Communicative Access Measures for Stroke: Development and Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Tool
Abstract Objective 1) To develop a systems level quality improvement tool targeting communicative access to information and decision-making for stroke patients with language disorders and 2) to evaluate the resulting tool – Communicative Access Measures for Stroke (CAMS). Design Survey development a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2017-11, Vol.98 (11), p.2228-2236.e5 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2236.e5 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2228 |
container_title | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Kagan, Aura, Ph.D Simmons-Mackie, Nina, Ph.D Victor, J. Charles, M.Sc Chan, Melodie T.Y., M.Ed |
description | Abstract Objective 1) To develop a systems level quality improvement tool targeting communicative access to information and decision-making for stroke patients with language disorders and 2) to evaluate the resulting tool – Communicative Access Measures for Stroke (CAMS). Design Survey development and evaluation was in line with accepted guidelines, and included item generation and reduction, survey formatting and composition, pre-testing, pilot-testing, and reliability assessment. Setting Development and evaluation were carried out in hospital and community agency settings. Participants The project utilized a convenience sample of 31 participants for the survey development, and 63 participants for the CAMS reliability study (broken down into 6 administrators/managers, 32 frontline staff, 25 participants with aphasia). The number of eligible participants invited to the reliability study included 45 community-based organizations in Ontario as well as 4400 individuals from communities of practice. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure(s) Data were analyzed using kappa statistics and intraclass correlations for each item score on all surveys. Results A tool, the Communicative Access Measures for Stroke (CAMS), comprising three surveys, was developed for health facilities from the perspectives of 1) administrators/policy makers, 2) staff/frontline health care providers, and 3) patients with aphasia (using a communicatively accessible version). Reliability for items on the CAMS Administrator and CAMS Staff surveys was moderate to high (Kappa/ICCs ranging from 0.54 to 1.00). As expected, reliability was lower for the CAMS Patient survey with most items having ICCs between 0.4 and 0.6. Conclusion (s): These findings suggest that CAMS may provide useful quality improvement information for health care facilities with an interest in improving care for patients with stroke and aphasia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.04.017 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1902106352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0003999317303167</els_id><sourcerecordid>1902106352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3dc50f91e47791615e0791e39a6cdbedb04d88b89a5c8aa341c575400fb76fc23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-L1TAUxYMozpvRL-BCsnTTTm7TtI2IMDznH4yIzAjuQpreQt6kzTNpC-_bm_pGF7NwdbjwOyfkHELeAcuBQXW-y_V-CHnBoM5ZmSd5QTYgeJE1Bfx8STaMMZ5JKfkJOY1xl85KcHhNTopGcCHrZkParR-GebRGT3ZBemEMxki_oo5zwEh7H-j9FPwjfqRfcEHn9wOOE9VjRy8X7eZk8yP1PdX0-6ydnQ70dtgHv-Af7sF794a86rWL-PZJz8iPq8uH7U129-36dntxl5kSYMp4ZwTrJWBZ1xIqEMiSIpe6Ml2LXcvKrmnaRmphGq15CUbUomSsb-uqNwU_Ix-Ouen5XzPGSQ02GnROj-jnqECyAljFxYoWR9QEH2PAXu2DHXQ4KGBq7Vbt1NqtWrtVrFRJkun9U_7cDtj9s_wtMwGfjgCmXy4Wg4rG4miwswHNpDpv_5__-ZndOLsu4x7xgHHn5zCm_hSoWCim7td113GTlXGoav4bJCWgPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1902106352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Communicative Access Measures for Stroke: Development and Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Tool</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Kagan, Aura, Ph.D ; Simmons-Mackie, Nina, Ph.D ; Victor, J. Charles, M.Sc ; Chan, Melodie T.Y., M.Ed</creator><creatorcontrib>Kagan, Aura, Ph.D ; Simmons-Mackie, Nina, Ph.D ; Victor, J. Charles, M.Sc ; Chan, Melodie T.Y., M.Ed</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective 1) To develop a systems level quality improvement tool targeting communicative access to information and decision-making for stroke patients with language disorders and 2) to evaluate the resulting tool – Communicative Access Measures for Stroke (CAMS). Design Survey development and evaluation was in line with accepted guidelines, and included item generation and reduction, survey formatting and composition, pre-testing, pilot-testing, and reliability assessment. Setting Development and evaluation were carried out in hospital and community agency settings. Participants The project utilized a convenience sample of 31 participants for the survey development, and 63 participants for the CAMS reliability study (broken down into 6 administrators/managers, 32 frontline staff, 25 participants with aphasia). The number of eligible participants invited to the reliability study included 45 community-based organizations in Ontario as well as 4400 individuals from communities of practice. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure(s) Data were analyzed using kappa statistics and intraclass correlations for each item score on all surveys. Results A tool, the Communicative Access Measures for Stroke (CAMS), comprising three surveys, was developed for health facilities from the perspectives of 1) administrators/policy makers, 2) staff/frontline health care providers, and 3) patients with aphasia (using a communicatively accessible version). Reliability for items on the CAMS Administrator and CAMS Staff surveys was moderate to high (Kappa/ICCs ranging from 0.54 to 1.00). As expected, reliability was lower for the CAMS Patient survey with most items having ICCs between 0.4 and 0.6. Conclusion (s): These findings suggest that CAMS may provide useful quality improvement information for health care facilities with an interest in improving care for patients with stroke and aphasia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.04.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28535978</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aphasia ; Aphasia - rehabilitation ; Communication ; Female ; Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation ; Health Facility Administration - standards ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient satisfaction ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Quality Improvement - organization & administration ; Quality Improvement - standards ; Rehabilitation ; Reproducibility of Results ; Severity of Illness Index ; Stroke ; Stroke Rehabilitation - standards</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2017-11, Vol.98 (11), p.2228-2236.e5</ispartof><rights>American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>2017 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3dc50f91e47791615e0791e39a6cdbedb04d88b89a5c8aa341c575400fb76fc23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3dc50f91e47791615e0791e39a6cdbedb04d88b89a5c8aa341c575400fb76fc23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.04.017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28535978$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kagan, Aura, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmons-Mackie, Nina, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Victor, J. Charles, M.Sc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Melodie T.Y., M.Ed</creatorcontrib><title>Communicative Access Measures for Stroke: Development and Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Tool</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective 1) To develop a systems level quality improvement tool targeting communicative access to information and decision-making for stroke patients with language disorders and 2) to evaluate the resulting tool – Communicative Access Measures for Stroke (CAMS). Design Survey development and evaluation was in line with accepted guidelines, and included item generation and reduction, survey formatting and composition, pre-testing, pilot-testing, and reliability assessment. Setting Development and evaluation were carried out in hospital and community agency settings. Participants The project utilized a convenience sample of 31 participants for the survey development, and 63 participants for the CAMS reliability study (broken down into 6 administrators/managers, 32 frontline staff, 25 participants with aphasia). The number of eligible participants invited to the reliability study included 45 community-based organizations in Ontario as well as 4400 individuals from communities of practice. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure(s) Data were analyzed using kappa statistics and intraclass correlations for each item score on all surveys. Results A tool, the Communicative Access Measures for Stroke (CAMS), comprising three surveys, was developed for health facilities from the perspectives of 1) administrators/policy makers, 2) staff/frontline health care providers, and 3) patients with aphasia (using a communicatively accessible version). Reliability for items on the CAMS Administrator and CAMS Staff surveys was moderate to high (Kappa/ICCs ranging from 0.54 to 1.00). As expected, reliability was lower for the CAMS Patient survey with most items having ICCs between 0.4 and 0.6. Conclusion (s): These findings suggest that CAMS may provide useful quality improvement information for health care facilities with an interest in improving care for patients with stroke and aphasia.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aphasia</subject><subject>Aphasia - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation</subject><subject>Health Facility Administration - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Quality Improvement - organization & administration</subject><subject>Quality Improvement - standards</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke Rehabilitation - standards</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU-L1TAUxYMozpvRL-BCsnTTTm7TtI2IMDznH4yIzAjuQpreQt6kzTNpC-_bm_pGF7NwdbjwOyfkHELeAcuBQXW-y_V-CHnBoM5ZmSd5QTYgeJE1Bfx8STaMMZ5JKfkJOY1xl85KcHhNTopGcCHrZkParR-GebRGT3ZBemEMxki_oo5zwEh7H-j9FPwjfqRfcEHn9wOOE9VjRy8X7eZk8yP1PdX0-6ydnQ70dtgHv-Af7sF794a86rWL-PZJz8iPq8uH7U129-36dntxl5kSYMp4ZwTrJWBZ1xIqEMiSIpe6Ml2LXcvKrmnaRmphGq15CUbUomSsb-uqNwU_Ix-Ouen5XzPGSQ02GnROj-jnqECyAljFxYoWR9QEH2PAXu2DHXQ4KGBq7Vbt1NqtWrtVrFRJkun9U_7cDtj9s_wtMwGfjgCmXy4Wg4rG4miwswHNpDpv_5__-ZndOLsu4x7xgHHn5zCm_hSoWCim7td113GTlXGoav4bJCWgPw</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Kagan, Aura, Ph.D</creator><creator>Simmons-Mackie, Nina, Ph.D</creator><creator>Victor, J. Charles, M.Sc</creator><creator>Chan, Melodie T.Y., M.Ed</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Communicative Access Measures for Stroke: Development and Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Tool</title><author>Kagan, Aura, Ph.D ; Simmons-Mackie, Nina, Ph.D ; Victor, J. Charles, M.Sc ; Chan, Melodie T.Y., M.Ed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3dc50f91e47791615e0791e39a6cdbedb04d88b89a5c8aa341c575400fb76fc23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aphasia</topic><topic>Aphasia - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation</topic><topic>Health Facility Administration - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Quality Improvement - organization & administration</topic><topic>Quality Improvement - standards</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke Rehabilitation - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kagan, Aura, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmons-Mackie, Nina, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Victor, J. Charles, M.Sc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Melodie T.Y., M.Ed</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kagan, Aura, Ph.D</au><au>Simmons-Mackie, Nina, Ph.D</au><au>Victor, J. Charles, M.Sc</au><au>Chan, Melodie T.Y., M.Ed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Communicative Access Measures for Stroke: Development and Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Tool</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2228</spage><epage>2236.e5</epage><pages>2228-2236.e5</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective 1) To develop a systems level quality improvement tool targeting communicative access to information and decision-making for stroke patients with language disorders and 2) to evaluate the resulting tool – Communicative Access Measures for Stroke (CAMS). Design Survey development and evaluation was in line with accepted guidelines, and included item generation and reduction, survey formatting and composition, pre-testing, pilot-testing, and reliability assessment. Setting Development and evaluation were carried out in hospital and community agency settings. Participants The project utilized a convenience sample of 31 participants for the survey development, and 63 participants for the CAMS reliability study (broken down into 6 administrators/managers, 32 frontline staff, 25 participants with aphasia). The number of eligible participants invited to the reliability study included 45 community-based organizations in Ontario as well as 4400 individuals from communities of practice. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure(s) Data were analyzed using kappa statistics and intraclass correlations for each item score on all surveys. Results A tool, the Communicative Access Measures for Stroke (CAMS), comprising three surveys, was developed for health facilities from the perspectives of 1) administrators/policy makers, 2) staff/frontline health care providers, and 3) patients with aphasia (using a communicatively accessible version). Reliability for items on the CAMS Administrator and CAMS Staff surveys was moderate to high (Kappa/ICCs ranging from 0.54 to 1.00). As expected, reliability was lower for the CAMS Patient survey with most items having ICCs between 0.4 and 0.6. Conclusion (s): These findings suggest that CAMS may provide useful quality improvement information for health care facilities with an interest in improving care for patients with stroke and aphasia.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28535978</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apmr.2017.04.017</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9993 |
ispartof | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2017-11, Vol.98 (11), p.2228-2236.e5 |
issn | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1902106352 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Aphasia Aphasia - rehabilitation Communication Female Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation Health Facility Administration - standards Humans Male Middle Aged Patient satisfaction Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Quality Improvement - organization & administration Quality Improvement - standards Rehabilitation Reproducibility of Results Severity of Illness Index Stroke Stroke Rehabilitation - standards |
title | Communicative Access Measures for Stroke: Development and Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Tool |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A23%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Communicative%20Access%20Measures%20for%20Stroke:%20Development%20and%20Evaluation%20of%20a%20Quality%20Improvement%20Tool&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Kagan,%20Aura,%20Ph.D&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2228&rft.epage=2236.e5&rft.pages=2228-2236.e5&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.04.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1902106352%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1902106352&rft_id=info:pmid/28535978&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0003999317303167&rfr_iscdi=true |