Endovascular Repair of Thoracoabdominal and Arch Aneurysms in Patients with Connective Tissue Disease Using Branched and Fenestrated Devices

Background Prophylactic open surgery is the standard practice in patients with connective tissue and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) and aortic arch disease. Branched and fenestrated devices offer a less invasive alternative but there are concerns regarding the durability of the repair and t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of vascular surgery 2017-10, Vol.44, p.158-163
Hauptverfasser: Clough, Rachel E, Martin-Gonzalez, Teresa, Van Calster, Katrien, Hertault, Adrien, Spear, Rafaëlle, Azzaoui, Richard, Sobocinski, Jonathan, Haulon, Stéphan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 163
container_issue
container_start_page 158
container_title Annals of vascular surgery
container_volume 44
creator Clough, Rachel E
Martin-Gonzalez, Teresa
Van Calster, Katrien
Hertault, Adrien
Spear, Rafaëlle
Azzaoui, Richard
Sobocinski, Jonathan
Haulon, Stéphan
description Background Prophylactic open surgery is the standard practice in patients with connective tissue and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) and aortic arch disease. Branched and fenestrated devices offer a less invasive alternative but there are concerns regarding the durability of the repair and the effect of the stent graft on the fragile aortic wall. The aim of this study is to evaluate mid-term outcomes of fenestrated and/or branched endografting in patients with connective tissue disease. Methods All patients with connective tissue disease who underwent TAAA or arch aneurysm repair using a fenestrated and/or branched endograft in a single, high-volume center between 2004 and 2015 were included. Ruptured aneurysms and acute aortic dissections were excluded from this study, but not chronic aortic dissections. Results In total, 427 (403 pararenal and TAAAs, and 24 arch aneurysms) endovascular interventions were performed during the study period. Of these, 17 patients (4%) (16 TAAAs, 1 arch) had connective tissue disease. All patients were classified as unfit for open repair. The mean age was 51 ± 8 years. Thirteen patients with TAAA were treated with a fenestrated, 1 with a branched, and 2 with a combined fenestrated/branch device. A double inner branch device was used to treat the arch aneurysm. The technical success rate was 100% with no incidence of early mortality, spinal cord ischemia, stroke, or further dissection. Postoperative deterioration in renal function was seen in 3 patients (18.8%) and no hemodialysis was required. The mean follow-up was 3.4 years (0.3–7.4). Aneurysm sac shrinkage was seen in 35% of patients (6/17) and the sac diameter remained stable in 65% of patients (11/17). No sac or sealing zone enlargement was observed in any of the patients and there were no conversions to open repair. Reintervention was required in 1 patient at 2 years for bilateral renal artery occlusion (successful fibrinolysis). One type II endoleak (lumbar) is under surveillance and 1 type III (left renal stent) sealed spontaneously. One patient died at 2 years after the procedure from nonaortic causes (endocarditis). Conclusions The favorable mid-term outcomes in this series that demonstrate fenestrated and/or branched endografting should be considered in patients with connective tissue and TAAA and aortic arch disease, which are considered unfit for open surgery. All patients require close lifetime surveillance at a center specializing in aortic surgery, wi
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.05.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1903159683</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0890509616313826</els_id><sourcerecordid>1903159683</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-bebaf4a36016181f382a31a4d2911071e84d05a814d47cc50c6dc21956d231d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk-P0zAQxSMEYsvCF-CAfOTSridx0kRCSKX7B6SVQNA9W1N7snVJ7a4nKep34EPj0IUDB07WSO89eX5vsuw1yBlIqC62Mzzw_SyXMJ_JciaheJJNoIJyWjZq_jSbyLqR01I21Vn2gnkrJeS1qp9nZ3ldqkoqNcl-XnkbDshm6DCKr7RHF0VoxWoTIpqAaxt2zmMn0FuxiGYjFp6GeOQdC-fFF-wd-Z7FD9dvxDJ4T6Z3BxIrxzyQuHRMyCTu2Pl78SGiNxuyv8OuyRP3Efs0X9LBGeKX2bMWO6ZXj-95dnd9tVp-nN5-vvm0XNxOjQLop2taY6uwqBIEqKEt6hwLQGXzBkDOgWplZYk1KKvmxpTSVNbk0JSVzQuw8-I8e3vK3cfwMKRf6J1jQ12HnsLAGhpZQNlUdZGk-UlqYmCO1Op9dDuMRw1Sjy3orR5b0GMLWpY6tZBMbx7zh_WO7F_LH-xJ8O4koLTlwVHUbBJHQ9bFBFDb4P6f__4fu-mcdwa773Qk3oYhpsrSHppzLfW38Q7GM4CqgASrKn4B1muu7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1903159683</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endovascular Repair of Thoracoabdominal and Arch Aneurysms in Patients with Connective Tissue Disease Using Branched and Fenestrated Devices</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Clough, Rachel E ; Martin-Gonzalez, Teresa ; Van Calster, Katrien ; Hertault, Adrien ; Spear, Rafaëlle ; Azzaoui, Richard ; Sobocinski, Jonathan ; Haulon, Stéphan</creator><creatorcontrib>Clough, Rachel E ; Martin-Gonzalez, Teresa ; Van Calster, Katrien ; Hertault, Adrien ; Spear, Rafaëlle ; Azzaoui, Richard ; Sobocinski, Jonathan ; Haulon, Stéphan</creatorcontrib><description>Background Prophylactic open surgery is the standard practice in patients with connective tissue and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) and aortic arch disease. Branched and fenestrated devices offer a less invasive alternative but there are concerns regarding the durability of the repair and the effect of the stent graft on the fragile aortic wall. The aim of this study is to evaluate mid-term outcomes of fenestrated and/or branched endografting in patients with connective tissue disease. Methods All patients with connective tissue disease who underwent TAAA or arch aneurysm repair using a fenestrated and/or branched endograft in a single, high-volume center between 2004 and 2015 were included. Ruptured aneurysms and acute aortic dissections were excluded from this study, but not chronic aortic dissections. Results In total, 427 (403 pararenal and TAAAs, and 24 arch aneurysms) endovascular interventions were performed during the study period. Of these, 17 patients (4%) (16 TAAAs, 1 arch) had connective tissue disease. All patients were classified as unfit for open repair. The mean age was 51 ± 8 years. Thirteen patients with TAAA were treated with a fenestrated, 1 with a branched, and 2 with a combined fenestrated/branch device. A double inner branch device was used to treat the arch aneurysm. The technical success rate was 100% with no incidence of early mortality, spinal cord ischemia, stroke, or further dissection. Postoperative deterioration in renal function was seen in 3 patients (18.8%) and no hemodialysis was required. The mean follow-up was 3.4 years (0.3–7.4). Aneurysm sac shrinkage was seen in 35% of patients (6/17) and the sac diameter remained stable in 65% of patients (11/17). No sac or sealing zone enlargement was observed in any of the patients and there were no conversions to open repair. Reintervention was required in 1 patient at 2 years for bilateral renal artery occlusion (successful fibrinolysis). One type II endoleak (lumbar) is under surveillance and 1 type III (left renal stent) sealed spontaneously. One patient died at 2 years after the procedure from nonaortic causes (endocarditis). Conclusions The favorable mid-term outcomes in this series that demonstrate fenestrated and/or branched endografting should be considered in patients with connective tissue and TAAA and aortic arch disease, which are considered unfit for open surgery. All patients require close lifetime surveillance at a center specializing in aortic surgery, with sufficient experience in both open and endovascular aortic surgery, so that if endovascular treatment failure occurs it can be recognized early and further treatment offered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-5096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-5947</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.05.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28546044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - complications ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - surgery ; Aortography - methods ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation ; Computed Tomography Angiography ; Connective Tissue Diseases - complications ; Connective Tissue Diseases - diagnosis ; Databases, Factual ; Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects ; Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation ; Female ; France ; Hospitals, High-Volume ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - therapy ; Prosthesis Design ; Retreatment ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Stents ; Surgery ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Annals of vascular surgery, 2017-10, Vol.44, p.158-163</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-bebaf4a36016181f382a31a4d2911071e84d05a814d47cc50c6dc21956d231d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-bebaf4a36016181f382a31a4d2911071e84d05a814d47cc50c6dc21956d231d73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2017.05.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28546044$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clough, Rachel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin-Gonzalez, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Calster, Katrien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hertault, Adrien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spear, Rafaëlle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azzaoui, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobocinski, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haulon, Stéphan</creatorcontrib><title>Endovascular Repair of Thoracoabdominal and Arch Aneurysms in Patients with Connective Tissue Disease Using Branched and Fenestrated Devices</title><title>Annals of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Background Prophylactic open surgery is the standard practice in patients with connective tissue and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) and aortic arch disease. Branched and fenestrated devices offer a less invasive alternative but there are concerns regarding the durability of the repair and the effect of the stent graft on the fragile aortic wall. The aim of this study is to evaluate mid-term outcomes of fenestrated and/or branched endografting in patients with connective tissue disease. Methods All patients with connective tissue disease who underwent TAAA or arch aneurysm repair using a fenestrated and/or branched endograft in a single, high-volume center between 2004 and 2015 were included. Ruptured aneurysms and acute aortic dissections were excluded from this study, but not chronic aortic dissections. Results In total, 427 (403 pararenal and TAAAs, and 24 arch aneurysms) endovascular interventions were performed during the study period. Of these, 17 patients (4%) (16 TAAAs, 1 arch) had connective tissue disease. All patients were classified as unfit for open repair. The mean age was 51 ± 8 years. Thirteen patients with TAAA were treated with a fenestrated, 1 with a branched, and 2 with a combined fenestrated/branch device. A double inner branch device was used to treat the arch aneurysm. The technical success rate was 100% with no incidence of early mortality, spinal cord ischemia, stroke, or further dissection. Postoperative deterioration in renal function was seen in 3 patients (18.8%) and no hemodialysis was required. The mean follow-up was 3.4 years (0.3–7.4). Aneurysm sac shrinkage was seen in 35% of patients (6/17) and the sac diameter remained stable in 65% of patients (11/17). No sac or sealing zone enlargement was observed in any of the patients and there were no conversions to open repair. Reintervention was required in 1 patient at 2 years for bilateral renal artery occlusion (successful fibrinolysis). One type II endoleak (lumbar) is under surveillance and 1 type III (left renal stent) sealed spontaneously. One patient died at 2 years after the procedure from nonaortic causes (endocarditis). Conclusions The favorable mid-term outcomes in this series that demonstrate fenestrated and/or branched endografting should be considered in patients with connective tissue and TAAA and aortic arch disease, which are considered unfit for open surgery. All patients require close lifetime surveillance at a center specializing in aortic surgery, with sufficient experience in both open and endovascular aortic surgery, so that if endovascular treatment failure occurs it can be recognized early and further treatment offered.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - complications</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - surgery</subject><subject>Aortography - methods</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Computed Tomography Angiography</subject><subject>Connective Tissue Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Connective Tissue Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Hospitals, High-Volume</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - therapy</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Retreatment</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0890-5096</issn><issn>1615-5947</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk-P0zAQxSMEYsvCF-CAfOTSridx0kRCSKX7B6SVQNA9W1N7snVJ7a4nKep34EPj0IUDB07WSO89eX5vsuw1yBlIqC62Mzzw_SyXMJ_JciaheJJNoIJyWjZq_jSbyLqR01I21Vn2gnkrJeS1qp9nZ3ldqkoqNcl-XnkbDshm6DCKr7RHF0VoxWoTIpqAaxt2zmMn0FuxiGYjFp6GeOQdC-fFF-wd-Z7FD9dvxDJ4T6Z3BxIrxzyQuHRMyCTu2Pl78SGiNxuyv8OuyRP3Efs0X9LBGeKX2bMWO6ZXj-95dnd9tVp-nN5-vvm0XNxOjQLop2taY6uwqBIEqKEt6hwLQGXzBkDOgWplZYk1KKvmxpTSVNbk0JSVzQuw8-I8e3vK3cfwMKRf6J1jQ12HnsLAGhpZQNlUdZGk-UlqYmCO1Op9dDuMRw1Sjy3orR5b0GMLWpY6tZBMbx7zh_WO7F_LH-xJ8O4koLTlwVHUbBJHQ9bFBFDb4P6f__4fu-mcdwa773Qk3oYhpsrSHppzLfW38Q7GM4CqgASrKn4B1muu7Q</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Clough, Rachel E</creator><creator>Martin-Gonzalez, Teresa</creator><creator>Van Calster, Katrien</creator><creator>Hertault, Adrien</creator><creator>Spear, Rafaëlle</creator><creator>Azzaoui, Richard</creator><creator>Sobocinski, Jonathan</creator><creator>Haulon, Stéphan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Endovascular Repair of Thoracoabdominal and Arch Aneurysms in Patients with Connective Tissue Disease Using Branched and Fenestrated Devices</title><author>Clough, Rachel E ; Martin-Gonzalez, Teresa ; Van Calster, Katrien ; Hertault, Adrien ; Spear, Rafaëlle ; Azzaoui, Richard ; Sobocinski, Jonathan ; Haulon, Stéphan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-bebaf4a36016181f382a31a4d2911071e84d05a814d47cc50c6dc21956d231d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - complications</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - surgery</topic><topic>Aortography - methods</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Computed Tomography Angiography</topic><topic>Connective Tissue Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Connective Tissue Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Hospitals, High-Volume</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - therapy</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Retreatment</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clough, Rachel E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin-Gonzalez, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Calster, Katrien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hertault, Adrien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spear, Rafaëlle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azzaoui, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobocinski, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haulon, Stéphan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clough, Rachel E</au><au>Martin-Gonzalez, Teresa</au><au>Van Calster, Katrien</au><au>Hertault, Adrien</au><au>Spear, Rafaëlle</au><au>Azzaoui, Richard</au><au>Sobocinski, Jonathan</au><au>Haulon, Stéphan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endovascular Repair of Thoracoabdominal and Arch Aneurysms in Patients with Connective Tissue Disease Using Branched and Fenestrated Devices</atitle><jtitle>Annals of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>44</volume><spage>158</spage><epage>163</epage><pages>158-163</pages><issn>0890-5096</issn><eissn>1615-5947</eissn><abstract>Background Prophylactic open surgery is the standard practice in patients with connective tissue and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) and aortic arch disease. Branched and fenestrated devices offer a less invasive alternative but there are concerns regarding the durability of the repair and the effect of the stent graft on the fragile aortic wall. The aim of this study is to evaluate mid-term outcomes of fenestrated and/or branched endografting in patients with connective tissue disease. Methods All patients with connective tissue disease who underwent TAAA or arch aneurysm repair using a fenestrated and/or branched endograft in a single, high-volume center between 2004 and 2015 were included. Ruptured aneurysms and acute aortic dissections were excluded from this study, but not chronic aortic dissections. Results In total, 427 (403 pararenal and TAAAs, and 24 arch aneurysms) endovascular interventions were performed during the study period. Of these, 17 patients (4%) (16 TAAAs, 1 arch) had connective tissue disease. All patients were classified as unfit for open repair. The mean age was 51 ± 8 years. Thirteen patients with TAAA were treated with a fenestrated, 1 with a branched, and 2 with a combined fenestrated/branch device. A double inner branch device was used to treat the arch aneurysm. The technical success rate was 100% with no incidence of early mortality, spinal cord ischemia, stroke, or further dissection. Postoperative deterioration in renal function was seen in 3 patients (18.8%) and no hemodialysis was required. The mean follow-up was 3.4 years (0.3–7.4). Aneurysm sac shrinkage was seen in 35% of patients (6/17) and the sac diameter remained stable in 65% of patients (11/17). No sac or sealing zone enlargement was observed in any of the patients and there were no conversions to open repair. Reintervention was required in 1 patient at 2 years for bilateral renal artery occlusion (successful fibrinolysis). One type II endoleak (lumbar) is under surveillance and 1 type III (left renal stent) sealed spontaneously. One patient died at 2 years after the procedure from nonaortic causes (endocarditis). Conclusions The favorable mid-term outcomes in this series that demonstrate fenestrated and/or branched endografting should be considered in patients with connective tissue and TAAA and aortic arch disease, which are considered unfit for open surgery. All patients require close lifetime surveillance at a center specializing in aortic surgery, with sufficient experience in both open and endovascular aortic surgery, so that if endovascular treatment failure occurs it can be recognized early and further treatment offered.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28546044</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.avsg.2017.05.013</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-5096
ispartof Annals of vascular surgery, 2017-10, Vol.44, p.158-163
issn 0890-5096
1615-5947
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1903159683
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - complications
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - diagnostic imaging
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic - surgery
Aortography - methods
Blood Vessel Prosthesis
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation
Computed Tomography Angiography
Connective Tissue Diseases - complications
Connective Tissue Diseases - diagnosis
Databases, Factual
Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects
Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation
Female
France
Hospitals, High-Volume
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications - therapy
Prosthesis Design
Retreatment
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Stents
Surgery
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Endovascular Repair of Thoracoabdominal and Arch Aneurysms in Patients with Connective Tissue Disease Using Branched and Fenestrated Devices
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A26%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endovascular%20Repair%20of%20Thoracoabdominal%20and%20Arch%20Aneurysms%20in%20Patients%20with%20Connective%20Tissue%20Disease%20Using%20Branched%20and%20Fenestrated%20Devices&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Clough,%20Rachel%20E&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=44&rft.spage=158&rft.epage=163&rft.pages=158-163&rft.issn=0890-5096&rft.eissn=1615-5947&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.avsg.2017.05.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1903159683%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1903159683&rft_id=info:pmid/28546044&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0890509616313826&rfr_iscdi=true