Calculation and verification of dynamical cavitation model for quasi-steady cavitating flow

Due to the intrinsically unsteady characteristics of bubbles, the spontaneous cavitation flow essentially is an unbalanced hydrodynamic process. The so called full cavitation model (FCM) is now widely used in the modeling of cavitating flow, as it accounts for all the first-order effects, but assume...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of heat and mass transfer 2015-07, Vol.86, p.294-301
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, XiaoBin, Zhu, JiaKai, Qiu, LiMin, Zhang, XueJun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 301
container_issue
container_start_page 294
container_title International journal of heat and mass transfer
container_volume 86
creator Zhang, XiaoBin
Zhu, JiaKai
Qiu, LiMin
Zhang, XueJun
description Due to the intrinsically unsteady characteristics of bubbles, the spontaneous cavitation flow essentially is an unbalanced hydrodynamic process. The so called full cavitation model (FCM) is now widely used in the modeling of cavitating flow, as it accounts for all the first-order effects, but assumes the typical bubble radius is the same as the maximum possible size based on the flow balance condition between aerodynamic drag and surface tension forces. The present paper develops a new cavitation model (named the dynamic cavitation model, DCM) by combining an expression for the pressure-dependent bubble radius with the FCM. The expression was derived from the Gibbs-Duhem equation and Young-Laplace equation under the assumption of thermodynamic equilibrium. Subsequently, the DCM was implemented into a homogeneous mixture flow model-based CFD code for cavitation flow. Verification calculations for water cavitating flows over a hydrofoil and submerged cylindrical bodies with different forehead geometries were performed to validate the DCM by comparing it with the experimental results. The quasi-steady pressure distributions computed with DCM accorded well with the results of FCM and the experiments. However, because the DCM is more sensitive to pressure than the FCM, the cavitation zone computed using the DCM spreads out over a smaller volume than that computed from the FCM.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.01.098
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1897390151</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1709776380</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-706dfbfc4daaaa75c4dfde5c1aaf51ea140a7f3ccb1eda1c6185c749360f9eba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLtOw0AQRbcAifD4B5dpbGZY22t3oIiXFIkGKorVZB-w1tpOdu2g_D2OjGgomGbmXh1NcRhbImQIWF43mWs-DQ0txTgE6qI1IbsBLDLADOrqhC0AUKQ1Rzhj5zE2xwh5uWDvK_Jq9DS4vkuo08neBGedmoveJvrQUTtlnyjau2Hu214bn9g-JLuRokvjYEgffonuI7G-_7pkp5Z8NFc_-4K9Pdy_rp7S9cvj8-punSqe45AKKLXdWJVrmkYU02G1KRQS2QINYQ4kLFdqg0YTqhKrQom85iXY2myIX7Dl_Hcb-t1o4iBbF5XxnjrTj1FiVQteTzrwf1RALUTJK5jQ2xlVoY8xGCu3wbUUDhJBHrXLRv7VLo_aJaCctPNva4ODVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1709776380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Calculation and verification of dynamical cavitation model for quasi-steady cavitating flow</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zhang, XiaoBin ; Zhu, JiaKai ; Qiu, LiMin ; Zhang, XueJun</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, XiaoBin ; Zhu, JiaKai ; Qiu, LiMin ; Zhang, XueJun</creatorcontrib><description>Due to the intrinsically unsteady characteristics of bubbles, the spontaneous cavitation flow essentially is an unbalanced hydrodynamic process. The so called full cavitation model (FCM) is now widely used in the modeling of cavitating flow, as it accounts for all the first-order effects, but assumes the typical bubble radius is the same as the maximum possible size based on the flow balance condition between aerodynamic drag and surface tension forces. The present paper develops a new cavitation model (named the dynamic cavitation model, DCM) by combining an expression for the pressure-dependent bubble radius with the FCM. The expression was derived from the Gibbs-Duhem equation and Young-Laplace equation under the assumption of thermodynamic equilibrium. Subsequently, the DCM was implemented into a homogeneous mixture flow model-based CFD code for cavitation flow. Verification calculations for water cavitating flows over a hydrofoil and submerged cylindrical bodies with different forehead geometries were performed to validate the DCM by comparing it with the experimental results. The quasi-steady pressure distributions computed with DCM accorded well with the results of FCM and the experiments. However, because the DCM is more sensitive to pressure than the FCM, the cavitation zone computed using the DCM spreads out over a smaller volume than that computed from the FCM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-9310</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.01.098</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Bubbles ; Cavitation ; Cavitation flow ; Computation ; Mass transfer ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Spreads</subject><ispartof>International journal of heat and mass transfer, 2015-07, Vol.86, p.294-301</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-706dfbfc4daaaa75c4dfde5c1aaf51ea140a7f3ccb1eda1c6185c749360f9eba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-706dfbfc4daaaa75c4dfde5c1aaf51ea140a7f3ccb1eda1c6185c749360f9eba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, XiaoBin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, JiaKai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, LiMin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, XueJun</creatorcontrib><title>Calculation and verification of dynamical cavitation model for quasi-steady cavitating flow</title><title>International journal of heat and mass transfer</title><description>Due to the intrinsically unsteady characteristics of bubbles, the spontaneous cavitation flow essentially is an unbalanced hydrodynamic process. The so called full cavitation model (FCM) is now widely used in the modeling of cavitating flow, as it accounts for all the first-order effects, but assumes the typical bubble radius is the same as the maximum possible size based on the flow balance condition between aerodynamic drag and surface tension forces. The present paper develops a new cavitation model (named the dynamic cavitation model, DCM) by combining an expression for the pressure-dependent bubble radius with the FCM. The expression was derived from the Gibbs-Duhem equation and Young-Laplace equation under the assumption of thermodynamic equilibrium. Subsequently, the DCM was implemented into a homogeneous mixture flow model-based CFD code for cavitation flow. Verification calculations for water cavitating flows over a hydrofoil and submerged cylindrical bodies with different forehead geometries were performed to validate the DCM by comparing it with the experimental results. The quasi-steady pressure distributions computed with DCM accorded well with the results of FCM and the experiments. However, because the DCM is more sensitive to pressure than the FCM, the cavitation zone computed using the DCM spreads out over a smaller volume than that computed from the FCM.</description><subject>Bubbles</subject><subject>Cavitation</subject><subject>Cavitation flow</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Mass transfer</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Spreads</subject><issn>0017-9310</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkLtOw0AQRbcAifD4B5dpbGZY22t3oIiXFIkGKorVZB-w1tpOdu2g_D2OjGgomGbmXh1NcRhbImQIWF43mWs-DQ0txTgE6qI1IbsBLDLADOrqhC0AUKQ1Rzhj5zE2xwh5uWDvK_Jq9DS4vkuo08neBGedmoveJvrQUTtlnyjau2Hu214bn9g-JLuRokvjYEgffonuI7G-_7pkp5Z8NFc_-4K9Pdy_rp7S9cvj8-punSqe45AKKLXdWJVrmkYU02G1KRQS2QINYQ4kLFdqg0YTqhKrQom85iXY2myIX7Dl_Hcb-t1o4iBbF5XxnjrTj1FiVQteTzrwf1RALUTJK5jQ2xlVoY8xGCu3wbUUDhJBHrXLRv7VLo_aJaCctPNva4ODVQ</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Zhang, XiaoBin</creator><creator>Zhu, JiaKai</creator><creator>Qiu, LiMin</creator><creator>Zhang, XueJun</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Calculation and verification of dynamical cavitation model for quasi-steady cavitating flow</title><author>Zhang, XiaoBin ; Zhu, JiaKai ; Qiu, LiMin ; Zhang, XueJun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-706dfbfc4daaaa75c4dfde5c1aaf51ea140a7f3ccb1eda1c6185c749360f9eba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Bubbles</topic><topic>Cavitation</topic><topic>Cavitation flow</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Mass transfer</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Spreads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, XiaoBin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, JiaKai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, LiMin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, XueJun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal of heat and mass transfer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, XiaoBin</au><au>Zhu, JiaKai</au><au>Qiu, LiMin</au><au>Zhang, XueJun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Calculation and verification of dynamical cavitation model for quasi-steady cavitating flow</atitle><jtitle>International journal of heat and mass transfer</jtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>86</volume><spage>294</spage><epage>301</epage><pages>294-301</pages><issn>0017-9310</issn><abstract>Due to the intrinsically unsteady characteristics of bubbles, the spontaneous cavitation flow essentially is an unbalanced hydrodynamic process. The so called full cavitation model (FCM) is now widely used in the modeling of cavitating flow, as it accounts for all the first-order effects, but assumes the typical bubble radius is the same as the maximum possible size based on the flow balance condition between aerodynamic drag and surface tension forces. The present paper develops a new cavitation model (named the dynamic cavitation model, DCM) by combining an expression for the pressure-dependent bubble radius with the FCM. The expression was derived from the Gibbs-Duhem equation and Young-Laplace equation under the assumption of thermodynamic equilibrium. Subsequently, the DCM was implemented into a homogeneous mixture flow model-based CFD code for cavitation flow. Verification calculations for water cavitating flows over a hydrofoil and submerged cylindrical bodies with different forehead geometries were performed to validate the DCM by comparing it with the experimental results. The quasi-steady pressure distributions computed with DCM accorded well with the results of FCM and the experiments. However, because the DCM is more sensitive to pressure than the FCM, the cavitation zone computed using the DCM spreads out over a smaller volume than that computed from the FCM.</abstract><doi>10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.01.098</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-9310
ispartof International journal of heat and mass transfer, 2015-07, Vol.86, p.294-301
issn 0017-9310
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1897390151
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Bubbles
Cavitation
Cavitation flow
Computation
Mass transfer
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Spreads
title Calculation and verification of dynamical cavitation model for quasi-steady cavitating flow
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T10%3A32%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Calculation%20and%20verification%20of%20dynamical%20cavitation%20model%20for%20quasi-steady%20cavitating%20flow&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20heat%20and%20mass%20transfer&rft.au=Zhang,%20XiaoBin&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=86&rft.spage=294&rft.epage=301&rft.pages=294-301&rft.issn=0017-9310&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.01.098&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1709776380%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1709776380&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true