Application challenges of the new EU Clinical Trials Regulation
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the challenges of the upcoming policy change in the field of clinical drug trials due to the shift from the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC to the new Clinical Trials Regulation 536/2014, adopted in 2014. Although it is expected that the new EU Cl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of clinical pharmacology 2017-07, Vol.73 (7), p.795-798 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 798 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 795 |
container_title | European journal of clinical pharmacology |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Gefenas, Eugenijus Cekanauskaite, Asta Lekstutiene, Jurate Lukaseviciene, Vilma |
description | Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the challenges of the upcoming policy change in the field of clinical drug trials due to the shift from the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC to the new Clinical Trials Regulation 536/2014, adopted in 2014. Although it is expected that the new EU Clinical Trials Regulation will increase Europe’s competitiveness in clinical research, the paper argues that some measures to assure protection of research subjects should be taken before the Regulation comes into application in 2018.
Methods
The methods used in this paper are comparative analysis of legal documents and related academic papers.
Results
The new Regulation serves as an efficient means to harmonize the clinical drug trial evaluation procedures across the EU. However, its application also raises potential challenges regarding interests and safety of research subjects: first, due to the possibility of skipping the assessment and balancing of benefits and risks from the scope of ethical review and limiting such a review to only Part II issues of the assessment report; second, due to direct applicability of the Regulation’s rather vague and too general requirements for investigator’s qualifications which does not allow the assessors (ethics committees and (or) competent authorities) to introduce higher qualification requirements for the investigators conducting high-risk clinical drug trials in the national legislation.
Conclusions
There is an urgent need to raise awareness and facilitate debate on potential application challenges of the new Regulation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00228-017-2267-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1904902930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1910235188</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9d6bc2d109d99a3847c47fe922d6841d8cdf746cda61298765cd2ac1d9f9647c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMobk5_gDdS8Mab6jlpmzRXMsb8gIEg23XoknTryNqarIj_3sxOEcGrwMnzvufwEHKJcIsA_M4DUJrHgDymlPGYHZEhpgmNEVI8JkOABGMmOAzImfcbAMwEJKdkQPOM8QzokNyP29ZWqthVTR2pdWGtqVfGR00Z7dYmqs17NF1EE1vVAbLR3FWF9dGrWXX2K3NOTsowMReHd0QWD9P55CmevTw-T8azWCWc7mKh2VJRjSC0EEWSp1ylvDSCUs3yFHWudMlTpnTBkIqcs0xpWijUohQswMmI3PS9rWveOuN3clt5ZawtatN0XqKAVAAVCQT0-g-6aTpXh-sChUCTDPM8UNhTyjXeO1PK1lXbwn1IBLm3K3u7MtiVe7uShczVoblbbo3-SXzrDADtAR--gkf3a_W_rZ8hqIK9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1910235188</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application challenges of the new EU Clinical Trials Regulation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Gefenas, Eugenijus ; Cekanauskaite, Asta ; Lekstutiene, Jurate ; Lukaseviciene, Vilma</creator><creatorcontrib>Gefenas, Eugenijus ; Cekanauskaite, Asta ; Lekstutiene, Jurate ; Lukaseviciene, Vilma</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the challenges of the upcoming policy change in the field of clinical drug trials due to the shift from the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC to the new Clinical Trials Regulation 536/2014, adopted in 2014. Although it is expected that the new EU Clinical Trials Regulation will increase Europe’s competitiveness in clinical research, the paper argues that some measures to assure protection of research subjects should be taken before the Regulation comes into application in 2018.
Methods
The methods used in this paper are comparative analysis of legal documents and related academic papers.
Results
The new Regulation serves as an efficient means to harmonize the clinical drug trial evaluation procedures across the EU. However, its application also raises potential challenges regarding interests and safety of research subjects: first, due to the possibility of skipping the assessment and balancing of benefits and risks from the scope of ethical review and limiting such a review to only Part II issues of the assessment report; second, due to direct applicability of the Regulation’s rather vague and too general requirements for investigator’s qualifications which does not allow the assessors (ethics committees and (or) competent authorities) to introduce higher qualification requirements for the investigators conducting high-risk clinical drug trials in the national legislation.
Conclusions
There is an urgent need to raise awareness and facilitate debate on potential application challenges of the new Regulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-6970</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1041</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00228-017-2267-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28567502</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Clinical trials ; Clinical Trials as Topic - legislation & jurisprudence ; Committees ; Comparative analysis ; Competitiveness ; Ethical standards ; Ethics ; European Union ; Government Regulation ; Humans ; Legislation ; Medical ethics ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Point of View ; Research ethics ; Reviews ; Risk factors ; Safety</subject><ispartof>European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017-07, Vol.73 (7), p.795-798</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017</rights><rights>European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9d6bc2d109d99a3847c47fe922d6841d8cdf746cda61298765cd2ac1d9f9647c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9d6bc2d109d99a3847c47fe922d6841d8cdf746cda61298765cd2ac1d9f9647c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00228-017-2267-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00228-017-2267-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28567502$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gefenas, Eugenijus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cekanauskaite, Asta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lekstutiene, Jurate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukaseviciene, Vilma</creatorcontrib><title>Application challenges of the new EU Clinical Trials Regulation</title><title>European journal of clinical pharmacology</title><addtitle>Eur J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the challenges of the upcoming policy change in the field of clinical drug trials due to the shift from the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC to the new Clinical Trials Regulation 536/2014, adopted in 2014. Although it is expected that the new EU Clinical Trials Regulation will increase Europe’s competitiveness in clinical research, the paper argues that some measures to assure protection of research subjects should be taken before the Regulation comes into application in 2018.
Methods
The methods used in this paper are comparative analysis of legal documents and related academic papers.
Results
The new Regulation serves as an efficient means to harmonize the clinical drug trial evaluation procedures across the EU. However, its application also raises potential challenges regarding interests and safety of research subjects: first, due to the possibility of skipping the assessment and balancing of benefits and risks from the scope of ethical review and limiting such a review to only Part II issues of the assessment report; second, due to direct applicability of the Regulation’s rather vague and too general requirements for investigator’s qualifications which does not allow the assessors (ethics committees and (or) competent authorities) to introduce higher qualification requirements for the investigators conducting high-risk clinical drug trials in the national legislation.
Conclusions
There is an urgent need to raise awareness and facilitate debate on potential application challenges of the new Regulation.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Ethical standards</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Government Regulation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Point of View</subject><subject>Research ethics</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Safety</subject><issn>0031-6970</issn><issn>1432-1041</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMobk5_gDdS8Mab6jlpmzRXMsb8gIEg23XoknTryNqarIj_3sxOEcGrwMnzvufwEHKJcIsA_M4DUJrHgDymlPGYHZEhpgmNEVI8JkOABGMmOAzImfcbAMwEJKdkQPOM8QzokNyP29ZWqthVTR2pdWGtqVfGR00Z7dYmqs17NF1EE1vVAbLR3FWF9dGrWXX2K3NOTsowMReHd0QWD9P55CmevTw-T8azWCWc7mKh2VJRjSC0EEWSp1ylvDSCUs3yFHWudMlTpnTBkIqcs0xpWijUohQswMmI3PS9rWveOuN3clt5ZawtatN0XqKAVAAVCQT0-g-6aTpXh-sChUCTDPM8UNhTyjXeO1PK1lXbwn1IBLm3K3u7MtiVe7uShczVoblbbo3-SXzrDADtAR--gkf3a_W_rZ8hqIK9</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Gefenas, Eugenijus</creator><creator>Cekanauskaite, Asta</creator><creator>Lekstutiene, Jurate</creator><creator>Lukaseviciene, Vilma</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Application challenges of the new EU Clinical Trials Regulation</title><author>Gefenas, Eugenijus ; Cekanauskaite, Asta ; Lekstutiene, Jurate ; Lukaseviciene, Vilma</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9d6bc2d109d99a3847c47fe922d6841d8cdf746cda61298765cd2ac1d9f9647c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Ethical standards</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Government Regulation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Point of View</topic><topic>Research ethics</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Safety</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gefenas, Eugenijus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cekanauskaite, Asta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lekstutiene, Jurate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukaseviciene, Vilma</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gefenas, Eugenijus</au><au>Cekanauskaite, Asta</au><au>Lekstutiene, Jurate</au><au>Lukaseviciene, Vilma</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application challenges of the new EU Clinical Trials Regulation</atitle><jtitle>European journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Clin Pharmacol</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>795</spage><epage>798</epage><pages>795-798</pages><issn>0031-6970</issn><eissn>1432-1041</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the challenges of the upcoming policy change in the field of clinical drug trials due to the shift from the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC to the new Clinical Trials Regulation 536/2014, adopted in 2014. Although it is expected that the new EU Clinical Trials Regulation will increase Europe’s competitiveness in clinical research, the paper argues that some measures to assure protection of research subjects should be taken before the Regulation comes into application in 2018.
Methods
The methods used in this paper are comparative analysis of legal documents and related academic papers.
Results
The new Regulation serves as an efficient means to harmonize the clinical drug trial evaluation procedures across the EU. However, its application also raises potential challenges regarding interests and safety of research subjects: first, due to the possibility of skipping the assessment and balancing of benefits and risks from the scope of ethical review and limiting such a review to only Part II issues of the assessment report; second, due to direct applicability of the Regulation’s rather vague and too general requirements for investigator’s qualifications which does not allow the assessors (ethics committees and (or) competent authorities) to introduce higher qualification requirements for the investigators conducting high-risk clinical drug trials in the national legislation.
Conclusions
There is an urgent need to raise awareness and facilitate debate on potential application challenges of the new Regulation.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28567502</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00228-017-2267-6</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-6970 |
ispartof | European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017-07, Vol.73 (7), p.795-798 |
issn | 0031-6970 1432-1041 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1904902930 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Clinical trials Clinical Trials as Topic - legislation & jurisprudence Committees Comparative analysis Competitiveness Ethical standards Ethics European Union Government Regulation Humans Legislation Medical ethics Pharmacology/Toxicology Point of View Research ethics Reviews Risk factors Safety |
title | Application challenges of the new EU Clinical Trials Regulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T13%3A14%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20challenges%20of%20the%20new%20EU%20Clinical%20Trials%20Regulation&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20clinical%20pharmacology&rft.au=Gefenas,%20Eugenijus&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=795&rft.epage=798&rft.pages=795-798&rft.issn=0031-6970&rft.eissn=1432-1041&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00228-017-2267-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1910235188%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1910235188&rft_id=info:pmid/28567502&rfr_iscdi=true |