Effect of air-blowing duration on the bond strength of current one-step adhesives to dentin
Abstract Objectives To evaluate the influence of different air-blowing durations on the micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) of five current one-step adhesive systems to dentin. Methods One hundred and five caries-free human molars and five current one-step adhesive systems were used: ABU (All Bond Un...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Dental materials 2017-08, Vol.33 (8), p.895-903 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 903 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 895 |
container_title | Dental materials |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Fu, Jiale Saikaew, Pipop Kawano, Shimpei Carvalho, Ricardo M Hannig, Matthias Sano, Hidehiko Selimovic, Denis |
description | Abstract Objectives To evaluate the influence of different air-blowing durations on the micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) of five current one-step adhesive systems to dentin. Methods One hundred and five caries-free human molars and five current one-step adhesive systems were used: ABU (All Bond Universal, Bisco, Inc.), CUB (CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond, Kuraray), GPB (G-Premio BOND, GC), OBA (OptiBond All-in-one, Kerr) and SBU (Scotchbond Universal, 3M ESPE). The adhesives were applied to 600 SiC paper-flat dentin surfaces according to each manufacturer’s instructions and were air-dried with standard, oil-free air pressure of 0.25 MPa for either 0 s, 5 s, 15 s or 30 s before light-curing. Bond strength to dentin was determined by using μTBS test after 24 h of water storage. The fracture pattern on the dentin surface was analyzed by SEM. The resin–dentin interface of untested specimens was visualized by panoramic SEM image. Data from μTBS were analyzed using two-way ANOVA (adhesive vs. air-blowing time), and Games-Howell (a = 0.05). Results Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect of materials (p = 0.000) and air-blowing time (p = 0.000) on bond strength to dentin. The interaction between factors was also significantly different (p = 0.000). Maximum bond strength for each system were recorded, OBA/15 s (76.34 ± 19.15 MPa), SBU/15 s (75.18 ± 12.83 MPa), CUB/15 s (68.23 ± 16.36 MPa), GPB/30 s (55.82 ± 12.99 MPa) and ABU/15 s (44.75 ± 8.95 MPa). The maximum bond strength of OBA and SUB were significantly higher than that of GPB and ABU (p < 0.05). Significance The bond strength of the current one-step adhesive systems is material-dependent (p = 0.000), and was influenced by air-blowing duration (p = 0.000). For the current one-step adhesive systems, higher bond strengths could be achieved with prolonged air-blowing duration between 15–30 s. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.dental.2017.03.015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1903438565</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0109564117300040</els_id><sourcerecordid>1903438565</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-18f613b9eedd72015fe5dd0a44363618ed4b0b0fe0bb82665fdffe6e0efe33943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk9r3DAQxUVpabZpv0Epgl56sTOyLNm-FEpI_0CghyanHoRsjbLaeqWtJCfk20dm0xZyKQgGwe-N3rwRIW8Z1AyYPNvVBn3Wc90A62rgNTDxjGxY3w0VwNA9JxtgMFRCtuyEvEppBwBtM7CX5KTphWg4Fxvy88JanDINlmoXq3EOd87fULNEnV3wtJy8RToGb2jKEf1N3q7wtMRyKTqPVcp4oNpsMblbTDQHujpz_jV5YfWc8M1jPSXXny-uzr9Wl9-_fDv_dFlNgrFcsd5KxscB0ZiuDCMsCmNAty2XXLIeTTvCCBZhHPtGSmFN8SwR0CLnQ8tPyYdj30MMvxdMWe1dmnCetcewJMUG4C3vhRQFff8E3YUl-uKuULyTPW8GXqj2SE0xpBTRqkN0ex3vFQO1hq926hi-WsNXwFWxXWTvHpsv4x7NX9GftAvw8QhgSePWYVRpcugnNC6WJSgT3P9eeNpgmp13k55_4T2mf7Oo1ChQP9YPsO6fdXxdPvAHH-6sFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1937683293</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of air-blowing duration on the bond strength of current one-step adhesives to dentin</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Fu, Jiale ; Saikaew, Pipop ; Kawano, Shimpei ; Carvalho, Ricardo M ; Hannig, Matthias ; Sano, Hidehiko ; Selimovic, Denis</creator><creatorcontrib>Fu, Jiale ; Saikaew, Pipop ; Kawano, Shimpei ; Carvalho, Ricardo M ; Hannig, Matthias ; Sano, Hidehiko ; Selimovic, Denis</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives To evaluate the influence of different air-blowing durations on the micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) of five current one-step adhesive systems to dentin. Methods One hundred and five caries-free human molars and five current one-step adhesive systems were used: ABU (All Bond Universal, Bisco, Inc.), CUB (CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond, Kuraray), GPB (G-Premio BOND, GC), OBA (OptiBond All-in-one, Kerr) and SBU (Scotchbond Universal, 3M ESPE). The adhesives were applied to 600 SiC paper-flat dentin surfaces according to each manufacturer’s instructions and were air-dried with standard, oil-free air pressure of 0.25 MPa for either 0 s, 5 s, 15 s or 30 s before light-curing. Bond strength to dentin was determined by using μTBS test after 24 h of water storage. The fracture pattern on the dentin surface was analyzed by SEM. The resin–dentin interface of untested specimens was visualized by panoramic SEM image. Data from μTBS were analyzed using two-way ANOVA (adhesive vs. air-blowing time), and Games-Howell (a = 0.05). Results Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect of materials (p = 0.000) and air-blowing time (p = 0.000) on bond strength to dentin. The interaction between factors was also significantly different (p = 0.000). Maximum bond strength for each system were recorded, OBA/15 s (76.34 ± 19.15 MPa), SBU/15 s (75.18 ± 12.83 MPa), CUB/15 s (68.23 ± 16.36 MPa), GPB/30 s (55.82 ± 12.99 MPa) and ABU/15 s (44.75 ± 8.95 MPa). The maximum bond strength of OBA and SUB were significantly higher than that of GPB and ABU (p < 0.05). Significance The bond strength of the current one-step adhesive systems is material-dependent (p = 0.000), and was influenced by air-blowing duration (p = 0.000). For the current one-step adhesive systems, higher bond strengths could be achieved with prolonged air-blowing duration between 15–30 s.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0109-5641</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.03.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28552335</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adhesion ; Adhesion tests ; Adhesive bonding ; Adhesives ; Advanced Basic Science ; Air-blowing time ; Blowing time ; Bond strength ; Bonding strength ; Composite Resins ; Curing Lights, Dental ; Data processing ; Dental Bonding ; Dental caries ; Dental Cements ; Dentin ; Dentin-Bonding Agents ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Materials Testing ; Maximum bond strength ; Micro-tensile bond strength ; Molars ; Panoramic SEM ; Resin Cements ; Teeth ; Tensile Strength ; Universal system ; Water storage</subject><ispartof>Dental materials, 2017-08, Vol.33 (8), p.895-903</ispartof><rights>The Academy of Dental Materials</rights><rights>2017 The Academy of Dental Materials</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Aug 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-18f613b9eedd72015fe5dd0a44363618ed4b0b0fe0bb82665fdffe6e0efe33943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-18f613b9eedd72015fe5dd0a44363618ed4b0b0fe0bb82665fdffe6e0efe33943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0109564117300040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28552335$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fu, Jiale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saikaew, Pipop</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawano, Shimpei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Ricardo M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannig, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sano, Hidehiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selimovic, Denis</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of air-blowing duration on the bond strength of current one-step adhesives to dentin</title><title>Dental materials</title><addtitle>Dent Mater</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives To evaluate the influence of different air-blowing durations on the micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) of five current one-step adhesive systems to dentin. Methods One hundred and five caries-free human molars and five current one-step adhesive systems were used: ABU (All Bond Universal, Bisco, Inc.), CUB (CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond, Kuraray), GPB (G-Premio BOND, GC), OBA (OptiBond All-in-one, Kerr) and SBU (Scotchbond Universal, 3M ESPE). The adhesives were applied to 600 SiC paper-flat dentin surfaces according to each manufacturer’s instructions and were air-dried with standard, oil-free air pressure of 0.25 MPa for either 0 s, 5 s, 15 s or 30 s before light-curing. Bond strength to dentin was determined by using μTBS test after 24 h of water storage. The fracture pattern on the dentin surface was analyzed by SEM. The resin–dentin interface of untested specimens was visualized by panoramic SEM image. Data from μTBS were analyzed using two-way ANOVA (adhesive vs. air-blowing time), and Games-Howell (a = 0.05). Results Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect of materials (p = 0.000) and air-blowing time (p = 0.000) on bond strength to dentin. The interaction between factors was also significantly different (p = 0.000). Maximum bond strength for each system were recorded, OBA/15 s (76.34 ± 19.15 MPa), SBU/15 s (75.18 ± 12.83 MPa), CUB/15 s (68.23 ± 16.36 MPa), GPB/30 s (55.82 ± 12.99 MPa) and ABU/15 s (44.75 ± 8.95 MPa). The maximum bond strength of OBA and SUB were significantly higher than that of GPB and ABU (p < 0.05). Significance The bond strength of the current one-step adhesive systems is material-dependent (p = 0.000), and was influenced by air-blowing duration (p = 0.000). For the current one-step adhesive systems, higher bond strengths could be achieved with prolonged air-blowing duration between 15–30 s.</description><subject>Adhesion</subject><subject>Adhesion tests</subject><subject>Adhesive bonding</subject><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Advanced Basic Science</subject><subject>Air-blowing time</subject><subject>Blowing time</subject><subject>Bond strength</subject><subject>Bonding strength</subject><subject>Composite Resins</subject><subject>Curing Lights, Dental</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Dental Bonding</subject><subject>Dental caries</subject><subject>Dental Cements</subject><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>Dentin-Bonding Agents</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Maximum bond strength</subject><subject>Micro-tensile bond strength</subject><subject>Molars</subject><subject>Panoramic SEM</subject><subject>Resin Cements</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Tensile Strength</subject><subject>Universal system</subject><subject>Water storage</subject><issn>0109-5641</issn><issn>1879-0097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk9r3DAQxUVpabZpv0Epgl56sTOyLNm-FEpI_0CghyanHoRsjbLaeqWtJCfk20dm0xZyKQgGwe-N3rwRIW8Z1AyYPNvVBn3Wc90A62rgNTDxjGxY3w0VwNA9JxtgMFRCtuyEvEppBwBtM7CX5KTphWg4Fxvy88JanDINlmoXq3EOd87fULNEnV3wtJy8RToGb2jKEf1N3q7wtMRyKTqPVcp4oNpsMblbTDQHujpz_jV5YfWc8M1jPSXXny-uzr9Wl9-_fDv_dFlNgrFcsd5KxscB0ZiuDCMsCmNAty2XXLIeTTvCCBZhHPtGSmFN8SwR0CLnQ8tPyYdj30MMvxdMWe1dmnCetcewJMUG4C3vhRQFff8E3YUl-uKuULyTPW8GXqj2SE0xpBTRqkN0ex3vFQO1hq926hi-WsNXwFWxXWTvHpsv4x7NX9GftAvw8QhgSePWYVRpcugnNC6WJSgT3P9eeNpgmp13k55_4T2mf7Oo1ChQP9YPsO6fdXxdPvAHH-6sFw</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Fu, Jiale</creator><creator>Saikaew, Pipop</creator><creator>Kawano, Shimpei</creator><creator>Carvalho, Ricardo M</creator><creator>Hannig, Matthias</creator><creator>Sano, Hidehiko</creator><creator>Selimovic, Denis</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Effect of air-blowing duration on the bond strength of current one-step adhesives to dentin</title><author>Fu, Jiale ; Saikaew, Pipop ; Kawano, Shimpei ; Carvalho, Ricardo M ; Hannig, Matthias ; Sano, Hidehiko ; Selimovic, Denis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-18f613b9eedd72015fe5dd0a44363618ed4b0b0fe0bb82665fdffe6e0efe33943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adhesion</topic><topic>Adhesion tests</topic><topic>Adhesive bonding</topic><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Advanced Basic Science</topic><topic>Air-blowing time</topic><topic>Blowing time</topic><topic>Bond strength</topic><topic>Bonding strength</topic><topic>Composite Resins</topic><topic>Curing Lights, Dental</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Dental Bonding</topic><topic>Dental caries</topic><topic>Dental Cements</topic><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>Dentin-Bonding Agents</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Maximum bond strength</topic><topic>Micro-tensile bond strength</topic><topic>Molars</topic><topic>Panoramic SEM</topic><topic>Resin Cements</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Tensile Strength</topic><topic>Universal system</topic><topic>Water storage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fu, Jiale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saikaew, Pipop</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawano, Shimpei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Ricardo M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannig, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sano, Hidehiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selimovic, Denis</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Dental materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fu, Jiale</au><au>Saikaew, Pipop</au><au>Kawano, Shimpei</au><au>Carvalho, Ricardo M</au><au>Hannig, Matthias</au><au>Sano, Hidehiko</au><au>Selimovic, Denis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of air-blowing duration on the bond strength of current one-step adhesives to dentin</atitle><jtitle>Dental materials</jtitle><addtitle>Dent Mater</addtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>895</spage><epage>903</epage><pages>895-903</pages><issn>0109-5641</issn><eissn>1879-0097</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives To evaluate the influence of different air-blowing durations on the micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) of five current one-step adhesive systems to dentin. Methods One hundred and five caries-free human molars and five current one-step adhesive systems were used: ABU (All Bond Universal, Bisco, Inc.), CUB (CLEARFIL™ Universal Bond, Kuraray), GPB (G-Premio BOND, GC), OBA (OptiBond All-in-one, Kerr) and SBU (Scotchbond Universal, 3M ESPE). The adhesives were applied to 600 SiC paper-flat dentin surfaces according to each manufacturer’s instructions and were air-dried with standard, oil-free air pressure of 0.25 MPa for either 0 s, 5 s, 15 s or 30 s before light-curing. Bond strength to dentin was determined by using μTBS test after 24 h of water storage. The fracture pattern on the dentin surface was analyzed by SEM. The resin–dentin interface of untested specimens was visualized by panoramic SEM image. Data from μTBS were analyzed using two-way ANOVA (adhesive vs. air-blowing time), and Games-Howell (a = 0.05). Results Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect of materials (p = 0.000) and air-blowing time (p = 0.000) on bond strength to dentin. The interaction between factors was also significantly different (p = 0.000). Maximum bond strength for each system were recorded, OBA/15 s (76.34 ± 19.15 MPa), SBU/15 s (75.18 ± 12.83 MPa), CUB/15 s (68.23 ± 16.36 MPa), GPB/30 s (55.82 ± 12.99 MPa) and ABU/15 s (44.75 ± 8.95 MPa). The maximum bond strength of OBA and SUB were significantly higher than that of GPB and ABU (p < 0.05). Significance The bond strength of the current one-step adhesive systems is material-dependent (p = 0.000), and was influenced by air-blowing duration (p = 0.000). For the current one-step adhesive systems, higher bond strengths could be achieved with prolonged air-blowing duration between 15–30 s.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28552335</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.dental.2017.03.015</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0109-5641 |
ispartof | Dental materials, 2017-08, Vol.33 (8), p.895-903 |
issn | 0109-5641 1879-0097 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1903438565 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adhesion Adhesion tests Adhesive bonding Adhesives Advanced Basic Science Air-blowing time Blowing time Bond strength Bonding strength Composite Resins Curing Lights, Dental Data processing Dental Bonding Dental caries Dental Cements Dentin Dentin-Bonding Agents Dentistry Humans Materials Testing Maximum bond strength Micro-tensile bond strength Molars Panoramic SEM Resin Cements Teeth Tensile Strength Universal system Water storage |
title | Effect of air-blowing duration on the bond strength of current one-step adhesives to dentin |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A18%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20air-blowing%20duration%20on%20the%20bond%20strength%20of%20current%20one-step%20adhesives%20to%20dentin&rft.jtitle=Dental%20materials&rft.au=Fu,%20Jiale&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=895&rft.epage=903&rft.pages=895-903&rft.issn=0109-5641&rft.eissn=1879-0097&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.dental.2017.03.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1903438565%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1937683293&rft_id=info:pmid/28552335&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0109564117300040&rfr_iscdi=true |