What you see is what you want to see: Motivationally relevant stimuli can interrupt current resource allocation
Arousing stimuli, either threat-related or pleasant, may be selected for priority at different stages within the processing stream. Here we examine the pattern of processing for non-task-relevant threatening (spiders: arousing to some) and pleasant stimuli (babies or chocolate: arousing to all) by r...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Cognition and emotion 2017-01, Vol.31 (1), p.168-174 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 174 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 168 |
| container_title | Cognition and emotion |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | McSorley, Eugene Morriss, Jayne |
| description | Arousing stimuli, either threat-related or pleasant, may be selected for priority at different stages within the processing stream. Here we examine the pattern of processing for non-task-relevant threatening (spiders: arousing to some) and pleasant stimuli (babies or chocolate: arousing to all) by recording the gaze of a spider Fearful and Non-fearful group while they performed a simple "follow the cross" task. There was no difference in first saccade latencies. Saccade trajectories showed a general hypervigilance for all stimuli in the Fearful group. Saccade landing positions corresponded to what each group would find arousing, such that the Fearful group deviated towards both types of images whereas the Non-fearful group deviated towards pleasant images. Secondary corrective saccade latencies away from threat-related stimuli were longer for the Fearful group (difficulty in disengaging) compared with the Non-fearful group. These results suggest that attentional biases towards arousing stimuli may occur at different processing stages. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/02699931.2015.1081872 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1901737615</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1901737615</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-d6b3da8e7b0d67fda7bbadfc8b8822bb0da2253d3a867f23d13630cca5b8e5d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1OJCEUhYlxou3PI2hI3Lgp58Ktoih3puOoiZPZjHFJKKBjmeqiBUrTbz_U2O3ChYYF4Zzv3ORyCDlhcMFAwk_gomkaZBccWDVJTNZ8h8xYKcoCBMAumU1MMUH75CDGZwAosYQ9ss8FirqU5Yz4xyed6NqPNDpHu0jftu83PSSa_KRf0t8-da86dX7Qfb-mwfXudfJj6pZj31GjB9oNyYUwrhI1Ywguu8FFPwbjaA558z9-RH4sdB_d8eY-JA-_rv_Ob4v7Pzd386v7wmAjU2FFi1ZLV7dgRb2wum5bbRdGtlJy3mZVc16hRS2zzdEyFAjG6KqVrrINHpLz97mr4F9GF5NadtG4vteD82NUrAFWYy1Y9T0quRDI8sno2Sf0OS-Y_yQqjg1HDrL-kmIS836M84mq3ikTfIzBLdQqdEsd1oqBmipW24rVVLHaVJxzp5vpY7t09iO17RT_Ae3coes</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1833981223</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What you see is what you want to see: Motivationally relevant stimuli can interrupt current resource allocation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>McSorley, Eugene ; Morriss, Jayne</creator><creatorcontrib>McSorley, Eugene ; Morriss, Jayne</creatorcontrib><description>Arousing stimuli, either threat-related or pleasant, may be selected for priority at different stages within the processing stream. Here we examine the pattern of processing for non-task-relevant threatening (spiders: arousing to some) and pleasant stimuli (babies or chocolate: arousing to all) by recording the gaze of a spider Fearful and Non-fearful group while they performed a simple "follow the cross" task. There was no difference in first saccade latencies. Saccade trajectories showed a general hypervigilance for all stimuli in the Fearful group. Saccade landing positions corresponded to what each group would find arousing, such that the Fearful group deviated towards both types of images whereas the Non-fearful group deviated towards pleasant images. Secondary corrective saccade latencies away from threat-related stimuli were longer for the Fearful group (difficulty in disengaging) compared with the Non-fearful group. These results suggest that attentional biases towards arousing stimuli may occur at different processing stages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-9931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0600</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1081872</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26367484</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Araneae ; Attentional bias ; Attentional Bias - physiology ; Chocolate ; Emotions - physiology ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Infants ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Motivation - physiology ; Photic Stimulation ; Processing stages ; Resource Allocation ; Saccadic eye movements ; Spiders ; Vigilance ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Cognition and emotion, 2017-01, Vol.31 (1), p.168-174</ispartof><rights>2015 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-d6b3da8e7b0d67fda7bbadfc8b8822bb0da2253d3a867f23d13630cca5b8e5d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-d6b3da8e7b0d67fda7bbadfc8b8822bb0da2253d3a867f23d13630cca5b8e5d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26367484$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McSorley, Eugene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morriss, Jayne</creatorcontrib><title>What you see is what you want to see: Motivationally relevant stimuli can interrupt current resource allocation</title><title>Cognition and emotion</title><addtitle>Cogn Emot</addtitle><description>Arousing stimuli, either threat-related or pleasant, may be selected for priority at different stages within the processing stream. Here we examine the pattern of processing for non-task-relevant threatening (spiders: arousing to some) and pleasant stimuli (babies or chocolate: arousing to all) by recording the gaze of a spider Fearful and Non-fearful group while they performed a simple "follow the cross" task. There was no difference in first saccade latencies. Saccade trajectories showed a general hypervigilance for all stimuli in the Fearful group. Saccade landing positions corresponded to what each group would find arousing, such that the Fearful group deviated towards both types of images whereas the Non-fearful group deviated towards pleasant images. Secondary corrective saccade latencies away from threat-related stimuli were longer for the Fearful group (difficulty in disengaging) compared with the Non-fearful group. These results suggest that attentional biases towards arousing stimuli may occur at different processing stages.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Araneae</subject><subject>Attentional bias</subject><subject>Attentional Bias - physiology</subject><subject>Chocolate</subject><subject>Emotions - physiology</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motivation - physiology</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Processing stages</subject><subject>Resource Allocation</subject><subject>Saccadic eye movements</subject><subject>Spiders</subject><subject>Vigilance</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0269-9931</issn><issn>1464-0600</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1OJCEUhYlxou3PI2hI3Lgp58Ktoih3puOoiZPZjHFJKKBjmeqiBUrTbz_U2O3ChYYF4Zzv3ORyCDlhcMFAwk_gomkaZBccWDVJTNZ8h8xYKcoCBMAumU1MMUH75CDGZwAosYQ9ss8FirqU5Yz4xyed6NqPNDpHu0jftu83PSSa_KRf0t8-da86dX7Qfb-mwfXudfJj6pZj31GjB9oNyYUwrhI1Ywguu8FFPwbjaA558z9-RH4sdB_d8eY-JA-_rv_Ob4v7Pzd386v7wmAjU2FFi1ZLV7dgRb2wum5bbRdGtlJy3mZVc16hRS2zzdEyFAjG6KqVrrINHpLz97mr4F9GF5NadtG4vteD82NUrAFWYy1Y9T0quRDI8sno2Sf0OS-Y_yQqjg1HDrL-kmIS836M84mq3ikTfIzBLdQqdEsd1oqBmipW24rVVLHaVJxzp5vpY7t09iO17RT_Ae3coes</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>McSorley, Eugene</creator><creator>Morriss, Jayne</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>What you see is what you want to see: Motivationally relevant stimuli can interrupt current resource allocation</title><author>McSorley, Eugene ; Morriss, Jayne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-d6b3da8e7b0d67fda7bbadfc8b8822bb0da2253d3a867f23d13630cca5b8e5d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Araneae</topic><topic>Attentional bias</topic><topic>Attentional Bias - physiology</topic><topic>Chocolate</topic><topic>Emotions - physiology</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motivation - physiology</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Processing stages</topic><topic>Resource Allocation</topic><topic>Saccadic eye movements</topic><topic>Spiders</topic><topic>Vigilance</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McSorley, Eugene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morriss, Jayne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cognition and emotion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McSorley, Eugene</au><au>Morriss, Jayne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What you see is what you want to see: Motivationally relevant stimuli can interrupt current resource allocation</atitle><jtitle>Cognition and emotion</jtitle><addtitle>Cogn Emot</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>168</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>168-174</pages><issn>0269-9931</issn><eissn>1464-0600</eissn><abstract>Arousing stimuli, either threat-related or pleasant, may be selected for priority at different stages within the processing stream. Here we examine the pattern of processing for non-task-relevant threatening (spiders: arousing to some) and pleasant stimuli (babies or chocolate: arousing to all) by recording the gaze of a spider Fearful and Non-fearful group while they performed a simple "follow the cross" task. There was no difference in first saccade latencies. Saccade trajectories showed a general hypervigilance for all stimuli in the Fearful group. Saccade landing positions corresponded to what each group would find arousing, such that the Fearful group deviated towards both types of images whereas the Non-fearful group deviated towards pleasant images. Secondary corrective saccade latencies away from threat-related stimuli were longer for the Fearful group (difficulty in disengaging) compared with the Non-fearful group. These results suggest that attentional biases towards arousing stimuli may occur at different processing stages.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Ltd</pub><pmid>26367484</pmid><doi>10.1080/02699931.2015.1081872</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0269-9931 |
| ispartof | Cognition and emotion, 2017-01, Vol.31 (1), p.168-174 |
| issn | 0269-9931 1464-0600 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1901737615 |
| source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Adult Araneae Attentional bias Attentional Bias - physiology Chocolate Emotions - physiology Eye Movements - physiology Female Humans Infants Male Middle Aged Motivation - physiology Photic Stimulation Processing stages Resource Allocation Saccadic eye movements Spiders Vigilance Young Adult |
| title | What you see is what you want to see: Motivationally relevant stimuli can interrupt current resource allocation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T09%3A24%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20you%20see%20is%20what%20you%20want%20to%20see:%20Motivationally%20relevant%20stimuli%20can%20interrupt%20current%20resource%20allocation&rft.jtitle=Cognition%20and%20emotion&rft.au=McSorley,%20Eugene&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=168&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=168-174&rft.issn=0269-9931&rft.eissn=1464-0600&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02699931.2015.1081872&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1901737615%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1833981223&rft_id=info:pmid/26367484&rfr_iscdi=true |