The influence of acceptor nucleophilicity on the glycosylation reaction mechanism
A set of model nucleophiles of gradually changing nucleophilicity is used to probe the glycosylation reaction mechanism. Glycosylations of ethanol-based acceptors, bearing varying amounts of fluorine atoms, report on the dependency of the stereochemistry in condensation reactions on the nucleophilic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chemical science (Cambridge) 2017-03, Vol.8 (3), p.1867-1875 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1875 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1867 |
container_title | Chemical science (Cambridge) |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | van der Vorm, S Hansen, T Overkleeft, H S van der Marel, G A Codée, J D C |
description | A set of model nucleophiles of gradually changing nucleophilicity is used to probe the glycosylation reaction mechanism. Glycosylations of ethanol-based acceptors, bearing varying amounts of fluorine atoms, report on the dependency of the stereochemistry in condensation reactions on the nucleophilicity of the acceptor. Three different glycosylation systems were scrutinized, that differ in the reaction mechanism, that - putatively - prevails during the coupling reaction. It is revealed that the stereoselectivity in glycosylations of benzylidene protected glucose donors are very susceptible to acceptor nucleophilicity whereas condensations of benzylidene mannose and mannuronic acid donors represent more robust glycosylation systems in terms of diastereoselectivity. The change in stereoselectivity with decreasing acceptor nucleophilicity is related to a change in reaction mechanism shifting from the S
2 side to the S
1 side of the reactivity spectrum. Carbohydrate acceptors are examined and the reactivity-selectivity profile of these nucleophiles mirrored those of the model acceptors studied. The set of model ethanol acceptors thus provides a simple and effective "toolbox" to investigate glycosylation reaction mechanisms and report on the robustness of glycosylation protocols. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1039/c6sc04638j |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1903437603</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1884125387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-779a0816f1f58a5e4da376a933fc96746e2c5d063ea715d02133cda4db0dead73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMoKuNs_AHSpQijSfPsRpDBJ4KIug7x9taJpM3YtML8ezszOujKbHLI_Tic3EPIIaOnjPLiDFQCKhQ371tkP6eCTZTkxfZG53SPjFN6p8PhnMlc75K93EjJhdb75PF5hplvqtBjA5jFKnMAOO9imzU9BIzzmQ8efLfIYpN1A_wWFhDTIrjODy8tOliJGmHmGp_qA7JTuZBw_H2PyMvV5fP0ZnL_cH07vbifgGSmm2hdOGqYqlgljZMoSse1cgXnFRRKC4U5yJIqjk6zQeSMcyidKF9pia7UfETO177z_rXGErDpWhfsvPW1axc2Om__Tho_s2_x00qRC0OLweD426CNHz2mztY-AYbgGox9sqygXAyZhrX9ixojWC65WcY6WaPQxpRarDaJGLXLxuxUPU1Xjd0N8NHvP2zQn374F4MLkq0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1884125387</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influence of acceptor nucleophilicity on the glycosylation reaction mechanism</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>van der Vorm, S ; Hansen, T ; Overkleeft, H S ; van der Marel, G A ; Codée, J D C</creator><creatorcontrib>van der Vorm, S ; Hansen, T ; Overkleeft, H S ; van der Marel, G A ; Codée, J D C</creatorcontrib><description>A set of model nucleophiles of gradually changing nucleophilicity is used to probe the glycosylation reaction mechanism. Glycosylations of ethanol-based acceptors, bearing varying amounts of fluorine atoms, report on the dependency of the stereochemistry in condensation reactions on the nucleophilicity of the acceptor. Three different glycosylation systems were scrutinized, that differ in the reaction mechanism, that - putatively - prevails during the coupling reaction. It is revealed that the stereoselectivity in glycosylations of benzylidene protected glucose donors are very susceptible to acceptor nucleophilicity whereas condensations of benzylidene mannose and mannuronic acid donors represent more robust glycosylation systems in terms of diastereoselectivity. The change in stereoselectivity with decreasing acceptor nucleophilicity is related to a change in reaction mechanism shifting from the S
2 side to the S
1 side of the reactivity spectrum. Carbohydrate acceptors are examined and the reactivity-selectivity profile of these nucleophiles mirrored those of the model acceptors studied. The set of model ethanol acceptors thus provides a simple and effective "toolbox" to investigate glycosylation reaction mechanisms and report on the robustness of glycosylation protocols.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2041-6520</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-6539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/c6sc04638j</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28553477</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Royal Society of Chemistry</publisher><subject>Chemistry ; Condensation ; Ethyl alcohol ; Mannose ; Nucleophiles ; Reaction mechanisms ; Robustness ; Stereoselectivity</subject><ispartof>Chemical science (Cambridge), 2017-03, Vol.8 (3), p.1867-1875</ispartof><rights>This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-779a0816f1f58a5e4da376a933fc96746e2c5d063ea715d02133cda4db0dead73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-779a0816f1f58a5e4da376a933fc96746e2c5d063ea715d02133cda4db0dead73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5424809/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5424809/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28553477$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van der Vorm, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Overkleeft, H S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Marel, G A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Codée, J D C</creatorcontrib><title>The influence of acceptor nucleophilicity on the glycosylation reaction mechanism</title><title>Chemical science (Cambridge)</title><addtitle>Chem Sci</addtitle><description>A set of model nucleophiles of gradually changing nucleophilicity is used to probe the glycosylation reaction mechanism. Glycosylations of ethanol-based acceptors, bearing varying amounts of fluorine atoms, report on the dependency of the stereochemistry in condensation reactions on the nucleophilicity of the acceptor. Three different glycosylation systems were scrutinized, that differ in the reaction mechanism, that - putatively - prevails during the coupling reaction. It is revealed that the stereoselectivity in glycosylations of benzylidene protected glucose donors are very susceptible to acceptor nucleophilicity whereas condensations of benzylidene mannose and mannuronic acid donors represent more robust glycosylation systems in terms of diastereoselectivity. The change in stereoselectivity with decreasing acceptor nucleophilicity is related to a change in reaction mechanism shifting from the S
2 side to the S
1 side of the reactivity spectrum. Carbohydrate acceptors are examined and the reactivity-selectivity profile of these nucleophiles mirrored those of the model acceptors studied. The set of model ethanol acceptors thus provides a simple and effective "toolbox" to investigate glycosylation reaction mechanisms and report on the robustness of glycosylation protocols.</description><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Condensation</subject><subject>Ethyl alcohol</subject><subject>Mannose</subject><subject>Nucleophiles</subject><subject>Reaction mechanisms</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><subject>Stereoselectivity</subject><issn>2041-6520</issn><issn>2041-6539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMoKuNs_AHSpQijSfPsRpDBJ4KIug7x9taJpM3YtML8ezszOujKbHLI_Tic3EPIIaOnjPLiDFQCKhQ371tkP6eCTZTkxfZG53SPjFN6p8PhnMlc75K93EjJhdb75PF5hplvqtBjA5jFKnMAOO9imzU9BIzzmQ8efLfIYpN1A_wWFhDTIrjODy8tOliJGmHmGp_qA7JTuZBw_H2PyMvV5fP0ZnL_cH07vbifgGSmm2hdOGqYqlgljZMoSse1cgXnFRRKC4U5yJIqjk6zQeSMcyidKF9pia7UfETO177z_rXGErDpWhfsvPW1axc2Om__Tho_s2_x00qRC0OLweD426CNHz2mztY-AYbgGox9sqygXAyZhrX9ixojWC65WcY6WaPQxpRarDaJGLXLxuxUPU1Xjd0N8NHvP2zQn374F4MLkq0</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>van der Vorm, S</creator><creator>Hansen, T</creator><creator>Overkleeft, H S</creator><creator>van der Marel, G A</creator><creator>Codée, J D C</creator><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>The influence of acceptor nucleophilicity on the glycosylation reaction mechanism</title><author>van der Vorm, S ; Hansen, T ; Overkleeft, H S ; van der Marel, G A ; Codée, J D C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-779a0816f1f58a5e4da376a933fc96746e2c5d063ea715d02133cda4db0dead73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Condensation</topic><topic>Ethyl alcohol</topic><topic>Mannose</topic><topic>Nucleophiles</topic><topic>Reaction mechanisms</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><topic>Stereoselectivity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van der Vorm, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Overkleeft, H S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Marel, G A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Codée, J D C</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Chemical science (Cambridge)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van der Vorm, S</au><au>Hansen, T</au><au>Overkleeft, H S</au><au>van der Marel, G A</au><au>Codée, J D C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influence of acceptor nucleophilicity on the glycosylation reaction mechanism</atitle><jtitle>Chemical science (Cambridge)</jtitle><addtitle>Chem Sci</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1867</spage><epage>1875</epage><pages>1867-1875</pages><issn>2041-6520</issn><eissn>2041-6539</eissn><abstract>A set of model nucleophiles of gradually changing nucleophilicity is used to probe the glycosylation reaction mechanism. Glycosylations of ethanol-based acceptors, bearing varying amounts of fluorine atoms, report on the dependency of the stereochemistry in condensation reactions on the nucleophilicity of the acceptor. Three different glycosylation systems were scrutinized, that differ in the reaction mechanism, that - putatively - prevails during the coupling reaction. It is revealed that the stereoselectivity in glycosylations of benzylidene protected glucose donors are very susceptible to acceptor nucleophilicity whereas condensations of benzylidene mannose and mannuronic acid donors represent more robust glycosylation systems in terms of diastereoselectivity. The change in stereoselectivity with decreasing acceptor nucleophilicity is related to a change in reaction mechanism shifting from the S
2 side to the S
1 side of the reactivity spectrum. Carbohydrate acceptors are examined and the reactivity-selectivity profile of these nucleophiles mirrored those of the model acceptors studied. The set of model ethanol acceptors thus provides a simple and effective "toolbox" to investigate glycosylation reaction mechanisms and report on the robustness of glycosylation protocols.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Royal Society of Chemistry</pub><pmid>28553477</pmid><doi>10.1039/c6sc04638j</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2041-6520 |
ispartof | Chemical science (Cambridge), 2017-03, Vol.8 (3), p.1867-1875 |
issn | 2041-6520 2041-6539 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1903437603 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Chemistry Condensation Ethyl alcohol Mannose Nucleophiles Reaction mechanisms Robustness Stereoselectivity |
title | The influence of acceptor nucleophilicity on the glycosylation reaction mechanism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T03%3A48%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influence%20of%20acceptor%20nucleophilicity%20on%20the%20glycosylation%20reaction%20mechanism&rft.jtitle=Chemical%20science%20(Cambridge)&rft.au=van%20der%20Vorm,%20S&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1867&rft.epage=1875&rft.pages=1867-1875&rft.issn=2041-6520&rft.eissn=2041-6539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/c6sc04638j&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1884125387%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1884125387&rft_id=info:pmid/28553477&rfr_iscdi=true |