Mandarin parents’ evaluation of developmental status in the detection of delays

Background We examined the parental perception and accuracy of the Mandarin translation of the Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status, a screening questionnaire for parent concerns about children's various developmental skills. Methods The questionnaire was translated into Mandarin. Upon e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatrics international 2017-08, Vol.59 (8), p.861-868
Hauptverfasser: Toh, Teck‐Hock, Lim, Boon‐Chuan, Bujang, Mohamad Adam Bin, Haniff, Jamaiyah, Wong, See‐Chang, Abdullah, Muhamad Rais
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 868
container_issue 8
container_start_page 861
container_title Pediatrics international
container_volume 59
creator Toh, Teck‐Hock
Lim, Boon‐Chuan
Bujang, Mohamad Adam Bin
Haniff, Jamaiyah
Wong, See‐Chang
Abdullah, Muhamad Rais
description Background We examined the parental perception and accuracy of the Mandarin translation of the Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status, a screening questionnaire for parent concerns about children's various developmental skills. Methods The questionnaire was translated into Mandarin. Upon enrollment, caregivers completed the Mandarin PEDS and answered four questions about its acceptability and usefulness, and its ease of understanding and completion. The Mandarin PEDS was independently evaluated by a pediatrician and a community nurse, and classified as high risk (≥two predictive concerns), medium risk (one predictive concern), low risk (any non‐predictive concerns) or no risk (if no concern) for developmental delays. The caregivers repeated Mandarin PEDS at a 2 week interval for test–retest reliability, while the children underwent testing for accuracy using a developmental assessment test. Results The majority (≥85%) of the 73 caregivers perceived the Mandarin PEDS as acceptable and useful, as well as easy to understand and complete. Fifteen (20.5%) and 24 responses (33.9%) were classified as high and moderate risk, respectively. The test–retest and inter‐rater reliabilities were excellent, with an intra‐class correlation coefficient of 0.812 (95% CI: 0.701–0.881, P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ped.13325
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1899410621</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1928229472</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-f78b63586dee1776e4ea1fb557e1511c67d6f9d2898f945de0cf523fc99537e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E9LwzAYBvAgipvTg19ACl700C1JkyY5ypx_YKKCgreQtW-wo2tr005282v49fwkZnZDEMwlIe8vD-FB6JjgIfFrVEE6JFFE-Q7qE8ZoSDF-2fXniMpQ4lj00IFzc4yxFJLtox6VnOCI8T56vDNFauqsCCpTQ9G4r4_PAJYmb02TlUVQ2iCFJeRltfBTkweuMU3rAv-geQU_ayD5hblZuUO0Z03u4GizD9Dz1eRpfBNO769vxxfTMGGE8tAKOYsjLuMUgAgRAwND7IxzAYQTksQija1KqVTSKsZTwInlNLKJUjzyJhqgsy63qsu3FlyjF5lLIM9NAWXrNJFKMYJjuqanf-i8bOvC_04TRSWlignq1Xmnkrp0rgarqzpbmHqlCdbrnrXvWf_07O3JJrGdLfztVm6L9WDUgfcsh9X_SfphctlFfgMqdYcy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928229472</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mandarin parents’ evaluation of developmental status in the detection of delays</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Toh, Teck‐Hock ; Lim, Boon‐Chuan ; Bujang, Mohamad Adam Bin ; Haniff, Jamaiyah ; Wong, See‐Chang ; Abdullah, Muhamad Rais</creator><creatorcontrib>Toh, Teck‐Hock ; Lim, Boon‐Chuan ; Bujang, Mohamad Adam Bin ; Haniff, Jamaiyah ; Wong, See‐Chang ; Abdullah, Muhamad Rais</creatorcontrib><description>Background We examined the parental perception and accuracy of the Mandarin translation of the Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status, a screening questionnaire for parent concerns about children's various developmental skills. Methods The questionnaire was translated into Mandarin. Upon enrollment, caregivers completed the Mandarin PEDS and answered four questions about its acceptability and usefulness, and its ease of understanding and completion. The Mandarin PEDS was independently evaluated by a pediatrician and a community nurse, and classified as high risk (≥two predictive concerns), medium risk (one predictive concern), low risk (any non‐predictive concerns) or no risk (if no concern) for developmental delays. The caregivers repeated Mandarin PEDS at a 2 week interval for test–retest reliability, while the children underwent testing for accuracy using a developmental assessment test. Results The majority (≥85%) of the 73 caregivers perceived the Mandarin PEDS as acceptable and useful, as well as easy to understand and complete. Fifteen (20.5%) and 24 responses (33.9%) were classified as high and moderate risk, respectively. The test–retest and inter‐rater reliabilities were excellent, with an intra‐class correlation coefficient of 0.812 (95% CI: 0.701–0.881, P &lt; 0.001) and a kappa value of 0.870 (P &lt; 0.001), respectively. Mandarin PEDS was 80.0% sensitive and 83.8% specific for those in the high‐risk category (adjusted OR, 64.68; 95% CI: 1.33–3,139.72; P = 0.035). Conclusion Mandarin PEDS was well received by the caregivers, and was reliable and accurate in detecting developmental delays in the Mandarin‐speaking subjects. We recommend it for early detection of children with developmental and behavioral problems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1328-8067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-200X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ped.13325</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28510345</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acceptability ; Attitude to Health ; Caregivers ; Child ; Child development ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; China ; Chinese languages ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; developmental delay ; Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis ; developmental screening ; Early Diagnosis ; Evaluation ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Observer Variation ; parent concern ; Parents ; Pediatrics ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Assessment ; sensitivity ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; specificity ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; translation ; Translations</subject><ispartof>Pediatrics international, 2017-08, Vol.59 (8), p.861-868</ispartof><rights>2017 Japan Pediatric Society</rights><rights>2017 Japan Pediatric Society.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Japan Pediatric Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-f78b63586dee1776e4ea1fb557e1511c67d6f9d2898f945de0cf523fc99537e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-f78b63586dee1776e4ea1fb557e1511c67d6f9d2898f945de0cf523fc99537e13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5909-4855</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fped.13325$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fped.13325$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28510345$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Toh, Teck‐Hock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Boon‐Chuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bujang, Mohamad Adam Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haniff, Jamaiyah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, See‐Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdullah, Muhamad Rais</creatorcontrib><title>Mandarin parents’ evaluation of developmental status in the detection of delays</title><title>Pediatrics international</title><addtitle>Pediatr Int</addtitle><description>Background We examined the parental perception and accuracy of the Mandarin translation of the Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status, a screening questionnaire for parent concerns about children's various developmental skills. Methods The questionnaire was translated into Mandarin. Upon enrollment, caregivers completed the Mandarin PEDS and answered four questions about its acceptability and usefulness, and its ease of understanding and completion. The Mandarin PEDS was independently evaluated by a pediatrician and a community nurse, and classified as high risk (≥two predictive concerns), medium risk (one predictive concern), low risk (any non‐predictive concerns) or no risk (if no concern) for developmental delays. The caregivers repeated Mandarin PEDS at a 2 week interval for test–retest reliability, while the children underwent testing for accuracy using a developmental assessment test. Results The majority (≥85%) of the 73 caregivers perceived the Mandarin PEDS as acceptable and useful, as well as easy to understand and complete. Fifteen (20.5%) and 24 responses (33.9%) were classified as high and moderate risk, respectively. The test–retest and inter‐rater reliabilities were excellent, with an intra‐class correlation coefficient of 0.812 (95% CI: 0.701–0.881, P &lt; 0.001) and a kappa value of 0.870 (P &lt; 0.001), respectively. Mandarin PEDS was 80.0% sensitive and 83.8% specific for those in the high‐risk category (adjusted OR, 64.68; 95% CI: 1.33–3,139.72; P = 0.035). Conclusion Mandarin PEDS was well received by the caregivers, and was reliable and accurate in detecting developmental delays in the Mandarin‐speaking subjects. We recommend it for early detection of children with developmental and behavioral problems.</description><subject>Acceptability</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Chinese languages</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>developmental delay</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis</subject><subject>developmental screening</subject><subject>Early Diagnosis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>parent concern</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>sensitivity</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>specificity</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>translation</subject><subject>Translations</subject><issn>1328-8067</issn><issn>1442-200X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E9LwzAYBvAgipvTg19ACl700C1JkyY5ypx_YKKCgreQtW-wo2tr005282v49fwkZnZDEMwlIe8vD-FB6JjgIfFrVEE6JFFE-Q7qE8ZoSDF-2fXniMpQ4lj00IFzc4yxFJLtox6VnOCI8T56vDNFauqsCCpTQ9G4r4_PAJYmb02TlUVQ2iCFJeRltfBTkweuMU3rAv-geQU_ayD5hblZuUO0Z03u4GizD9Dz1eRpfBNO769vxxfTMGGE8tAKOYsjLuMUgAgRAwND7IxzAYQTksQija1KqVTSKsZTwInlNLKJUjzyJhqgsy63qsu3FlyjF5lLIM9NAWXrNJFKMYJjuqanf-i8bOvC_04TRSWlignq1Xmnkrp0rgarqzpbmHqlCdbrnrXvWf_07O3JJrGdLfztVm6L9WDUgfcsh9X_SfphctlFfgMqdYcy</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>Toh, Teck‐Hock</creator><creator>Lim, Boon‐Chuan</creator><creator>Bujang, Mohamad Adam Bin</creator><creator>Haniff, Jamaiyah</creator><creator>Wong, See‐Chang</creator><creator>Abdullah, Muhamad Rais</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5909-4855</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>Mandarin parents’ evaluation of developmental status in the detection of delays</title><author>Toh, Teck‐Hock ; Lim, Boon‐Chuan ; Bujang, Mohamad Adam Bin ; Haniff, Jamaiyah ; Wong, See‐Chang ; Abdullah, Muhamad Rais</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-f78b63586dee1776e4ea1fb557e1511c67d6f9d2898f945de0cf523fc99537e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acceptability</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Chinese languages</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>developmental delay</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis</topic><topic>developmental screening</topic><topic>Early Diagnosis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>parent concern</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>sensitivity</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>specificity</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>translation</topic><topic>Translations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Toh, Teck‐Hock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Boon‐Chuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bujang, Mohamad Adam Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haniff, Jamaiyah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, See‐Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdullah, Muhamad Rais</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatrics international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Toh, Teck‐Hock</au><au>Lim, Boon‐Chuan</au><au>Bujang, Mohamad Adam Bin</au><au>Haniff, Jamaiyah</au><au>Wong, See‐Chang</au><au>Abdullah, Muhamad Rais</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mandarin parents’ evaluation of developmental status in the detection of delays</atitle><jtitle>Pediatrics international</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatr Int</addtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>861</spage><epage>868</epage><pages>861-868</pages><issn>1328-8067</issn><eissn>1442-200X</eissn><abstract>Background We examined the parental perception and accuracy of the Mandarin translation of the Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status, a screening questionnaire for parent concerns about children's various developmental skills. Methods The questionnaire was translated into Mandarin. Upon enrollment, caregivers completed the Mandarin PEDS and answered four questions about its acceptability and usefulness, and its ease of understanding and completion. The Mandarin PEDS was independently evaluated by a pediatrician and a community nurse, and classified as high risk (≥two predictive concerns), medium risk (one predictive concern), low risk (any non‐predictive concerns) or no risk (if no concern) for developmental delays. The caregivers repeated Mandarin PEDS at a 2 week interval for test–retest reliability, while the children underwent testing for accuracy using a developmental assessment test. Results The majority (≥85%) of the 73 caregivers perceived the Mandarin PEDS as acceptable and useful, as well as easy to understand and complete. Fifteen (20.5%) and 24 responses (33.9%) were classified as high and moderate risk, respectively. The test–retest and inter‐rater reliabilities were excellent, with an intra‐class correlation coefficient of 0.812 (95% CI: 0.701–0.881, P &lt; 0.001) and a kappa value of 0.870 (P &lt; 0.001), respectively. Mandarin PEDS was 80.0% sensitive and 83.8% specific for those in the high‐risk category (adjusted OR, 64.68; 95% CI: 1.33–3,139.72; P = 0.035). Conclusion Mandarin PEDS was well received by the caregivers, and was reliable and accurate in detecting developmental delays in the Mandarin‐speaking subjects. We recommend it for early detection of children with developmental and behavioral problems.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>28510345</pmid><doi>10.1111/ped.13325</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5909-4855</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1328-8067
ispartof Pediatrics international, 2017-08, Vol.59 (8), p.861-868
issn 1328-8067
1442-200X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1899410621
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Acceptability
Attitude to Health
Caregivers
Child
Child development
Child, Preschool
Children
China
Chinese languages
Correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficients
Cross-Sectional Studies
developmental delay
Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis
developmental screening
Early Diagnosis
Evaluation
Female
Humans
Infant
Logistic Models
Male
Observer Variation
parent concern
Parents
Pediatrics
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Assessment
sensitivity
Sensitivity and Specificity
specificity
Surveys and Questionnaires
translation
Translations
title Mandarin parents’ evaluation of developmental status in the detection of delays
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T17%3A25%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mandarin%20parents%E2%80%99%20evaluation%20of%20developmental%20status%20in%20the%20detection%20of%20delays&rft.jtitle=Pediatrics%20international&rft.au=Toh,%20Teck%E2%80%90Hock&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=861&rft.epage=868&rft.pages=861-868&rft.issn=1328-8067&rft.eissn=1442-200X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ped.13325&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1928229472%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928229472&rft_id=info:pmid/28510345&rfr_iscdi=true