MATTER IN THE BEAM: WEAK LENSING, SUBSTRUCTURES, AND THE TEMPERATURE OF DARK MATTER
ABSTRACT Warm dark matter (WDM) models offer an attractive alternative to the current cold dark matter (CDM) cosmological model. We present a novel method to differentiate between WDM and CDM cosmologies, namely, using weak lensing; this provides a unique probe as it is sensitive to all of the "...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Astrophysical journal 2016-08, Vol.826 (2), p.212-212 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 212 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 212 |
container_title | The Astrophysical journal |
container_volume | 826 |
creator | Mahdi, Hareth S. Elahi, Pascal J. Lewis, Geraint F. Power, Chris |
description | ABSTRACT Warm dark matter (WDM) models offer an attractive alternative to the current cold dark matter (CDM) cosmological model. We present a novel method to differentiate between WDM and CDM cosmologies, namely, using weak lensing; this provides a unique probe as it is sensitive to all of the "matter in the beam," not just dark matter haloes and the galaxies that reside in them, but also the diffuse material between haloes. We compare the weak lensing maps of CDM clusters to those in a WDM model corresponding to a thermally produced 0.5 keV dark matter particle. Our analysis clearly shows that the weak lensing magnification, convergence, and shear distributions can be used to distinguish between CDM and WDM models. WDM models increase the probability of weak magnifications, with the differences being significant to 5 , while leaving no significant imprint on the shear distribution. WDM clusters analyzed in this work are more homogeneous than CDM ones, and the fractional decrease in the amount of material in haloes is proportional to the average increase in the magnification. This difference arises from matter that would be bound in compact haloes in CDM being smoothly distributed over much larger volumes at lower densities in WDM. Moreover, the signature does not solely lie in the probability distribution function but in the full spatial distribution of the convergence field. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/212 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_O3W</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1904211753</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1904211753</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-b8eec3ec136073f752a2d331273569a1907ed7bcbc807cc6979713a4064cb36b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkVFr2zAUhcVoYWm6X7AXQRnsIa4lXVmy9-amahKapMN22N6ErSjMIY1dy3nYv59dl_al0D1d7uU758I5CH2l5BpCLn1CCPcEyN9-yITPfEbZJzSiAYQeh0CeodEr8RldOLfvVxZFI5Su4ixTCV6scTZX-EbFqx_4l4rv8VKt08V6NsHp5ibNks002yQqneB4ffuMZmr1UyVxf8UPd_g2Tu7xYHaJznf5wdkvL3OMNncqm8695cNsMY2XnuEUWq8IrTVgDQVBJOxkwHK2BaBMQiCinEZE2q0sTGFCIo0RkYwkhZwTwU0BooAxuhp8K9eW2pmyteaPqY5Ha1rNmJBRIHhHfR-ouqmeTta1-rF0xh4O-dFWJ6e7P5xRKgP4H5RKHkbQu8KAmqZyrrE7XTflY9781ZTovhPdR6z7xHXXiWa666RT-YOqrGq9r07NscvnA8W3dxR5vX9jdL3dwT-oYY_7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1901748934</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MATTER IN THE BEAM: WEAK LENSING, SUBSTRUCTURES, AND THE TEMPERATURE OF DARK MATTER</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><creator>Mahdi, Hareth S. ; Elahi, Pascal J. ; Lewis, Geraint F. ; Power, Chris</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahdi, Hareth S. ; Elahi, Pascal J. ; Lewis, Geraint F. ; Power, Chris</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Warm dark matter (WDM) models offer an attractive alternative to the current cold dark matter (CDM) cosmological model. We present a novel method to differentiate between WDM and CDM cosmologies, namely, using weak lensing; this provides a unique probe as it is sensitive to all of the "matter in the beam," not just dark matter haloes and the galaxies that reside in them, but also the diffuse material between haloes. We compare the weak lensing maps of CDM clusters to those in a WDM model corresponding to a thermally produced 0.5 keV dark matter particle. Our analysis clearly shows that the weak lensing magnification, convergence, and shear distributions can be used to distinguish between CDM and WDM models. WDM models increase the probability of weak magnifications, with the differences being significant to 5 , while leaving no significant imprint on the shear distribution. WDM clusters analyzed in this work are more homogeneous than CDM ones, and the fractional decrease in the amount of material in haloes is proportional to the average increase in the magnification. This difference arises from matter that would be bound in compact haloes in CDM being smoothly distributed over much larger volumes at lower densities in WDM. Moreover, the signature does not solely lie in the probability distribution function but in the full spatial distribution of the convergence field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-637X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4357</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/212</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The American Astronomical Society</publisher><subject>Astronomical models ; ASTROPHYSICS, COSMOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY ; BEAMS ; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS ; CONVERGENCE ; COSMOLOGICAL MODELS ; COSMOLOGY ; cosmology: theory ; Dark matter ; DENSITY ; DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS ; GALAXIES ; galaxies: clusters: general ; GALAXY CLUSTERS ; GRAVITATIONAL LENSES ; gravitational lensing: weak ; KEV RANGE ; methods: numerical ; NONLUMINOUS MATTER ; PROBABILITY ; Shear ; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION ; Substructures</subject><ispartof>The Astrophysical journal, 2016-08, Vol.826 (2), p.212-212</ispartof><rights>2016. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-b8eec3ec136073f752a2d331273569a1907ed7bcbc807cc6979713a4064cb36b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-b8eec3ec136073f752a2d331273569a1907ed7bcbc807cc6979713a4064cb36b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0827-0473 ; 0000-0002-4003-0904</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/212/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,38869,53845</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/212$$EView_record_in_IOP_Publishing$$FView_record_in_$$GIOP_Publishing</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22679564$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahdi, Hareth S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elahi, Pascal J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Geraint F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Power, Chris</creatorcontrib><title>MATTER IN THE BEAM: WEAK LENSING, SUBSTRUCTURES, AND THE TEMPERATURE OF DARK MATTER</title><title>The Astrophysical journal</title><addtitle>APJ</addtitle><addtitle>Astrophys. J</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Warm dark matter (WDM) models offer an attractive alternative to the current cold dark matter (CDM) cosmological model. We present a novel method to differentiate between WDM and CDM cosmologies, namely, using weak lensing; this provides a unique probe as it is sensitive to all of the "matter in the beam," not just dark matter haloes and the galaxies that reside in them, but also the diffuse material between haloes. We compare the weak lensing maps of CDM clusters to those in a WDM model corresponding to a thermally produced 0.5 keV dark matter particle. Our analysis clearly shows that the weak lensing magnification, convergence, and shear distributions can be used to distinguish between CDM and WDM models. WDM models increase the probability of weak magnifications, with the differences being significant to 5 , while leaving no significant imprint on the shear distribution. WDM clusters analyzed in this work are more homogeneous than CDM ones, and the fractional decrease in the amount of material in haloes is proportional to the average increase in the magnification. This difference arises from matter that would be bound in compact haloes in CDM being smoothly distributed over much larger volumes at lower densities in WDM. Moreover, the signature does not solely lie in the probability distribution function but in the full spatial distribution of the convergence field.</description><subject>Astronomical models</subject><subject>ASTROPHYSICS, COSMOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY</subject><subject>BEAMS</subject><subject>COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS</subject><subject>CONVERGENCE</subject><subject>COSMOLOGICAL MODELS</subject><subject>COSMOLOGY</subject><subject>cosmology: theory</subject><subject>Dark matter</subject><subject>DENSITY</subject><subject>DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS</subject><subject>GALAXIES</subject><subject>galaxies: clusters: general</subject><subject>GALAXY CLUSTERS</subject><subject>GRAVITATIONAL LENSES</subject><subject>gravitational lensing: weak</subject><subject>KEV RANGE</subject><subject>methods: numerical</subject><subject>NONLUMINOUS MATTER</subject><subject>PROBABILITY</subject><subject>Shear</subject><subject>SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION</subject><subject>Substructures</subject><issn>0004-637X</issn><issn>1538-4357</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkVFr2zAUhcVoYWm6X7AXQRnsIa4lXVmy9-amahKapMN22N6ErSjMIY1dy3nYv59dl_al0D1d7uU758I5CH2l5BpCLn1CCPcEyN9-yITPfEbZJzSiAYQeh0CeodEr8RldOLfvVxZFI5Su4ixTCV6scTZX-EbFqx_4l4rv8VKt08V6NsHp5ibNks002yQqneB4ffuMZmr1UyVxf8UPd_g2Tu7xYHaJznf5wdkvL3OMNncqm8695cNsMY2XnuEUWq8IrTVgDQVBJOxkwHK2BaBMQiCinEZE2q0sTGFCIo0RkYwkhZwTwU0BooAxuhp8K9eW2pmyteaPqY5Ha1rNmJBRIHhHfR-ouqmeTta1-rF0xh4O-dFWJ6e7P5xRKgP4H5RKHkbQu8KAmqZyrrE7XTflY9781ZTovhPdR6z7xHXXiWa666RT-YOqrGq9r07NscvnA8W3dxR5vX9jdL3dwT-oYY_7</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Mahdi, Hareth S.</creator><creator>Elahi, Pascal J.</creator><creator>Lewis, Geraint F.</creator><creator>Power, Chris</creator><general>The American Astronomical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0827-0473</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4003-0904</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>MATTER IN THE BEAM: WEAK LENSING, SUBSTRUCTURES, AND THE TEMPERATURE OF DARK MATTER</title><author>Mahdi, Hareth S. ; Elahi, Pascal J. ; Lewis, Geraint F. ; Power, Chris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-b8eec3ec136073f752a2d331273569a1907ed7bcbc807cc6979713a4064cb36b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Astronomical models</topic><topic>ASTROPHYSICS, COSMOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY</topic><topic>BEAMS</topic><topic>COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS</topic><topic>CONVERGENCE</topic><topic>COSMOLOGICAL MODELS</topic><topic>COSMOLOGY</topic><topic>cosmology: theory</topic><topic>Dark matter</topic><topic>DENSITY</topic><topic>DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS</topic><topic>GALAXIES</topic><topic>galaxies: clusters: general</topic><topic>GALAXY CLUSTERS</topic><topic>GRAVITATIONAL LENSES</topic><topic>gravitational lensing: weak</topic><topic>KEV RANGE</topic><topic>methods: numerical</topic><topic>NONLUMINOUS MATTER</topic><topic>PROBABILITY</topic><topic>Shear</topic><topic>SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION</topic><topic>Substructures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahdi, Hareth S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elahi, Pascal J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Geraint F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Power, Chris</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahdi, Hareth S.</au><au>Elahi, Pascal J.</au><au>Lewis, Geraint F.</au><au>Power, Chris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MATTER IN THE BEAM: WEAK LENSING, SUBSTRUCTURES, AND THE TEMPERATURE OF DARK MATTER</atitle><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle><stitle>APJ</stitle><addtitle>Astrophys. J</addtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>826</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>212</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>212-212</pages><issn>0004-637X</issn><eissn>1538-4357</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Warm dark matter (WDM) models offer an attractive alternative to the current cold dark matter (CDM) cosmological model. We present a novel method to differentiate between WDM and CDM cosmologies, namely, using weak lensing; this provides a unique probe as it is sensitive to all of the "matter in the beam," not just dark matter haloes and the galaxies that reside in them, but also the diffuse material between haloes. We compare the weak lensing maps of CDM clusters to those in a WDM model corresponding to a thermally produced 0.5 keV dark matter particle. Our analysis clearly shows that the weak lensing magnification, convergence, and shear distributions can be used to distinguish between CDM and WDM models. WDM models increase the probability of weak magnifications, with the differences being significant to 5 , while leaving no significant imprint on the shear distribution. WDM clusters analyzed in this work are more homogeneous than CDM ones, and the fractional decrease in the amount of material in haloes is proportional to the average increase in the magnification. This difference arises from matter that would be bound in compact haloes in CDM being smoothly distributed over much larger volumes at lower densities in WDM. Moreover, the signature does not solely lie in the probability distribution function but in the full spatial distribution of the convergence field.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The American Astronomical Society</pub><doi>10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/212</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0827-0473</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4003-0904</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0004-637X |
ispartof | The Astrophysical journal, 2016-08, Vol.826 (2), p.212-212 |
issn | 0004-637X 1538-4357 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1904211753 |
source | IOP Publishing Free Content |
subjects | Astronomical models ASTROPHYSICS, COSMOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY BEAMS COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS CONVERGENCE COSMOLOGICAL MODELS COSMOLOGY cosmology: theory Dark matter DENSITY DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS GALAXIES galaxies: clusters: general GALAXY CLUSTERS GRAVITATIONAL LENSES gravitational lensing: weak KEV RANGE methods: numerical NONLUMINOUS MATTER PROBABILITY Shear SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION Substructures |
title | MATTER IN THE BEAM: WEAK LENSING, SUBSTRUCTURES, AND THE TEMPERATURE OF DARK MATTER |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A48%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_O3W&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MATTER%20IN%20THE%20BEAM:%20WEAK%20LENSING,%20SUBSTRUCTURES,%20AND%20THE%20TEMPERATURE%20OF%20DARK%20MATTER&rft.jtitle=The%20Astrophysical%20journal&rft.au=Mahdi,%20Hareth%20S.&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=826&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=212&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=212-212&rft.issn=0004-637X&rft.eissn=1538-4357&rft_id=info:doi/10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/212&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_O3W%3E1904211753%3C/proquest_O3W%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1901748934&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |