Seeing What You Want to See: How Imprecise Uncertainty Ranges Enhance Motivated Reasoning

In this article, we consider a novel criterion for evaluating representations of uncertainty ranges, namely, the extent to which a representation enhances motivated reasoning. In two studies, we show that perceptions of the distribution underlying ambiguous numerical ranges are affected by the motiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Risk analysis 2017-03, Vol.37 (3), p.471-486
Hauptverfasser: Dieckmann, Nathan F., Gregory, Robin, Peters, Ellen, Hartman, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 486
container_issue 3
container_start_page 471
container_title Risk analysis
container_volume 37
creator Dieckmann, Nathan F.
Gregory, Robin
Peters, Ellen
Hartman, Robert
description In this article, we consider a novel criterion for evaluating representations of uncertainty ranges, namely, the extent to which a representation enhances motivated reasoning. In two studies, we show that perceptions of the distribution underlying ambiguous numerical ranges are affected by the motivations and worldviews of end users. This motivated reasoning effect remained after controlling for objective numeracy and fluid intelligence but was attenuated when the correct interpretation was made clear. We suggest that analysts and communicators explicitly consider the potential for motivated evaluation when evaluating uncertainty displays.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/risa.12639
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1904222368</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4321781453</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5259-8b13f574446090a232188bb084593f8d66315884d92da13b40c2807492d5b2ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0ctKJDEUBuAgI9peNj7AEHAjQmlycncnomODIrSKuCpSVSkt6U7apErptzdOq4tZ6GRzyOHjh8OP0A4lBzS_w9gle0BBMrOCRlQwU0gD_BcaEVBQcMZgHW2k9EQIJUSoNbQOSkqllByh-2vnOv-A7x5tj-_DgO-s73EfcN4f4fPwisezeXR1lxy-9bWLve18v8AT6x9cwqf-0eYtvgx992J71-CJsyn4HLmFVls7TW77Y26i27PTm5Pz4uLqz_jk-KKoBQhT6IqyVijOuSSGWGBAta4qorkwrNWNlIwKrXljoLGUVZzUoIni-SsqaFu2ifaWufMYngeX-nLWpdpNp9a7MKSSGsIBgEn9M9WGakGJhP-gwigghqlMd_-hT2GIPt-cldZGZyuz2l-qOoaUomvLeexmNi5KSsr3Gsv3Gsu_NWb8-yNyqGau-aKfvWVAl-C1m7rFN1HlZHx9vAx9AwxCo8I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1888981856</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seeing What You Want to See: How Imprecise Uncertainty Ranges Enhance Motivated Reasoning</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Dieckmann, Nathan F. ; Gregory, Robin ; Peters, Ellen ; Hartman, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Dieckmann, Nathan F. ; Gregory, Robin ; Peters, Ellen ; Hartman, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, we consider a novel criterion for evaluating representations of uncertainty ranges, namely, the extent to which a representation enhances motivated reasoning. In two studies, we show that perceptions of the distribution underlying ambiguous numerical ranges are affected by the motivations and worldviews of end users. This motivated reasoning effect remained after controlling for objective numeracy and fluid intelligence but was attenuated when the correct interpretation was made clear. We suggest that analysts and communicators explicitly consider the potential for motivated evaluation when evaluating uncertainty displays.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-4332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-6924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/risa.12639</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27667776</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Attenuation ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Displays ; End users ; Motivated reasoning ; Perception ; Perceptions ; Reasoning ; Representations ; Risk assessment ; risk communication ; Studies ; Uncertainty ; worldviews</subject><ispartof>Risk analysis, 2017-03, Vol.37 (3), p.471-486</ispartof><rights>2016 Society for Risk Analysis</rights><rights>2016 Society for Risk Analysis.</rights><rights>2017 Society for Risk Analysis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5259-8b13f574446090a232188bb084593f8d66315884d92da13b40c2807492d5b2ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5259-8b13f574446090a232188bb084593f8d66315884d92da13b40c2807492d5b2ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Frisa.12639$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Frisa.12639$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27667776$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dieckmann, Nathan F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregory, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartman, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Seeing What You Want to See: How Imprecise Uncertainty Ranges Enhance Motivated Reasoning</title><title>Risk analysis</title><addtitle>Risk Anal</addtitle><description>In this article, we consider a novel criterion for evaluating representations of uncertainty ranges, namely, the extent to which a representation enhances motivated reasoning. In two studies, we show that perceptions of the distribution underlying ambiguous numerical ranges are affected by the motivations and worldviews of end users. This motivated reasoning effect remained after controlling for objective numeracy and fluid intelligence but was attenuated when the correct interpretation was made clear. We suggest that analysts and communicators explicitly consider the potential for motivated evaluation when evaluating uncertainty displays.</description><subject>Attenuation</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Displays</subject><subject>End users</subject><subject>Motivated reasoning</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Representations</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>risk communication</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>worldviews</subject><issn>0272-4332</issn><issn>1539-6924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0ctKJDEUBuAgI9peNj7AEHAjQmlycncnomODIrSKuCpSVSkt6U7apErptzdOq4tZ6GRzyOHjh8OP0A4lBzS_w9gle0BBMrOCRlQwU0gD_BcaEVBQcMZgHW2k9EQIJUSoNbQOSkqllByh-2vnOv-A7x5tj-_DgO-s73EfcN4f4fPwisezeXR1lxy-9bWLve18v8AT6x9cwqf-0eYtvgx992J71-CJsyn4HLmFVls7TW77Y26i27PTm5Pz4uLqz_jk-KKoBQhT6IqyVijOuSSGWGBAta4qorkwrNWNlIwKrXljoLGUVZzUoIni-SsqaFu2ifaWufMYngeX-nLWpdpNp9a7MKSSGsIBgEn9M9WGakGJhP-gwigghqlMd_-hT2GIPt-cldZGZyuz2l-qOoaUomvLeexmNi5KSsr3Gsv3Gsu_NWb8-yNyqGau-aKfvWVAl-C1m7rFN1HlZHx9vAx9AwxCo8I</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>Dieckmann, Nathan F.</creator><creator>Gregory, Robin</creator><creator>Peters, Ellen</creator><creator>Hartman, Robert</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>Seeing What You Want to See: How Imprecise Uncertainty Ranges Enhance Motivated Reasoning</title><author>Dieckmann, Nathan F. ; Gregory, Robin ; Peters, Ellen ; Hartman, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5259-8b13f574446090a232188bb084593f8d66315884d92da13b40c2807492d5b2ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Attenuation</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Displays</topic><topic>End users</topic><topic>Motivated reasoning</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Representations</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>risk communication</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>worldviews</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dieckmann, Nathan F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregory, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartman, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dieckmann, Nathan F.</au><au>Gregory, Robin</au><au>Peters, Ellen</au><au>Hartman, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seeing What You Want to See: How Imprecise Uncertainty Ranges Enhance Motivated Reasoning</atitle><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle><addtitle>Risk Anal</addtitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>471</spage><epage>486</epage><pages>471-486</pages><issn>0272-4332</issn><eissn>1539-6924</eissn><abstract>In this article, we consider a novel criterion for evaluating representations of uncertainty ranges, namely, the extent to which a representation enhances motivated reasoning. In two studies, we show that perceptions of the distribution underlying ambiguous numerical ranges are affected by the motivations and worldviews of end users. This motivated reasoning effect remained after controlling for objective numeracy and fluid intelligence but was attenuated when the correct interpretation was made clear. We suggest that analysts and communicators explicitly consider the potential for motivated evaluation when evaluating uncertainty displays.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>27667776</pmid><doi>10.1111/risa.12639</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0272-4332
ispartof Risk analysis, 2017-03, Vol.37 (3), p.471-486
issn 0272-4332
1539-6924
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1904222368
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Attenuation
Cognition & reasoning
Computational fluid dynamics
Displays
End users
Motivated reasoning
Perception
Perceptions
Reasoning
Representations
Risk assessment
risk communication
Studies
Uncertainty
worldviews
title Seeing What You Want to See: How Imprecise Uncertainty Ranges Enhance Motivated Reasoning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T17%3A45%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seeing%20What%20You%20Want%20to%20See:%20How%20Imprecise%20Uncertainty%20Ranges%20Enhance%20Motivated%20Reasoning&rft.jtitle=Risk%20analysis&rft.au=Dieckmann,%20Nathan%20F.&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=471&rft.epage=486&rft.pages=471-486&rft.issn=0272-4332&rft.eissn=1539-6924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/risa.12639&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4321781453%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1888981856&rft_id=info:pmid/27667776&rfr_iscdi=true