Comparison of the effectiveness of resistance training in women with chronic computer-related neck pain: a randomized controlled study
Background Chronic computer-related neck pain is common among office workers. Studies have proposed neck strengthening exercise as a therapy to pain relieving and function improvement. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different loading resistance trainings and we hypothesized tha...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International archives of occupational and environmental health 2017-10, Vol.90 (7), p.673-683 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 683 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 673 |
| container_title | International archives of occupational and environmental health |
| container_volume | 90 |
| creator | Li, Xiao Lin, Caina Liu, Cuicui Ke, Songjian Wan, Qing Luo, Haijie Huang, Zhuxi Xin, Wenjun Ma, Chao Wu, Shaoling |
| description | Background
Chronic computer-related neck pain is common among office workers. Studies have proposed neck strengthening exercise as a therapy to pain relieving and function improvement. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different loading resistance trainings and we hypothesized that women with work-related neck pain could benefit more from progressive resistance training for pain and function recovery.
Methods
A randomized controlled trial was conducted and subjects characterized by monotonous jobs were recruited. One hundred and nine employed women with chronic neck pain were randomly allocated into three groups, namely, progressive resistance training (PRT), fixed resistance training (FRT), and control group (CG). In PRT and FRT, four exercises for neck muscles with an elastic rubber band were performed on regular basis for 6 weeks. The therapeutic effectiveness was then evaluated at pretreatment, 2, 4, and 6 weeks during training period, and 3-month posttreatment. Assessment tools included visual analog scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), pressure pain threshold (PPT), and maximal isometric neck strength.
Results
The outcomes were significantly better in PRT and FRT than those in CG at 6-week timepoint and 3-month follow-up (
p
= 0.000), in terms of VAS, NDI, PPT, and neck muscle strength. Besides, there were statistically significant decreases observed in VAS scores of PRT group compared with those in FRT at 4-, 6-week timepoints, and 3-month follow-up (
p
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00420-017-1230-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1901311538</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1901311538</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-b0083fb595a43950cfa3804a2f4a47d102e12551e3b7ec7450b095eb28a9cd9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1O3DAUha2qqAzQB-imstRNN4Hrv0nSXTVqCxJSN7C2HOeGMU3sqe2A4AH63DgaWlVIbPxz73eOrXsI-cDglAHUZwlAcqiA1RXjAir-hqyYFLzc5PotWYGQS1ewQ3KU0i0UcF2Ld-SQN4o3QskV-bMJ085El4KnYaB5ixSHAW12d-gxpaUYMbmUjbdIczTOO39Dnaf3YcKyuryldhuDd5baYjZnjFXE0WTsqUf7i-6K5gs1NBrfh8k9lroNPscwjuWY8tw_nJCDwYwJ3z_vx-T6-7erzXl1-fPHxebrZWVFzXPVATRi6FSrjBStAjsY0YA0fJBG1j0DjowrxVB0NdpaKuigVdjxxrS2b1Eck897310Mv2dMWU8uWRxH4zHMSbN2GRdToinopxfobZijL78rlFCFlGpdKLanbAwpRRz0LrrJxAfNQC8h6X1IusxeLyFpXjQfn53nbsL-n-JvKgXgeyCVlr_B-N_Tr7o-AfgSneo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1935190456</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the effectiveness of resistance training in women with chronic computer-related neck pain: a randomized controlled study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Li, Xiao ; Lin, Caina ; Liu, Cuicui ; Ke, Songjian ; Wan, Qing ; Luo, Haijie ; Huang, Zhuxi ; Xin, Wenjun ; Ma, Chao ; Wu, Shaoling</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiao ; Lin, Caina ; Liu, Cuicui ; Ke, Songjian ; Wan, Qing ; Luo, Haijie ; Huang, Zhuxi ; Xin, Wenjun ; Ma, Chao ; Wu, Shaoling</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Chronic computer-related neck pain is common among office workers. Studies have proposed neck strengthening exercise as a therapy to pain relieving and function improvement. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different loading resistance trainings and we hypothesized that women with work-related neck pain could benefit more from progressive resistance training for pain and function recovery.
Methods
A randomized controlled trial was conducted and subjects characterized by monotonous jobs were recruited. One hundred and nine employed women with chronic neck pain were randomly allocated into three groups, namely, progressive resistance training (PRT), fixed resistance training (FRT), and control group (CG). In PRT and FRT, four exercises for neck muscles with an elastic rubber band were performed on regular basis for 6 weeks. The therapeutic effectiveness was then evaluated at pretreatment, 2, 4, and 6 weeks during training period, and 3-month posttreatment. Assessment tools included visual analog scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), pressure pain threshold (PPT), and maximal isometric neck strength.
Results
The outcomes were significantly better in PRT and FRT than those in CG at 6-week timepoint and 3-month follow-up (
p
= 0.000), in terms of VAS, NDI, PPT, and neck muscle strength. Besides, there were statistically significant decreases observed in VAS scores of PRT group compared with those in FRT at 4-, 6-week timepoints, and 3-month follow-up (
p
< 0.05).
Conclusions
The neck resistance training was an effective method for pain relieving, mobility improving, pain threshold, and neck muscle strength enhancing in women with chronic computer-related neck pain. Thus, our study provided evidence that women with work-related neck pain might benefit more from PRT, which may have important implications for future clinical practice.
Trial registration
The study was qualified and registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry as ChiCTR-TRC-12002723.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-0131</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1246</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00420-017-1230-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28528354</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Chronic Pain ; Computers ; Control methods ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Employment ; Environment ; Environmental Health ; Exercise Therapy - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Inspection ; Load resistance ; Middle Aged ; Muscle contraction ; Muscle function ; Muscle strength ; Muscles ; Neck ; Neck pain ; Neck Pain - rehabilitation ; Nondestructive testing ; Occupational health ; Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine ; Original Article ; Pain ; Physical training ; Pretreatment ; Randomization ; Rehabilitation ; Resistance training ; Resistance Training - methods ; Rubber ; Statistical analysis ; Strength training ; Visual perception ; Visual thresholds ; Women ; Workers</subject><ispartof>International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2017-10, Vol.90 (7), p.673-683</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017</rights><rights>International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-b0083fb595a43950cfa3804a2f4a47d102e12551e3b7ec7450b095eb28a9cd9e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-b0083fb595a43950cfa3804a2f4a47d102e12551e3b7ec7450b095eb28a9cd9e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00420-017-1230-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00420-017-1230-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28528354$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Caina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Cuicui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ke, Songjian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Haijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Zhuxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xin, Wenjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Shaoling</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the effectiveness of resistance training in women with chronic computer-related neck pain: a randomized controlled study</title><title>International archives of occupational and environmental health</title><addtitle>Int Arch Occup Environ Health</addtitle><addtitle>Int Arch Occup Environ Health</addtitle><description>Background
Chronic computer-related neck pain is common among office workers. Studies have proposed neck strengthening exercise as a therapy to pain relieving and function improvement. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different loading resistance trainings and we hypothesized that women with work-related neck pain could benefit more from progressive resistance training for pain and function recovery.
Methods
A randomized controlled trial was conducted and subjects characterized by monotonous jobs were recruited. One hundred and nine employed women with chronic neck pain were randomly allocated into three groups, namely, progressive resistance training (PRT), fixed resistance training (FRT), and control group (CG). In PRT and FRT, four exercises for neck muscles with an elastic rubber band were performed on regular basis for 6 weeks. The therapeutic effectiveness was then evaluated at pretreatment, 2, 4, and 6 weeks during training period, and 3-month posttreatment. Assessment tools included visual analog scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), pressure pain threshold (PPT), and maximal isometric neck strength.
Results
The outcomes were significantly better in PRT and FRT than those in CG at 6-week timepoint and 3-month follow-up (
p
= 0.000), in terms of VAS, NDI, PPT, and neck muscle strength. Besides, there were statistically significant decreases observed in VAS scores of PRT group compared with those in FRT at 4-, 6-week timepoints, and 3-month follow-up (
p
< 0.05).
Conclusions
The neck resistance training was an effective method for pain relieving, mobility improving, pain threshold, and neck muscle strength enhancing in women with chronic computer-related neck pain. Thus, our study provided evidence that women with work-related neck pain might benefit more from PRT, which may have important implications for future clinical practice.
Trial registration
The study was qualified and registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry as ChiCTR-TRC-12002723.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Chronic Pain</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Control methods</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Exercise Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Load resistance</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle contraction</subject><subject>Muscle function</subject><subject>Muscle strength</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>Neck pain</subject><subject>Neck Pain - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Nondestructive testing</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Physical training</subject><subject>Pretreatment</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Resistance training</subject><subject>Resistance Training - methods</subject><subject>Rubber</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Strength training</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><subject>Visual thresholds</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>0340-0131</issn><issn>1432-1246</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1O3DAUha2qqAzQB-imstRNN4Hrv0nSXTVqCxJSN7C2HOeGMU3sqe2A4AH63DgaWlVIbPxz73eOrXsI-cDglAHUZwlAcqiA1RXjAir-hqyYFLzc5PotWYGQS1ewQ3KU0i0UcF2Ld-SQN4o3QskV-bMJ085El4KnYaB5ixSHAW12d-gxpaUYMbmUjbdIczTOO39Dnaf3YcKyuryldhuDd5baYjZnjFXE0WTsqUf7i-6K5gs1NBrfh8k9lroNPscwjuWY8tw_nJCDwYwJ3z_vx-T6-7erzXl1-fPHxebrZWVFzXPVATRi6FSrjBStAjsY0YA0fJBG1j0DjowrxVB0NdpaKuigVdjxxrS2b1Eck897310Mv2dMWU8uWRxH4zHMSbN2GRdToinopxfobZijL78rlFCFlGpdKLanbAwpRRz0LrrJxAfNQC8h6X1IusxeLyFpXjQfn53nbsL-n-JvKgXgeyCVlr_B-N_Tr7o-AfgSneo</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Li, Xiao</creator><creator>Lin, Caina</creator><creator>Liu, Cuicui</creator><creator>Ke, Songjian</creator><creator>Wan, Qing</creator><creator>Luo, Haijie</creator><creator>Huang, Zhuxi</creator><creator>Xin, Wenjun</creator><creator>Ma, Chao</creator><creator>Wu, Shaoling</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Comparison of the effectiveness of resistance training in women with chronic computer-related neck pain: a randomized controlled study</title><author>Li, Xiao ; Lin, Caina ; Liu, Cuicui ; Ke, Songjian ; Wan, Qing ; Luo, Haijie ; Huang, Zhuxi ; Xin, Wenjun ; Ma, Chao ; Wu, Shaoling</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-b0083fb595a43950cfa3804a2f4a47d102e12551e3b7ec7450b095eb28a9cd9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Chronic Pain</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Control methods</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Exercise Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Load resistance</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle contraction</topic><topic>Muscle function</topic><topic>Muscle strength</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>Neck pain</topic><topic>Neck Pain - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Nondestructive testing</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Physical training</topic><topic>Pretreatment</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Resistance training</topic><topic>Resistance Training - methods</topic><topic>Rubber</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Strength training</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><topic>Visual thresholds</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Caina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Cuicui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ke, Songjian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Haijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Zhuxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xin, Wenjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Shaoling</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International archives of occupational and environmental health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Xiao</au><au>Lin, Caina</au><au>Liu, Cuicui</au><au>Ke, Songjian</au><au>Wan, Qing</au><au>Luo, Haijie</au><au>Huang, Zhuxi</au><au>Xin, Wenjun</au><au>Ma, Chao</au><au>Wu, Shaoling</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the effectiveness of resistance training in women with chronic computer-related neck pain: a randomized controlled study</atitle><jtitle>International archives of occupational and environmental health</jtitle><stitle>Int Arch Occup Environ Health</stitle><addtitle>Int Arch Occup Environ Health</addtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>673</spage><epage>683</epage><pages>673-683</pages><issn>0340-0131</issn><eissn>1432-1246</eissn><abstract>Background
Chronic computer-related neck pain is common among office workers. Studies have proposed neck strengthening exercise as a therapy to pain relieving and function improvement. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different loading resistance trainings and we hypothesized that women with work-related neck pain could benefit more from progressive resistance training for pain and function recovery.
Methods
A randomized controlled trial was conducted and subjects characterized by monotonous jobs were recruited. One hundred and nine employed women with chronic neck pain were randomly allocated into three groups, namely, progressive resistance training (PRT), fixed resistance training (FRT), and control group (CG). In PRT and FRT, four exercises for neck muscles with an elastic rubber band were performed on regular basis for 6 weeks. The therapeutic effectiveness was then evaluated at pretreatment, 2, 4, and 6 weeks during training period, and 3-month posttreatment. Assessment tools included visual analog scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), pressure pain threshold (PPT), and maximal isometric neck strength.
Results
The outcomes were significantly better in PRT and FRT than those in CG at 6-week timepoint and 3-month follow-up (
p
= 0.000), in terms of VAS, NDI, PPT, and neck muscle strength. Besides, there were statistically significant decreases observed in VAS scores of PRT group compared with those in FRT at 4-, 6-week timepoints, and 3-month follow-up (
p
< 0.05).
Conclusions
The neck resistance training was an effective method for pain relieving, mobility improving, pain threshold, and neck muscle strength enhancing in women with chronic computer-related neck pain. Thus, our study provided evidence that women with work-related neck pain might benefit more from PRT, which may have important implications for future clinical practice.
Trial registration
The study was qualified and registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry as ChiCTR-TRC-12002723.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28528354</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00420-017-1230-2</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0340-0131 |
| ispartof | International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2017-10, Vol.90 (7), p.673-683 |
| issn | 0340-0131 1432-1246 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1901311538 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Adult Chronic Pain Computers Control methods Earth and Environmental Science Employment Environment Environmental Health Exercise Therapy - methods Female Humans Inspection Load resistance Middle Aged Muscle contraction Muscle function Muscle strength Muscles Neck Neck pain Neck Pain - rehabilitation Nondestructive testing Occupational health Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine Original Article Pain Physical training Pretreatment Randomization Rehabilitation Resistance training Resistance Training - methods Rubber Statistical analysis Strength training Visual perception Visual thresholds Women Workers |
| title | Comparison of the effectiveness of resistance training in women with chronic computer-related neck pain: a randomized controlled study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T07%3A37%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20resistance%20training%20in%20women%20with%20chronic%20computer-related%20neck%20pain:%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20archives%20of%20occupational%20and%20environmental%20health&rft.au=Li,%20Xiao&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=673&rft.epage=683&rft.pages=673-683&rft.issn=0340-0131&rft.eissn=1432-1246&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00420-017-1230-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1901311538%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1935190456&rft_id=info:pmid/28528354&rfr_iscdi=true |