The Influence of Environmental Management and Animal Shelters in Vector Control of Culicoides (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) in Northeastern Brazil
We investigated whether biting midges in peridomestic environments are affected by environmental management practices and the presence of domestic animals. We used CDC light traps to collect midges in 112 residences across 24 locations along tourism routes of Maranhão, Brazil. The collection areas w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of vector ecology 2017-06, Vol.42 (1), p.113-119 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 119 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 113 |
container_title | Journal of vector ecology |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Bandeira, Maria da C.A Brito, Gustavo A Penha, Adriane da Santos, Ciro L.C Rebêlo, José M.M |
description | We investigated whether biting midges in peridomestic environments are affected by environmental management practices and the presence of domestic animals. We used CDC light traps to collect midges in 112 residences across 24 locations along tourism routes of Maranhão, Brazil. The collection areas were characterized as follows: i) peridomestic area with domestic animals and without management (dirty); ii) peridomestic with domestic animals and management (clean); iii) peridomestic without animals and with management (clean); iv) peridomestic without animals and without management (dirty). The first two treatments had higher biting midge species richness and abundance, respectively. Generalized linear models indicated a positive correlation between the presence of domestic animals and midge abundance, with an approximate four-fold increase in Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) abundance in peridomestic areas with animals. The same model showed that domestic animals have no influence on richness. Environmental management does not appear to influence species richness or abundance of biting midges. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jvec.12245 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1899106891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1933864513</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3905-4425c2d9c0fda64d762b9a95654c3326d28a5062471713d5a481e50237038e563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEoqVw4QGQJS4FkeK_iX0sYYGiAgdKr5Y3nnS98tpbOykqL8Er47BbDhzqg-2xfvN5Zr6qek7wCSnr7foG-hNCKRcPqkOiuKxbwvjDcseS1KQl-KB6kvMaYya5bB5XB1QKzLnAh9XvixWgszD4CUIPKA5oEW5cimEDYTQefTHBXMEcIBMsOg1uU16_r8CPkDJyAV1CP8aEuhjGFP2s0E3e9dFZyOj4vdsW0LxBXdnHuI1XMThr4NWc-jWmcQUmFyKgd8n8cv5p9WgwPsOz_XlU_fiwuOg-1effPp51p-f1kiksas6p6KlVPR6sabhtG7pURolG8J4x2lgqjcAN5W1pn1lhuCQgMGVtmQGIhh1VxzvdbYrXE-RRb1zuwXsTIE5ZE6kUwY1UpKAv_0PXcUqhVKeJYkw2XBBWqNc7qk8x5wSD3qYyq3SrCdazTXq2Sf-1qcAv9pLTcgP2H3rnSwHIDvjpPNzeI6U_Xy66O9F9S0sXY4D7_v8DD6SpXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1933864513</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Influence of Environmental Management and Animal Shelters in Vector Control of Culicoides (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) in Northeastern Brazil</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Bandeira, Maria da C.A ; Brito, Gustavo A ; Penha, Adriane da ; Santos, Ciro L.C ; Rebêlo, José M.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Bandeira, Maria da C.A ; Brito, Gustavo A ; Penha, Adriane da ; Santos, Ciro L.C ; Rebêlo, José M.M</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated whether biting midges in peridomestic environments are affected by environmental management practices and the presence of domestic animals. We used CDC light traps to collect midges in 112 residences across 24 locations along tourism routes of Maranhão, Brazil. The collection areas were characterized as follows: i) peridomestic area with domestic animals and without management (dirty); ii) peridomestic with domestic animals and management (clean); iii) peridomestic without animals and with management (clean); iv) peridomestic without animals and without management (dirty). The first two treatments had higher biting midge species richness and abundance, respectively. Generalized linear models indicated a positive correlation between the presence of domestic animals and midge abundance, with an approximate four-fold increase in Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) abundance in peridomestic areas with animals. The same model showed that domestic animals have no influence on richness. Environmental management does not appear to influence species richness or abundance of biting midges.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1081-1710</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1948-7134</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jvec.12245</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28504450</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society for Vector Ecology</publisher><subject>Animal manures ; Animals ; Animals, Domestic ; Biodiversity ; biological vector ; Biting midges ; Brazil ; Breeding sites ; Ceratopogonidae ; Domestic animals ; Dominant species ; Ecology ; entomological surveillance ; Environment ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental management ; Generalized linear models ; Insect Control ; Insect Vectors ; National parks ; Organic matter ; Organic soils ; ORIGINAL ARTICLES ; Rural areas ; Shelters ; Soil moisture ; Tourism ; Towns ; vector control</subject><ispartof>Journal of vector ecology, 2017-06, Vol.42 (1), p.113-119</ispartof><rights>2017 The Society for Vector Ecology</rights><rights>2017 The Society for Vector Ecology.</rights><rights>Copyright Society for Vector Ecology Jun 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3905-4425c2d9c0fda64d762b9a95654c3326d28a5062471713d5a481e50237038e563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3905-4425c2d9c0fda64d762b9a95654c3326d28a5062471713d5a481e50237038e563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28504450$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bandeira, Maria da C.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brito, Gustavo A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penha, Adriane da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Ciro L.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebêlo, José M.M</creatorcontrib><title>The Influence of Environmental Management and Animal Shelters in Vector Control of Culicoides (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) in Northeastern Brazil</title><title>Journal of vector ecology</title><addtitle>J Vector Ecol</addtitle><description>We investigated whether biting midges in peridomestic environments are affected by environmental management practices and the presence of domestic animals. We used CDC light traps to collect midges in 112 residences across 24 locations along tourism routes of Maranhão, Brazil. The collection areas were characterized as follows: i) peridomestic area with domestic animals and without management (dirty); ii) peridomestic with domestic animals and management (clean); iii) peridomestic without animals and with management (clean); iv) peridomestic without animals and without management (dirty). The first two treatments had higher biting midge species richness and abundance, respectively. Generalized linear models indicated a positive correlation between the presence of domestic animals and midge abundance, with an approximate four-fold increase in Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) abundance in peridomestic areas with animals. The same model showed that domestic animals have no influence on richness. Environmental management does not appear to influence species richness or abundance of biting midges.</description><subject>Animal manures</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Domestic</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>biological vector</subject><subject>Biting midges</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Breeding sites</subject><subject>Ceratopogonidae</subject><subject>Domestic animals</subject><subject>Dominant species</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>entomological surveillance</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Generalized linear models</subject><subject>Insect Control</subject><subject>Insect Vectors</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Shelters</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Tourism</subject><subject>Towns</subject><subject>vector control</subject><issn>1081-1710</issn><issn>1948-7134</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEoqVw4QGQJS4FkeK_iX0sYYGiAgdKr5Y3nnS98tpbOykqL8Er47BbDhzqg-2xfvN5Zr6qek7wCSnr7foG-hNCKRcPqkOiuKxbwvjDcseS1KQl-KB6kvMaYya5bB5XB1QKzLnAh9XvixWgszD4CUIPKA5oEW5cimEDYTQefTHBXMEcIBMsOg1uU16_r8CPkDJyAV1CP8aEuhjGFP2s0E3e9dFZyOj4vdsW0LxBXdnHuI1XMThr4NWc-jWmcQUmFyKgd8n8cv5p9WgwPsOz_XlU_fiwuOg-1effPp51p-f1kiksas6p6KlVPR6sabhtG7pURolG8J4x2lgqjcAN5W1pn1lhuCQgMGVtmQGIhh1VxzvdbYrXE-RRb1zuwXsTIE5ZE6kUwY1UpKAv_0PXcUqhVKeJYkw2XBBWqNc7qk8x5wSD3qYyq3SrCdazTXq2Sf-1qcAv9pLTcgP2H3rnSwHIDvjpPNzeI6U_Xy66O9F9S0sXY4D7_v8DD6SpXA</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Bandeira, Maria da C.A</creator><creator>Brito, Gustavo A</creator><creator>Penha, Adriane da</creator><creator>Santos, Ciro L.C</creator><creator>Rebêlo, José M.M</creator><general>Society for Vector Ecology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>The Influence of Environmental Management and Animal Shelters in Vector Control of Culicoides (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) in Northeastern Brazil</title><author>Bandeira, Maria da C.A ; Brito, Gustavo A ; Penha, Adriane da ; Santos, Ciro L.C ; Rebêlo, José M.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b3905-4425c2d9c0fda64d762b9a95654c3326d28a5062471713d5a481e50237038e563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animal manures</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Domestic</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>biological vector</topic><topic>Biting midges</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Breeding sites</topic><topic>Ceratopogonidae</topic><topic>Domestic animals</topic><topic>Dominant species</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>entomological surveillance</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Generalized linear models</topic><topic>Insect Control</topic><topic>Insect Vectors</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Shelters</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Tourism</topic><topic>Towns</topic><topic>vector control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bandeira, Maria da C.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brito, Gustavo A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penha, Adriane da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Ciro L.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebêlo, José M.M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vector ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bandeira, Maria da C.A</au><au>Brito, Gustavo A</au><au>Penha, Adriane da</au><au>Santos, Ciro L.C</au><au>Rebêlo, José M.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Influence of Environmental Management and Animal Shelters in Vector Control of Culicoides (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) in Northeastern Brazil</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vector ecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Vector Ecol</addtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>113</spage><epage>119</epage><pages>113-119</pages><issn>1081-1710</issn><eissn>1948-7134</eissn><abstract>We investigated whether biting midges in peridomestic environments are affected by environmental management practices and the presence of domestic animals. We used CDC light traps to collect midges in 112 residences across 24 locations along tourism routes of Maranhão, Brazil. The collection areas were characterized as follows: i) peridomestic area with domestic animals and without management (dirty); ii) peridomestic with domestic animals and management (clean); iii) peridomestic without animals and with management (clean); iv) peridomestic without animals and without management (dirty). The first two treatments had higher biting midge species richness and abundance, respectively. Generalized linear models indicated a positive correlation between the presence of domestic animals and midge abundance, with an approximate four-fold increase in Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) abundance in peridomestic areas with animals. The same model showed that domestic animals have no influence on richness. Environmental management does not appear to influence species richness or abundance of biting midges.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society for Vector Ecology</pub><pmid>28504450</pmid><doi>10.1111/jvec.12245</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1081-1710 |
ispartof | Journal of vector ecology, 2017-06, Vol.42 (1), p.113-119 |
issn | 1081-1710 1948-7134 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1899106891 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Animal manures Animals Animals, Domestic Biodiversity biological vector Biting midges Brazil Breeding sites Ceratopogonidae Domestic animals Dominant species Ecology entomological surveillance Environment Environmental conditions Environmental management Generalized linear models Insect Control Insect Vectors National parks Organic matter Organic soils ORIGINAL ARTICLES Rural areas Shelters Soil moisture Tourism Towns vector control |
title | The Influence of Environmental Management and Animal Shelters in Vector Control of Culicoides (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) in Northeastern Brazil |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T18%3A54%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Influence%20of%20Environmental%20Management%20and%20Animal%20Shelters%20in%20Vector%20Control%20of%20Culicoides%20(Diptera,%20Ceratopogonidae)%20in%20Northeastern%20Brazil&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vector%20ecology&rft.au=Bandeira,%20Maria%20da%20C.A&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=119&rft.pages=113-119&rft.issn=1081-1710&rft.eissn=1948-7134&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jvec.12245&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1933864513%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1933864513&rft_id=info:pmid/28504450&rfr_iscdi=true |