Transient flashing propellant flow models to predict internal flow characteristics, spray velocity, and aerosol droplet size of a pMDI

Despite the popularity of the pMDI as an asthma remedy, the mechanism leading to spray generation is elusive, mainly due to small length scales and short time scale, causing experimental difficulties to obtain flow information. This mechanism involves transient development of two-phase flashing prop...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aerosol science and technology 2017-05, Vol.51 (5), p.564-575
Hauptverfasser: Gavtash, B., Versteeg, H. K., Hargrave, G., Myatt, B., Lewis, D., Church, T., Brambilla, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 575
container_issue 5
container_start_page 564
container_title Aerosol science and technology
container_volume 51
creator Gavtash, B.
Versteeg, H. K.
Hargrave, G.
Myatt, B.
Lewis, D.
Church, T.
Brambilla, G.
description Despite the popularity of the pMDI as an asthma remedy, the mechanism leading to spray generation is elusive, mainly due to small length scales and short time scale, causing experimental difficulties to obtain flow information. This mechanism involves transient development of two-phase flashing propellant flow inside pMDI actuator as well as transfer of heat, mass, and momentum between the liquid and vapor phase. Variations in the rate of such interphase phenomena dictate the two-phase mass flow rate emission, which itself determines spray velocity and droplet size. In this work, we compare the performance of existing two-phase flow models to predict the flow conditions and the rate of propellant flow through a pMDI actuator: the homogenous equilibrium model (HEM), the slip equilibrium model (SEM), and the homogenous frozen model (HFM). The velocity prediction of the HFM was found to be in good agreement with phase Doppler anemometry (PDA) data indicating the metastable nature of the emitted propellant spray. This work also considers Clark's correlation for the aerosol droplet size based on the results of the flow model. The results of the correlation were compared with PDA droplet size measurements. Clark's correlation was found to be effective in predictions of the temporal droplet size variations. However, the value of an empirical constant had to be tuned to fix the droplet size for a given combination of formulation, device, and to a lesser extent also the distance from the spray orifice where predictions are compared with PDA data. This highlights the need to develop first principle atomization models without the need for case-by-case adjustment. © 2017 American Association for Aerosol Research
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02786826.2017.1282151
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1897371902</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4321668909</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-e879d5bb6e063faf66dccd3caffa92b1956393dd17c97e7c372740a4614e1e643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uFDEQhC0EEkvIIyBZ4sIhs7jtGdtzAwUSIgVxSc6W1z_EkXc82N5EywPw3Hiy4cIhObXU_VVJXYXQOyBrIJJ8JFRILilfUwJiDVRSGOAFWsFAoRNMypdotTDdAr1Gb0q5JaShFFboz1XWUwluqthHXW7C9BPPOc0uRv2wS_d4m6yLBdfULs4GU3GYqsuTjoe7udFZm7YJpQZTTnCZs97jOxeTCXV_gvVksXY5lRSxbebRVVzCb4eTxxrP379cvEWvvI7FHT_OI3R99vXq9Ft3-eP84vTzZWf6AWrnpBjtsNlwRzjz2nNujbHMaO_1SDcwDpyNzFoQZhROGCao6InuOfQOHO_ZEfpw8G0__tq5UtU2FPPwrEu7omAkPSVDi_N5VI6CiSagDX3_H3qbdks-CyUFYSBgMRwOlGlJlOy8mnPY6rxXQNRSpPpXpFqKVI9FNt2ngy5MPuWtvk85WlX1PqbsW3smFMWetvgLw6-mJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1887031718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transient flashing propellant flow models to predict internal flow characteristics, spray velocity, and aerosol droplet size of a pMDI</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Gavtash, B. ; Versteeg, H. K. ; Hargrave, G. ; Myatt, B. ; Lewis, D. ; Church, T. ; Brambilla, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gavtash, B. ; Versteeg, H. K. ; Hargrave, G. ; Myatt, B. ; Lewis, D. ; Church, T. ; Brambilla, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the popularity of the pMDI as an asthma remedy, the mechanism leading to spray generation is elusive, mainly due to small length scales and short time scale, causing experimental difficulties to obtain flow information. This mechanism involves transient development of two-phase flashing propellant flow inside pMDI actuator as well as transfer of heat, mass, and momentum between the liquid and vapor phase. Variations in the rate of such interphase phenomena dictate the two-phase mass flow rate emission, which itself determines spray velocity and droplet size. In this work, we compare the performance of existing two-phase flow models to predict the flow conditions and the rate of propellant flow through a pMDI actuator: the homogenous equilibrium model (HEM), the slip equilibrium model (SEM), and the homogenous frozen model (HFM). The velocity prediction of the HFM was found to be in good agreement with phase Doppler anemometry (PDA) data indicating the metastable nature of the emitted propellant spray. This work also considers Clark's correlation for the aerosol droplet size based on the results of the flow model. The results of the correlation were compared with PDA droplet size measurements. Clark's correlation was found to be effective in predictions of the temporal droplet size variations. However, the value of an empirical constant had to be tuned to fix the droplet size for a given combination of formulation, device, and to a lesser extent also the distance from the spray orifice where predictions are compared with PDA data. This highlights the need to develop first principle atomization models without the need for case-by-case adjustment. © 2017 American Association for Aerosol Research</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-6826</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-7388</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2017.1282151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Aerosols ; Droplets ; Flashing ; Mathematical models ; PDA ; Propellants ; Sprayers ; Sprays ; Warren Finlay</subject><ispartof>Aerosol science and technology, 2017-05, Vol.51 (5), p.564-575</ispartof><rights>2017 American Association for Aerosol Research 2017</rights><rights>2017 American Association for Aerosol Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-e879d5bb6e063faf66dccd3caffa92b1956393dd17c97e7c372740a4614e1e643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-e879d5bb6e063faf66dccd3caffa92b1956393dd17c97e7c372740a4614e1e643</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6045-6902 ; 0000-0001-8032-1178</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gavtash, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Versteeg, H. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hargrave, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myatt, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Church, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brambilla, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Transient flashing propellant flow models to predict internal flow characteristics, spray velocity, and aerosol droplet size of a pMDI</title><title>Aerosol science and technology</title><description>Despite the popularity of the pMDI as an asthma remedy, the mechanism leading to spray generation is elusive, mainly due to small length scales and short time scale, causing experimental difficulties to obtain flow information. This mechanism involves transient development of two-phase flashing propellant flow inside pMDI actuator as well as transfer of heat, mass, and momentum between the liquid and vapor phase. Variations in the rate of such interphase phenomena dictate the two-phase mass flow rate emission, which itself determines spray velocity and droplet size. In this work, we compare the performance of existing two-phase flow models to predict the flow conditions and the rate of propellant flow through a pMDI actuator: the homogenous equilibrium model (HEM), the slip equilibrium model (SEM), and the homogenous frozen model (HFM). The velocity prediction of the HFM was found to be in good agreement with phase Doppler anemometry (PDA) data indicating the metastable nature of the emitted propellant spray. This work also considers Clark's correlation for the aerosol droplet size based on the results of the flow model. The results of the correlation were compared with PDA droplet size measurements. Clark's correlation was found to be effective in predictions of the temporal droplet size variations. However, the value of an empirical constant had to be tuned to fix the droplet size for a given combination of formulation, device, and to a lesser extent also the distance from the spray orifice where predictions are compared with PDA data. This highlights the need to develop first principle atomization models without the need for case-by-case adjustment. © 2017 American Association for Aerosol Research</description><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Droplets</subject><subject>Flashing</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>PDA</subject><subject>Propellants</subject><subject>Sprayers</subject><subject>Sprays</subject><subject>Warren Finlay</subject><issn>0278-6826</issn><issn>1521-7388</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1uFDEQhC0EEkvIIyBZ4sIhs7jtGdtzAwUSIgVxSc6W1z_EkXc82N5EywPw3Hiy4cIhObXU_VVJXYXQOyBrIJJ8JFRILilfUwJiDVRSGOAFWsFAoRNMypdotTDdAr1Gb0q5JaShFFboz1XWUwluqthHXW7C9BPPOc0uRv2wS_d4m6yLBdfULs4GU3GYqsuTjoe7udFZm7YJpQZTTnCZs97jOxeTCXV_gvVksXY5lRSxbebRVVzCb4eTxxrP379cvEWvvI7FHT_OI3R99vXq9Ft3-eP84vTzZWf6AWrnpBjtsNlwRzjz2nNujbHMaO_1SDcwDpyNzFoQZhROGCao6InuOfQOHO_ZEfpw8G0__tq5UtU2FPPwrEu7omAkPSVDi_N5VI6CiSagDX3_H3qbdks-CyUFYSBgMRwOlGlJlOy8mnPY6rxXQNRSpPpXpFqKVI9FNt2ngy5MPuWtvk85WlX1PqbsW3smFMWetvgLw6-mJw</recordid><startdate>20170504</startdate><enddate>20170504</enddate><creator>Gavtash, B.</creator><creator>Versteeg, H. K.</creator><creator>Hargrave, G.</creator><creator>Myatt, B.</creator><creator>Lewis, D.</creator><creator>Church, T.</creator><creator>Brambilla, G.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KL.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6045-6902</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8032-1178</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170504</creationdate><title>Transient flashing propellant flow models to predict internal flow characteristics, spray velocity, and aerosol droplet size of a pMDI</title><author>Gavtash, B. ; Versteeg, H. K. ; Hargrave, G. ; Myatt, B. ; Lewis, D. ; Church, T. ; Brambilla, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-e879d5bb6e063faf66dccd3caffa92b1956393dd17c97e7c372740a4614e1e643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Droplets</topic><topic>Flashing</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>PDA</topic><topic>Propellants</topic><topic>Sprayers</topic><topic>Sprays</topic><topic>Warren Finlay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gavtash, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Versteeg, H. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hargrave, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myatt, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Church, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brambilla, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aerosol science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gavtash, B.</au><au>Versteeg, H. K.</au><au>Hargrave, G.</au><au>Myatt, B.</au><au>Lewis, D.</au><au>Church, T.</au><au>Brambilla, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transient flashing propellant flow models to predict internal flow characteristics, spray velocity, and aerosol droplet size of a pMDI</atitle><jtitle>Aerosol science and technology</jtitle><date>2017-05-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>564</spage><epage>575</epage><pages>564-575</pages><issn>0278-6826</issn><eissn>1521-7388</eissn><abstract>Despite the popularity of the pMDI as an asthma remedy, the mechanism leading to spray generation is elusive, mainly due to small length scales and short time scale, causing experimental difficulties to obtain flow information. This mechanism involves transient development of two-phase flashing propellant flow inside pMDI actuator as well as transfer of heat, mass, and momentum between the liquid and vapor phase. Variations in the rate of such interphase phenomena dictate the two-phase mass flow rate emission, which itself determines spray velocity and droplet size. In this work, we compare the performance of existing two-phase flow models to predict the flow conditions and the rate of propellant flow through a pMDI actuator: the homogenous equilibrium model (HEM), the slip equilibrium model (SEM), and the homogenous frozen model (HFM). The velocity prediction of the HFM was found to be in good agreement with phase Doppler anemometry (PDA) data indicating the metastable nature of the emitted propellant spray. This work also considers Clark's correlation for the aerosol droplet size based on the results of the flow model. The results of the correlation were compared with PDA droplet size measurements. Clark's correlation was found to be effective in predictions of the temporal droplet size variations. However, the value of an empirical constant had to be tuned to fix the droplet size for a given combination of formulation, device, and to a lesser extent also the distance from the spray orifice where predictions are compared with PDA data. This highlights the need to develop first principle atomization models without the need for case-by-case adjustment. © 2017 American Association for Aerosol Research</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/02786826.2017.1282151</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6045-6902</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8032-1178</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-6826
ispartof Aerosol science and technology, 2017-05, Vol.51 (5), p.564-575
issn 0278-6826
1521-7388
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1897371902
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Aerosols
Droplets
Flashing
Mathematical models
PDA
Propellants
Sprayers
Sprays
Warren Finlay
title Transient flashing propellant flow models to predict internal flow characteristics, spray velocity, and aerosol droplet size of a pMDI
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A07%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transient%20flashing%20propellant%20flow%20models%20to%20predict%20internal%20flow%20characteristics,%20spray%20velocity,%20and%20aerosol%20droplet%20size%20of%20a%20pMDI&rft.jtitle=Aerosol%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Gavtash,%20B.&rft.date=2017-05-04&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=564&rft.epage=575&rft.pages=564-575&rft.issn=0278-6826&rft.eissn=1521-7388&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02786826.2017.1282151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E4321668909%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1887031718&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true