The Influence of Resected Gastric Weight upon Weight Loss after Sleeve Gastrectomy

Bariatric surgery is an effective and enduring treatment for obesity. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has emerged as an increasingly prevalent surgical intervention. Further investigation is required to determine optimal standardization of SG. Data were collected prospectively for 64 patients who underwent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American surgeon 2015-12, Vol.81 (12), p.1240-1243
Hauptverfasser: Rosas, Ulysses, Hines, Harrison, Rogan, Daniel, Rivas, Homero, Morton, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1243
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1240
container_title The American surgeon
container_volume 81
creator Rosas, Ulysses
Hines, Harrison
Rogan, Daniel
Rivas, Homero
Morton, John
description Bariatric surgery is an effective and enduring treatment for obesity. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has emerged as an increasingly prevalent surgical intervention. Further investigation is required to determine optimal standardization of SG. Data were collected prospectively for 64 patients who underwent a laparoscopic vertical SG between December 2010 and February 2013 at a single academic institution. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative (postop) data were collected for all patients including weighing each resected stomach. The total resected gastric weight varied widely. Preoperatively, patients in the upper tercile for resected gastric weight were more likely to be male (lower 10%, middle 23%, upper 52%, P = 0.006) and had greater initial weights (lower 255.9%, middle 245.1%, upper 280.0%, P = 0.019). The resected gastric weight (g) varied by tercile (mean of all, 131.24 ± 39.8; lower, 93.9 ± 10.9; middle, 127.4 ± 11.7; upper 172.7 ± 37.9, P = 0.000). Patients were followed for 1-year postop with follow-up data for 94 per cent (60/64) of participants. Per cent excess weight loss (EWL) was obtained at three, six, and 12 months postop. At 12 months, there was a trend toward increased per cent EWL in the upper tercile (lower 61.1%, middle 54.1%, upper 90.5%, P = 0.057). In conclusion, while the amount of gastric sleeve resected can vary, this study shows that intraoperative assessment of resected sleeve weight can help evaluate adequacy of resection. Improved 12-month per cent EWL in patients with greater resected tissue demonstrate potentially improved outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/000313481508101225
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1897378959</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1760900910</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-249da3022b17a30ea1e15477356a49356408097810f1cef6a61470b5f74f5a583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLw0AUhQdRbK3-ARcy4MZNdO48M0spWoWCUCsuwzS9Y1PSpGYSof_eKW1d6MLNfcB3Lpx7CLkEdgtgzB1jTICQKSiWAgPO1RHpg1IqsSkXx6S_BZIt0SNnISzjKrWCU9Lj2ggNGvpkMl0gfa582WGVI609nWDAvMU5HbnQNkVO37H4WLS0W9fVYR7XIVDnW2zoa4n4hTs46urV5pyceFcGvNj3AXl7fJgOn5Lxy-h5eD9OcsnSNuHSzp1gnM_AxI4OEJQ0RijtpI01Usya6MxDjl47DdKwmfJGeuVUKgbkZnd33dSfHYY2WxUhx7J0FdZdyCC1RpjUKvs_ajSzjFlgEb3-hS7rrqmikUgpwUQsMlJ8R-VNfEWDPls3xco1mwxYtg0n-xtOFF3tT3ezFc5_JIc0xDclgYXZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1753037534</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Influence of Resected Gastric Weight upon Weight Loss after Sleeve Gastrectomy</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Rosas, Ulysses ; Hines, Harrison ; Rogan, Daniel ; Rivas, Homero ; Morton, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosas, Ulysses ; Hines, Harrison ; Rogan, Daniel ; Rivas, Homero ; Morton, John</creatorcontrib><description>Bariatric surgery is an effective and enduring treatment for obesity. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has emerged as an increasingly prevalent surgical intervention. Further investigation is required to determine optimal standardization of SG. Data were collected prospectively for 64 patients who underwent a laparoscopic vertical SG between December 2010 and February 2013 at a single academic institution. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative (postop) data were collected for all patients including weighing each resected stomach. The total resected gastric weight varied widely. Preoperatively, patients in the upper tercile for resected gastric weight were more likely to be male (lower 10%, middle 23%, upper 52%, P = 0.006) and had greater initial weights (lower 255.9%, middle 245.1%, upper 280.0%, P = 0.019). The resected gastric weight (g) varied by tercile (mean of all, 131.24 ± 39.8; lower, 93.9 ± 10.9; middle, 127.4 ± 11.7; upper 172.7 ± 37.9, P = 0.000). Patients were followed for 1-year postop with follow-up data for 94 per cent (60/64) of participants. Per cent excess weight loss (EWL) was obtained at three, six, and 12 months postop. At 12 months, there was a trend toward increased per cent EWL in the upper tercile (lower 61.1%, middle 54.1%, upper 90.5%, P = 0.057). In conclusion, while the amount of gastric sleeve resected can vary, this study shows that intraoperative assessment of resected sleeve weight can help evaluate adequacy of resection. Improved 12-month per cent EWL in patients with greater resected tissue demonstrate potentially improved outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/000313481508101225</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26736161</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cardiovascular disease ; Cholesterol ; Chronic illnesses ; Coronary vessels ; Diabetes ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastrectomy - methods ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Glucose ; Humans ; Insulin ; Laboratories ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Obesity ; Obesity, Morbid - physiopathology ; Obesity, Morbid - surgery ; Organ Size ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; Quality ; Software ; Stomach ; Treatment Outcome ; Variance analysis ; Weight control ; Weight Loss</subject><ispartof>The American surgeon, 2015-12, Vol.81 (12), p.1240-1243</ispartof><rights>Copyright Southeastern Surgical Congress Dec 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-249da3022b17a30ea1e15477356a49356408097810f1cef6a61470b5f74f5a583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-249da3022b17a30ea1e15477356a49356408097810f1cef6a61470b5f74f5a583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26736161$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosas, Ulysses</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hines, Harrison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogan, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivas, Homero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morton, John</creatorcontrib><title>The Influence of Resected Gastric Weight upon Weight Loss after Sleeve Gastrectomy</title><title>The American surgeon</title><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><description>Bariatric surgery is an effective and enduring treatment for obesity. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has emerged as an increasingly prevalent surgical intervention. Further investigation is required to determine optimal standardization of SG. Data were collected prospectively for 64 patients who underwent a laparoscopic vertical SG between December 2010 and February 2013 at a single academic institution. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative (postop) data were collected for all patients including weighing each resected stomach. The total resected gastric weight varied widely. Preoperatively, patients in the upper tercile for resected gastric weight were more likely to be male (lower 10%, middle 23%, upper 52%, P = 0.006) and had greater initial weights (lower 255.9%, middle 245.1%, upper 280.0%, P = 0.019). The resected gastric weight (g) varied by tercile (mean of all, 131.24 ± 39.8; lower, 93.9 ± 10.9; middle, 127.4 ± 11.7; upper 172.7 ± 37.9, P = 0.000). Patients were followed for 1-year postop with follow-up data for 94 per cent (60/64) of participants. Per cent excess weight loss (EWL) was obtained at three, six, and 12 months postop. At 12 months, there was a trend toward increased per cent EWL in the upper tercile (lower 61.1%, middle 54.1%, upper 90.5%, P = 0.057). In conclusion, while the amount of gastric sleeve resected can vary, this study shows that intraoperative assessment of resected sleeve weight can help evaluate adequacy of resection. Improved 12-month per cent EWL in patients with greater resected tissue demonstrate potentially improved outcomes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cholesterol</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastrectomy - methods</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - physiopathology</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</subject><subject>Organ Size</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Stomach</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Weight control</subject><subject>Weight Loss</subject><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLw0AUhQdRbK3-ARcy4MZNdO48M0spWoWCUCsuwzS9Y1PSpGYSof_eKW1d6MLNfcB3Lpx7CLkEdgtgzB1jTICQKSiWAgPO1RHpg1IqsSkXx6S_BZIt0SNnISzjKrWCU9Lj2ggNGvpkMl0gfa582WGVI609nWDAvMU5HbnQNkVO37H4WLS0W9fVYR7XIVDnW2zoa4n4hTs46urV5pyceFcGvNj3AXl7fJgOn5Lxy-h5eD9OcsnSNuHSzp1gnM_AxI4OEJQ0RijtpI01Usya6MxDjl47DdKwmfJGeuVUKgbkZnd33dSfHYY2WxUhx7J0FdZdyCC1RpjUKvs_ajSzjFlgEb3-hS7rrqmikUgpwUQsMlJ8R-VNfEWDPls3xco1mwxYtg0n-xtOFF3tT3ezFc5_JIc0xDclgYXZ</recordid><startdate>201512</startdate><enddate>201512</enddate><creator>Rosas, Ulysses</creator><creator>Hines, Harrison</creator><creator>Rogan, Daniel</creator><creator>Rivas, Homero</creator><creator>Morton, John</creator><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201512</creationdate><title>The Influence of Resected Gastric Weight upon Weight Loss after Sleeve Gastrectomy</title><author>Rosas, Ulysses ; Hines, Harrison ; Rogan, Daniel ; Rivas, Homero ; Morton, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-249da3022b17a30ea1e15477356a49356408097810f1cef6a61470b5f74f5a583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cholesterol</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastrectomy - methods</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - physiopathology</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</topic><topic>Organ Size</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Stomach</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Weight control</topic><topic>Weight Loss</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosas, Ulysses</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hines, Harrison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogan, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivas, Homero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morton, John</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosas, Ulysses</au><au>Hines, Harrison</au><au>Rogan, Daniel</au><au>Rivas, Homero</au><au>Morton, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Influence of Resected Gastric Weight upon Weight Loss after Sleeve Gastrectomy</atitle><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><date>2015-12</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1240</spage><epage>1243</epage><pages>1240-1243</pages><issn>0003-1348</issn><eissn>1555-9823</eissn><abstract>Bariatric surgery is an effective and enduring treatment for obesity. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has emerged as an increasingly prevalent surgical intervention. Further investigation is required to determine optimal standardization of SG. Data were collected prospectively for 64 patients who underwent a laparoscopic vertical SG between December 2010 and February 2013 at a single academic institution. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative (postop) data were collected for all patients including weighing each resected stomach. The total resected gastric weight varied widely. Preoperatively, patients in the upper tercile for resected gastric weight were more likely to be male (lower 10%, middle 23%, upper 52%, P = 0.006) and had greater initial weights (lower 255.9%, middle 245.1%, upper 280.0%, P = 0.019). The resected gastric weight (g) varied by tercile (mean of all, 131.24 ± 39.8; lower, 93.9 ± 10.9; middle, 127.4 ± 11.7; upper 172.7 ± 37.9, P = 0.000). Patients were followed for 1-year postop with follow-up data for 94 per cent (60/64) of participants. Per cent excess weight loss (EWL) was obtained at three, six, and 12 months postop. At 12 months, there was a trend toward increased per cent EWL in the upper tercile (lower 61.1%, middle 54.1%, upper 90.5%, P = 0.057). In conclusion, while the amount of gastric sleeve resected can vary, this study shows that intraoperative assessment of resected sleeve weight can help evaluate adequacy of resection. Improved 12-month per cent EWL in patients with greater resected tissue demonstrate potentially improved outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</pub><pmid>26736161</pmid><doi>10.1177/000313481508101225</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-1348
ispartof The American surgeon, 2015-12, Vol.81 (12), p.1240-1243
issn 0003-1348
1555-9823
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1897378959
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Cardiovascular disease
Cholesterol
Chronic illnesses
Coronary vessels
Diabetes
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gastrectomy - methods
Gastrointestinal surgery
Glucose
Humans
Insulin
Laboratories
Laparoscopy
Male
Middle Aged
Mortality
Obesity
Obesity, Morbid - physiopathology
Obesity, Morbid - surgery
Organ Size
Patients
Prospective Studies
Quality
Software
Stomach
Treatment Outcome
Variance analysis
Weight control
Weight Loss
title The Influence of Resected Gastric Weight upon Weight Loss after Sleeve Gastrectomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T06%3A12%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Influence%20of%20Resected%20Gastric%20Weight%20upon%20Weight%20Loss%20after%20Sleeve%20Gastrectomy&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20surgeon&rft.au=Rosas,%20Ulysses&rft.date=2015-12&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1240&rft.epage=1243&rft.pages=1240-1243&rft.issn=0003-1348&rft.eissn=1555-9823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/000313481508101225&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1760900910%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1753037534&rft_id=info:pmid/26736161&rfr_iscdi=true