Does Confinement Always Lead to Thermodynamically and/or Kinetically Favorable Reactions? A Case Study using Diels–Alder Reactions within ExBox+4 and CB[7]
The impact of geometrical confinement on the thermodynamic as well as kinetic aspects of a model cycloaddition reaction between 1,3‐butadiene and ethylene have been investigated based on density functional theory calculations. To this end, organic hosts ExBox+4 and cucurbit[7]uril (CB[7]) were used...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chemphyschem 2017-08, Vol.18 (16), p.2162-2170 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2170 |
---|---|
container_issue | 16 |
container_start_page | 2162 |
container_title | Chemphyschem |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Chakraborty, Debdutta Das, Ranjita Chattaraj, Pratim Kumar |
description | The impact of geometrical confinement on the thermodynamic as well as kinetic aspects of a model cycloaddition reaction between 1,3‐butadiene and ethylene have been investigated based on density functional theory calculations. To this end, organic hosts ExBox+4 and cucurbit[7]uril (CB[7]) were used to impose confinement effects on the reactants, transition state (TS), and product involved in the reaction. The results suggest that the shape of the host and thereby the nature of the confining regime dictates the thermodynamic outcome of the reaction. The reaction becomes thermodynamically more spontaneous inside CB[7] as compared with that in either ExBox+4 or in the “unconfined” gaseous state. Furthermore, the rate constant associated with the reaction increases manifold inside CB[7]. Atoms‐in a‐molecule, noncovalent interaction, natural bond orbital, as well as energy decomposition analyses suggest that the close geometrical proximity of the reactants inside CB[7] as well as extra stabilization of the TS in the encapsulated state may dictate the outcome.
Forced to react: The cycloaddition reaction of 1,3‐butadiene and ethylene becomes thermodynamically and kinetically more favorable inside cucurbit[7]uril as compared with that inside ExBox+4 as well as in the unconfined state. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cphc.201700308 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1903939054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1903939054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3408-cab8601384b4e24191041fbdcdcafbd0d493a07a8a83de9fe85f941c4fca5f943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EoqVw5YgscUFCu7VjZ2Of0DZtKWIlEJQTQpFjT1hXjr3YSbe59T9w5s_xS0i0Sytx4TRPo--9Gekh9JySOSUkO9abtZ5nhBaEMCIeoEPKmZwVC04f7jXPWH6AnqR0RQgRpKCP0UEm8rzIJDtEv04DJFwG31gPLfgOL91WDQmvQBncBXy5htgGM3jVWq2cG7Dy5jhE_H40dPvVuboOUdUO8CdQurPBpzd4iUuVAH_uejPgPln_HZ9acOn37c-lMxDvWby13dp6fHZzEm5e8-kCLk--Ft-eokeNcgme7ecR-nJ-dllezFYf3r4rl6uZZpyImVa1WBDKBK85ZJxKSjhtaqONVuMghkumSKGEEsyAbEDkjeRU80arSbEj9GqXu4nhRw-pq1qbNDinPIQ-VVQSJpkk-YS-_Ae9Cn3043cjlcmFyMQiH6n5jtIxpBShqTbRtioOFSXVVFw1FVfdFTcaXuxj-7oFc4f_bWoE5A7YWgfDf-Kq8uNFeR_-Bz-SprU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1929682865</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Confinement Always Lead to Thermodynamically and/or Kinetically Favorable Reactions? A Case Study using Diels–Alder Reactions within ExBox+4 and CB[7]</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Chakraborty, Debdutta ; Das, Ranjita ; Chattaraj, Pratim Kumar</creator><creatorcontrib>Chakraborty, Debdutta ; Das, Ranjita ; Chattaraj, Pratim Kumar</creatorcontrib><description>The impact of geometrical confinement on the thermodynamic as well as kinetic aspects of a model cycloaddition reaction between 1,3‐butadiene and ethylene have been investigated based on density functional theory calculations. To this end, organic hosts ExBox+4 and cucurbit[7]uril (CB[7]) were used to impose confinement effects on the reactants, transition state (TS), and product involved in the reaction. The results suggest that the shape of the host and thereby the nature of the confining regime dictates the thermodynamic outcome of the reaction. The reaction becomes thermodynamically more spontaneous inside CB[7] as compared with that in either ExBox+4 or in the “unconfined” gaseous state. Furthermore, the rate constant associated with the reaction increases manifold inside CB[7]. Atoms‐in a‐molecule, noncovalent interaction, natural bond orbital, as well as energy decomposition analyses suggest that the close geometrical proximity of the reactants inside CB[7] as well as extra stabilization of the TS in the encapsulated state may dictate the outcome.
Forced to react: The cycloaddition reaction of 1,3‐butadiene and ethylene becomes thermodynamically and kinetically more favorable inside cucurbit[7]uril as compared with that inside ExBox+4 as well as in the unconfined state.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1439-4235</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-7641</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201700308</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28557293</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Butadiene ; cage compounds ; Chemical bonds ; Confinement ; Confining ; Cycloaddition ; Decomposition reactions ; Density functional theory ; Diels-Alder reactions ; Encapsulation ; Ethylene ; host–guest systems ; kinetics ; thermodynamics</subject><ispartof>Chemphyschem, 2017-08, Vol.18 (16), p.2162-2170</ispartof><rights>2017 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><rights>2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.</rights><rights>2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3408-cab8601384b4e24191041fbdcdcafbd0d493a07a8a83de9fe85f941c4fca5f943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3408-cab8601384b4e24191041fbdcdcafbd0d493a07a8a83de9fe85f941c4fca5f943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcphc.201700308$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcphc.201700308$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28557293$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chakraborty, Debdutta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Das, Ranjita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chattaraj, Pratim Kumar</creatorcontrib><title>Does Confinement Always Lead to Thermodynamically and/or Kinetically Favorable Reactions? A Case Study using Diels–Alder Reactions within ExBox+4 and CB[7]</title><title>Chemphyschem</title><addtitle>Chemphyschem</addtitle><description>The impact of geometrical confinement on the thermodynamic as well as kinetic aspects of a model cycloaddition reaction between 1,3‐butadiene and ethylene have been investigated based on density functional theory calculations. To this end, organic hosts ExBox+4 and cucurbit[7]uril (CB[7]) were used to impose confinement effects on the reactants, transition state (TS), and product involved in the reaction. The results suggest that the shape of the host and thereby the nature of the confining regime dictates the thermodynamic outcome of the reaction. The reaction becomes thermodynamically more spontaneous inside CB[7] as compared with that in either ExBox+4 or in the “unconfined” gaseous state. Furthermore, the rate constant associated with the reaction increases manifold inside CB[7]. Atoms‐in a‐molecule, noncovalent interaction, natural bond orbital, as well as energy decomposition analyses suggest that the close geometrical proximity of the reactants inside CB[7] as well as extra stabilization of the TS in the encapsulated state may dictate the outcome.
Forced to react: The cycloaddition reaction of 1,3‐butadiene and ethylene becomes thermodynamically and kinetically more favorable inside cucurbit[7]uril as compared with that inside ExBox+4 as well as in the unconfined state.</description><subject>Butadiene</subject><subject>cage compounds</subject><subject>Chemical bonds</subject><subject>Confinement</subject><subject>Confining</subject><subject>Cycloaddition</subject><subject>Decomposition reactions</subject><subject>Density functional theory</subject><subject>Diels-Alder reactions</subject><subject>Encapsulation</subject><subject>Ethylene</subject><subject>host–guest systems</subject><subject>kinetics</subject><subject>thermodynamics</subject><issn>1439-4235</issn><issn>1439-7641</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EoqVw5YgscUFCu7VjZ2Of0DZtKWIlEJQTQpFjT1hXjr3YSbe59T9w5s_xS0i0Sytx4TRPo--9Gekh9JySOSUkO9abtZ5nhBaEMCIeoEPKmZwVC04f7jXPWH6AnqR0RQgRpKCP0UEm8rzIJDtEv04DJFwG31gPLfgOL91WDQmvQBncBXy5htgGM3jVWq2cG7Dy5jhE_H40dPvVuboOUdUO8CdQurPBpzd4iUuVAH_uejPgPln_HZ9acOn37c-lMxDvWby13dp6fHZzEm5e8-kCLk--Ft-eokeNcgme7ecR-nJ-dllezFYf3r4rl6uZZpyImVa1WBDKBK85ZJxKSjhtaqONVuMghkumSKGEEsyAbEDkjeRU80arSbEj9GqXu4nhRw-pq1qbNDinPIQ-VVQSJpkk-YS-_Ae9Cn3043cjlcmFyMQiH6n5jtIxpBShqTbRtioOFSXVVFw1FVfdFTcaXuxj-7oFc4f_bWoE5A7YWgfDf-Kq8uNFeR_-Bz-SprU</recordid><startdate>20170818</startdate><enddate>20170818</enddate><creator>Chakraborty, Debdutta</creator><creator>Das, Ranjita</creator><creator>Chattaraj, Pratim Kumar</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170818</creationdate><title>Does Confinement Always Lead to Thermodynamically and/or Kinetically Favorable Reactions? A Case Study using Diels–Alder Reactions within ExBox+4 and CB[7]</title><author>Chakraborty, Debdutta ; Das, Ranjita ; Chattaraj, Pratim Kumar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3408-cab8601384b4e24191041fbdcdcafbd0d493a07a8a83de9fe85f941c4fca5f943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Butadiene</topic><topic>cage compounds</topic><topic>Chemical bonds</topic><topic>Confinement</topic><topic>Confining</topic><topic>Cycloaddition</topic><topic>Decomposition reactions</topic><topic>Density functional theory</topic><topic>Diels-Alder reactions</topic><topic>Encapsulation</topic><topic>Ethylene</topic><topic>host–guest systems</topic><topic>kinetics</topic><topic>thermodynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chakraborty, Debdutta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Das, Ranjita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chattaraj, Pratim Kumar</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chemphyschem</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chakraborty, Debdutta</au><au>Das, Ranjita</au><au>Chattaraj, Pratim Kumar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Confinement Always Lead to Thermodynamically and/or Kinetically Favorable Reactions? A Case Study using Diels–Alder Reactions within ExBox+4 and CB[7]</atitle><jtitle>Chemphyschem</jtitle><addtitle>Chemphyschem</addtitle><date>2017-08-18</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>2162</spage><epage>2170</epage><pages>2162-2170</pages><issn>1439-4235</issn><eissn>1439-7641</eissn><abstract>The impact of geometrical confinement on the thermodynamic as well as kinetic aspects of a model cycloaddition reaction between 1,3‐butadiene and ethylene have been investigated based on density functional theory calculations. To this end, organic hosts ExBox+4 and cucurbit[7]uril (CB[7]) were used to impose confinement effects on the reactants, transition state (TS), and product involved in the reaction. The results suggest that the shape of the host and thereby the nature of the confining regime dictates the thermodynamic outcome of the reaction. The reaction becomes thermodynamically more spontaneous inside CB[7] as compared with that in either ExBox+4 or in the “unconfined” gaseous state. Furthermore, the rate constant associated with the reaction increases manifold inside CB[7]. Atoms‐in a‐molecule, noncovalent interaction, natural bond orbital, as well as energy decomposition analyses suggest that the close geometrical proximity of the reactants inside CB[7] as well as extra stabilization of the TS in the encapsulated state may dictate the outcome.
Forced to react: The cycloaddition reaction of 1,3‐butadiene and ethylene becomes thermodynamically and kinetically more favorable inside cucurbit[7]uril as compared with that inside ExBox+4 as well as in the unconfined state.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28557293</pmid><doi>10.1002/cphc.201700308</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1439-4235 |
ispartof | Chemphyschem, 2017-08, Vol.18 (16), p.2162-2170 |
issn | 1439-4235 1439-7641 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1903939054 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Butadiene cage compounds Chemical bonds Confinement Confining Cycloaddition Decomposition reactions Density functional theory Diels-Alder reactions Encapsulation Ethylene host–guest systems kinetics thermodynamics |
title | Does Confinement Always Lead to Thermodynamically and/or Kinetically Favorable Reactions? A Case Study using Diels–Alder Reactions within ExBox+4 and CB[7] |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T23%3A20%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Confinement%20Always%20Lead%20to%20Thermodynamically%20and/or%20Kinetically%20Favorable%20Reactions?%20A%20Case%20Study%20using%20Diels%E2%80%93Alder%20Reactions%20within%20ExBox+4%20and%20CB%5B7%5D&rft.jtitle=Chemphyschem&rft.au=Chakraborty,%20Debdutta&rft.date=2017-08-18&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=2162&rft.epage=2170&rft.pages=2162-2170&rft.issn=1439-4235&rft.eissn=1439-7641&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cphc.201700308&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1903939054%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1929682865&rft_id=info:pmid/28557293&rfr_iscdi=true |