Methodological systematic review identifies major limitations in prioritization processes for updating

Abstract Objectives The aim of the study was to identify and describe strategies to prioritize the updating of systematic reviews (SRs), health technology assessments (HTAs), or clinical guidelines (CGs). Study Design and Setting We conducted an SR of studies describing one or more methods to priori...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Journal of clinical epidemiology 2017-06, Vol.86, p.11-24
Hauptverfasser:	Martínez García, Laura, Pardo-Hernandez, Hector, Superchi, Cecilia, Niño de Guzman, Ena, Ballesteros, Monica, Ibargoyen Roteta, Nora, McFarlane, Emma, Posso, Margarita, Roqué i Figuls, Marta, Rotaeche del Campo, Rafael, Sanabria, Andrea Juliana, Selva, Anna, Solà, Ivan, Vernooij, Robin W.M, Alonso-Coello, Pablo
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Clinical decision making Clinical guidelines Clinical practice guidelines Criteria Decision making Epidemiology Guidelines as Topic - standards Humans Internal Medicine Internet Libraries Lists Methodology Methods Prioritization Research methodology Review Literature as Topic Reviews Studies Surveillance Systematic review Technology assessment Technology Assessment, Biomedical - standards Updating Upgrading
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!