Communicative Access Measures for Stroke: Development and Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Tool

Abstract Objective 1) To develop a systems level quality improvement tool targeting communicative access to information and decision-making for stroke patients with language disorders and 2) to evaluate the resulting tool – Communicative Access Measures for Stroke (CAMS). Design Survey development a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2017-11, Vol.98 (11), p.2228-2236.e5
Hauptverfasser: Kagan, Aura, Ph.D, Simmons-Mackie, Nina, Ph.D, Victor, J. Charles, M.Sc, Chan, Melodie T.Y., M.Ed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2236.e5
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2228
container_title Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
container_volume 98
creator Kagan, Aura, Ph.D
Simmons-Mackie, Nina, Ph.D
Victor, J. Charles, M.Sc
Chan, Melodie T.Y., M.Ed
description Abstract Objective 1) To develop a systems level quality improvement tool targeting communicative access to information and decision-making for stroke patients with language disorders and 2) to evaluate the resulting tool – Communicative Access Measures for Stroke (CAMS). Design Survey development and evaluation was in line with accepted guidelines, and included item generation and reduction, survey formatting and composition, pre-testing, pilot-testing, and reliability assessment. Setting Development and evaluation were carried out in hospital and community agency settings. Participants The project utilized a convenience sample of 31 participants for the survey development, and 63 participants for the CAMS reliability study (broken down into 6 administrators/managers, 32 frontline staff, 25 participants with aphasia). The number of eligible participants invited to the reliability study included 45 community-based organizations in Ontario as well as 4400 individuals from communities of practice. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure(s) Data were analyzed using kappa statistics and intraclass correlations for each item score on all surveys. Results A tool, the Communicative Access Measures for Stroke (CAMS), comprising three surveys, was developed for health facilities from the perspectives of 1) administrators/policy makers, 2) staff/frontline health care providers, and 3) patients with aphasia (using a communicatively accessible version). Reliability for items on the CAMS Administrator and CAMS Staff surveys was moderate to high (Kappa/ICCs ranging from 0.54 to 1.00). As expected, reliability was lower for the CAMS Patient survey with most items having ICCs between 0.4 and 0.6. Conclusion (s): These findings suggest that CAMS may provide useful quality improvement information for health care facilities with an interest in improving care for patients with stroke and aphasia.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.04.017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1902106352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0003999317303167</els_id><sourcerecordid>1902106352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3dc50f91e47791615e0791e39a6cdbedb04d88b89a5c8aa341c575400fb76fc23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-L1TAUxYMozpvRL-BCsnTTTm7TtI2IMDznH4yIzAjuQpreQt6kzTNpC-_bm_pGF7NwdbjwOyfkHELeAcuBQXW-y_V-CHnBoM5ZmSd5QTYgeJE1Bfx8STaMMZ5JKfkJOY1xl85KcHhNTopGcCHrZkParR-GebRGT3ZBemEMxki_oo5zwEh7H-j9FPwjfqRfcEHn9wOOE9VjRy8X7eZk8yP1PdX0-6ydnQ70dtgHv-Af7sF794a86rWL-PZJz8iPq8uH7U129-36dntxl5kSYMp4ZwTrJWBZ1xIqEMiSIpe6Ml2LXcvKrmnaRmphGq15CUbUomSsb-uqNwU_Ix-Ouen5XzPGSQ02GnROj-jnqECyAljFxYoWR9QEH2PAXu2DHXQ4KGBq7Vbt1NqtWrtVrFRJkun9U_7cDtj9s_wtMwGfjgCmXy4Wg4rG4miwswHNpDpv_5__-ZndOLsu4x7xgHHn5zCm_hSoWCim7td113GTlXGoav4bJCWgPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1902106352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Communicative Access Measures for Stroke: Development and Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Tool</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Kagan, Aura, Ph.D ; Simmons-Mackie, Nina, Ph.D ; Victor, J. Charles, M.Sc ; Chan, Melodie T.Y., M.Ed</creator><creatorcontrib>Kagan, Aura, Ph.D ; Simmons-Mackie, Nina, Ph.D ; Victor, J. Charles, M.Sc ; Chan, Melodie T.Y., M.Ed</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective 1) To develop a systems level quality improvement tool targeting communicative access to information and decision-making for stroke patients with language disorders and 2) to evaluate the resulting tool – Communicative Access Measures for Stroke (CAMS). Design Survey development and evaluation was in line with accepted guidelines, and included item generation and reduction, survey formatting and composition, pre-testing, pilot-testing, and reliability assessment. Setting Development and evaluation were carried out in hospital and community agency settings. Participants The project utilized a convenience sample of 31 participants for the survey development, and 63 participants for the CAMS reliability study (broken down into 6 administrators/managers, 32 frontline staff, 25 participants with aphasia). The number of eligible participants invited to the reliability study included 45 community-based organizations in Ontario as well as 4400 individuals from communities of practice. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure(s) Data were analyzed using kappa statistics and intraclass correlations for each item score on all surveys. Results A tool, the Communicative Access Measures for Stroke (CAMS), comprising three surveys, was developed for health facilities from the perspectives of 1) administrators/policy makers, 2) staff/frontline health care providers, and 3) patients with aphasia (using a communicatively accessible version). Reliability for items on the CAMS Administrator and CAMS Staff surveys was moderate to high (Kappa/ICCs ranging from 0.54 to 1.00). As expected, reliability was lower for the CAMS Patient survey with most items having ICCs between 0.4 and 0.6. Conclusion (s): These findings suggest that CAMS may provide useful quality improvement information for health care facilities with an interest in improving care for patients with stroke and aphasia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.04.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28535978</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aphasia ; Aphasia - rehabilitation ; Communication ; Female ; Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation ; Health Facility Administration - standards ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient satisfaction ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Quality Improvement - organization &amp; administration ; Quality Improvement - standards ; Rehabilitation ; Reproducibility of Results ; Severity of Illness Index ; Stroke ; Stroke Rehabilitation - standards</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2017-11, Vol.98 (11), p.2228-2236.e5</ispartof><rights>American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>2017 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3dc50f91e47791615e0791e39a6cdbedb04d88b89a5c8aa341c575400fb76fc23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3dc50f91e47791615e0791e39a6cdbedb04d88b89a5c8aa341c575400fb76fc23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.04.017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28535978$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kagan, Aura, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmons-Mackie, Nina, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Victor, J. Charles, M.Sc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Melodie T.Y., M.Ed</creatorcontrib><title>Communicative Access Measures for Stroke: Development and Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Tool</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective 1) To develop a systems level quality improvement tool targeting communicative access to information and decision-making for stroke patients with language disorders and 2) to evaluate the resulting tool – Communicative Access Measures for Stroke (CAMS). Design Survey development and evaluation was in line with accepted guidelines, and included item generation and reduction, survey formatting and composition, pre-testing, pilot-testing, and reliability assessment. Setting Development and evaluation were carried out in hospital and community agency settings. Participants The project utilized a convenience sample of 31 participants for the survey development, and 63 participants for the CAMS reliability study (broken down into 6 administrators/managers, 32 frontline staff, 25 participants with aphasia). The number of eligible participants invited to the reliability study included 45 community-based organizations in Ontario as well as 4400 individuals from communities of practice. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure(s) Data were analyzed using kappa statistics and intraclass correlations for each item score on all surveys. Results A tool, the Communicative Access Measures for Stroke (CAMS), comprising three surveys, was developed for health facilities from the perspectives of 1) administrators/policy makers, 2) staff/frontline health care providers, and 3) patients with aphasia (using a communicatively accessible version). Reliability for items on the CAMS Administrator and CAMS Staff surveys was moderate to high (Kappa/ICCs ranging from 0.54 to 1.00). As expected, reliability was lower for the CAMS Patient survey with most items having ICCs between 0.4 and 0.6. Conclusion (s): These findings suggest that CAMS may provide useful quality improvement information for health care facilities with an interest in improving care for patients with stroke and aphasia.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aphasia</subject><subject>Aphasia - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation</subject><subject>Health Facility Administration - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Quality Improvement - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Quality Improvement - standards</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Stroke Rehabilitation - standards</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU-L1TAUxYMozpvRL-BCsnTTTm7TtI2IMDznH4yIzAjuQpreQt6kzTNpC-_bm_pGF7NwdbjwOyfkHELeAcuBQXW-y_V-CHnBoM5ZmSd5QTYgeJE1Bfx8STaMMZ5JKfkJOY1xl85KcHhNTopGcCHrZkParR-GebRGT3ZBemEMxki_oo5zwEh7H-j9FPwjfqRfcEHn9wOOE9VjRy8X7eZk8yP1PdX0-6ydnQ70dtgHv-Af7sF794a86rWL-PZJz8iPq8uH7U129-36dntxl5kSYMp4ZwTrJWBZ1xIqEMiSIpe6Ml2LXcvKrmnaRmphGq15CUbUomSsb-uqNwU_Ix-Ouen5XzPGSQ02GnROj-jnqECyAljFxYoWR9QEH2PAXu2DHXQ4KGBq7Vbt1NqtWrtVrFRJkun9U_7cDtj9s_wtMwGfjgCmXy4Wg4rG4miwswHNpDpv_5__-ZndOLsu4x7xgHHn5zCm_hSoWCim7td113GTlXGoav4bJCWgPw</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Kagan, Aura, Ph.D</creator><creator>Simmons-Mackie, Nina, Ph.D</creator><creator>Victor, J. Charles, M.Sc</creator><creator>Chan, Melodie T.Y., M.Ed</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Communicative Access Measures for Stroke: Development and Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Tool</title><author>Kagan, Aura, Ph.D ; Simmons-Mackie, Nina, Ph.D ; Victor, J. Charles, M.Sc ; Chan, Melodie T.Y., M.Ed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3dc50f91e47791615e0791e39a6cdbedb04d88b89a5c8aa341c575400fb76fc23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aphasia</topic><topic>Aphasia - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation</topic><topic>Health Facility Administration - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Quality Improvement - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Quality Improvement - standards</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Stroke Rehabilitation - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kagan, Aura, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmons-Mackie, Nina, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Victor, J. Charles, M.Sc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Melodie T.Y., M.Ed</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kagan, Aura, Ph.D</au><au>Simmons-Mackie, Nina, Ph.D</au><au>Victor, J. Charles, M.Sc</au><au>Chan, Melodie T.Y., M.Ed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Communicative Access Measures for Stroke: Development and Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Tool</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2228</spage><epage>2236.e5</epage><pages>2228-2236.e5</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective 1) To develop a systems level quality improvement tool targeting communicative access to information and decision-making for stroke patients with language disorders and 2) to evaluate the resulting tool – Communicative Access Measures for Stroke (CAMS). Design Survey development and evaluation was in line with accepted guidelines, and included item generation and reduction, survey formatting and composition, pre-testing, pilot-testing, and reliability assessment. Setting Development and evaluation were carried out in hospital and community agency settings. Participants The project utilized a convenience sample of 31 participants for the survey development, and 63 participants for the CAMS reliability study (broken down into 6 administrators/managers, 32 frontline staff, 25 participants with aphasia). The number of eligible participants invited to the reliability study included 45 community-based organizations in Ontario as well as 4400 individuals from communities of practice. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure(s) Data were analyzed using kappa statistics and intraclass correlations for each item score on all surveys. Results A tool, the Communicative Access Measures for Stroke (CAMS), comprising three surveys, was developed for health facilities from the perspectives of 1) administrators/policy makers, 2) staff/frontline health care providers, and 3) patients with aphasia (using a communicatively accessible version). Reliability for items on the CAMS Administrator and CAMS Staff surveys was moderate to high (Kappa/ICCs ranging from 0.54 to 1.00). As expected, reliability was lower for the CAMS Patient survey with most items having ICCs between 0.4 and 0.6. Conclusion (s): These findings suggest that CAMS may provide useful quality improvement information for health care facilities with an interest in improving care for patients with stroke and aphasia.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28535978</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apmr.2017.04.017</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-9993
ispartof Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2017-11, Vol.98 (11), p.2228-2236.e5
issn 0003-9993
1532-821X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1902106352
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Aphasia
Aphasia - rehabilitation
Communication
Female
Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation
Health Facility Administration - standards
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patient satisfaction
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Quality Improvement - organization & administration
Quality Improvement - standards
Rehabilitation
Reproducibility of Results
Severity of Illness Index
Stroke
Stroke Rehabilitation - standards
title Communicative Access Measures for Stroke: Development and Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Tool
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A23%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Communicative%20Access%20Measures%20for%20Stroke:%20Development%20and%20Evaluation%20of%20a%20Quality%20Improvement%20Tool&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Kagan,%20Aura,%20Ph.D&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2228&rft.epage=2236.e5&rft.pages=2228-2236.e5&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.04.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1902106352%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1902106352&rft_id=info:pmid/28535978&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0003999317303167&rfr_iscdi=true