Does Confinement Always Lead to Thermodynamically and/or Kinetically Favorable Reactions? A Case Study using Diels–Alder Reactions within ExBox+4 and CB[7]

The impact of geometrical confinement on the thermodynamic as well as kinetic aspects of a model cycloaddition reaction between 1,3‐butadiene and ethylene have been investigated based on density functional theory calculations. To this end, organic hosts ExBox+4 and cucurbit[7]uril (CB[7]) were used...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemphyschem 2017-08, Vol.18 (16), p.2162-2170
Hauptverfasser: Chakraborty, Debdutta, Das, Ranjita, Chattaraj, Pratim Kumar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2170
container_issue 16
container_start_page 2162
container_title Chemphyschem
container_volume 18
creator Chakraborty, Debdutta
Das, Ranjita
Chattaraj, Pratim Kumar
description The impact of geometrical confinement on the thermodynamic as well as kinetic aspects of a model cycloaddition reaction between 1,3‐butadiene and ethylene have been investigated based on density functional theory calculations. To this end, organic hosts ExBox+4 and cucurbit[7]uril (CB[7]) were used to impose confinement effects on the reactants, transition state (TS), and product involved in the reaction. The results suggest that the shape of the host and thereby the nature of the confining regime dictates the thermodynamic outcome of the reaction. The reaction becomes thermodynamically more spontaneous inside CB[7] as compared with that in either ExBox+4 or in the “unconfined” gaseous state. Furthermore, the rate constant associated with the reaction increases manifold inside CB[7]. Atoms‐in a‐molecule, noncovalent interaction, natural bond orbital, as well as energy decomposition analyses suggest that the close geometrical proximity of the reactants inside CB[7] as well as extra stabilization of the TS in the encapsulated state may dictate the outcome. Forced to react: The cycloaddition reaction of 1,3‐butadiene and ethylene becomes thermodynamically and kinetically more favorable inside cucurbit[7]uril as compared with that inside ExBox+4 as well as in the unconfined state.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cphc.201700308
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1903939054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1903939054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3408-cab8601384b4e24191041fbdcdcafbd0d493a07a8a83de9fe85f941c4fca5f943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EoqVw5YgscUFCu7VjZ2Of0DZtKWIlEJQTQpFjT1hXjr3YSbe59T9w5s_xS0i0Sytx4TRPo--9Gekh9JySOSUkO9abtZ5nhBaEMCIeoEPKmZwVC04f7jXPWH6AnqR0RQgRpKCP0UEm8rzIJDtEv04DJFwG31gPLfgOL91WDQmvQBncBXy5htgGM3jVWq2cG7Dy5jhE_H40dPvVuboOUdUO8CdQurPBpzd4iUuVAH_uejPgPln_HZ9acOn37c-lMxDvWby13dp6fHZzEm5e8-kCLk--Ft-eokeNcgme7ecR-nJ-dllezFYf3r4rl6uZZpyImVa1WBDKBK85ZJxKSjhtaqONVuMghkumSKGEEsyAbEDkjeRU80arSbEj9GqXu4nhRw-pq1qbNDinPIQ-VVQSJpkk-YS-_Ae9Cn3043cjlcmFyMQiH6n5jtIxpBShqTbRtioOFSXVVFw1FVfdFTcaXuxj-7oFc4f_bWoE5A7YWgfDf-Kq8uNFeR_-Bz-SprU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1929682865</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Confinement Always Lead to Thermodynamically and/or Kinetically Favorable Reactions? A Case Study using Diels–Alder Reactions within ExBox+4 and CB[7]</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Chakraborty, Debdutta ; Das, Ranjita ; Chattaraj, Pratim Kumar</creator><creatorcontrib>Chakraborty, Debdutta ; Das, Ranjita ; Chattaraj, Pratim Kumar</creatorcontrib><description>The impact of geometrical confinement on the thermodynamic as well as kinetic aspects of a model cycloaddition reaction between 1,3‐butadiene and ethylene have been investigated based on density functional theory calculations. To this end, organic hosts ExBox+4 and cucurbit[7]uril (CB[7]) were used to impose confinement effects on the reactants, transition state (TS), and product involved in the reaction. The results suggest that the shape of the host and thereby the nature of the confining regime dictates the thermodynamic outcome of the reaction. The reaction becomes thermodynamically more spontaneous inside CB[7] as compared with that in either ExBox+4 or in the “unconfined” gaseous state. Furthermore, the rate constant associated with the reaction increases manifold inside CB[7]. Atoms‐in a‐molecule, noncovalent interaction, natural bond orbital, as well as energy decomposition analyses suggest that the close geometrical proximity of the reactants inside CB[7] as well as extra stabilization of the TS in the encapsulated state may dictate the outcome. Forced to react: The cycloaddition reaction of 1,3‐butadiene and ethylene becomes thermodynamically and kinetically more favorable inside cucurbit[7]uril as compared with that inside ExBox+4 as well as in the unconfined state.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1439-4235</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-7641</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201700308</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28557293</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Butadiene ; cage compounds ; Chemical bonds ; Confinement ; Confining ; Cycloaddition ; Decomposition reactions ; Density functional theory ; Diels-Alder reactions ; Encapsulation ; Ethylene ; host–guest systems ; kinetics ; thermodynamics</subject><ispartof>Chemphyschem, 2017-08, Vol.18 (16), p.2162-2170</ispartof><rights>2017 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><rights>2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim.</rights><rights>2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3408-cab8601384b4e24191041fbdcdcafbd0d493a07a8a83de9fe85f941c4fca5f943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3408-cab8601384b4e24191041fbdcdcafbd0d493a07a8a83de9fe85f941c4fca5f943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcphc.201700308$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcphc.201700308$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28557293$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chakraborty, Debdutta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Das, Ranjita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chattaraj, Pratim Kumar</creatorcontrib><title>Does Confinement Always Lead to Thermodynamically and/or Kinetically Favorable Reactions? A Case Study using Diels–Alder Reactions within ExBox+4 and CB[7]</title><title>Chemphyschem</title><addtitle>Chemphyschem</addtitle><description>The impact of geometrical confinement on the thermodynamic as well as kinetic aspects of a model cycloaddition reaction between 1,3‐butadiene and ethylene have been investigated based on density functional theory calculations. To this end, organic hosts ExBox+4 and cucurbit[7]uril (CB[7]) were used to impose confinement effects on the reactants, transition state (TS), and product involved in the reaction. The results suggest that the shape of the host and thereby the nature of the confining regime dictates the thermodynamic outcome of the reaction. The reaction becomes thermodynamically more spontaneous inside CB[7] as compared with that in either ExBox+4 or in the “unconfined” gaseous state. Furthermore, the rate constant associated with the reaction increases manifold inside CB[7]. Atoms‐in a‐molecule, noncovalent interaction, natural bond orbital, as well as energy decomposition analyses suggest that the close geometrical proximity of the reactants inside CB[7] as well as extra stabilization of the TS in the encapsulated state may dictate the outcome. Forced to react: The cycloaddition reaction of 1,3‐butadiene and ethylene becomes thermodynamically and kinetically more favorable inside cucurbit[7]uril as compared with that inside ExBox+4 as well as in the unconfined state.</description><subject>Butadiene</subject><subject>cage compounds</subject><subject>Chemical bonds</subject><subject>Confinement</subject><subject>Confining</subject><subject>Cycloaddition</subject><subject>Decomposition reactions</subject><subject>Density functional theory</subject><subject>Diels-Alder reactions</subject><subject>Encapsulation</subject><subject>Ethylene</subject><subject>host–guest systems</subject><subject>kinetics</subject><subject>thermodynamics</subject><issn>1439-4235</issn><issn>1439-7641</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EoqVw5YgscUFCu7VjZ2Of0DZtKWIlEJQTQpFjT1hXjr3YSbe59T9w5s_xS0i0Sytx4TRPo--9Gekh9JySOSUkO9abtZ5nhBaEMCIeoEPKmZwVC04f7jXPWH6AnqR0RQgRpKCP0UEm8rzIJDtEv04DJFwG31gPLfgOL91WDQmvQBncBXy5htgGM3jVWq2cG7Dy5jhE_H40dPvVuboOUdUO8CdQurPBpzd4iUuVAH_uejPgPln_HZ9acOn37c-lMxDvWby13dp6fHZzEm5e8-kCLk--Ft-eokeNcgme7ecR-nJ-dllezFYf3r4rl6uZZpyImVa1WBDKBK85ZJxKSjhtaqONVuMghkumSKGEEsyAbEDkjeRU80arSbEj9GqXu4nhRw-pq1qbNDinPIQ-VVQSJpkk-YS-_Ae9Cn3043cjlcmFyMQiH6n5jtIxpBShqTbRtioOFSXVVFw1FVfdFTcaXuxj-7oFc4f_bWoE5A7YWgfDf-Kq8uNFeR_-Bz-SprU</recordid><startdate>20170818</startdate><enddate>20170818</enddate><creator>Chakraborty, Debdutta</creator><creator>Das, Ranjita</creator><creator>Chattaraj, Pratim Kumar</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170818</creationdate><title>Does Confinement Always Lead to Thermodynamically and/or Kinetically Favorable Reactions? A Case Study using Diels–Alder Reactions within ExBox+4 and CB[7]</title><author>Chakraborty, Debdutta ; Das, Ranjita ; Chattaraj, Pratim Kumar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3408-cab8601384b4e24191041fbdcdcafbd0d493a07a8a83de9fe85f941c4fca5f943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Butadiene</topic><topic>cage compounds</topic><topic>Chemical bonds</topic><topic>Confinement</topic><topic>Confining</topic><topic>Cycloaddition</topic><topic>Decomposition reactions</topic><topic>Density functional theory</topic><topic>Diels-Alder reactions</topic><topic>Encapsulation</topic><topic>Ethylene</topic><topic>host–guest systems</topic><topic>kinetics</topic><topic>thermodynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chakraborty, Debdutta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Das, Ranjita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chattaraj, Pratim Kumar</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chemphyschem</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chakraborty, Debdutta</au><au>Das, Ranjita</au><au>Chattaraj, Pratim Kumar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Confinement Always Lead to Thermodynamically and/or Kinetically Favorable Reactions? A Case Study using Diels–Alder Reactions within ExBox+4 and CB[7]</atitle><jtitle>Chemphyschem</jtitle><addtitle>Chemphyschem</addtitle><date>2017-08-18</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>2162</spage><epage>2170</epage><pages>2162-2170</pages><issn>1439-4235</issn><eissn>1439-7641</eissn><abstract>The impact of geometrical confinement on the thermodynamic as well as kinetic aspects of a model cycloaddition reaction between 1,3‐butadiene and ethylene have been investigated based on density functional theory calculations. To this end, organic hosts ExBox+4 and cucurbit[7]uril (CB[7]) were used to impose confinement effects on the reactants, transition state (TS), and product involved in the reaction. The results suggest that the shape of the host and thereby the nature of the confining regime dictates the thermodynamic outcome of the reaction. The reaction becomes thermodynamically more spontaneous inside CB[7] as compared with that in either ExBox+4 or in the “unconfined” gaseous state. Furthermore, the rate constant associated with the reaction increases manifold inside CB[7]. Atoms‐in a‐molecule, noncovalent interaction, natural bond orbital, as well as energy decomposition analyses suggest that the close geometrical proximity of the reactants inside CB[7] as well as extra stabilization of the TS in the encapsulated state may dictate the outcome. Forced to react: The cycloaddition reaction of 1,3‐butadiene and ethylene becomes thermodynamically and kinetically more favorable inside cucurbit[7]uril as compared with that inside ExBox+4 as well as in the unconfined state.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28557293</pmid><doi>10.1002/cphc.201700308</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1439-4235
ispartof Chemphyschem, 2017-08, Vol.18 (16), p.2162-2170
issn 1439-4235
1439-7641
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1903939054
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Butadiene
cage compounds
Chemical bonds
Confinement
Confining
Cycloaddition
Decomposition reactions
Density functional theory
Diels-Alder reactions
Encapsulation
Ethylene
host–guest systems
kinetics
thermodynamics
title Does Confinement Always Lead to Thermodynamically and/or Kinetically Favorable Reactions? A Case Study using Diels–Alder Reactions within ExBox+4 and CB[7]
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T23%3A20%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Confinement%20Always%20Lead%20to%20Thermodynamically%20and/or%20Kinetically%20Favorable%20Reactions?%20A%20Case%20Study%20using%20Diels%E2%80%93Alder%20Reactions%20within%20ExBox+4%20and%20CB%5B7%5D&rft.jtitle=Chemphyschem&rft.au=Chakraborty,%20Debdutta&rft.date=2017-08-18&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=2162&rft.epage=2170&rft.pages=2162-2170&rft.issn=1439-4235&rft.eissn=1439-7641&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cphc.201700308&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1903939054%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1929682865&rft_id=info:pmid/28557293&rfr_iscdi=true