MATTER IN THE BEAM: WEAK LENSING, SUBSTRUCTURES, AND THE TEMPERATURE OF DARK MATTER

ABSTRACT Warm dark matter (WDM) models offer an attractive alternative to the current cold dark matter (CDM) cosmological model. We present a novel method to differentiate between WDM and CDM cosmologies, namely, using weak lensing; this provides a unique probe as it is sensitive to all of the "...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Astrophysical journal 2016-08, Vol.826 (2), p.212-212
Hauptverfasser: Mahdi, Hareth S., Elahi, Pascal J., Lewis, Geraint F., Power, Chris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 212
container_issue 2
container_start_page 212
container_title The Astrophysical journal
container_volume 826
creator Mahdi, Hareth S.
Elahi, Pascal J.
Lewis, Geraint F.
Power, Chris
description ABSTRACT Warm dark matter (WDM) models offer an attractive alternative to the current cold dark matter (CDM) cosmological model. We present a novel method to differentiate between WDM and CDM cosmologies, namely, using weak lensing; this provides a unique probe as it is sensitive to all of the "matter in the beam," not just dark matter haloes and the galaxies that reside in them, but also the diffuse material between haloes. We compare the weak lensing maps of CDM clusters to those in a WDM model corresponding to a thermally produced 0.5 keV dark matter particle. Our analysis clearly shows that the weak lensing magnification, convergence, and shear distributions can be used to distinguish between CDM and WDM models. WDM models increase the probability of weak magnifications, with the differences being significant to 5 , while leaving no significant imprint on the shear distribution. WDM clusters analyzed in this work are more homogeneous than CDM ones, and the fractional decrease in the amount of material in haloes is proportional to the average increase in the magnification. This difference arises from matter that would be bound in compact haloes in CDM being smoothly distributed over much larger volumes at lower densities in WDM. Moreover, the signature does not solely lie in the probability distribution function but in the full spatial distribution of the convergence field.
doi_str_mv 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/212
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_O3W</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1904211753</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1904211753</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-b8eec3ec136073f752a2d331273569a1907ed7bcbc807cc6979713a4064cb36b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkVFr2zAUhcVoYWm6X7AXQRnsIa4lXVmy9-amahKapMN22N6ErSjMIY1dy3nYv59dl_al0D1d7uU758I5CH2l5BpCLn1CCPcEyN9-yITPfEbZJzSiAYQeh0CeodEr8RldOLfvVxZFI5Su4ixTCV6scTZX-EbFqx_4l4rv8VKt08V6NsHp5ibNks002yQqneB4ffuMZmr1UyVxf8UPd_g2Tu7xYHaJznf5wdkvL3OMNncqm8695cNsMY2XnuEUWq8IrTVgDQVBJOxkwHK2BaBMQiCinEZE2q0sTGFCIo0RkYwkhZwTwU0BooAxuhp8K9eW2pmyteaPqY5Ha1rNmJBRIHhHfR-ouqmeTta1-rF0xh4O-dFWJ6e7P5xRKgP4H5RKHkbQu8KAmqZyrrE7XTflY9781ZTovhPdR6z7xHXXiWa666RT-YOqrGq9r07NscvnA8W3dxR5vX9jdL3dwT-oYY_7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1901748934</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MATTER IN THE BEAM: WEAK LENSING, SUBSTRUCTURES, AND THE TEMPERATURE OF DARK MATTER</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><creator>Mahdi, Hareth S. ; Elahi, Pascal J. ; Lewis, Geraint F. ; Power, Chris</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahdi, Hareth S. ; Elahi, Pascal J. ; Lewis, Geraint F. ; Power, Chris</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Warm dark matter (WDM) models offer an attractive alternative to the current cold dark matter (CDM) cosmological model. We present a novel method to differentiate between WDM and CDM cosmologies, namely, using weak lensing; this provides a unique probe as it is sensitive to all of the "matter in the beam," not just dark matter haloes and the galaxies that reside in them, but also the diffuse material between haloes. We compare the weak lensing maps of CDM clusters to those in a WDM model corresponding to a thermally produced 0.5 keV dark matter particle. Our analysis clearly shows that the weak lensing magnification, convergence, and shear distributions can be used to distinguish between CDM and WDM models. WDM models increase the probability of weak magnifications, with the differences being significant to 5 , while leaving no significant imprint on the shear distribution. WDM clusters analyzed in this work are more homogeneous than CDM ones, and the fractional decrease in the amount of material in haloes is proportional to the average increase in the magnification. This difference arises from matter that would be bound in compact haloes in CDM being smoothly distributed over much larger volumes at lower densities in WDM. Moreover, the signature does not solely lie in the probability distribution function but in the full spatial distribution of the convergence field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-637X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4357</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/212</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The American Astronomical Society</publisher><subject>Astronomical models ; ASTROPHYSICS, COSMOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY ; BEAMS ; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS ; CONVERGENCE ; COSMOLOGICAL MODELS ; COSMOLOGY ; cosmology: theory ; Dark matter ; DENSITY ; DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS ; GALAXIES ; galaxies: clusters: general ; GALAXY CLUSTERS ; GRAVITATIONAL LENSES ; gravitational lensing: weak ; KEV RANGE ; methods: numerical ; NONLUMINOUS MATTER ; PROBABILITY ; Shear ; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION ; Substructures</subject><ispartof>The Astrophysical journal, 2016-08, Vol.826 (2), p.212-212</ispartof><rights>2016. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-b8eec3ec136073f752a2d331273569a1907ed7bcbc807cc6979713a4064cb36b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-b8eec3ec136073f752a2d331273569a1907ed7bcbc807cc6979713a4064cb36b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0827-0473 ; 0000-0002-4003-0904</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/212/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,38869,53845</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/212$$EView_record_in_IOP_Publishing$$FView_record_in_$$GIOP_Publishing</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22679564$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahdi, Hareth S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elahi, Pascal J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Geraint F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Power, Chris</creatorcontrib><title>MATTER IN THE BEAM: WEAK LENSING, SUBSTRUCTURES, AND THE TEMPERATURE OF DARK MATTER</title><title>The Astrophysical journal</title><addtitle>APJ</addtitle><addtitle>Astrophys. J</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Warm dark matter (WDM) models offer an attractive alternative to the current cold dark matter (CDM) cosmological model. We present a novel method to differentiate between WDM and CDM cosmologies, namely, using weak lensing; this provides a unique probe as it is sensitive to all of the "matter in the beam," not just dark matter haloes and the galaxies that reside in them, but also the diffuse material between haloes. We compare the weak lensing maps of CDM clusters to those in a WDM model corresponding to a thermally produced 0.5 keV dark matter particle. Our analysis clearly shows that the weak lensing magnification, convergence, and shear distributions can be used to distinguish between CDM and WDM models. WDM models increase the probability of weak magnifications, with the differences being significant to 5 , while leaving no significant imprint on the shear distribution. WDM clusters analyzed in this work are more homogeneous than CDM ones, and the fractional decrease in the amount of material in haloes is proportional to the average increase in the magnification. This difference arises from matter that would be bound in compact haloes in CDM being smoothly distributed over much larger volumes at lower densities in WDM. Moreover, the signature does not solely lie in the probability distribution function but in the full spatial distribution of the convergence field.</description><subject>Astronomical models</subject><subject>ASTROPHYSICS, COSMOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY</subject><subject>BEAMS</subject><subject>COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS</subject><subject>CONVERGENCE</subject><subject>COSMOLOGICAL MODELS</subject><subject>COSMOLOGY</subject><subject>cosmology: theory</subject><subject>Dark matter</subject><subject>DENSITY</subject><subject>DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS</subject><subject>GALAXIES</subject><subject>galaxies: clusters: general</subject><subject>GALAXY CLUSTERS</subject><subject>GRAVITATIONAL LENSES</subject><subject>gravitational lensing: weak</subject><subject>KEV RANGE</subject><subject>methods: numerical</subject><subject>NONLUMINOUS MATTER</subject><subject>PROBABILITY</subject><subject>Shear</subject><subject>SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION</subject><subject>Substructures</subject><issn>0004-637X</issn><issn>1538-4357</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkVFr2zAUhcVoYWm6X7AXQRnsIa4lXVmy9-amahKapMN22N6ErSjMIY1dy3nYv59dl_al0D1d7uU758I5CH2l5BpCLn1CCPcEyN9-yITPfEbZJzSiAYQeh0CeodEr8RldOLfvVxZFI5Su4ixTCV6scTZX-EbFqx_4l4rv8VKt08V6NsHp5ibNks002yQqneB4ffuMZmr1UyVxf8UPd_g2Tu7xYHaJznf5wdkvL3OMNncqm8695cNsMY2XnuEUWq8IrTVgDQVBJOxkwHK2BaBMQiCinEZE2q0sTGFCIo0RkYwkhZwTwU0BooAxuhp8K9eW2pmyteaPqY5Ha1rNmJBRIHhHfR-ouqmeTta1-rF0xh4O-dFWJ6e7P5xRKgP4H5RKHkbQu8KAmqZyrrE7XTflY9781ZTovhPdR6z7xHXXiWa666RT-YOqrGq9r07NscvnA8W3dxR5vX9jdL3dwT-oYY_7</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Mahdi, Hareth S.</creator><creator>Elahi, Pascal J.</creator><creator>Lewis, Geraint F.</creator><creator>Power, Chris</creator><general>The American Astronomical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0827-0473</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4003-0904</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>MATTER IN THE BEAM: WEAK LENSING, SUBSTRUCTURES, AND THE TEMPERATURE OF DARK MATTER</title><author>Mahdi, Hareth S. ; Elahi, Pascal J. ; Lewis, Geraint F. ; Power, Chris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-b8eec3ec136073f752a2d331273569a1907ed7bcbc807cc6979713a4064cb36b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Astronomical models</topic><topic>ASTROPHYSICS, COSMOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY</topic><topic>BEAMS</topic><topic>COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS</topic><topic>CONVERGENCE</topic><topic>COSMOLOGICAL MODELS</topic><topic>COSMOLOGY</topic><topic>cosmology: theory</topic><topic>Dark matter</topic><topic>DENSITY</topic><topic>DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS</topic><topic>GALAXIES</topic><topic>galaxies: clusters: general</topic><topic>GALAXY CLUSTERS</topic><topic>GRAVITATIONAL LENSES</topic><topic>gravitational lensing: weak</topic><topic>KEV RANGE</topic><topic>methods: numerical</topic><topic>NONLUMINOUS MATTER</topic><topic>PROBABILITY</topic><topic>Shear</topic><topic>SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION</topic><topic>Substructures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahdi, Hareth S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elahi, Pascal J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Geraint F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Power, Chris</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahdi, Hareth S.</au><au>Elahi, Pascal J.</au><au>Lewis, Geraint F.</au><au>Power, Chris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MATTER IN THE BEAM: WEAK LENSING, SUBSTRUCTURES, AND THE TEMPERATURE OF DARK MATTER</atitle><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle><stitle>APJ</stitle><addtitle>Astrophys. J</addtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>826</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>212</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>212-212</pages><issn>0004-637X</issn><eissn>1538-4357</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Warm dark matter (WDM) models offer an attractive alternative to the current cold dark matter (CDM) cosmological model. We present a novel method to differentiate between WDM and CDM cosmologies, namely, using weak lensing; this provides a unique probe as it is sensitive to all of the "matter in the beam," not just dark matter haloes and the galaxies that reside in them, but also the diffuse material between haloes. We compare the weak lensing maps of CDM clusters to those in a WDM model corresponding to a thermally produced 0.5 keV dark matter particle. Our analysis clearly shows that the weak lensing magnification, convergence, and shear distributions can be used to distinguish between CDM and WDM models. WDM models increase the probability of weak magnifications, with the differences being significant to 5 , while leaving no significant imprint on the shear distribution. WDM clusters analyzed in this work are more homogeneous than CDM ones, and the fractional decrease in the amount of material in haloes is proportional to the average increase in the magnification. This difference arises from matter that would be bound in compact haloes in CDM being smoothly distributed over much larger volumes at lower densities in WDM. Moreover, the signature does not solely lie in the probability distribution function but in the full spatial distribution of the convergence field.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The American Astronomical Society</pub><doi>10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/212</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0827-0473</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4003-0904</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0004-637X
ispartof The Astrophysical journal, 2016-08, Vol.826 (2), p.212-212
issn 0004-637X
1538-4357
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1904211753
source IOP Publishing Free Content
subjects Astronomical models
ASTROPHYSICS, COSMOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY
BEAMS
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS
CONVERGENCE
COSMOLOGICAL MODELS
COSMOLOGY
cosmology: theory
Dark matter
DENSITY
DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS
GALAXIES
galaxies: clusters: general
GALAXY CLUSTERS
GRAVITATIONAL LENSES
gravitational lensing: weak
KEV RANGE
methods: numerical
NONLUMINOUS MATTER
PROBABILITY
Shear
SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION
Substructures
title MATTER IN THE BEAM: WEAK LENSING, SUBSTRUCTURES, AND THE TEMPERATURE OF DARK MATTER
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A48%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_O3W&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MATTER%20IN%20THE%20BEAM:%20WEAK%20LENSING,%20SUBSTRUCTURES,%20AND%20THE%20TEMPERATURE%20OF%20DARK%20MATTER&rft.jtitle=The%20Astrophysical%20journal&rft.au=Mahdi,%20Hareth%20S.&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=826&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=212&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=212-212&rft.issn=0004-637X&rft.eissn=1538-4357&rft_id=info:doi/10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/212&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_O3W%3E1904211753%3C/proquest_O3W%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1901748934&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true