Preferred 11 different job rotation types in automotive company and their effects on productivity, quality and musculoskeletal disorders: comparison between subjective and actual scores by workers' age

This study investigates workers' favoured rotation types by their age and compares means between subjective and actual scores on productivity, quality and musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). The subjects of research were 422 assembly line units in Hyundai Motor Company. The survey of 422 units fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ergonomics 2016-10, Vol.59 (10), p.1318-1326
Hauptverfasser: Jeon, In Sik, Jeong, Byung Yong, Jeong, Ji Hyun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1326
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1318
container_title Ergonomics
container_volume 59
creator Jeon, In Sik
Jeong, Byung Yong
Jeong, Ji Hyun
description This study investigates workers' favoured rotation types by their age and compares means between subjective and actual scores on productivity, quality and musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). The subjects of research were 422 assembly line units in Hyundai Motor Company. The survey of 422 units focused on the workers' preference for 11 different rotation types and subjective scores for each type's perceived benefits, both by the workers' age. Then, actual scores on production-related indices were traced over a five-year period. The results suggest that different rotation types lead to different results in productivity, product quality and MSDs. Workers tend to perceive job rotation as a helpful method to enhance satisfaction, productivity and product quality more so than the actual production data suggests. Job rotation was especially effective in preventing MSDs for workers aged under 45, while its effects were not clear for the workers aged 45 years or older. Practitioner's Summary: This research presents appropriate rotation type for different age groups. Taking workers' age into account, administrators can use the paper's outcomes to select and implement the suitable rotation type to attain specific goals such as enhancing productivity, improving product quality or reducing MSDs.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00140139.2016.1140816
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1901739765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1904249466</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-10162b60c8e202df1d10f3ed4f6969ddc0f51297922ea5ab0d961532b7d1f9423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks9u1DAQxiMEotvCI4AscaAHdvHYibPmBKr4J1WCA5wjx55Atom9tR2qPCJvxaS75cABONkj_b5v7JmvKJ4A3wDf8pecQ8lB6o3goDZAxRbUvWIFUql1tS3r-8VqYdYLdFKcprSjUoIWD4sToWpdKqlXxc_PETuMER0DYK7vqECf2S60LIZsch88y_MeE-s9M1MOY8j9D2Q2jHvjZ2a8Y_k79pEhaW1OjAT7GNxkievz_IJdT2agyy06TslOQ0hXOGA2A3VMITqM6dXBMVLtWYv5BtGzNLU7tLf9FrGxmaxYsiHSe9qZ3YR4RdrnzHzDR8WDzgwJHx_Ps-Lru7dfLj6sLz-9_3jx5nJtKy7zGmhcolXcblFw4TpwwDuJruyUVto5y7sKhK61EGgq03KnFVRStLWDTpdCnhXnB1_65PWEKTdjnywOg_EYptSA5qUoabzqf1Copa5V9W90KxRhNZSEPvsD3YUpevozUXKxk2p5ZnWgbAwp0ZKbfexHE-cGeLMkqLlLULMkqDkmiHRPj-5TO6L7rbqLDAGvD0DvuxBHQzsYXJPNPITYReNtnxr59x6_AJgW2D0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1833976362</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preferred 11 different job rotation types in automotive company and their effects on productivity, quality and musculoskeletal disorders: comparison between subjective and actual scores by workers' age</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Jeon, In Sik ; Jeong, Byung Yong ; Jeong, Ji Hyun</creator><creatorcontrib>Jeon, In Sik ; Jeong, Byung Yong ; Jeong, Ji Hyun</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigates workers' favoured rotation types by their age and compares means between subjective and actual scores on productivity, quality and musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). The subjects of research were 422 assembly line units in Hyundai Motor Company. The survey of 422 units focused on the workers' preference for 11 different rotation types and subjective scores for each type's perceived benefits, both by the workers' age. Then, actual scores on production-related indices were traced over a five-year period. The results suggest that different rotation types lead to different results in productivity, product quality and MSDs. Workers tend to perceive job rotation as a helpful method to enhance satisfaction, productivity and product quality more so than the actual production data suggests. Job rotation was especially effective in preventing MSDs for workers aged under 45, while its effects were not clear for the workers aged 45 years or older. Practitioner's Summary: This research presents appropriate rotation type for different age groups. Taking workers' age into account, administrators can use the paper's outcomes to select and implement the suitable rotation type to attain specific goals such as enhancing productivity, improving product quality or reducing MSDs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-0139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-5847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2016.1140816</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26794639</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERGOAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Age Distribution ; Analysis of Variance ; Assembly lines ; Automobile industry ; Automobiles ; Automotive industry ; Autonomous job rotation ; Disorders ; Efficiency ; Ergonomics ; Ergonomics - methods ; Humans ; Job Satisfaction ; Manufacturing and Industrial Facilities ; Middle Aged ; Motors ; Musculoskeletal diseases ; Musculoskeletal Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; musculoskeletal disorders ; Occupational Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; Occupational health ; Productivity ; productivity and quality ; Republic of Korea ; satisfaction ; Space life sciences ; Summaries ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Task Performance and Analysis</subject><ispartof>Ergonomics, 2016-10, Vol.59 (10), p.1318-1326</ispartof><rights>2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2016</rights><rights>2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-10162b60c8e202df1d10f3ed4f6969ddc0f51297922ea5ab0d961532b7d1f9423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-10162b60c8e202df1d10f3ed4f6969ddc0f51297922ea5ab0d961532b7d1f9423</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6837-1324</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00140139.2016.1140816$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00140139.2016.1140816$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,59624,60413</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26794639$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jeon, In Sik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Byung Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Ji Hyun</creatorcontrib><title>Preferred 11 different job rotation types in automotive company and their effects on productivity, quality and musculoskeletal disorders: comparison between subjective and actual scores by workers' age</title><title>Ergonomics</title><addtitle>Ergonomics</addtitle><description>This study investigates workers' favoured rotation types by their age and compares means between subjective and actual scores on productivity, quality and musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). The subjects of research were 422 assembly line units in Hyundai Motor Company. The survey of 422 units focused on the workers' preference for 11 different rotation types and subjective scores for each type's perceived benefits, both by the workers' age. Then, actual scores on production-related indices were traced over a five-year period. The results suggest that different rotation types lead to different results in productivity, product quality and MSDs. Workers tend to perceive job rotation as a helpful method to enhance satisfaction, productivity and product quality more so than the actual production data suggests. Job rotation was especially effective in preventing MSDs for workers aged under 45, while its effects were not clear for the workers aged 45 years or older. Practitioner's Summary: This research presents appropriate rotation type for different age groups. Taking workers' age into account, administrators can use the paper's outcomes to select and implement the suitable rotation type to attain specific goals such as enhancing productivity, improving product quality or reducing MSDs.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Distribution</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Assembly lines</subject><subject>Automobile industry</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Automotive industry</subject><subject>Autonomous job rotation</subject><subject>Disorders</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Ergonomics - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Manufacturing and Industrial Facilities</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motors</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal diseases</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>musculoskeletal disorders</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>productivity and quality</subject><subject>Republic of Korea</subject><subject>satisfaction</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><subject>Summaries</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><issn>0014-0139</issn><issn>1366-5847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks9u1DAQxiMEotvCI4AscaAHdvHYibPmBKr4J1WCA5wjx55Atom9tR2qPCJvxaS75cABONkj_b5v7JmvKJ4A3wDf8pecQ8lB6o3goDZAxRbUvWIFUql1tS3r-8VqYdYLdFKcprSjUoIWD4sToWpdKqlXxc_PETuMER0DYK7vqECf2S60LIZsch88y_MeE-s9M1MOY8j9D2Q2jHvjZ2a8Y_k79pEhaW1OjAT7GNxkievz_IJdT2agyy06TslOQ0hXOGA2A3VMITqM6dXBMVLtWYv5BtGzNLU7tLf9FrGxmaxYsiHSe9qZ3YR4RdrnzHzDR8WDzgwJHx_Ps-Lru7dfLj6sLz-9_3jx5nJtKy7zGmhcolXcblFw4TpwwDuJruyUVto5y7sKhK61EGgq03KnFVRStLWDTpdCnhXnB1_65PWEKTdjnywOg_EYptSA5qUoabzqf1Copa5V9W90KxRhNZSEPvsD3YUpevozUXKxk2p5ZnWgbAwp0ZKbfexHE-cGeLMkqLlLULMkqDkmiHRPj-5TO6L7rbqLDAGvD0DvuxBHQzsYXJPNPITYReNtnxr59x6_AJgW2D0</recordid><startdate>20161002</startdate><enddate>20161002</enddate><creator>Jeon, In Sik</creator><creator>Jeong, Byung Yong</creator><creator>Jeong, Ji Hyun</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis LLC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6837-1324</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161002</creationdate><title>Preferred 11 different job rotation types in automotive company and their effects on productivity, quality and musculoskeletal disorders: comparison between subjective and actual scores by workers' age</title><author>Jeon, In Sik ; Jeong, Byung Yong ; Jeong, Ji Hyun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-10162b60c8e202df1d10f3ed4f6969ddc0f51297922ea5ab0d961532b7d1f9423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Distribution</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Assembly lines</topic><topic>Automobile industry</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Automotive industry</topic><topic>Autonomous job rotation</topic><topic>Disorders</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Ergonomics - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Manufacturing and Industrial Facilities</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motors</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal diseases</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>musculoskeletal disorders</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>productivity and quality</topic><topic>Republic of Korea</topic><topic>satisfaction</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><topic>Summaries</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jeon, In Sik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Byung Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Ji Hyun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jeon, In Sik</au><au>Jeong, Byung Yong</au><au>Jeong, Ji Hyun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preferred 11 different job rotation types in automotive company and their effects on productivity, quality and musculoskeletal disorders: comparison between subjective and actual scores by workers' age</atitle><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Ergonomics</addtitle><date>2016-10-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1318</spage><epage>1326</epage><pages>1318-1326</pages><issn>0014-0139</issn><eissn>1366-5847</eissn><coden>ERGOAX</coden><abstract>This study investigates workers' favoured rotation types by their age and compares means between subjective and actual scores on productivity, quality and musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). The subjects of research were 422 assembly line units in Hyundai Motor Company. The survey of 422 units focused on the workers' preference for 11 different rotation types and subjective scores for each type's perceived benefits, both by the workers' age. Then, actual scores on production-related indices were traced over a five-year period. The results suggest that different rotation types lead to different results in productivity, product quality and MSDs. Workers tend to perceive job rotation as a helpful method to enhance satisfaction, productivity and product quality more so than the actual production data suggests. Job rotation was especially effective in preventing MSDs for workers aged under 45, while its effects were not clear for the workers aged 45 years or older. Practitioner's Summary: This research presents appropriate rotation type for different age groups. Taking workers' age into account, administrators can use the paper's outcomes to select and implement the suitable rotation type to attain specific goals such as enhancing productivity, improving product quality or reducing MSDs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>26794639</pmid><doi>10.1080/00140139.2016.1140816</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6837-1324</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-0139
ispartof Ergonomics, 2016-10, Vol.59 (10), p.1318-1326
issn 0014-0139
1366-5847
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1901739765
source MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Age
Age Distribution
Analysis of Variance
Assembly lines
Automobile industry
Automobiles
Automotive industry
Autonomous job rotation
Disorders
Efficiency
Ergonomics
Ergonomics - methods
Humans
Job Satisfaction
Manufacturing and Industrial Facilities
Middle Aged
Motors
Musculoskeletal diseases
Musculoskeletal Diseases - prevention & control
musculoskeletal disorders
Occupational Diseases - prevention & control
Occupational health
Productivity
productivity and quality
Republic of Korea
satisfaction
Space life sciences
Summaries
Surveys and Questionnaires
Task Performance and Analysis
title Preferred 11 different job rotation types in automotive company and their effects on productivity, quality and musculoskeletal disorders: comparison between subjective and actual scores by workers' age
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T05%3A52%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preferred%2011%20different%20job%20rotation%20types%20in%20automotive%20company%20and%20their%20effects%20on%20productivity,%20quality%20and%20musculoskeletal%20disorders:%20comparison%20between%20subjective%20and%20actual%20scores%20by%20workers'%20age&rft.jtitle=Ergonomics&rft.au=Jeon,%20In%20Sik&rft.date=2016-10-02&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1318&rft.epage=1326&rft.pages=1318-1326&rft.issn=0014-0139&rft.eissn=1366-5847&rft.coden=ERGOAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00140139.2016.1140816&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E1904249466%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1833976362&rft_id=info:pmid/26794639&rfr_iscdi=true