An open, multicentre, randomized clinical study in patients with bullous pemphigoid comparing methylprednisolone and azathioprine with methylprednisolone and dapsone

Summary Background Current treatment of bullous pemphigoid (BP) is based on the long‐term use of topical and/or systemic corticosteroids, which are associated with a high rate of adverse events and increased mortality. Objectives To study the corticosteroid‐sparing potential of azathioprine and daps...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of dermatology (1951) 2017-11, Vol.177 (5), p.1299-1305
Hauptverfasser: Sticherling, M., Franke, A., Aberer, E., Gläser, R., Hertl, M., Pfeiffer, C., Rzany, B., Schneider, S., Shimanovich, I., Werfel, T., Wilczek, A., Zillikens, D., Schmidt, E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1305
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1299
container_title British journal of dermatology (1951)
container_volume 177
creator Sticherling, M.
Franke, A.
Aberer, E.
Gläser, R.
Hertl, M.
Pfeiffer, C.
Rzany, B.
Schneider, S.
Shimanovich, I.
Werfel, T.
Wilczek, A.
Zillikens, D.
Schmidt, E.
description Summary Background Current treatment of bullous pemphigoid (BP) is based on the long‐term use of topical and/or systemic corticosteroids, which are associated with a high rate of adverse events and increased mortality. Objectives To study the corticosteroid‐sparing potential of azathioprine and dapsone. Methods This was a prospective, multicentre, randomized, nonblinded clinical trial that compared the efficacy and safety of two parallel groups of patients with BP treated with oral methylprednisolone 0·5 mg kg−1 per day in combination with either azathioprine 1·5–2·5 mg kg−1 per day or dapsone 1·5 mg kg−1 per day. Nine German and Austrian departments of dermatology included 54 patients based on clinical lesions, positive direct immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy and detection of serum autoantibodies by indirect IF microscopy, immunoblotting or enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. The primary end point was the time until complete tapering of methylprednisolone, and the most important secondary end point was the cumulative corticosteroid dose. Results In eight patients (five azathioprine, three dapsone), methylprednisolone could be discontinued after a median time of 251 days in the azathioprine group and 81 days in the dapsone group. The median cumulative corticosteroid dose was 2·65 g for azathioprine compared with 1·92 g for dapsone (P = 0·06). The median numbers of days when corticosteroids were applied were 148 and 51, respectively (P = 0·24). No significant difference in the number of adverse events was seen between the treatment arms. Four patients (8%) died within the observation period of 12 months. Conclusions Due to the lower than intended number of patients, the results of the primary and secondary end points were not or only barely significant. Dapsone appeared to have a moderately higher corticosteroid‐sparing potential than azathioprine. The combination regimen of either drug with oral methylprednisolone is associated with a relatively low 1‐year mortality in this vulnerable patient population. What's already known about this topic? Antibiotics like doxycycline and dapsone have been used clinically for the treatment of bullous pemphigoid for a long time, yet few data from clinically controlled studies are available. What does this study add? Following a recently published study on the noninferiority of doxycycline to oral corticosteroids in bullous pemphigoid, this study presents data on the safety and efficacy of dapsone compared with azathiopr
doi_str_mv 10.1111/bjd.15649
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1899119534</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1899119534</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-7489b25e9f43a9d63e4a39bea58fcf2706bd8103eb63727bdd0c17aace1830a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10cFuFSEUBmBiNPZaXfgChsSNJp0WhplhWLa1ak0TN7omDJzp5YYBhJk0t-_T95R2ahcmZQOL7_zh5EfoPSXHtJyTYWeOads14gXaUNa1VU0Ze4k2hBBeEdGxA_Qm5x0hlJGWvEYHdd-Ihgi-QXenHocI_ghPi5utBj8nOMJJeRMmewsGa2e91crhPC9mj63HUc22uIxv7LzFw-JcWDKOMMWtvQ62jIQpqmT9NZ5g3u5dTGC8zcEFD7gkY3Wr5q0NsRhYU56BRsVc3m_Rq1G5DO8e70P0--vFr_Pv1dXPb5fnp1eVZi0TFW96MdQtiLFhSpiOQaOYGEC1_ajHmpNuMD0lDIaO8ZoPxhBNuVIaaM-I4uwQfVpzYwp_FsiznGzW4JzyUHaUtBeCUtGyptCP_9FdWJIvv5NUcFKTpu9pUZ9XpVPIOcEoy86TSntJibzvTpbu5EN3xX54TFyGCcyT_FdWAScruLEO9s8nybMfX9bIv_3gp78</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1970204881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An open, multicentre, randomized clinical study in patients with bullous pemphigoid comparing methylprednisolone and azathioprine with methylprednisolone and dapsone</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Sticherling, M. ; Franke, A. ; Aberer, E. ; Gläser, R. ; Hertl, M. ; Pfeiffer, C. ; Rzany, B. ; Schneider, S. ; Shimanovich, I. ; Werfel, T. ; Wilczek, A. ; Zillikens, D. ; Schmidt, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sticherling, M. ; Franke, A. ; Aberer, E. ; Gläser, R. ; Hertl, M. ; Pfeiffer, C. ; Rzany, B. ; Schneider, S. ; Shimanovich, I. ; Werfel, T. ; Wilczek, A. ; Zillikens, D. ; Schmidt, E.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Current treatment of bullous pemphigoid (BP) is based on the long‐term use of topical and/or systemic corticosteroids, which are associated with a high rate of adverse events and increased mortality. Objectives To study the corticosteroid‐sparing potential of azathioprine and dapsone. Methods This was a prospective, multicentre, randomized, nonblinded clinical trial that compared the efficacy and safety of two parallel groups of patients with BP treated with oral methylprednisolone 0·5 mg kg−1 per day in combination with either azathioprine 1·5–2·5 mg kg−1 per day or dapsone 1·5 mg kg−1 per day. Nine German and Austrian departments of dermatology included 54 patients based on clinical lesions, positive direct immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy and detection of serum autoantibodies by indirect IF microscopy, immunoblotting or enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. The primary end point was the time until complete tapering of methylprednisolone, and the most important secondary end point was the cumulative corticosteroid dose. Results In eight patients (five azathioprine, three dapsone), methylprednisolone could be discontinued after a median time of 251 days in the azathioprine group and 81 days in the dapsone group. The median cumulative corticosteroid dose was 2·65 g for azathioprine compared with 1·92 g for dapsone (P = 0·06). The median numbers of days when corticosteroids were applied were 148 and 51, respectively (P = 0·24). No significant difference in the number of adverse events was seen between the treatment arms. Four patients (8%) died within the observation period of 12 months. Conclusions Due to the lower than intended number of patients, the results of the primary and secondary end points were not or only barely significant. Dapsone appeared to have a moderately higher corticosteroid‐sparing potential than azathioprine. The combination regimen of either drug with oral methylprednisolone is associated with a relatively low 1‐year mortality in this vulnerable patient population. What's already known about this topic? Antibiotics like doxycycline and dapsone have been used clinically for the treatment of bullous pemphigoid for a long time, yet few data from clinically controlled studies are available. What does this study add? Following a recently published study on the noninferiority of doxycycline to oral corticosteroids in bullous pemphigoid, this study presents data on the safety and efficacy of dapsone compared with azathioprine. Dapsone appeared to have a higher corticosteroid‐sparing potential than azathioprine in the treatment of bullous pemphigoid. Linked Comment: Iwata. Br J Dermatol 2017; 177:1155–1156.Linked Comment: Żychowska. Br J Dermatol 2017; 177:1156–1157.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bjd.15649</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28494097</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Adrenal Cortex Hormones - administration &amp; dosage ; Aged ; Antibiotics ; Autoantibodies ; Azathioprine ; Azathioprine - administration &amp; dosage ; Azathioprine - adverse effects ; Bullous pemphigoid ; Corticosteroids ; Dapsone ; Dapsone - administration &amp; dosage ; Dapsone - adverse effects ; Dermatologic Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Doxycycline ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ; Female ; Humans ; Immunoblotting ; Immunofluorescence ; Immunomodulators ; Male ; Methylprednisolone ; Methylprednisolone - administration &amp; dosage ; Methylprednisolone - adverse effects ; Microscopy ; Mortality ; Pemphigoid, Bullous - drug therapy ; Prospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>British journal of dermatology (1951), 2017-11, Vol.177 (5), p.1299-1305</ispartof><rights>2017 British Association of Dermatologists</rights><rights>2017 British Association of Dermatologists.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 British Association of Dermatologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-7489b25e9f43a9d63e4a39bea58fcf2706bd8103eb63727bdd0c17aace1830a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-7489b25e9f43a9d63e4a39bea58fcf2706bd8103eb63727bdd0c17aace1830a73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1206-8913 ; 0000-0001-9396-3938</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbjd.15649$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbjd.15649$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28494097$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sticherling, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franke, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aberer, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gläser, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hertl, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rzany, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimanovich, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werfel, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilczek, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zillikens, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, E.</creatorcontrib><title>An open, multicentre, randomized clinical study in patients with bullous pemphigoid comparing methylprednisolone and azathioprine with methylprednisolone and dapsone</title><title>British journal of dermatology (1951)</title><addtitle>Br J Dermatol</addtitle><description>Summary Background Current treatment of bullous pemphigoid (BP) is based on the long‐term use of topical and/or systemic corticosteroids, which are associated with a high rate of adverse events and increased mortality. Objectives To study the corticosteroid‐sparing potential of azathioprine and dapsone. Methods This was a prospective, multicentre, randomized, nonblinded clinical trial that compared the efficacy and safety of two parallel groups of patients with BP treated with oral methylprednisolone 0·5 mg kg−1 per day in combination with either azathioprine 1·5–2·5 mg kg−1 per day or dapsone 1·5 mg kg−1 per day. Nine German and Austrian departments of dermatology included 54 patients based on clinical lesions, positive direct immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy and detection of serum autoantibodies by indirect IF microscopy, immunoblotting or enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. The primary end point was the time until complete tapering of methylprednisolone, and the most important secondary end point was the cumulative corticosteroid dose. Results In eight patients (five azathioprine, three dapsone), methylprednisolone could be discontinued after a median time of 251 days in the azathioprine group and 81 days in the dapsone group. The median cumulative corticosteroid dose was 2·65 g for azathioprine compared with 1·92 g for dapsone (P = 0·06). The median numbers of days when corticosteroids were applied were 148 and 51, respectively (P = 0·24). No significant difference in the number of adverse events was seen between the treatment arms. Four patients (8%) died within the observation period of 12 months. Conclusions Due to the lower than intended number of patients, the results of the primary and secondary end points were not or only barely significant. Dapsone appeared to have a moderately higher corticosteroid‐sparing potential than azathioprine. The combination regimen of either drug with oral methylprednisolone is associated with a relatively low 1‐year mortality in this vulnerable patient population. What's already known about this topic? Antibiotics like doxycycline and dapsone have been used clinically for the treatment of bullous pemphigoid for a long time, yet few data from clinically controlled studies are available. What does this study add? Following a recently published study on the noninferiority of doxycycline to oral corticosteroids in bullous pemphigoid, this study presents data on the safety and efficacy of dapsone compared with azathioprine. Dapsone appeared to have a higher corticosteroid‐sparing potential than azathioprine in the treatment of bullous pemphigoid. Linked Comment: Iwata. Br J Dermatol 2017; 177:1155–1156.Linked Comment: Żychowska. Br J Dermatol 2017; 177:1156–1157.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Adrenal Cortex Hormones - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Autoantibodies</subject><subject>Azathioprine</subject><subject>Azathioprine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Azathioprine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Bullous pemphigoid</subject><subject>Corticosteroids</subject><subject>Dapsone</subject><subject>Dapsone - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Dapsone - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dermatologic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Doxycycline</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoblotting</subject><subject>Immunofluorescence</subject><subject>Immunomodulators</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methylprednisolone</subject><subject>Methylprednisolone - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Methylprednisolone - adverse effects</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Pemphigoid, Bullous - drug therapy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0007-0963</issn><issn>1365-2133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10cFuFSEUBmBiNPZaXfgChsSNJp0WhplhWLa1ak0TN7omDJzp5YYBhJk0t-_T95R2ahcmZQOL7_zh5EfoPSXHtJyTYWeOads14gXaUNa1VU0Ze4k2hBBeEdGxA_Qm5x0hlJGWvEYHdd-Ihgi-QXenHocI_ghPi5utBj8nOMJJeRMmewsGa2e91crhPC9mj63HUc22uIxv7LzFw-JcWDKOMMWtvQ62jIQpqmT9NZ5g3u5dTGC8zcEFD7gkY3Wr5q0NsRhYU56BRsVc3m_Rq1G5DO8e70P0--vFr_Pv1dXPb5fnp1eVZi0TFW96MdQtiLFhSpiOQaOYGEC1_ajHmpNuMD0lDIaO8ZoPxhBNuVIaaM-I4uwQfVpzYwp_FsiznGzW4JzyUHaUtBeCUtGyptCP_9FdWJIvv5NUcFKTpu9pUZ9XpVPIOcEoy86TSntJibzvTpbu5EN3xX54TFyGCcyT_FdWAScruLEO9s8nybMfX9bIv_3gp78</recordid><startdate>201711</startdate><enddate>201711</enddate><creator>Sticherling, M.</creator><creator>Franke, A.</creator><creator>Aberer, E.</creator><creator>Gläser, R.</creator><creator>Hertl, M.</creator><creator>Pfeiffer, C.</creator><creator>Rzany, B.</creator><creator>Schneider, S.</creator><creator>Shimanovich, I.</creator><creator>Werfel, T.</creator><creator>Wilczek, A.</creator><creator>Zillikens, D.</creator><creator>Schmidt, E.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1206-8913</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9396-3938</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201711</creationdate><title>An open, multicentre, randomized clinical study in patients with bullous pemphigoid comparing methylprednisolone and azathioprine with methylprednisolone and dapsone</title><author>Sticherling, M. ; Franke, A. ; Aberer, E. ; Gläser, R. ; Hertl, M. ; Pfeiffer, C. ; Rzany, B. ; Schneider, S. ; Shimanovich, I. ; Werfel, T. ; Wilczek, A. ; Zillikens, D. ; Schmidt, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3539-7489b25e9f43a9d63e4a39bea58fcf2706bd8103eb63727bdd0c17aace1830a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Adrenal Cortex Hormones - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Autoantibodies</topic><topic>Azathioprine</topic><topic>Azathioprine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Azathioprine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Bullous pemphigoid</topic><topic>Corticosteroids</topic><topic>Dapsone</topic><topic>Dapsone - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Dapsone - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dermatologic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Doxycycline</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoblotting</topic><topic>Immunofluorescence</topic><topic>Immunomodulators</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methylprednisolone</topic><topic>Methylprednisolone - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Methylprednisolone - adverse effects</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Pemphigoid, Bullous - drug therapy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sticherling, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franke, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aberer, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gläser, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hertl, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rzany, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimanovich, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werfel, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilczek, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zillikens, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of dermatology (1951)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sticherling, M.</au><au>Franke, A.</au><au>Aberer, E.</au><au>Gläser, R.</au><au>Hertl, M.</au><au>Pfeiffer, C.</au><au>Rzany, B.</au><au>Schneider, S.</au><au>Shimanovich, I.</au><au>Werfel, T.</au><au>Wilczek, A.</au><au>Zillikens, D.</au><au>Schmidt, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An open, multicentre, randomized clinical study in patients with bullous pemphigoid comparing methylprednisolone and azathioprine with methylprednisolone and dapsone</atitle><jtitle>British journal of dermatology (1951)</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Dermatol</addtitle><date>2017-11</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>177</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1299</spage><epage>1305</epage><pages>1299-1305</pages><issn>0007-0963</issn><eissn>1365-2133</eissn><abstract>Summary Background Current treatment of bullous pemphigoid (BP) is based on the long‐term use of topical and/or systemic corticosteroids, which are associated with a high rate of adverse events and increased mortality. Objectives To study the corticosteroid‐sparing potential of azathioprine and dapsone. Methods This was a prospective, multicentre, randomized, nonblinded clinical trial that compared the efficacy and safety of two parallel groups of patients with BP treated with oral methylprednisolone 0·5 mg kg−1 per day in combination with either azathioprine 1·5–2·5 mg kg−1 per day or dapsone 1·5 mg kg−1 per day. Nine German and Austrian departments of dermatology included 54 patients based on clinical lesions, positive direct immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy and detection of serum autoantibodies by indirect IF microscopy, immunoblotting or enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. The primary end point was the time until complete tapering of methylprednisolone, and the most important secondary end point was the cumulative corticosteroid dose. Results In eight patients (five azathioprine, three dapsone), methylprednisolone could be discontinued after a median time of 251 days in the azathioprine group and 81 days in the dapsone group. The median cumulative corticosteroid dose was 2·65 g for azathioprine compared with 1·92 g for dapsone (P = 0·06). The median numbers of days when corticosteroids were applied were 148 and 51, respectively (P = 0·24). No significant difference in the number of adverse events was seen between the treatment arms. Four patients (8%) died within the observation period of 12 months. Conclusions Due to the lower than intended number of patients, the results of the primary and secondary end points were not or only barely significant. Dapsone appeared to have a moderately higher corticosteroid‐sparing potential than azathioprine. The combination regimen of either drug with oral methylprednisolone is associated with a relatively low 1‐year mortality in this vulnerable patient population. What's already known about this topic? Antibiotics like doxycycline and dapsone have been used clinically for the treatment of bullous pemphigoid for a long time, yet few data from clinically controlled studies are available. What does this study add? Following a recently published study on the noninferiority of doxycycline to oral corticosteroids in bullous pemphigoid, this study presents data on the safety and efficacy of dapsone compared with azathioprine. Dapsone appeared to have a higher corticosteroid‐sparing potential than azathioprine in the treatment of bullous pemphigoid. Linked Comment: Iwata. Br J Dermatol 2017; 177:1155–1156.Linked Comment: Żychowska. Br J Dermatol 2017; 177:1156–1157.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>28494097</pmid><doi>10.1111/bjd.15649</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1206-8913</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9396-3938</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0963
ispartof British journal of dermatology (1951), 2017-11, Vol.177 (5), p.1299-1305
issn 0007-0963
1365-2133
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1899119534
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Administration, Oral
Adrenal Cortex Hormones - administration & dosage
Aged
Antibiotics
Autoantibodies
Azathioprine
Azathioprine - administration & dosage
Azathioprine - adverse effects
Bullous pemphigoid
Corticosteroids
Dapsone
Dapsone - administration & dosage
Dapsone - adverse effects
Dermatologic Agents - administration & dosage
Doxycycline
Drug Administration Schedule
Drug Therapy, Combination
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Female
Humans
Immunoblotting
Immunofluorescence
Immunomodulators
Male
Methylprednisolone
Methylprednisolone - administration & dosage
Methylprednisolone - adverse effects
Microscopy
Mortality
Pemphigoid, Bullous - drug therapy
Prospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
title An open, multicentre, randomized clinical study in patients with bullous pemphigoid comparing methylprednisolone and azathioprine with methylprednisolone and dapsone
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A22%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20open,%20multicentre,%20randomized%20clinical%20study%20in%20patients%20with%20bullous%20pemphigoid%20comparing%20methylprednisolone%20and%20azathioprine%20with%20methylprednisolone%20and%20dapsone&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20dermatology%20(1951)&rft.au=Sticherling,%20M.&rft.date=2017-11&rft.volume=177&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1299&rft.epage=1305&rft.pages=1299-1305&rft.issn=0007-0963&rft.eissn=1365-2133&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bjd.15649&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1899119534%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1970204881&rft_id=info:pmid/28494097&rfr_iscdi=true