22%) and 6 (6.12%) patients were classified as having catatonia according to the BFCRS and DSM-5 criteria, respectively. The majority of the patients had catatonia due to a medical condition. A significant minority of gerontopsychiatric inpatients present with catatonia. Dementia was not a risk factor for catatonia.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28578181</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.psychres.2017.05.039</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-1781 |
ispartof | Psychiatry research, 2017-09, Vol.255, p.215-218 |
issn | 0165-1781 1872-7123 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1906142557 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Catatonia - diagnosis Catatonia - psychology Cross-Sectional Studies Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Female Geriatric Assessment - methods Hospitalization - trends Hospitals, General - trends Humans Inpatients - psychology Male Psychiatry |
title | Catatonia in an inpatient gerontopsychiatric population |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T18%3A37%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Catatonia%20in%20an%20inpatient%20gerontopsychiatric%20population&rft.jtitle=Psychiatry%20research&rft.au=Tak%C3%A1cs,%20R&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=255&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=215-218&rft.issn=0165-1781&rft.eissn=1872-7123&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.05.039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1906142557%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1906142557&rft_id=info:pmid/28578181&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0165178116317802&rfr_iscdi=true |