The Influence of Environmental Management and Animal Shelters in Vector Control of Culicoides (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) in Northeastern Brazil

We investigated whether biting midges in peridomestic environments are affected by environmental management practices and the presence of domestic animals. We used CDC light traps to collect midges in 112 residences across 24 locations along tourism routes of Maranhão, Brazil. The collection areas w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of vector ecology 2017-06, Vol.42 (1), p.113-119
Hauptverfasser: Bandeira, Maria da C.A, Brito, Gustavo A, Penha, Adriane da, Santos, Ciro L.C, Rebêlo, José M.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 119
container_issue 1
container_start_page 113
container_title Journal of vector ecology
container_volume 42
creator Bandeira, Maria da C.A
Brito, Gustavo A
Penha, Adriane da
Santos, Ciro L.C
Rebêlo, José M.M
description We investigated whether biting midges in peridomestic environments are affected by environmental management practices and the presence of domestic animals. We used CDC light traps to collect midges in 112 residences across 24 locations along tourism routes of Maranhão, Brazil. The collection areas were characterized as follows: i) peridomestic area with domestic animals and without management (dirty); ii) peridomestic with domestic animals and management (clean); iii) peridomestic without animals and with management (clean); iv) peridomestic without animals and without management (dirty). The first two treatments had higher biting midge species richness and abundance, respectively. Generalized linear models indicated a positive correlation between the presence of domestic animals and midge abundance, with an approximate four-fold increase in Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) abundance in peridomestic areas with animals. The same model showed that domestic animals have no influence on richness. Environmental management does not appear to influence species richness or abundance of biting midges.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jvec.12245
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1899106891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1933864513</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3905-4425c2d9c0fda64d762b9a95654c3326d28a5062471713d5a481e50237038e563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEoqVw4QGQJS4FkeK_iX0sYYGiAgdKr5Y3nnS98tpbOykqL8Er47BbDhzqg-2xfvN5Zr6qek7wCSnr7foG-hNCKRcPqkOiuKxbwvjDcseS1KQl-KB6kvMaYya5bB5XB1QKzLnAh9XvixWgszD4CUIPKA5oEW5cimEDYTQefTHBXMEcIBMsOg1uU16_r8CPkDJyAV1CP8aEuhjGFP2s0E3e9dFZyOj4vdsW0LxBXdnHuI1XMThr4NWc-jWmcQUmFyKgd8n8cv5p9WgwPsOz_XlU_fiwuOg-1effPp51p-f1kiksas6p6KlVPR6sabhtG7pURolG8J4x2lgqjcAN5W1pn1lhuCQgMGVtmQGIhh1VxzvdbYrXE-RRb1zuwXsTIE5ZE6kUwY1UpKAv_0PXcUqhVKeJYkw2XBBWqNc7qk8x5wSD3qYyq3SrCdazTXq2Sf-1qcAv9pLTcgP2H3rnSwHIDvjpPNzeI6U_Xy66O9F9S0sXY4D7_v8DD6SpXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1933864513</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Influence of Environmental Management and Animal Shelters in Vector Control of Culicoides (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) in Northeastern Brazil</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Bandeira, Maria da C.A ; Brito, Gustavo A ; Penha, Adriane da ; Santos, Ciro L.C ; Rebêlo, José M.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Bandeira, Maria da C.A ; Brito, Gustavo A ; Penha, Adriane da ; Santos, Ciro L.C ; Rebêlo, José M.M</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated whether biting midges in peridomestic environments are affected by environmental management practices and the presence of domestic animals. We used CDC light traps to collect midges in 112 residences across 24 locations along tourism routes of Maranhão, Brazil. The collection areas were characterized as follows: i) peridomestic area with domestic animals and without management (dirty); ii) peridomestic with domestic animals and management (clean); iii) peridomestic without animals and with management (clean); iv) peridomestic without animals and without management (dirty). The first two treatments had higher biting midge species richness and abundance, respectively. Generalized linear models indicated a positive correlation between the presence of domestic animals and midge abundance, with an approximate four-fold increase in Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) abundance in peridomestic areas with animals. The same model showed that domestic animals have no influence on richness. Environmental management does not appear to influence species richness or abundance of biting midges.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1081-1710</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1948-7134</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jvec.12245</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28504450</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society for Vector Ecology</publisher><subject>Animal manures ; Animals ; Animals, Domestic ; Biodiversity ; biological vector ; Biting midges ; Brazil ; Breeding sites ; Ceratopogonidae ; Domestic animals ; Dominant species ; Ecology ; entomological surveillance ; Environment ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental management ; Generalized linear models ; Insect Control ; Insect Vectors ; National parks ; Organic matter ; Organic soils ; ORIGINAL ARTICLES ; Rural areas ; Shelters ; Soil moisture ; Tourism ; Towns ; vector control</subject><ispartof>Journal of vector ecology, 2017-06, Vol.42 (1), p.113-119</ispartof><rights>2017 The Society for Vector Ecology</rights><rights>2017 The Society for Vector Ecology.</rights><rights>Copyright Society for Vector Ecology Jun 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3905-4425c2d9c0fda64d762b9a95654c3326d28a5062471713d5a481e50237038e563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3905-4425c2d9c0fda64d762b9a95654c3326d28a5062471713d5a481e50237038e563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28504450$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bandeira, Maria da C.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brito, Gustavo A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penha, Adriane da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Ciro L.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebêlo, José M.M</creatorcontrib><title>The Influence of Environmental Management and Animal Shelters in Vector Control of Culicoides (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) in Northeastern Brazil</title><title>Journal of vector ecology</title><addtitle>J Vector Ecol</addtitle><description>We investigated whether biting midges in peridomestic environments are affected by environmental management practices and the presence of domestic animals. We used CDC light traps to collect midges in 112 residences across 24 locations along tourism routes of Maranhão, Brazil. The collection areas were characterized as follows: i) peridomestic area with domestic animals and without management (dirty); ii) peridomestic with domestic animals and management (clean); iii) peridomestic without animals and with management (clean); iv) peridomestic without animals and without management (dirty). The first two treatments had higher biting midge species richness and abundance, respectively. Generalized linear models indicated a positive correlation between the presence of domestic animals and midge abundance, with an approximate four-fold increase in Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) abundance in peridomestic areas with animals. The same model showed that domestic animals have no influence on richness. Environmental management does not appear to influence species richness or abundance of biting midges.</description><subject>Animal manures</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Domestic</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>biological vector</subject><subject>Biting midges</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Breeding sites</subject><subject>Ceratopogonidae</subject><subject>Domestic animals</subject><subject>Dominant species</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>entomological surveillance</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Generalized linear models</subject><subject>Insect Control</subject><subject>Insect Vectors</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Shelters</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Tourism</subject><subject>Towns</subject><subject>vector control</subject><issn>1081-1710</issn><issn>1948-7134</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEoqVw4QGQJS4FkeK_iX0sYYGiAgdKr5Y3nnS98tpbOykqL8Er47BbDhzqg-2xfvN5Zr6qek7wCSnr7foG-hNCKRcPqkOiuKxbwvjDcseS1KQl-KB6kvMaYya5bB5XB1QKzLnAh9XvixWgszD4CUIPKA5oEW5cimEDYTQefTHBXMEcIBMsOg1uU16_r8CPkDJyAV1CP8aEuhjGFP2s0E3e9dFZyOj4vdsW0LxBXdnHuI1XMThr4NWc-jWmcQUmFyKgd8n8cv5p9WgwPsOz_XlU_fiwuOg-1effPp51p-f1kiksas6p6KlVPR6sabhtG7pURolG8J4x2lgqjcAN5W1pn1lhuCQgMGVtmQGIhh1VxzvdbYrXE-RRb1zuwXsTIE5ZE6kUwY1UpKAv_0PXcUqhVKeJYkw2XBBWqNc7qk8x5wSD3qYyq3SrCdazTXq2Sf-1qcAv9pLTcgP2H3rnSwHIDvjpPNzeI6U_Xy66O9F9S0sXY4D7_v8DD6SpXA</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Bandeira, Maria da C.A</creator><creator>Brito, Gustavo A</creator><creator>Penha, Adriane da</creator><creator>Santos, Ciro L.C</creator><creator>Rebêlo, José M.M</creator><general>Society for Vector Ecology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>The Influence of Environmental Management and Animal Shelters in Vector Control of Culicoides (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) in Northeastern Brazil</title><author>Bandeira, Maria da C.A ; Brito, Gustavo A ; Penha, Adriane da ; Santos, Ciro L.C ; Rebêlo, José M.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b3905-4425c2d9c0fda64d762b9a95654c3326d28a5062471713d5a481e50237038e563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animal manures</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Domestic</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>biological vector</topic><topic>Biting midges</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Breeding sites</topic><topic>Ceratopogonidae</topic><topic>Domestic animals</topic><topic>Dominant species</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>entomological surveillance</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Generalized linear models</topic><topic>Insect Control</topic><topic>Insect Vectors</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Shelters</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Tourism</topic><topic>Towns</topic><topic>vector control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bandeira, Maria da C.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brito, Gustavo A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penha, Adriane da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Ciro L.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebêlo, José M.M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vector ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bandeira, Maria da C.A</au><au>Brito, Gustavo A</au><au>Penha, Adriane da</au><au>Santos, Ciro L.C</au><au>Rebêlo, José M.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Influence of Environmental Management and Animal Shelters in Vector Control of Culicoides (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) in Northeastern Brazil</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vector ecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Vector Ecol</addtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>113</spage><epage>119</epage><pages>113-119</pages><issn>1081-1710</issn><eissn>1948-7134</eissn><abstract>We investigated whether biting midges in peridomestic environments are affected by environmental management practices and the presence of domestic animals. We used CDC light traps to collect midges in 112 residences across 24 locations along tourism routes of Maranhão, Brazil. The collection areas were characterized as follows: i) peridomestic area with domestic animals and without management (dirty); ii) peridomestic with domestic animals and management (clean); iii) peridomestic without animals and with management (clean); iv) peridomestic without animals and without management (dirty). The first two treatments had higher biting midge species richness and abundance, respectively. Generalized linear models indicated a positive correlation between the presence of domestic animals and midge abundance, with an approximate four-fold increase in Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) abundance in peridomestic areas with animals. The same model showed that domestic animals have no influence on richness. Environmental management does not appear to influence species richness or abundance of biting midges.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society for Vector Ecology</pub><pmid>28504450</pmid><doi>10.1111/jvec.12245</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1081-1710
ispartof Journal of vector ecology, 2017-06, Vol.42 (1), p.113-119
issn 1081-1710
1948-7134
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1899106891
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Animal manures
Animals
Animals, Domestic
Biodiversity
biological vector
Biting midges
Brazil
Breeding sites
Ceratopogonidae
Domestic animals
Dominant species
Ecology
entomological surveillance
Environment
Environmental conditions
Environmental management
Generalized linear models
Insect Control
Insect Vectors
National parks
Organic matter
Organic soils
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Rural areas
Shelters
Soil moisture
Tourism
Towns
vector control
title The Influence of Environmental Management and Animal Shelters in Vector Control of Culicoides (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) in Northeastern Brazil
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T18%3A54%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Influence%20of%20Environmental%20Management%20and%20Animal%20Shelters%20in%20Vector%20Control%20of%20Culicoides%20(Diptera,%20Ceratopogonidae)%20in%20Northeastern%20Brazil&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vector%20ecology&rft.au=Bandeira,%20Maria%20da%20C.A&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=119&rft.pages=113-119&rft.issn=1081-1710&rft.eissn=1948-7134&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jvec.12245&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1933864513%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1933864513&rft_id=info:pmid/28504450&rfr_iscdi=true