SU‐E‐T‐196: Commissioning for Volumetric Modulated Radiation Therapy on Varian Clinac 21EX

Purpose: Recently the volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) technology such as RapidArc is widely distributed in Japan. These technologies are normally provided by the high spec linear accelerator such as Trilogy, Novalis Tx, Synergy, et al.. The specific DICOM‐file is generally used for commissioning of th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical Physics 2012-06, Vol.39 (6), p.3748-3748
Hauptverfasser: Yada, R, Hayashi, N, Matsunaga, T, Nozue, M, Sai, H, Yamada, K, Yamanaka, R, Kato, Y, Muraki, Y
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3748
container_issue 6
container_start_page 3748
container_title Medical Physics
container_volume 39
creator Yada, R
Hayashi, N
Matsunaga, T
Nozue, M
Sai, H
Yamada, K
Yamanaka, R
Kato, Y
Muraki, Y
description Purpose: Recently the volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) technology such as RapidArc is widely distributed in Japan. These technologies are normally provided by the high spec linear accelerator such as Trilogy, Novalis Tx, Synergy, et al.. The specific DICOM‐file is generally used for commissioning of these technologies. On the other hand, we had to apply RapidArc into historic linear accelerator. This title expresses an experience how we performed the commissioning of RapidArc with the old linear accelerator. Methods: Two Varian's linear accelerators “Clinac 21EX” equipped with Millenium multi‐leaf collimator and a Varian's treatment planning system “Eclipse ver.8.9” were used for this study. The commissioning for RapidArc was performed in energy 4,6,10,15 MV (Max‐DR: 250, 600, 400, 600 MU/min). Commissioning procedure composed two categories: the general machine QA for DMLC‐IMRT procedure and the specific RapidArc QA procedure. In RapidArc QA procedure, we modified DICOM‐file to apply into the potential spec of Clinac 21EX optimally. The specific MLC‐motion sequence and the gantry rotation speed were created by the dedicated programs (Shaper and DicomEdit, Varian) for RapidArc QA procedure. Each tolerance value was defied by the data from daily/monthly QA and the paper by Ling et al. Results: As the results of the general machine QA procedure, the variance of radiation output during static/dynamic gantry rotation was less than 1%. The deference of fence tests during static/dynamic gantry rotation and RapidArc were less than 1 mm in each. However, the results of the RapidArc QA were worse than the latest machine (especially variable gantry speed) and it was careful to define tolerance level. Conclusion: The procedure of commissioning for RapidArc on historic linear accelerator was proposed. Several minor revisions for DICOM‐file should be required for suitable commissioning and it may ensure the tolerance limit for gantry/MLC‐leaf motion speeds.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4735255
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1900128179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1900128179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2335-9830c01872b91665735efc5f93f9c79138216eeb5f211b3ec283b5c10559ef423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAUhC0EglJYcAHkJSCl-NlxYrNDVfmRQCAoFbvguA4Y5afYiVB3HIEzchIMLexgMXqz-DRPMwjtABkAgDiEQZwyTjlfQT0abBRTIldRjxAZRzQmfANtev9MCEkYJ-togwoOqQDRQw-3dx9v76OgcRDI5AgPm6qy3tumtvUjLhqHJ03ZVaZ1VuPLZtqVqjVTfKOmVrWBwuMn49RsjoOdKGdVjYelrZXGFEb3W2itUKU328vbR3cno_HwLLq4Oj0fHl9EmjLGIykY0QRESnMJScJDH1NoXkhWSJ1KYIJCYkzOCwqQM6OpYDnXQDiXpogp66O9Re7MNS-d8W0WSmhTlqo2TeczkIQAFZDKgO4vUO0a750pspmzlXLzDEj2NWgG2XLQwO4uY7u8MtNf8mfBAEQL4NWWZv53UnZ5vQw8WPBe2_Z7v3--fwI7U4rd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1900128179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SU‐E‐T‐196: Commissioning for Volumetric Modulated Radiation Therapy on Varian Clinac 21EX</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Yada, R ; Hayashi, N ; Matsunaga, T ; Nozue, M ; Sai, H ; Yamada, K ; Yamanaka, R ; Kato, Y ; Muraki, Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Yada, R ; Hayashi, N ; Matsunaga, T ; Nozue, M ; Sai, H ; Yamada, K ; Yamanaka, R ; Kato, Y ; Muraki, Y</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Recently the volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) technology such as RapidArc is widely distributed in Japan. These technologies are normally provided by the high spec linear accelerator such as Trilogy, Novalis Tx, Synergy, et al.. The specific DICOM‐file is generally used for commissioning of these technologies. On the other hand, we had to apply RapidArc into historic linear accelerator. This title expresses an experience how we performed the commissioning of RapidArc with the old linear accelerator. Methods: Two Varian's linear accelerators “Clinac 21EX” equipped with Millenium multi‐leaf collimator and a Varian's treatment planning system “Eclipse ver.8.9” were used for this study. The commissioning for RapidArc was performed in energy 4,6,10,15 MV (Max‐DR: 250, 600, 400, 600 MU/min). Commissioning procedure composed two categories: the general machine QA for DMLC‐IMRT procedure and the specific RapidArc QA procedure. In RapidArc QA procedure, we modified DICOM‐file to apply into the potential spec of Clinac 21EX optimally. The specific MLC‐motion sequence and the gantry rotation speed were created by the dedicated programs (Shaper and DicomEdit, Varian) for RapidArc QA procedure. Each tolerance value was defied by the data from daily/monthly QA and the paper by Ling et al. Results: As the results of the general machine QA procedure, the variance of radiation output during static/dynamic gantry rotation was less than 1%. The deference of fence tests during static/dynamic gantry rotation and RapidArc were less than 1 mm in each. However, the results of the RapidArc QA were worse than the latest machine (especially variable gantry speed) and it was careful to define tolerance level. Conclusion: The procedure of commissioning for RapidArc on historic linear accelerator was proposed. Several minor revisions for DICOM‐file should be required for suitable commissioning and it may ensure the tolerance limit for gantry/MLC‐leaf motion speeds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4735255</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28517818</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Collimators ; Linear accelerators ; Medical treatment planning ; Radiation therapy</subject><ispartof>Medical Physics, 2012-06, Vol.39 (6), p.3748-3748</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4735255$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,1411,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28517818$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yada, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsunaga, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nozue, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sai, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamanaka, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muraki, Y</creatorcontrib><title>SU‐E‐T‐196: Commissioning for Volumetric Modulated Radiation Therapy on Varian Clinac 21EX</title><title>Medical Physics</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose: Recently the volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) technology such as RapidArc is widely distributed in Japan. These technologies are normally provided by the high spec linear accelerator such as Trilogy, Novalis Tx, Synergy, et al.. The specific DICOM‐file is generally used for commissioning of these technologies. On the other hand, we had to apply RapidArc into historic linear accelerator. This title expresses an experience how we performed the commissioning of RapidArc with the old linear accelerator. Methods: Two Varian's linear accelerators “Clinac 21EX” equipped with Millenium multi‐leaf collimator and a Varian's treatment planning system “Eclipse ver.8.9” were used for this study. The commissioning for RapidArc was performed in energy 4,6,10,15 MV (Max‐DR: 250, 600, 400, 600 MU/min). Commissioning procedure composed two categories: the general machine QA for DMLC‐IMRT procedure and the specific RapidArc QA procedure. In RapidArc QA procedure, we modified DICOM‐file to apply into the potential spec of Clinac 21EX optimally. The specific MLC‐motion sequence and the gantry rotation speed were created by the dedicated programs (Shaper and DicomEdit, Varian) for RapidArc QA procedure. Each tolerance value was defied by the data from daily/monthly QA and the paper by Ling et al. Results: As the results of the general machine QA procedure, the variance of radiation output during static/dynamic gantry rotation was less than 1%. The deference of fence tests during static/dynamic gantry rotation and RapidArc were less than 1 mm in each. However, the results of the RapidArc QA were worse than the latest machine (especially variable gantry speed) and it was careful to define tolerance level. Conclusion: The procedure of commissioning for RapidArc on historic linear accelerator was proposed. Several minor revisions for DICOM‐file should be required for suitable commissioning and it may ensure the tolerance limit for gantry/MLC‐leaf motion speeds.</description><subject>Collimators</subject><subject>Linear accelerators</subject><subject>Medical treatment planning</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAUhC0EglJYcAHkJSCl-NlxYrNDVfmRQCAoFbvguA4Y5afYiVB3HIEzchIMLexgMXqz-DRPMwjtABkAgDiEQZwyTjlfQT0abBRTIldRjxAZRzQmfANtev9MCEkYJ-togwoOqQDRQw-3dx9v76OgcRDI5AgPm6qy3tumtvUjLhqHJ03ZVaZ1VuPLZtqVqjVTfKOmVrWBwuMn49RsjoOdKGdVjYelrZXGFEb3W2itUKU328vbR3cno_HwLLq4Oj0fHl9EmjLGIykY0QRESnMJScJDH1NoXkhWSJ1KYIJCYkzOCwqQM6OpYDnXQDiXpogp66O9Re7MNS-d8W0WSmhTlqo2TeczkIQAFZDKgO4vUO0a750pspmzlXLzDEj2NWgG2XLQwO4uY7u8MtNf8mfBAEQL4NWWZv53UnZ5vQw8WPBe2_Z7v3--fwI7U4rd</recordid><startdate>201206</startdate><enddate>201206</enddate><creator>Yada, R</creator><creator>Hayashi, N</creator><creator>Matsunaga, T</creator><creator>Nozue, M</creator><creator>Sai, H</creator><creator>Yamada, K</creator><creator>Yamanaka, R</creator><creator>Kato, Y</creator><creator>Muraki, Y</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201206</creationdate><title>SU‐E‐T‐196: Commissioning for Volumetric Modulated Radiation Therapy on Varian Clinac 21EX</title><author>Yada, R ; Hayashi, N ; Matsunaga, T ; Nozue, M ; Sai, H ; Yamada, K ; Yamanaka, R ; Kato, Y ; Muraki, Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2335-9830c01872b91665735efc5f93f9c79138216eeb5f211b3ec283b5c10559ef423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Collimators</topic><topic>Linear accelerators</topic><topic>Medical treatment planning</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yada, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsunaga, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nozue, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sai, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamanaka, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muraki, Y</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical Physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yada, R</au><au>Hayashi, N</au><au>Matsunaga, T</au><au>Nozue, M</au><au>Sai, H</au><au>Yamada, K</au><au>Yamanaka, R</au><au>Kato, Y</au><au>Muraki, Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SU‐E‐T‐196: Commissioning for Volumetric Modulated Radiation Therapy on Varian Clinac 21EX</atitle><jtitle>Medical Physics</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2012-06</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3748</spage><epage>3748</epage><pages>3748-3748</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: Recently the volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) technology such as RapidArc is widely distributed in Japan. These technologies are normally provided by the high spec linear accelerator such as Trilogy, Novalis Tx, Synergy, et al.. The specific DICOM‐file is generally used for commissioning of these technologies. On the other hand, we had to apply RapidArc into historic linear accelerator. This title expresses an experience how we performed the commissioning of RapidArc with the old linear accelerator. Methods: Two Varian's linear accelerators “Clinac 21EX” equipped with Millenium multi‐leaf collimator and a Varian's treatment planning system “Eclipse ver.8.9” were used for this study. The commissioning for RapidArc was performed in energy 4,6,10,15 MV (Max‐DR: 250, 600, 400, 600 MU/min). Commissioning procedure composed two categories: the general machine QA for DMLC‐IMRT procedure and the specific RapidArc QA procedure. In RapidArc QA procedure, we modified DICOM‐file to apply into the potential spec of Clinac 21EX optimally. The specific MLC‐motion sequence and the gantry rotation speed were created by the dedicated programs (Shaper and DicomEdit, Varian) for RapidArc QA procedure. Each tolerance value was defied by the data from daily/monthly QA and the paper by Ling et al. Results: As the results of the general machine QA procedure, the variance of radiation output during static/dynamic gantry rotation was less than 1%. The deference of fence tests during static/dynamic gantry rotation and RapidArc were less than 1 mm in each. However, the results of the RapidArc QA were worse than the latest machine (especially variable gantry speed) and it was careful to define tolerance level. Conclusion: The procedure of commissioning for RapidArc on historic linear accelerator was proposed. Several minor revisions for DICOM‐file should be required for suitable commissioning and it may ensure the tolerance limit for gantry/MLC‐leaf motion speeds.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>28517818</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.4735255</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical Physics, 2012-06, Vol.39 (6), p.3748-3748
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1900128179
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Collimators
Linear accelerators
Medical treatment planning
Radiation therapy
title SU‐E‐T‐196: Commissioning for Volumetric Modulated Radiation Therapy on Varian Clinac 21EX
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T10%3A04%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SU%E2%80%90E%E2%80%90T%E2%80%90196:%20Commissioning%20for%20Volumetric%20Modulated%20Radiation%20Therapy%20on%20Varian%20Clinac%2021EX&rft.jtitle=Medical%20Physics&rft.au=Yada,%20R&rft.date=2012-06&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3748&rft.epage=3748&rft.pages=3748-3748&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4735255&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1900128179%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1900128179&rft_id=info:pmid/28517818&rfr_iscdi=true