Mandarin parents’ evaluation of developmental status in the detection of delays
Background We examined the parental perception and accuracy of the Mandarin translation of the Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status, a screening questionnaire for parent concerns about children's various developmental skills. Methods The questionnaire was translated into Mandarin. Upon e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pediatrics international 2017-08, Vol.59 (8), p.861-868 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 868 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 861 |
container_title | Pediatrics international |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Toh, Teck‐Hock Lim, Boon‐Chuan Bujang, Mohamad Adam Bin Haniff, Jamaiyah Wong, See‐Chang Abdullah, Muhamad Rais |
description | Background
We examined the parental perception and accuracy of the Mandarin translation of the Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status, a screening questionnaire for parent concerns about children's various developmental skills.
Methods
The questionnaire was translated into Mandarin. Upon enrollment, caregivers completed the Mandarin PEDS and answered four questions about its acceptability and usefulness, and its ease of understanding and completion. The Mandarin PEDS was independently evaluated by a pediatrician and a community nurse, and classified as high risk (≥two predictive concerns), medium risk (one predictive concern), low risk (any non‐predictive concerns) or no risk (if no concern) for developmental delays. The caregivers repeated Mandarin PEDS at a 2 week interval for test–retest reliability, while the children underwent testing for accuracy using a developmental assessment test.
Results
The majority (≥85%) of the 73 caregivers perceived the Mandarin PEDS as acceptable and useful, as well as easy to understand and complete. Fifteen (20.5%) and 24 responses (33.9%) were classified as high and moderate risk, respectively. The test–retest and inter‐rater reliabilities were excellent, with an intra‐class correlation coefficient of 0.812 (95% CI: 0.701–0.881, P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ped.13325 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1899410621</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1928229472</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-f78b63586dee1776e4ea1fb557e1511c67d6f9d2898f945de0cf523fc99537e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E9LwzAYBvAgipvTg19ACl700C1JkyY5ypx_YKKCgreQtW-wo2tr005282v49fwkZnZDEMwlIe8vD-FB6JjgIfFrVEE6JFFE-Q7qE8ZoSDF-2fXniMpQ4lj00IFzc4yxFJLtox6VnOCI8T56vDNFauqsCCpTQ9G4r4_PAJYmb02TlUVQ2iCFJeRltfBTkweuMU3rAv-geQU_ayD5hblZuUO0Z03u4GizD9Dz1eRpfBNO769vxxfTMGGE8tAKOYsjLuMUgAgRAwND7IxzAYQTksQija1KqVTSKsZTwInlNLKJUjzyJhqgsy63qsu3FlyjF5lLIM9NAWXrNJFKMYJjuqanf-i8bOvC_04TRSWlignq1Xmnkrp0rgarqzpbmHqlCdbrnrXvWf_07O3JJrGdLfztVm6L9WDUgfcsh9X_SfphctlFfgMqdYcy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928229472</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mandarin parents’ evaluation of developmental status in the detection of delays</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Toh, Teck‐Hock ; Lim, Boon‐Chuan ; Bujang, Mohamad Adam Bin ; Haniff, Jamaiyah ; Wong, See‐Chang ; Abdullah, Muhamad Rais</creator><creatorcontrib>Toh, Teck‐Hock ; Lim, Boon‐Chuan ; Bujang, Mohamad Adam Bin ; Haniff, Jamaiyah ; Wong, See‐Chang ; Abdullah, Muhamad Rais</creatorcontrib><description>Background
We examined the parental perception and accuracy of the Mandarin translation of the Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status, a screening questionnaire for parent concerns about children's various developmental skills.
Methods
The questionnaire was translated into Mandarin. Upon enrollment, caregivers completed the Mandarin PEDS and answered four questions about its acceptability and usefulness, and its ease of understanding and completion. The Mandarin PEDS was independently evaluated by a pediatrician and a community nurse, and classified as high risk (≥two predictive concerns), medium risk (one predictive concern), low risk (any non‐predictive concerns) or no risk (if no concern) for developmental delays. The caregivers repeated Mandarin PEDS at a 2 week interval for test–retest reliability, while the children underwent testing for accuracy using a developmental assessment test.
Results
The majority (≥85%) of the 73 caregivers perceived the Mandarin PEDS as acceptable and useful, as well as easy to understand and complete. Fifteen (20.5%) and 24 responses (33.9%) were classified as high and moderate risk, respectively. The test–retest and inter‐rater reliabilities were excellent, with an intra‐class correlation coefficient of 0.812 (95% CI: 0.701–0.881, P < 0.001) and a kappa value of 0.870 (P < 0.001), respectively. Mandarin PEDS was 80.0% sensitive and 83.8% specific for those in the high‐risk category (adjusted OR, 64.68; 95% CI: 1.33–3,139.72; P = 0.035).
Conclusion
Mandarin PEDS was well received by the caregivers, and was reliable and accurate in detecting developmental delays in the Mandarin‐speaking subjects. We recommend it for early detection of children with developmental and behavioral problems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1328-8067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-200X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ped.13325</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28510345</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acceptability ; Attitude to Health ; Caregivers ; Child ; Child development ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; China ; Chinese languages ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; developmental delay ; Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis ; developmental screening ; Early Diagnosis ; Evaluation ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Observer Variation ; parent concern ; Parents ; Pediatrics ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Assessment ; sensitivity ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; specificity ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; translation ; Translations</subject><ispartof>Pediatrics international, 2017-08, Vol.59 (8), p.861-868</ispartof><rights>2017 Japan Pediatric Society</rights><rights>2017 Japan Pediatric Society.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Japan Pediatric Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-f78b63586dee1776e4ea1fb557e1511c67d6f9d2898f945de0cf523fc99537e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-f78b63586dee1776e4ea1fb557e1511c67d6f9d2898f945de0cf523fc99537e13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5909-4855</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fped.13325$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fped.13325$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28510345$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Toh, Teck‐Hock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Boon‐Chuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bujang, Mohamad Adam Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haniff, Jamaiyah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, See‐Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdullah, Muhamad Rais</creatorcontrib><title>Mandarin parents’ evaluation of developmental status in the detection of delays</title><title>Pediatrics international</title><addtitle>Pediatr Int</addtitle><description>Background
We examined the parental perception and accuracy of the Mandarin translation of the Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status, a screening questionnaire for parent concerns about children's various developmental skills.
Methods
The questionnaire was translated into Mandarin. Upon enrollment, caregivers completed the Mandarin PEDS and answered four questions about its acceptability and usefulness, and its ease of understanding and completion. The Mandarin PEDS was independently evaluated by a pediatrician and a community nurse, and classified as high risk (≥two predictive concerns), medium risk (one predictive concern), low risk (any non‐predictive concerns) or no risk (if no concern) for developmental delays. The caregivers repeated Mandarin PEDS at a 2 week interval for test–retest reliability, while the children underwent testing for accuracy using a developmental assessment test.
Results
The majority (≥85%) of the 73 caregivers perceived the Mandarin PEDS as acceptable and useful, as well as easy to understand and complete. Fifteen (20.5%) and 24 responses (33.9%) were classified as high and moderate risk, respectively. The test–retest and inter‐rater reliabilities were excellent, with an intra‐class correlation coefficient of 0.812 (95% CI: 0.701–0.881, P < 0.001) and a kappa value of 0.870 (P < 0.001), respectively. Mandarin PEDS was 80.0% sensitive and 83.8% specific for those in the high‐risk category (adjusted OR, 64.68; 95% CI: 1.33–3,139.72; P = 0.035).
Conclusion
Mandarin PEDS was well received by the caregivers, and was reliable and accurate in detecting developmental delays in the Mandarin‐speaking subjects. We recommend it for early detection of children with developmental and behavioral problems.</description><subject>Acceptability</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Chinese languages</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>developmental delay</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis</subject><subject>developmental screening</subject><subject>Early Diagnosis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>parent concern</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>sensitivity</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>specificity</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>translation</subject><subject>Translations</subject><issn>1328-8067</issn><issn>1442-200X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E9LwzAYBvAgipvTg19ACl700C1JkyY5ypx_YKKCgreQtW-wo2tr005282v49fwkZnZDEMwlIe8vD-FB6JjgIfFrVEE6JFFE-Q7qE8ZoSDF-2fXniMpQ4lj00IFzc4yxFJLtox6VnOCI8T56vDNFauqsCCpTQ9G4r4_PAJYmb02TlUVQ2iCFJeRltfBTkweuMU3rAv-geQU_ayD5hblZuUO0Z03u4GizD9Dz1eRpfBNO769vxxfTMGGE8tAKOYsjLuMUgAgRAwND7IxzAYQTksQija1KqVTSKsZTwInlNLKJUjzyJhqgsy63qsu3FlyjF5lLIM9NAWXrNJFKMYJjuqanf-i8bOvC_04TRSWlignq1Xmnkrp0rgarqzpbmHqlCdbrnrXvWf_07O3JJrGdLfztVm6L9WDUgfcsh9X_SfphctlFfgMqdYcy</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>Toh, Teck‐Hock</creator><creator>Lim, Boon‐Chuan</creator><creator>Bujang, Mohamad Adam Bin</creator><creator>Haniff, Jamaiyah</creator><creator>Wong, See‐Chang</creator><creator>Abdullah, Muhamad Rais</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5909-4855</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>Mandarin parents’ evaluation of developmental status in the detection of delays</title><author>Toh, Teck‐Hock ; Lim, Boon‐Chuan ; Bujang, Mohamad Adam Bin ; Haniff, Jamaiyah ; Wong, See‐Chang ; Abdullah, Muhamad Rais</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-f78b63586dee1776e4ea1fb557e1511c67d6f9d2898f945de0cf523fc99537e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acceptability</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Chinese languages</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>developmental delay</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis</topic><topic>developmental screening</topic><topic>Early Diagnosis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>parent concern</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>sensitivity</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>specificity</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>translation</topic><topic>Translations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Toh, Teck‐Hock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Boon‐Chuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bujang, Mohamad Adam Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haniff, Jamaiyah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, See‐Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdullah, Muhamad Rais</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatrics international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Toh, Teck‐Hock</au><au>Lim, Boon‐Chuan</au><au>Bujang, Mohamad Adam Bin</au><au>Haniff, Jamaiyah</au><au>Wong, See‐Chang</au><au>Abdullah, Muhamad Rais</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mandarin parents’ evaluation of developmental status in the detection of delays</atitle><jtitle>Pediatrics international</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatr Int</addtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>861</spage><epage>868</epage><pages>861-868</pages><issn>1328-8067</issn><eissn>1442-200X</eissn><abstract>Background
We examined the parental perception and accuracy of the Mandarin translation of the Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status, a screening questionnaire for parent concerns about children's various developmental skills.
Methods
The questionnaire was translated into Mandarin. Upon enrollment, caregivers completed the Mandarin PEDS and answered four questions about its acceptability and usefulness, and its ease of understanding and completion. The Mandarin PEDS was independently evaluated by a pediatrician and a community nurse, and classified as high risk (≥two predictive concerns), medium risk (one predictive concern), low risk (any non‐predictive concerns) or no risk (if no concern) for developmental delays. The caregivers repeated Mandarin PEDS at a 2 week interval for test–retest reliability, while the children underwent testing for accuracy using a developmental assessment test.
Results
The majority (≥85%) of the 73 caregivers perceived the Mandarin PEDS as acceptable and useful, as well as easy to understand and complete. Fifteen (20.5%) and 24 responses (33.9%) were classified as high and moderate risk, respectively. The test–retest and inter‐rater reliabilities were excellent, with an intra‐class correlation coefficient of 0.812 (95% CI: 0.701–0.881, P < 0.001) and a kappa value of 0.870 (P < 0.001), respectively. Mandarin PEDS was 80.0% sensitive and 83.8% specific for those in the high‐risk category (adjusted OR, 64.68; 95% CI: 1.33–3,139.72; P = 0.035).
Conclusion
Mandarin PEDS was well received by the caregivers, and was reliable and accurate in detecting developmental delays in the Mandarin‐speaking subjects. We recommend it for early detection of children with developmental and behavioral problems.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>28510345</pmid><doi>10.1111/ped.13325</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5909-4855</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1328-8067 |
ispartof | Pediatrics international, 2017-08, Vol.59 (8), p.861-868 |
issn | 1328-8067 1442-200X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1899410621 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Acceptability Attitude to Health Caregivers Child Child development Child, Preschool Children China Chinese languages Correlation coefficient Correlation coefficients Cross-Sectional Studies developmental delay Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis developmental screening Early Diagnosis Evaluation Female Humans Infant Logistic Models Male Observer Variation parent concern Parents Pediatrics Reproducibility of Results Risk Assessment sensitivity Sensitivity and Specificity specificity Surveys and Questionnaires translation Translations |
title | Mandarin parents’ evaluation of developmental status in the detection of delays |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T17%3A25%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mandarin%20parents%E2%80%99%20evaluation%20of%20developmental%20status%20in%20the%20detection%20of%20delays&rft.jtitle=Pediatrics%20international&rft.au=Toh,%20Teck%E2%80%90Hock&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=861&rft.epage=868&rft.pages=861-868&rft.issn=1328-8067&rft.eissn=1442-200X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ped.13325&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1928229472%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928229472&rft_id=info:pmid/28510345&rfr_iscdi=true |