Application of the activated sludge model to aerated lagoons
The different kinds of aerated lagoons, which exclude anaerobic pre-treatment ponds, are described and the design approach for aerated lagoons is explained. This hinges around ensuring that the 1st lagoon is suspension mixed and the second and any additional are facultative. Selection of the retenti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water S. A. 2017-04, Vol.43 (2), p.238-238 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 238 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 238 |
container_title | Water S. A. |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Marais, G.v.R. Ekama, G.A. Wentzel, M.C. |
description | The different kinds of aerated lagoons, which exclude anaerobic pre-treatment ponds, are described and the design approach for aerated lagoons is explained. This hinges around ensuring that the 1st lagoon is suspension mixed and the second and any additional are facultative. Selection of the retention time for the 1st lagoon is important to ensure complete utilization of the influent biodegradable organics. Minimum retention times to achieve this at 14°C and 22°C were determined with the general activated sludge kinetic simulation model for (i) readily biodegradable soluble organics (BSO) only, (ii) slowly biodegradable particulate organics (BPO) only, (iii) real municipal wastewater (20% BSO and 80% BPO) and (iv) real municipal wastewater with 5% OHO active VSS mass seed. The minimum hydraulic retention times for these four cases are: at 14°C 1.3, 3.0, 2.0 and 1.5 d, respectively, and at 22°C 0.3, 2.0, 1.2 and 1.0 d, respectively. From a comparison of the simulation results with the steady-state model calculations, washout of OHOs takes place at about 75% of these retention times. Approximate equations to estimate the power requirements for aeration by mechanical surface aerators and mixing are given. These equations are combined with those of the steady-state activated sludge lagoon model for calculating the oxygen requirements and the aeration power density (W/m^sup 3^) in each lagoon. With these equations, it is shown that influent COD concentration needs to be between an upper and lower limit band to ensure that the 1st lagoon is suspension mixed and the second lagoon is facultative. This COD concentration band decreases as the influent flow increases. The important conclusion arising from this is that if the aerated lagoon system is applied for small rural communities, where land for these large systems is likely to be available, then additional mixing energy above that for aeration will need to be provided to ensure that the 1st lagoon is suspension mixed - this additional aeration cost makes it unlikely that aerated lagoons will be applied for municipal wastewater treatment. Matching mixing and aeration power requirements for industrial organic wastewaters is easier because these usually are significantly stronger than municipal wastewaters. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4314/wsa.v43i2.08 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1901757145</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A494585720</galeid><sourcerecordid>A494585720</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-e457497eb0240a015baeb90736faa7acaa16d0ccb64bf22c2de76a39c398021c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLw0AUhYMoWKs7f0DAjQtT55VMBtyU4gsKbnQ93Exu6pQkE2cmFf-9qXUhru7h8J3L4STJJSULwam4_Qyw2Alu2YKUR8mMcFlmQvLy-I8-Tc5C2BLCOBdqltwth6G1BqJ1feqaNL5jCibaHUSs09CO9QbTztXYptGlgP7Hb2HjXB_Ok5MG2oAXv3eevD3cv66esvXL4_Nquc6MyGnMUORSKIkVYYIAoXkFWCkiedEASDAAtKiJMVUhqoYxw2qUBXBluCoJo4bPk-vD38G7jxFD1J0NBtsWenRj0FQRKnNJRT6hV__QrRt9P7XTtFSMUikImajFgdpAi9r2jYt-6mGgxs4a12NjJ38plMjLXLJ94OYQMN6F4LHRg7cd-C9Nid5vr6ft9c_2mpT8G2OhdsY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1892117400</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application of the activated sludge model to aerated lagoons</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>African Journals Online (Open Access)</source><source>Sabinet African Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Marais, G.v.R. ; Ekama, G.A. ; Wentzel, M.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Marais, G.v.R. ; Ekama, G.A. ; Wentzel, M.C.</creatorcontrib><description>The different kinds of aerated lagoons, which exclude anaerobic pre-treatment ponds, are described and the design approach for aerated lagoons is explained. This hinges around ensuring that the 1st lagoon is suspension mixed and the second and any additional are facultative. Selection of the retention time for the 1st lagoon is important to ensure complete utilization of the influent biodegradable organics. Minimum retention times to achieve this at 14°C and 22°C were determined with the general activated sludge kinetic simulation model for (i) readily biodegradable soluble organics (BSO) only, (ii) slowly biodegradable particulate organics (BPO) only, (iii) real municipal wastewater (20% BSO and 80% BPO) and (iv) real municipal wastewater with 5% OHO active VSS mass seed. The minimum hydraulic retention times for these four cases are: at 14°C 1.3, 3.0, 2.0 and 1.5 d, respectively, and at 22°C 0.3, 2.0, 1.2 and 1.0 d, respectively. From a comparison of the simulation results with the steady-state model calculations, washout of OHOs takes place at about 75% of these retention times. Approximate equations to estimate the power requirements for aeration by mechanical surface aerators and mixing are given. These equations are combined with those of the steady-state activated sludge lagoon model for calculating the oxygen requirements and the aeration power density (W/m^sup 3^) in each lagoon. With these equations, it is shown that influent COD concentration needs to be between an upper and lower limit band to ensure that the 1st lagoon is suspension mixed and the second lagoon is facultative. This COD concentration band decreases as the influent flow increases. The important conclusion arising from this is that if the aerated lagoon system is applied for small rural communities, where land for these large systems is likely to be available, then additional mixing energy above that for aeration will need to be provided to ensure that the 1st lagoon is suspension mixed - this additional aeration cost makes it unlikely that aerated lagoons will be applied for municipal wastewater treatment. Matching mixing and aeration power requirements for industrial organic wastewaters is easier because these usually are significantly stronger than municipal wastewaters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-4738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0378-4738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4314/wsa.v43i2.08</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Gezina: Water Research Commission</publisher><subject>Activated sludge ; Aerated lagoons ; Aeration ; Biodegradation ; Environmental aspects ; Methods ; Municipal wastewater ; Oxygen requirement ; Retention ; Retention time ; Rural areas ; Sewage lagoons ; Sewage treatment ; Sludge ; Sludge lagoons ; Wastewater treatment</subject><ispartof>Water S. A., 2017-04, Vol.43 (2), p.238-238</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Water Research Commission</rights><rights>Copyright Water Research Commission Apr 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-e457497eb0240a015baeb90736faa7acaa16d0ccb64bf22c2de76a39c398021c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marais, G.v.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekama, G.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wentzel, M.C.</creatorcontrib><title>Application of the activated sludge model to aerated lagoons</title><title>Water S. A.</title><description>The different kinds of aerated lagoons, which exclude anaerobic pre-treatment ponds, are described and the design approach for aerated lagoons is explained. This hinges around ensuring that the 1st lagoon is suspension mixed and the second and any additional are facultative. Selection of the retention time for the 1st lagoon is important to ensure complete utilization of the influent biodegradable organics. Minimum retention times to achieve this at 14°C and 22°C were determined with the general activated sludge kinetic simulation model for (i) readily biodegradable soluble organics (BSO) only, (ii) slowly biodegradable particulate organics (BPO) only, (iii) real municipal wastewater (20% BSO and 80% BPO) and (iv) real municipal wastewater with 5% OHO active VSS mass seed. The minimum hydraulic retention times for these four cases are: at 14°C 1.3, 3.0, 2.0 and 1.5 d, respectively, and at 22°C 0.3, 2.0, 1.2 and 1.0 d, respectively. From a comparison of the simulation results with the steady-state model calculations, washout of OHOs takes place at about 75% of these retention times. Approximate equations to estimate the power requirements for aeration by mechanical surface aerators and mixing are given. These equations are combined with those of the steady-state activated sludge lagoon model for calculating the oxygen requirements and the aeration power density (W/m^sup 3^) in each lagoon. With these equations, it is shown that influent COD concentration needs to be between an upper and lower limit band to ensure that the 1st lagoon is suspension mixed and the second lagoon is facultative. This COD concentration band decreases as the influent flow increases. The important conclusion arising from this is that if the aerated lagoon system is applied for small rural communities, where land for these large systems is likely to be available, then additional mixing energy above that for aeration will need to be provided to ensure that the 1st lagoon is suspension mixed - this additional aeration cost makes it unlikely that aerated lagoons will be applied for municipal wastewater treatment. Matching mixing and aeration power requirements for industrial organic wastewaters is easier because these usually are significantly stronger than municipal wastewaters.</description><subject>Activated sludge</subject><subject>Aerated lagoons</subject><subject>Aeration</subject><subject>Biodegradation</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Municipal wastewater</subject><subject>Oxygen requirement</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Retention time</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Sewage lagoons</subject><subject>Sewage treatment</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Sludge lagoons</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><issn>0378-4738</issn><issn>0378-4738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLw0AUhYMoWKs7f0DAjQtT55VMBtyU4gsKbnQ93Exu6pQkE2cmFf-9qXUhru7h8J3L4STJJSULwam4_Qyw2Alu2YKUR8mMcFlmQvLy-I8-Tc5C2BLCOBdqltwth6G1BqJ1feqaNL5jCibaHUSs09CO9QbTztXYptGlgP7Hb2HjXB_Ok5MG2oAXv3eevD3cv66esvXL4_Nquc6MyGnMUORSKIkVYYIAoXkFWCkiedEASDAAtKiJMVUhqoYxw2qUBXBluCoJo4bPk-vD38G7jxFD1J0NBtsWenRj0FQRKnNJRT6hV__QrRt9P7XTtFSMUikImajFgdpAi9r2jYt-6mGgxs4a12NjJ38plMjLXLJ94OYQMN6F4LHRg7cd-C9Nid5vr6ft9c_2mpT8G2OhdsY</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Marais, G.v.R.</creator><creator>Ekama, G.A.</creator><creator>Wentzel, M.C.</creator><general>Water Research Commission</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Application of the activated sludge model to aerated lagoons</title><author>Marais, G.v.R. ; Ekama, G.A. ; Wentzel, M.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-e457497eb0240a015baeb90736faa7acaa16d0ccb64bf22c2de76a39c398021c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Activated sludge</topic><topic>Aerated lagoons</topic><topic>Aeration</topic><topic>Biodegradation</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Municipal wastewater</topic><topic>Oxygen requirement</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Retention time</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Sewage lagoons</topic><topic>Sewage treatment</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Sludge lagoons</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marais, G.v.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekama, G.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wentzel, M.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East & Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water S. A.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marais, G.v.R.</au><au>Ekama, G.A.</au><au>Wentzel, M.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application of the activated sludge model to aerated lagoons</atitle><jtitle>Water S. A.</jtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>238</spage><epage>238</epage><pages>238-238</pages><issn>0378-4738</issn><eissn>0378-4738</eissn><abstract>The different kinds of aerated lagoons, which exclude anaerobic pre-treatment ponds, are described and the design approach for aerated lagoons is explained. This hinges around ensuring that the 1st lagoon is suspension mixed and the second and any additional are facultative. Selection of the retention time for the 1st lagoon is important to ensure complete utilization of the influent biodegradable organics. Minimum retention times to achieve this at 14°C and 22°C were determined with the general activated sludge kinetic simulation model for (i) readily biodegradable soluble organics (BSO) only, (ii) slowly biodegradable particulate organics (BPO) only, (iii) real municipal wastewater (20% BSO and 80% BPO) and (iv) real municipal wastewater with 5% OHO active VSS mass seed. The minimum hydraulic retention times for these four cases are: at 14°C 1.3, 3.0, 2.0 and 1.5 d, respectively, and at 22°C 0.3, 2.0, 1.2 and 1.0 d, respectively. From a comparison of the simulation results with the steady-state model calculations, washout of OHOs takes place at about 75% of these retention times. Approximate equations to estimate the power requirements for aeration by mechanical surface aerators and mixing are given. These equations are combined with those of the steady-state activated sludge lagoon model for calculating the oxygen requirements and the aeration power density (W/m^sup 3^) in each lagoon. With these equations, it is shown that influent COD concentration needs to be between an upper and lower limit band to ensure that the 1st lagoon is suspension mixed and the second lagoon is facultative. This COD concentration band decreases as the influent flow increases. The important conclusion arising from this is that if the aerated lagoon system is applied for small rural communities, where land for these large systems is likely to be available, then additional mixing energy above that for aeration will need to be provided to ensure that the 1st lagoon is suspension mixed - this additional aeration cost makes it unlikely that aerated lagoons will be applied for municipal wastewater treatment. Matching mixing and aeration power requirements for industrial organic wastewaters is easier because these usually are significantly stronger than municipal wastewaters.</abstract><cop>Gezina</cop><pub>Water Research Commission</pub><doi>10.4314/wsa.v43i2.08</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-4738 |
ispartof | Water S. A., 2017-04, Vol.43 (2), p.238-238 |
issn | 0378-4738 0378-4738 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1901757145 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; African Journals Online (Open Access); Sabinet African Journals Open Access Collection; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Activated sludge Aerated lagoons Aeration Biodegradation Environmental aspects Methods Municipal wastewater Oxygen requirement Retention Retention time Rural areas Sewage lagoons Sewage treatment Sludge Sludge lagoons Wastewater treatment |
title | Application of the activated sludge model to aerated lagoons |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A09%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20of%20the%20activated%20sludge%20model%20to%20aerated%20lagoons&rft.jtitle=Water%20S.%20A.&rft.au=Marais,%20G.v.R.&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=238&rft.epage=238&rft.pages=238-238&rft.issn=0378-4738&rft.eissn=0378-4738&rft_id=info:doi/10.4314/wsa.v43i2.08&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA494585720%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1892117400&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A494585720&rfr_iscdi=true |