Baseline Sleep Efficiency and Arousal Index Do Not Predict Who Will Benefit From Sedatives in Improving Positive Airway Pressure Adherence in Sleep Apnea to 90

Positive airway pressure (PAP) is the preferred treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but adherence is low. Educational or ongoing supportive intervention improves the number of PAP adherent patients from the 50% to the 70% range. A common side effect of PAP is increased awakenings. This pros...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical EEG and neuroscience 2018-07, Vol.49 (4), p.285-289
1. Verfasser: Sangal, R. Bart
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 289
container_issue 4
container_start_page 285
container_title Clinical EEG and neuroscience
container_volume 49
creator Sangal, R. Bart
description Positive airway pressure (PAP) is the preferred treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but adherence is low. Educational or ongoing supportive intervention improves the number of PAP adherent patients from the 50% to the 70% range. A common side effect of PAP is increased awakenings. This prospective trial examined baseline polysomnographically derived sleep efficiency and arousal index in PAP adherent and nonadherent patients, and in patients needing sedating medicines to attain PAP adherence versus those who did not need such medicines. Patients with OSA were titrated on PAP during a polysomnography or treated with autotitrating PAP, followed by educational and supportive interventions. Patients with PAP related awakenings (patients describing waking up and taking PAP off in the middle of the night) or difficulty tolerating PAP were additionally treated with medicines that suppress arousals/awakenings (trazodone, mirtazapine, doxepin). A total of 120 of 151 (79%) new patients were ≥70% PAP adherent over a continuous 30-day period, typically within the first 90 days of starting PAP, without sedating medicines. Nineteen of the remaining patients were treated with medicines that suppress arousals and awakenings, and 16 became adherent, resulting in 136 (90%) of 151 new patients achieving adherence. There were no differences in baseline sleep efficiency or arousal index, between adherent and nonadherent patients, as well as between patients who needed sedating medicines for PAP adherence and those who did not. Adding medicines that suppress arousals and awakenings for patients having trouble tolerating PAP, increases the number of patients who are PAP adherent. The need for such medicines seems to be related to the PAP side effect of increased awakenings rather than baseline impaired sleep.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1550059417709882
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1901311803</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1550059417709882</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2046933020</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-b3865827d1e17f769bb3186b924ddda98b9637e0dbb52e22770e8fd137a335223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtv1DAUhS0EokNhzwpdiQ2bFD_Gib2cvmCkilYqqMvIiW9aV4k92Elhfk3_ah1NC1Klrvy43z336B5CPjJ6wFhVfWVSUir1Mt-pVoq_IgvOSl1ITvlrspjLxVzfI-9SuqVUlFws35I9rqSgTIoFuT80CXvnES57xA2cdJ1rHfp2C8ZbWMUwJdPD2lv8C8cBfoQRLiJa145wdRPgyvU9HKLHzo1wGsMAl2jN6O4wgfOwHjYx3Dl_DRchufkbVi7-MdtZJKUp5re9wZgH4szvTKw2Hg2MATR9T950pk_44fHcJ79OT34efS_Ozr-tj1ZnRStKORaNUKVUvLIMWdVVpW4awVTZaL601hqtGl2KCqltGsmR87wvVJ1lojJCSM7FPvmy081-f0-YxnpwqcW-Nx7zCmqmKROMKSoy-vkZehum6LO7mtNlqYWgnGaK7qg2hpQidvUmusHEbc1oPYdXPw8vt3x6FJ6aAe2_hqe0MlDsgGSu8f_UFwUfALtQoBE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2046933020</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Baseline Sleep Efficiency and Arousal Index Do Not Predict Who Will Benefit From Sedatives in Improving Positive Airway Pressure Adherence in Sleep Apnea to 90</title><source>SAGE Publications</source><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Sangal, R. Bart</creator><creatorcontrib>Sangal, R. Bart</creatorcontrib><description>Positive airway pressure (PAP) is the preferred treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but adherence is low. Educational or ongoing supportive intervention improves the number of PAP adherent patients from the 50% to the 70% range. A common side effect of PAP is increased awakenings. This prospective trial examined baseline polysomnographically derived sleep efficiency and arousal index in PAP adherent and nonadherent patients, and in patients needing sedating medicines to attain PAP adherence versus those who did not need such medicines. Patients with OSA were titrated on PAP during a polysomnography or treated with autotitrating PAP, followed by educational and supportive interventions. Patients with PAP related awakenings (patients describing waking up and taking PAP off in the middle of the night) or difficulty tolerating PAP were additionally treated with medicines that suppress arousals/awakenings (trazodone, mirtazapine, doxepin). A total of 120 of 151 (79%) new patients were ≥70% PAP adherent over a continuous 30-day period, typically within the first 90 days of starting PAP, without sedating medicines. Nineteen of the remaining patients were treated with medicines that suppress arousals and awakenings, and 16 became adherent, resulting in 136 (90%) of 151 new patients achieving adherence. There were no differences in baseline sleep efficiency or arousal index, between adherent and nonadherent patients, as well as between patients who needed sedating medicines for PAP adherence and those who did not. Adding medicines that suppress arousals and awakenings for patients having trouble tolerating PAP, increases the number of patients who are PAP adherent. The need for such medicines seems to be related to the PAP side effect of increased awakenings rather than baseline impaired sleep.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1550-0594</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-5202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1550059417709882</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28530153</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Apnea ; Arousal ; Efficiency ; Intervention ; Medical records ; Medicine ; Multivariate analysis ; Patients ; Pressure ; Respiratory tract ; Sedatives ; Side effects ; Sleep ; Sleep apnea ; Sleep disorders</subject><ispartof>Clinical EEG and neuroscience, 2018-07, Vol.49 (4), p.285-289</ispartof><rights>EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society (ECNS) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-b3865827d1e17f769bb3186b924ddda98b9637e0dbb52e22770e8fd137a335223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-b3865827d1e17f769bb3186b924ddda98b9637e0dbb52e22770e8fd137a335223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2046933020/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2046933020?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21380,21810,27915,27916,33521,33522,43612,43613,43650,64374,64376,64378,72230,73865</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28530153$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sangal, R. Bart</creatorcontrib><title>Baseline Sleep Efficiency and Arousal Index Do Not Predict Who Will Benefit From Sedatives in Improving Positive Airway Pressure Adherence in Sleep Apnea to 90</title><title>Clinical EEG and neuroscience</title><addtitle>Clin EEG Neurosci</addtitle><description>Positive airway pressure (PAP) is the preferred treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but adherence is low. Educational or ongoing supportive intervention improves the number of PAP adherent patients from the 50% to the 70% range. A common side effect of PAP is increased awakenings. This prospective trial examined baseline polysomnographically derived sleep efficiency and arousal index in PAP adherent and nonadherent patients, and in patients needing sedating medicines to attain PAP adherence versus those who did not need such medicines. Patients with OSA were titrated on PAP during a polysomnography or treated with autotitrating PAP, followed by educational and supportive interventions. Patients with PAP related awakenings (patients describing waking up and taking PAP off in the middle of the night) or difficulty tolerating PAP were additionally treated with medicines that suppress arousals/awakenings (trazodone, mirtazapine, doxepin). A total of 120 of 151 (79%) new patients were ≥70% PAP adherent over a continuous 30-day period, typically within the first 90 days of starting PAP, without sedating medicines. Nineteen of the remaining patients were treated with medicines that suppress arousals and awakenings, and 16 became adherent, resulting in 136 (90%) of 151 new patients achieving adherence. There were no differences in baseline sleep efficiency or arousal index, between adherent and nonadherent patients, as well as between patients who needed sedating medicines for PAP adherence and those who did not. Adding medicines that suppress arousals and awakenings for patients having trouble tolerating PAP, increases the number of patients who are PAP adherent. The need for such medicines seems to be related to the PAP side effect of increased awakenings rather than baseline impaired sleep.</description><subject>Apnea</subject><subject>Arousal</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Respiratory tract</subject><subject>Sedatives</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><subject>Sleep apnea</subject><subject>Sleep disorders</subject><issn>1550-0594</issn><issn>2169-5202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtv1DAUhS0EokNhzwpdiQ2bFD_Gib2cvmCkilYqqMvIiW9aV4k92Elhfk3_ah1NC1Klrvy43z336B5CPjJ6wFhVfWVSUir1Mt-pVoq_IgvOSl1ITvlrspjLxVzfI-9SuqVUlFws35I9rqSgTIoFuT80CXvnES57xA2cdJ1rHfp2C8ZbWMUwJdPD2lv8C8cBfoQRLiJa145wdRPgyvU9HKLHzo1wGsMAl2jN6O4wgfOwHjYx3Dl_DRchufkbVi7-MdtZJKUp5re9wZgH4szvTKw2Hg2MATR9T950pk_44fHcJ79OT34efS_Ozr-tj1ZnRStKORaNUKVUvLIMWdVVpW4awVTZaL601hqtGl2KCqltGsmR87wvVJ1lojJCSM7FPvmy081-f0-YxnpwqcW-Nx7zCmqmKROMKSoy-vkZehum6LO7mtNlqYWgnGaK7qg2hpQidvUmusHEbc1oPYdXPw8vt3x6FJ6aAe2_hqe0MlDsgGSu8f_UFwUfALtQoBE</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>Sangal, R. Bart</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>Baseline Sleep Efficiency and Arousal Index Do Not Predict Who Will Benefit From Sedatives in Improving Positive Airway Pressure Adherence in Sleep Apnea to 90</title><author>Sangal, R. Bart</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-b3865827d1e17f769bb3186b924ddda98b9637e0dbb52e22770e8fd137a335223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Apnea</topic><topic>Arousal</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Respiratory tract</topic><topic>Sedatives</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><topic>Sleep apnea</topic><topic>Sleep disorders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sangal, R. Bart</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical EEG and neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sangal, R. Bart</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Baseline Sleep Efficiency and Arousal Index Do Not Predict Who Will Benefit From Sedatives in Improving Positive Airway Pressure Adherence in Sleep Apnea to 90</atitle><jtitle>Clinical EEG and neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>Clin EEG Neurosci</addtitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>285</spage><epage>289</epage><pages>285-289</pages><issn>1550-0594</issn><eissn>2169-5202</eissn><abstract>Positive airway pressure (PAP) is the preferred treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but adherence is low. Educational or ongoing supportive intervention improves the number of PAP adherent patients from the 50% to the 70% range. A common side effect of PAP is increased awakenings. This prospective trial examined baseline polysomnographically derived sleep efficiency and arousal index in PAP adherent and nonadherent patients, and in patients needing sedating medicines to attain PAP adherence versus those who did not need such medicines. Patients with OSA were titrated on PAP during a polysomnography or treated with autotitrating PAP, followed by educational and supportive interventions. Patients with PAP related awakenings (patients describing waking up and taking PAP off in the middle of the night) or difficulty tolerating PAP were additionally treated with medicines that suppress arousals/awakenings (trazodone, mirtazapine, doxepin). A total of 120 of 151 (79%) new patients were ≥70% PAP adherent over a continuous 30-day period, typically within the first 90 days of starting PAP, without sedating medicines. Nineteen of the remaining patients were treated with medicines that suppress arousals and awakenings, and 16 became adherent, resulting in 136 (90%) of 151 new patients achieving adherence. There were no differences in baseline sleep efficiency or arousal index, between adherent and nonadherent patients, as well as between patients who needed sedating medicines for PAP adherence and those who did not. Adding medicines that suppress arousals and awakenings for patients having trouble tolerating PAP, increases the number of patients who are PAP adherent. The need for such medicines seems to be related to the PAP side effect of increased awakenings rather than baseline impaired sleep.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>28530153</pmid><doi>10.1177/1550059417709882</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1550-0594
ispartof Clinical EEG and neuroscience, 2018-07, Vol.49 (4), p.285-289
issn 1550-0594
2169-5202
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1901311803
source SAGE Publications; ProQuest Central (Alumni); ProQuest Central
subjects Apnea
Arousal
Efficiency
Intervention
Medical records
Medicine
Multivariate analysis
Patients
Pressure
Respiratory tract
Sedatives
Side effects
Sleep
Sleep apnea
Sleep disorders
title Baseline Sleep Efficiency and Arousal Index Do Not Predict Who Will Benefit From Sedatives in Improving Positive Airway Pressure Adherence in Sleep Apnea to 90
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T18%3A37%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Baseline%20Sleep%20Efficiency%20and%20Arousal%20Index%20Do%20Not%20Predict%20Who%20Will%20Benefit%20From%20Sedatives%20in%20Improving%20Positive%20Airway%20Pressure%20Adherence%20in%20Sleep%20Apnea%20to%2090&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20EEG%20and%20neuroscience&rft.au=Sangal,%20R.%20Bart&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=289&rft.pages=285-289&rft.issn=1550-0594&rft.eissn=2169-5202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1550059417709882&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2046933020%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2046933020&rft_id=info:pmid/28530153&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1550059417709882&rfr_iscdi=true