Comparison of centre of gravity and centre of pressure patterns in the golf swing
Analysing the centre of pressure (COP) and centre of gravity (COG) could reveal stabilising strategies used by golfers throughout the golf swing. This study identified and compared golfers' COP and COG patterns throughout the golf swing in medial-lateral (ML) and anterior-posterior (AP) directi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of sport science 2017-03, Vol.17 (2), p.168-178 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 178 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 168 |
| container_title | European journal of sport science |
| container_volume | 17 |
| creator | Smith, Aimée C. Roberts, Jonathan R. Kong, Pui Wah Forrester, Stephanie E. |
| description | Analysing the centre of pressure (COP) and centre of gravity (COG) could reveal stabilising strategies used by golfers throughout the golf swing. This study identified and compared golfers' COP and COG patterns throughout the golf swing in medial-lateral (ML) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions using principal component analysis (PCA) and examined their relationship to clubhead velocity. Three-dimensional marker trajectories were collected using Vicon motion analysis and force plate data from two Kistler force plates for 22 low-handicap golfers during drives. Golfers' COG and COP were expressed as a percentage distance between their feet. PCA was performed on COG and COP in ML and AP directions. Relationships between principal component (PC) scores were examined using Pearson correlation and regression analysis used to examine the relationship with clubhead velocity. ML COP movements varied in magnitude (PC1), rate of change and timing (PC2 and PC3). The COP and COG PC1 scores were strongly correlated in both directions (ML: r = 0.90, P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/17461391.2016.1240238 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1901761781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1835408198</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5017-7c63413b1fbc879c5ee8e92c8377a03d72e3422f863f7c426f25dfca4dbdf2173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EolD4BFCWbFL8SGJng4Cq5SEkhIC15Tp2MUrsYKdU_XsctUWsgNVcjc7cmbkAnCA4QpDBc0SzApESjTBExQjhDGLCdsABykmRUlzC3agjk_bQAByG8A5hbGC2DwaYUkILTA7A09g1rfAmOJs4nUhlO696Nffi03SrRNjqR7f1KoRF1K3oOuVtSIxNujeVzF2tk7A0dn4E9rSogzre1CF4nU5exrfpw-PN3fjqIZV5vCOlsiAZIjOkZ5LRUuZKMVViyQilApKKYkUyjDUriKYyw4XGeaWlyKpZpTGiZAjO1r6tdx8LFTremCBVXQur3CJwVMY1BaIM_Y0ykmeQoZJFNF-j0rsQvNK89aYRfsUR5H3wfBs874Pnm-Dj3OlmxWLWqOp7apt0BC7WwNLUavU_Vz65fx5fTyEsy_7fy7WBsdr5RiydryveiVXtvPbCShM4-f3ILwftotg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835408198</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of centre of gravity and centre of pressure patterns in the golf swing</title><source>Taylor & Francis Online</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Smith, Aimée C. ; Roberts, Jonathan R. ; Kong, Pui Wah ; Forrester, Stephanie E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Aimée C. ; Roberts, Jonathan R. ; Kong, Pui Wah ; Forrester, Stephanie E.</creatorcontrib><description>Analysing the centre of pressure (COP) and centre of gravity (COG) could reveal stabilising strategies used by golfers throughout the golf swing. This study identified and compared golfers' COP and COG patterns throughout the golf swing in medial-lateral (ML) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions using principal component analysis (PCA) and examined their relationship to clubhead velocity. Three-dimensional marker trajectories were collected using Vicon motion analysis and force plate data from two Kistler force plates for 22 low-handicap golfers during drives. Golfers' COG and COP were expressed as a percentage distance between their feet. PCA was performed on COG and COP in ML and AP directions. Relationships between principal component (PC) scores were examined using Pearson correlation and regression analysis used to examine the relationship with clubhead velocity. ML COP movements varied in magnitude (PC1), rate of change and timing (PC2 and PC3). The COP and COG PC1 scores were strongly correlated in both directions (ML: r = 0.90, P < .05; AP: r = 0.81, P < .05). Clubhead velocity, explained by three PCs (74%), related to timing and rate of change in COP
ML
near downswing (PC2 and PC3) and timing of COG
ML
late backswing (PC2). The relationship between COP
ML
and COG
ML
PC1 scores identified extremes of COP and COG patterns in golfers and could indicate a golfer's dynamic balance. Golfers with earlier movement of COP to the front foot (PC2) and rate of change (PC3) patterns in ML COP, prior to the downswing, may be more likely to generate higher clubhead velocity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1746-1391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-7290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1240238</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27737623</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Adult ; Athletic Performance - physiology ; balance ; Biomechanical Phenomena - physiology ; Biomechanics ; force plate ; golf ; Golf - physiology ; Humans ; Postural Balance - physiology ; Principal Component Analysis ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European journal of sport science, 2017-03, Vol.17 (2), p.168-178</ispartof><rights>2016 European College of Sport Science 2016</rights><rights>European College of Sport Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5017-7c63413b1fbc879c5ee8e92c8377a03d72e3422f863f7c426f25dfca4dbdf2173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5017-7c63413b1fbc879c5ee8e92c8377a03d72e3422f863f7c426f25dfca4dbdf2173</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9531-9214</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17461391.2016.1240238$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17461391.2016.1240238$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27737623$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Aimée C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Jonathan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Pui Wah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrester, Stephanie E.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of centre of gravity and centre of pressure patterns in the golf swing</title><title>European journal of sport science</title><addtitle>Eur J Sport Sci</addtitle><description>Analysing the centre of pressure (COP) and centre of gravity (COG) could reveal stabilising strategies used by golfers throughout the golf swing. This study identified and compared golfers' COP and COG patterns throughout the golf swing in medial-lateral (ML) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions using principal component analysis (PCA) and examined their relationship to clubhead velocity. Three-dimensional marker trajectories were collected using Vicon motion analysis and force plate data from two Kistler force plates for 22 low-handicap golfers during drives. Golfers' COG and COP were expressed as a percentage distance between their feet. PCA was performed on COG and COP in ML and AP directions. Relationships between principal component (PC) scores were examined using Pearson correlation and regression analysis used to examine the relationship with clubhead velocity. ML COP movements varied in magnitude (PC1), rate of change and timing (PC2 and PC3). The COP and COG PC1 scores were strongly correlated in both directions (ML: r = 0.90, P < .05; AP: r = 0.81, P < .05). Clubhead velocity, explained by three PCs (74%), related to timing and rate of change in COP
ML
near downswing (PC2 and PC3) and timing of COG
ML
late backswing (PC2). The relationship between COP
ML
and COG
ML
PC1 scores identified extremes of COP and COG patterns in golfers and could indicate a golfer's dynamic balance. Golfers with earlier movement of COP to the front foot (PC2) and rate of change (PC3) patterns in ML COP, prior to the downswing, may be more likely to generate higher clubhead velocity.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Athletic Performance - physiology</subject><subject>balance</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena - physiology</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>force plate</subject><subject>golf</subject><subject>Golf - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Postural Balance - physiology</subject><subject>Principal Component Analysis</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1746-1391</issn><issn>1536-7290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EolD4BFCWbFL8SGJng4Cq5SEkhIC15Tp2MUrsYKdU_XsctUWsgNVcjc7cmbkAnCA4QpDBc0SzApESjTBExQjhDGLCdsABykmRUlzC3agjk_bQAByG8A5hbGC2DwaYUkILTA7A09g1rfAmOJs4nUhlO696Nffi03SrRNjqR7f1KoRF1K3oOuVtSIxNujeVzF2tk7A0dn4E9rSogzre1CF4nU5exrfpw-PN3fjqIZV5vCOlsiAZIjOkZ5LRUuZKMVViyQilApKKYkUyjDUriKYyw4XGeaWlyKpZpTGiZAjO1r6tdx8LFTremCBVXQur3CJwVMY1BaIM_Y0ykmeQoZJFNF-j0rsQvNK89aYRfsUR5H3wfBs874Pnm-Dj3OlmxWLWqOp7apt0BC7WwNLUavU_Vz65fx5fTyEsy_7fy7WBsdr5RiydryveiVXtvPbCShM4-f3ILwftotg</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>Smith, Aimée C.</creator><creator>Roberts, Jonathan R.</creator><creator>Kong, Pui Wah</creator><creator>Forrester, Stephanie E.</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9531-9214</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>Comparison of centre of gravity and centre of pressure patterns in the golf swing</title><author>Smith, Aimée C. ; Roberts, Jonathan R. ; Kong, Pui Wah ; Forrester, Stephanie E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5017-7c63413b1fbc879c5ee8e92c8377a03d72e3422f863f7c426f25dfca4dbdf2173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Athletic Performance - physiology</topic><topic>balance</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena - physiology</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>force plate</topic><topic>golf</topic><topic>Golf - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Postural Balance - physiology</topic><topic>Principal Component Analysis</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Aimée C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Jonathan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Pui Wah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forrester, Stephanie E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>European journal of sport science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Aimée C.</au><au>Roberts, Jonathan R.</au><au>Kong, Pui Wah</au><au>Forrester, Stephanie E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of centre of gravity and centre of pressure patterns in the golf swing</atitle><jtitle>European journal of sport science</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Sport Sci</addtitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>168</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>168-178</pages><issn>1746-1391</issn><eissn>1536-7290</eissn><abstract>Analysing the centre of pressure (COP) and centre of gravity (COG) could reveal stabilising strategies used by golfers throughout the golf swing. This study identified and compared golfers' COP and COG patterns throughout the golf swing in medial-lateral (ML) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions using principal component analysis (PCA) and examined their relationship to clubhead velocity. Three-dimensional marker trajectories were collected using Vicon motion analysis and force plate data from two Kistler force plates for 22 low-handicap golfers during drives. Golfers' COG and COP were expressed as a percentage distance between their feet. PCA was performed on COG and COP in ML and AP directions. Relationships between principal component (PC) scores were examined using Pearson correlation and regression analysis used to examine the relationship with clubhead velocity. ML COP movements varied in magnitude (PC1), rate of change and timing (PC2 and PC3). The COP and COG PC1 scores were strongly correlated in both directions (ML: r = 0.90, P < .05; AP: r = 0.81, P < .05). Clubhead velocity, explained by three PCs (74%), related to timing and rate of change in COP
ML
near downswing (PC2 and PC3) and timing of COG
ML
late backswing (PC2). The relationship between COP
ML
and COG
ML
PC1 scores identified extremes of COP and COG patterns in golfers and could indicate a golfer's dynamic balance. Golfers with earlier movement of COP to the front foot (PC2) and rate of change (PC3) patterns in ML COP, prior to the downswing, may be more likely to generate higher clubhead velocity.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>27737623</pmid><doi>10.1080/17461391.2016.1240238</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9531-9214</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1746-1391 |
| ispartof | European journal of sport science, 2017-03, Vol.17 (2), p.168-178 |
| issn | 1746-1391 1536-7290 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1901761781 |
| source | Taylor & Francis Online; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adult Athletic Performance - physiology balance Biomechanical Phenomena - physiology Biomechanics force plate golf Golf - physiology Humans Postural Balance - physiology Principal Component Analysis Task Performance and Analysis Young Adult |
| title | Comparison of centre of gravity and centre of pressure patterns in the golf swing |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T15%3A35%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20centre%20of%20gravity%20and%20centre%20of%20pressure%20patterns%20in%20the%20golf%20swing&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20sport%20science&rft.au=Smith,%20Aim%C3%A9e%20C.&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=168&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=168-178&rft.issn=1746-1391&rft.eissn=1536-7290&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17461391.2016.1240238&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1835408198%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835408198&rft_id=info:pmid/27737623&rfr_iscdi=true |