Research on Evaluation Method Framework Model of Production Job Operability
The operability of production job is described from two aspects of operation process and cognitive psychological process through combining literature research with production practice. Based on the analysis of operation behavior, the evaluation method framework model of production job operability is...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ji xie gong cheng xue bao 2017-01, Vol.53 (4), p.198-212 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | chi ; eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 212 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 198 |
container_title | Ji xie gong cheng xue bao |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Kong, Fansen Ye, Zhenggeng |
description | The operability of production job is described from two aspects of operation process and cognitive psychological process through combining literature research with production practice. Based on the analysis of operation behavior, the evaluation method framework model of production job operability is established by considering time pressure. And the operational evaluation index and its calculation method are developed from six aspects: job space evaluation, job pose evaluation, action feature evaluation, information acquisition process evaluation, information processing evaluation and information output. The case study shows that the method is feasible and can be applied to many different fields when we select different weights. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3901/JME.2017.04.198 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1904214810</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1904214810</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2588-ca579cad8804906eb7a6310cbd9d58cc0132c7b1ecbb376ed0fa3ad3977977b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkD1PwzAURT2ARCnMrJZYWJI-x0nsjKhqgdKoCMFs-StqSloXOwH13-NSJqQn3TccXV0dhG4IpLQCMlnUszQDwlLIU1LxMzSCgrGkLHl5gS5D2ADQimVkhJ5fbbDS6zV2Ozz7kt0g-za-te3XzuC5l1v77fwHrp2xHXYNfvHODPoXWjiFV3vrpWq7tj9cofNGdsFe_-UYvc9nb9PHZLl6eJreLxOdFZwnWhas0tJwDnkFpVVMlpSAVqYyBdcaCM00U8RqpSgrrYFGUmniYBZPUTpGd6fevXefgw292LZB266TO-uGIEgFeUZyTiCit__QjRv8Lq4TGYECKCd5EanJidLeheBtI_a-3Up_EATEUaiIQsVRqIA81nP6AzWfafQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2105038145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Research on Evaluation Method Framework Model of Production Job Operability</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kong, Fansen ; Ye, Zhenggeng</creator><creatorcontrib>Kong, Fansen ; Ye, Zhenggeng</creatorcontrib><description>The operability of production job is described from two aspects of operation process and cognitive psychological process through combining literature research with production practice. Based on the analysis of operation behavior, the evaluation method framework model of production job operability is established by considering time pressure. And the operational evaluation index and its calculation method are developed from six aspects: job space evaluation, job pose evaluation, action feature evaluation, information acquisition process evaluation, information processing evaluation and information output. The case study shows that the method is feasible and can be applied to many different fields when we select different weights.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0577-6686</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3901/JME.2017.04.198</identifier><language>chi ; eng</language><publisher>Beijing: Chinese Mechanical Engineering Society (CMES)</publisher><subject>Chief executive officers ; Data processing ; Feasibility studies ; Mathematical models ; Mechanical engineering</subject><ispartof>Ji xie gong cheng xue bao, 2017-01, Vol.53 (4), p.198-212</ispartof><rights>Copyright Chinese Mechanical Engineering Society (CMES) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2588-ca579cad8804906eb7a6310cbd9d58cc0132c7b1ecbb376ed0fa3ad3977977b33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kong, Fansen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Zhenggeng</creatorcontrib><title>Research on Evaluation Method Framework Model of Production Job Operability</title><title>Ji xie gong cheng xue bao</title><description>The operability of production job is described from two aspects of operation process and cognitive psychological process through combining literature research with production practice. Based on the analysis of operation behavior, the evaluation method framework model of production job operability is established by considering time pressure. And the operational evaluation index and its calculation method are developed from six aspects: job space evaluation, job pose evaluation, action feature evaluation, information acquisition process evaluation, information processing evaluation and information output. The case study shows that the method is feasible and can be applied to many different fields when we select different weights.</description><subject>Chief executive officers</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mechanical engineering</subject><issn>0577-6686</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkD1PwzAURT2ARCnMrJZYWJI-x0nsjKhqgdKoCMFs-StqSloXOwH13-NSJqQn3TccXV0dhG4IpLQCMlnUszQDwlLIU1LxMzSCgrGkLHl5gS5D2ADQimVkhJ5fbbDS6zV2Ozz7kt0g-za-te3XzuC5l1v77fwHrp2xHXYNfvHODPoXWjiFV3vrpWq7tj9cofNGdsFe_-UYvc9nb9PHZLl6eJreLxOdFZwnWhas0tJwDnkFpVVMlpSAVqYyBdcaCM00U8RqpSgrrYFGUmniYBZPUTpGd6fevXefgw292LZB266TO-uGIEgFeUZyTiCit__QjRv8Lq4TGYECKCd5EanJidLeheBtI_a-3Up_EATEUaiIQsVRqIA81nP6AzWfafQ</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Kong, Fansen</creator><creator>Ye, Zhenggeng</creator><general>Chinese Mechanical Engineering Society (CMES)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Research on Evaluation Method Framework Model of Production Job Operability</title><author>Kong, Fansen ; Ye, Zhenggeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2588-ca579cad8804906eb7a6310cbd9d58cc0132c7b1ecbb376ed0fa3ad3977977b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>chi ; eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Chief executive officers</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mechanical engineering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kong, Fansen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Zhenggeng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Ji xie gong cheng xue bao</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kong, Fansen</au><au>Ye, Zhenggeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Research on Evaluation Method Framework Model of Production Job Operability</atitle><jtitle>Ji xie gong cheng xue bao</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>198</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>198-212</pages><issn>0577-6686</issn><abstract>The operability of production job is described from two aspects of operation process and cognitive psychological process through combining literature research with production practice. Based on the analysis of operation behavior, the evaluation method framework model of production job operability is established by considering time pressure. And the operational evaluation index and its calculation method are developed from six aspects: job space evaluation, job pose evaluation, action feature evaluation, information acquisition process evaluation, information processing evaluation and information output. The case study shows that the method is feasible and can be applied to many different fields when we select different weights.</abstract><cop>Beijing</cop><pub>Chinese Mechanical Engineering Society (CMES)</pub><doi>10.3901/JME.2017.04.198</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0577-6686 |
ispartof | Ji xie gong cheng xue bao, 2017-01, Vol.53 (4), p.198-212 |
issn | 0577-6686 |
language | chi ; eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1904214810 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Chief executive officers Data processing Feasibility studies Mathematical models Mechanical engineering |
title | Research on Evaluation Method Framework Model of Production Job Operability |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T18%3A30%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Research%20on%20Evaluation%20Method%20Framework%20Model%20of%20Production%20Job%20Operability&rft.jtitle=Ji%20xie%20gong%20cheng%20xue%20bao&rft.au=Kong,%20Fansen&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=198-212&rft.issn=0577-6686&rft_id=info:doi/10.3901/JME.2017.04.198&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1904214810%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2105038145&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |