Distribution of Aleutian mink disease virus contamination in the environment of infected mink farms
•Samples were classified depending on the type of sample and proximity to animals.•A high percentage of samples from all categories were AMDV positive (31–100%).•Some categories without direct contact with animals showed a high viral load.•Differences between DNA extraction methods were found regard...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Veterinary microbiology 2017-05, Vol.204, p.59-63 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 63 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 59 |
container_title | Veterinary microbiology |
container_volume | 204 |
creator | Prieto, A. Fernández-Antonio, R. Díaz-Cao, J.M. López, G. Díaz, P. Alonso, J.M. Morrondo, P. Fernández, G. |
description | •Samples were classified depending on the type of sample and proximity to animals.•A high percentage of samples from all categories were AMDV positive (31–100%).•Some categories without direct contact with animals showed a high viral load.•Differences between DNA extraction methods were found regarding AMDV quantification.•Results are helpful for revising the biosecurity and cleaning/disinfection measures.
Control and eradication of Aleutian Mink Disease Virus (AMDV) are a major concern for fur-bearing animal production. Despite notably reducing disease prevalence, current control programs are unable to prevent the reinfection of farms, and environmental AMDV persistence seems to play a major role regarding this issue. In this study 114 samples from different areas and elements of seven infected mink farms were analyzed by qPCR in order to evaluate the environmental distribution of AMDV load. Samples were classified into nine categories, depending on the type of sample and degree of proximity to the animals, the main source of infection. Two different commercial DNA extraction kits were employed in parallel for all samples. qPCR analysis showed 69.3% positive samples with one kit and 81.6% with the other, and significant differences between the two DNA extraction methods were found regarding AMDV DNA recovery. Regarding sample categorization, all categories showed a high percentage of AMDV positive samples (31%–100%). Quantification of positive samples showed a decrease in AMDV load from animal barns to the periphery of the farm. In addition, those elements in direct contact with animals, the street clothes and vehicles of farm workers and personal protective equipment used for sampling showed a high viral load, and statistical analysis revealed significant differences in AMDV load between the first and last categories. These results indicate high environmental contamination of positive farms, which is helpful for future considerations about cleaning and disinfection procedures and biosecurity protocols. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.04.013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1901752746</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378113517302997</els_id><sourcerecordid>1963136004</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-56ab074fa0db33527d9388cb5d0885ff13930bdc9e8e6f865fed95a028ffc24a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv3CAUhVHVqpk8_kFVWeomG7sXY2y8qRSleUmRuknWCMNFZTqGBPBI_fdl6jSLLrLiivudAzqHkE8UGgq0_7pt9phnp5sW6NBA1wBl78iGioHVLe_a92QDbBA1pYwfkeOUtgDQjT18JEet4KwVMGyI_u5Sjm5asgu-Cra62GGZla9m539VxiVUCau9i0uqdPBZlXv1F3a-yj-xQl-Wwc_o80HvvEWd0ax6q-KcTskHq3YJz17OE_J4ffVweVvf_7i5u7y4rzUbIde8VxMMnVVgJsZ4O5iRCaEnbkAIbi1lI4PJ6BEF9lb03KIZuYJWWKvbTrETcr76PsXwvGDKcnZJ426nPIYlSTqWpIpv1xf0y3_oNizRl98VqmeU9SWrQnUrpWNIKaKVT9HNKv6WFOShBLmVawnyUIKETpYSiuzzi_kyzWheRf9SL8C3FcCSxt5hlEk79BqNiyU8aYJ7-4U_ZnqbDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1963136004</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distribution of Aleutian mink disease virus contamination in the environment of infected mink farms</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Prieto, A. ; Fernández-Antonio, R. ; Díaz-Cao, J.M. ; López, G. ; Díaz, P. ; Alonso, J.M. ; Morrondo, P. ; Fernández, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Prieto, A. ; Fernández-Antonio, R. ; Díaz-Cao, J.M. ; López, G. ; Díaz, P. ; Alonso, J.M. ; Morrondo, P. ; Fernández, G.</creatorcontrib><description>•Samples were classified depending on the type of sample and proximity to animals.•A high percentage of samples from all categories were AMDV positive (31–100%).•Some categories without direct contact with animals showed a high viral load.•Differences between DNA extraction methods were found regarding AMDV quantification.•Results are helpful for revising the biosecurity and cleaning/disinfection measures.
Control and eradication of Aleutian Mink Disease Virus (AMDV) are a major concern for fur-bearing animal production. Despite notably reducing disease prevalence, current control programs are unable to prevent the reinfection of farms, and environmental AMDV persistence seems to play a major role regarding this issue. In this study 114 samples from different areas and elements of seven infected mink farms were analyzed by qPCR in order to evaluate the environmental distribution of AMDV load. Samples were classified into nine categories, depending on the type of sample and degree of proximity to the animals, the main source of infection. Two different commercial DNA extraction kits were employed in parallel for all samples. qPCR analysis showed 69.3% positive samples with one kit and 81.6% with the other, and significant differences between the two DNA extraction methods were found regarding AMDV DNA recovery. Regarding sample categorization, all categories showed a high percentage of AMDV positive samples (31%–100%). Quantification of positive samples showed a decrease in AMDV load from animal barns to the periphery of the farm. In addition, those elements in direct contact with animals, the street clothes and vehicles of farm workers and personal protective equipment used for sampling showed a high viral load, and statistical analysis revealed significant differences in AMDV load between the first and last categories. These results indicate high environmental contamination of positive farms, which is helpful for future considerations about cleaning and disinfection procedures and biosecurity protocols.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-1135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2542</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.04.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28532807</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural pollution ; Aleutian disease ; Aleutian Mink Disease - virology ; Aleutian mink disease virus ; Aleutian Mink Disease Virus - isolation & purification ; Animal Husbandry ; Animals ; Bacterial infections ; Barns ; Contamination ; Control programs ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; Disease control ; Disinfection ; Disinfection & disinfectants ; DNA ; DNA extraction ; Environmental Monitoring ; Farms ; Housing, Animal ; Load distribution ; Mink ; Molecular epidemiology ; Personal protective equipment ; Protective equipment ; Small mammals ; Spain ; Statistical analysis ; Stress concentration ; Studies ; Viruses ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Veterinary microbiology, 2017-05, Vol.204, p.59-63</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV May 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-56ab074fa0db33527d9388cb5d0885ff13930bdc9e8e6f865fed95a028ffc24a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-56ab074fa0db33527d9388cb5d0885ff13930bdc9e8e6f865fed95a028ffc24a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378113517302997$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28532807$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prieto, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Antonio, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Díaz-Cao, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Díaz, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrondo, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Distribution of Aleutian mink disease virus contamination in the environment of infected mink farms</title><title>Veterinary microbiology</title><addtitle>Vet Microbiol</addtitle><description>•Samples were classified depending on the type of sample and proximity to animals.•A high percentage of samples from all categories were AMDV positive (31–100%).•Some categories without direct contact with animals showed a high viral load.•Differences between DNA extraction methods were found regarding AMDV quantification.•Results are helpful for revising the biosecurity and cleaning/disinfection measures.
Control and eradication of Aleutian Mink Disease Virus (AMDV) are a major concern for fur-bearing animal production. Despite notably reducing disease prevalence, current control programs are unable to prevent the reinfection of farms, and environmental AMDV persistence seems to play a major role regarding this issue. In this study 114 samples from different areas and elements of seven infected mink farms were analyzed by qPCR in order to evaluate the environmental distribution of AMDV load. Samples were classified into nine categories, depending on the type of sample and degree of proximity to the animals, the main source of infection. Two different commercial DNA extraction kits were employed in parallel for all samples. qPCR analysis showed 69.3% positive samples with one kit and 81.6% with the other, and significant differences between the two DNA extraction methods were found regarding AMDV DNA recovery. Regarding sample categorization, all categories showed a high percentage of AMDV positive samples (31%–100%). Quantification of positive samples showed a decrease in AMDV load from animal barns to the periphery of the farm. In addition, those elements in direct contact with animals, the street clothes and vehicles of farm workers and personal protective equipment used for sampling showed a high viral load, and statistical analysis revealed significant differences in AMDV load between the first and last categories. These results indicate high environmental contamination of positive farms, which is helpful for future considerations about cleaning and disinfection procedures and biosecurity protocols.</description><subject>Agricultural pollution</subject><subject>Aleutian disease</subject><subject>Aleutian Mink Disease - virology</subject><subject>Aleutian mink disease virus</subject><subject>Aleutian Mink Disease Virus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Barns</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Control programs</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disinfection</subject><subject>Disinfection & disinfectants</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA extraction</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Housing, Animal</subject><subject>Load distribution</subject><subject>Mink</subject><subject>Molecular epidemiology</subject><subject>Personal protective equipment</subject><subject>Protective equipment</subject><subject>Small mammals</subject><subject>Spain</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stress concentration</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>0378-1135</issn><issn>1873-2542</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv3CAUhVHVqpk8_kFVWeomG7sXY2y8qRSleUmRuknWCMNFZTqGBPBI_fdl6jSLLrLiivudAzqHkE8UGgq0_7pt9phnp5sW6NBA1wBl78iGioHVLe_a92QDbBA1pYwfkeOUtgDQjT18JEet4KwVMGyI_u5Sjm5asgu-Cra62GGZla9m539VxiVUCau9i0uqdPBZlXv1F3a-yj-xQl-Wwc_o80HvvEWd0ax6q-KcTskHq3YJz17OE_J4ffVweVvf_7i5u7y4rzUbIde8VxMMnVVgJsZ4O5iRCaEnbkAIbi1lI4PJ6BEF9lb03KIZuYJWWKvbTrETcr76PsXwvGDKcnZJ426nPIYlSTqWpIpv1xf0y3_oNizRl98VqmeU9SWrQnUrpWNIKaKVT9HNKv6WFOShBLmVawnyUIKETpYSiuzzi_kyzWheRf9SL8C3FcCSxt5hlEk79BqNiyU8aYJ7-4U_ZnqbDA</recordid><startdate>201705</startdate><enddate>201705</enddate><creator>Prieto, A.</creator><creator>Fernández-Antonio, R.</creator><creator>Díaz-Cao, J.M.</creator><creator>López, G.</creator><creator>Díaz, P.</creator><creator>Alonso, J.M.</creator><creator>Morrondo, P.</creator><creator>Fernández, G.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201705</creationdate><title>Distribution of Aleutian mink disease virus contamination in the environment of infected mink farms</title><author>Prieto, A. ; Fernández-Antonio, R. ; Díaz-Cao, J.M. ; López, G. ; Díaz, P. ; Alonso, J.M. ; Morrondo, P. ; Fernández, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-56ab074fa0db33527d9388cb5d0885ff13930bdc9e8e6f865fed95a028ffc24a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agricultural pollution</topic><topic>Aleutian disease</topic><topic>Aleutian Mink Disease - virology</topic><topic>Aleutian mink disease virus</topic><topic>Aleutian Mink Disease Virus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Barns</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Control programs</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disinfection</topic><topic>Disinfection & disinfectants</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA extraction</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Housing, Animal</topic><topic>Load distribution</topic><topic>Mink</topic><topic>Molecular epidemiology</topic><topic>Personal protective equipment</topic><topic>Protective equipment</topic><topic>Small mammals</topic><topic>Spain</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stress concentration</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prieto, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Antonio, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Díaz-Cao, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Díaz, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrondo, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prieto, A.</au><au>Fernández-Antonio, R.</au><au>Díaz-Cao, J.M.</au><au>López, G.</au><au>Díaz, P.</au><au>Alonso, J.M.</au><au>Morrondo, P.</au><au>Fernández, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distribution of Aleutian mink disease virus contamination in the environment of infected mink farms</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Microbiol</addtitle><date>2017-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>204</volume><spage>59</spage><epage>63</epage><pages>59-63</pages><issn>0378-1135</issn><eissn>1873-2542</eissn><abstract>•Samples were classified depending on the type of sample and proximity to animals.•A high percentage of samples from all categories were AMDV positive (31–100%).•Some categories without direct contact with animals showed a high viral load.•Differences between DNA extraction methods were found regarding AMDV quantification.•Results are helpful for revising the biosecurity and cleaning/disinfection measures.
Control and eradication of Aleutian Mink Disease Virus (AMDV) are a major concern for fur-bearing animal production. Despite notably reducing disease prevalence, current control programs are unable to prevent the reinfection of farms, and environmental AMDV persistence seems to play a major role regarding this issue. In this study 114 samples from different areas and elements of seven infected mink farms were analyzed by qPCR in order to evaluate the environmental distribution of AMDV load. Samples were classified into nine categories, depending on the type of sample and degree of proximity to the animals, the main source of infection. Two different commercial DNA extraction kits were employed in parallel for all samples. qPCR analysis showed 69.3% positive samples with one kit and 81.6% with the other, and significant differences between the two DNA extraction methods were found regarding AMDV DNA recovery. Regarding sample categorization, all categories showed a high percentage of AMDV positive samples (31%–100%). Quantification of positive samples showed a decrease in AMDV load from animal barns to the periphery of the farm. In addition, those elements in direct contact with animals, the street clothes and vehicles of farm workers and personal protective equipment used for sampling showed a high viral load, and statistical analysis revealed significant differences in AMDV load between the first and last categories. These results indicate high environmental contamination of positive farms, which is helpful for future considerations about cleaning and disinfection procedures and biosecurity protocols.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28532807</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.04.013</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-1135 |
ispartof | Veterinary microbiology, 2017-05, Vol.204, p.59-63 |
issn | 0378-1135 1873-2542 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1901752746 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Agricultural pollution Aleutian disease Aleutian Mink Disease - virology Aleutian mink disease virus Aleutian Mink Disease Virus - isolation & purification Animal Husbandry Animals Bacterial infections Barns Contamination Control programs Deoxyribonucleic acid Disease control Disinfection Disinfection & disinfectants DNA DNA extraction Environmental Monitoring Farms Housing, Animal Load distribution Mink Molecular epidemiology Personal protective equipment Protective equipment Small mammals Spain Statistical analysis Stress concentration Studies Viruses Workers |
title | Distribution of Aleutian mink disease virus contamination in the environment of infected mink farms |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T21%3A31%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distribution%20of%20Aleutian%20mink%20disease%20virus%20contamination%20in%20the%20environment%20of%20infected%20mink%20farms&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20microbiology&rft.au=Prieto,%20A.&rft.date=2017-05&rft.volume=204&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=63&rft.pages=59-63&rft.issn=0378-1135&rft.eissn=1873-2542&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.04.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1963136004%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1963136004&rft_id=info:pmid/28532807&rft_els_id=S0378113517302997&rfr_iscdi=true |