Evaluation of sampling locations in pregnant women and newborns for the detection of colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria

Up to now, little has been known about the prevalence and clinical relevance of colonisation of asymptomatic pregnant women with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) or extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli . In this t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases 2017-10, Vol.36 (10), p.1819-1826
Hauptverfasser: Zamfir, M., Adler, A. C., Kolb, S., Dammeyer, A., Nasri, L., Schomacher, L., Karlin, B., Franitza, M., Hörmansdorfer, S., Tuschak, C., Valenza, G., Ochmann, U., Herr, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1826
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1819
container_title European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases
container_volume 36
creator Zamfir, M.
Adler, A. C.
Kolb, S.
Dammeyer, A.
Nasri, L.
Schomacher, L.
Karlin, B.
Franitza, M.
Hörmansdorfer, S.
Tuschak, C.
Valenza, G.
Ochmann, U.
Herr, C.
description Up to now, little has been known about the prevalence and clinical relevance of colonisation of asymptomatic pregnant women with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) or extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli . In this two-centre cross-sectional study, we evaluated the performance and importance of screening at different times and different locations for colonisation in pregnant women and newborns. Between October 2013 and December 2015, four samples were collected from pregnant women, two from newborns at birth and three from 3-day-old newborns. Samples were screened on culturing media and were confirmed with molecular methods. MSSA was used as a surrogate for MRSA, as the two share most microbiologic characteristics and colonisation patterns. Of 763 pregnant women, 14.5% (111) were colonised with MSSA, 0.4% (3) with MRSA and 2.6% (20) with ESBL-producing E. coli . Of 658 newborns, 0.9% (10) were colonised with MSSA at birth and 13.1% (70) at 3 days old, 0.5% (3) were colonised with MRSA and 2.6% (17) with ESBL-producing E. coli . Nasal sampling identified 91.0% of MSSA-colonised pregnant women and 60.0% of newborns. In newborns, nasal and umbilical sampling at 3 days after birth discovered 84.0% of colonised cases. For ESBL-producing E. coli , the perianal region was positive in all colonised pregnant women and in 88.2% of colonised newborns. Combining nasal and perianal swabs is optimal when screening for antibiotic-resistant bacteria in pregnant women. Nasal, perianal and umbilical sample collection from 3-day-old newborns significantly increased the sensitivity compared to screening immediately after birth.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10096-017-2997-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1896041391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1939423505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-c05f811ff61fba4a3260961f9f2bac5c2b24f7720e326c854b36ded7a625a4b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1vFSEUhonR2NvqD3BjSNy4QfmaYViapn4kTdzomjDM4ZZmBq7AeNN9f7hcpzXGxA0knOd9gLwIvWL0HaNUvS9t1T2hTBGutSLdE7RjUnRECiWeoh3VQhKtuDhD56Xc0pYZlHqOzvgglWRK79D91U87r7aGFHHyuNjlMIe4x3Nyvw8LDhEfMuyjjRUf0wIR2zjhCMcx5Tb2KeN6A3iCCu5R49KcYiib9hjqTcvUMIZUgyMZSij1pButq5CDfYGeeTsXePmwX6DvH6--XX4m118_fbn8cE2cULwSRzs_MOZ9z_xopRW8b99nXnveTJ3jI5deKU6hTdzQyVH0E0zK9ryzcqTiAr3dvIecfqxQqllCcTDPNkJai2GD7qlkQrOGvvkHvU1rju11hmmhJRcd7RrFNsrlVEoGbw45LDbfGUbNqSKzVWRaReZUkTllXj-Y13GB6U_isZMG8A0obRT3kP-6-r_WXyyAnpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1939423505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of sampling locations in pregnant women and newborns for the detection of colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Zamfir, M. ; Adler, A. C. ; Kolb, S. ; Dammeyer, A. ; Nasri, L. ; Schomacher, L. ; Karlin, B. ; Franitza, M. ; Hörmansdorfer, S. ; Tuschak, C. ; Valenza, G. ; Ochmann, U. ; Herr, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zamfir, M. ; Adler, A. C. ; Kolb, S. ; Dammeyer, A. ; Nasri, L. ; Schomacher, L. ; Karlin, B. ; Franitza, M. ; Hörmansdorfer, S. ; Tuschak, C. ; Valenza, G. ; Ochmann, U. ; Herr, C.</creatorcontrib><description>Up to now, little has been known about the prevalence and clinical relevance of colonisation of asymptomatic pregnant women with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) or extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli . In this two-centre cross-sectional study, we evaluated the performance and importance of screening at different times and different locations for colonisation in pregnant women and newborns. Between October 2013 and December 2015, four samples were collected from pregnant women, two from newborns at birth and three from 3-day-old newborns. Samples were screened on culturing media and were confirmed with molecular methods. MSSA was used as a surrogate for MRSA, as the two share most microbiologic characteristics and colonisation patterns. Of 763 pregnant women, 14.5% (111) were colonised with MSSA, 0.4% (3) with MRSA and 2.6% (20) with ESBL-producing E. coli . Of 658 newborns, 0.9% (10) were colonised with MSSA at birth and 13.1% (70) at 3 days old, 0.5% (3) were colonised with MRSA and 2.6% (17) with ESBL-producing E. coli . Nasal sampling identified 91.0% of MSSA-colonised pregnant women and 60.0% of newborns. In newborns, nasal and umbilical sampling at 3 days after birth discovered 84.0% of colonised cases. For ESBL-producing E. coli , the perianal region was positive in all colonised pregnant women and in 88.2% of colonised newborns. Combining nasal and perianal swabs is optimal when screening for antibiotic-resistant bacteria in pregnant women. Nasal, perianal and umbilical sample collection from 3-day-old newborns significantly increased the sensitivity compared to screening immediately after birth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0934-9723</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-4373</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10096-017-2997-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28474179</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Antibiotic resistance ; Antibiotics ; Bacteria ; Bacterial Infections - diagnosis ; Bacterial Infections - epidemiology ; Bacterial Infections - microbiology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Birth ; Carrier State - diagnosis ; Carrier State - epidemiology ; Carrier State - microbiology ; Childbirth &amp; labor ; Colonization ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Drug resistance ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; E coli ; Escherichia coli - drug effects ; Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification ; Female ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Medical Microbiology ; Methicillin ; Neonates ; Original Article ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious ; Sampling ; Screening ; Specimen Handling - methods ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects ; Staphylococcus aureus - isolation &amp; purification ; Staphylococcus infections ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European journal of clinical microbiology &amp; infectious diseases, 2017-10, Vol.36 (10), p.1819-1826</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017</rights><rights>European Journal of Clinical Microbiology &amp; Infectious Diseases is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-c05f811ff61fba4a3260961f9f2bac5c2b24f7720e326c854b36ded7a625a4b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-c05f811ff61fba4a3260961f9f2bac5c2b24f7720e326c854b36ded7a625a4b03</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7440-492X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10096-017-2997-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10096-017-2997-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28474179$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zamfir, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adler, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolb, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dammeyer, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasri, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schomacher, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlin, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franitza, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hörmansdorfer, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuschak, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valenza, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochmann, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herr, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of sampling locations in pregnant women and newborns for the detection of colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria</title><title>European journal of clinical microbiology &amp; infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><description>Up to now, little has been known about the prevalence and clinical relevance of colonisation of asymptomatic pregnant women with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) or extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli . In this two-centre cross-sectional study, we evaluated the performance and importance of screening at different times and different locations for colonisation in pregnant women and newborns. Between October 2013 and December 2015, four samples were collected from pregnant women, two from newborns at birth and three from 3-day-old newborns. Samples were screened on culturing media and were confirmed with molecular methods. MSSA was used as a surrogate for MRSA, as the two share most microbiologic characteristics and colonisation patterns. Of 763 pregnant women, 14.5% (111) were colonised with MSSA, 0.4% (3) with MRSA and 2.6% (20) with ESBL-producing E. coli . Of 658 newborns, 0.9% (10) were colonised with MSSA at birth and 13.1% (70) at 3 days old, 0.5% (3) were colonised with MRSA and 2.6% (17) with ESBL-producing E. coli . Nasal sampling identified 91.0% of MSSA-colonised pregnant women and 60.0% of newborns. In newborns, nasal and umbilical sampling at 3 days after birth discovered 84.0% of colonised cases. For ESBL-producing E. coli , the perianal region was positive in all colonised pregnant women and in 88.2% of colonised newborns. Combining nasal and perianal swabs is optimal when screening for antibiotic-resistant bacteria in pregnant women. Nasal, perianal and umbilical sample collection from 3-day-old newborns significantly increased the sensitivity compared to screening immediately after birth.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibiotic resistance</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Birth</subject><subject>Carrier State - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carrier State - epidemiology</subject><subject>Carrier State - microbiology</subject><subject>Childbirth &amp; labor</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - drug effects</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Microbiology</subject><subject>Methicillin</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Specimen Handling - methods</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Staphylococcus infections</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0934-9723</issn><issn>1435-4373</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1vFSEUhonR2NvqD3BjSNy4QfmaYViapn4kTdzomjDM4ZZmBq7AeNN9f7hcpzXGxA0knOd9gLwIvWL0HaNUvS9t1T2hTBGutSLdE7RjUnRECiWeoh3VQhKtuDhD56Xc0pYZlHqOzvgglWRK79D91U87r7aGFHHyuNjlMIe4x3Nyvw8LDhEfMuyjjRUf0wIR2zjhCMcx5Tb2KeN6A3iCCu5R49KcYiib9hjqTcvUMIZUgyMZSij1pButq5CDfYGeeTsXePmwX6DvH6--XX4m118_fbn8cE2cULwSRzs_MOZ9z_xopRW8b99nXnveTJ3jI5deKU6hTdzQyVH0E0zK9ryzcqTiAr3dvIecfqxQqllCcTDPNkJai2GD7qlkQrOGvvkHvU1rju11hmmhJRcd7RrFNsrlVEoGbw45LDbfGUbNqSKzVWRaReZUkTllXj-Y13GB6U_isZMG8A0obRT3kP-6-r_WXyyAnpA</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Zamfir, M.</creator><creator>Adler, A. C.</creator><creator>Kolb, S.</creator><creator>Dammeyer, A.</creator><creator>Nasri, L.</creator><creator>Schomacher, L.</creator><creator>Karlin, B.</creator><creator>Franitza, M.</creator><creator>Hörmansdorfer, S.</creator><creator>Tuschak, C.</creator><creator>Valenza, G.</creator><creator>Ochmann, U.</creator><creator>Herr, C.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7440-492X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Evaluation of sampling locations in pregnant women and newborns for the detection of colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria</title><author>Zamfir, M. ; Adler, A. C. ; Kolb, S. ; Dammeyer, A. ; Nasri, L. ; Schomacher, L. ; Karlin, B. ; Franitza, M. ; Hörmansdorfer, S. ; Tuschak, C. ; Valenza, G. ; Ochmann, U. ; Herr, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-c05f811ff61fba4a3260961f9f2bac5c2b24f7720e326c854b36ded7a625a4b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibiotic resistance</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Birth</topic><topic>Carrier State - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carrier State - epidemiology</topic><topic>Carrier State - microbiology</topic><topic>Childbirth &amp; labor</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - drug effects</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Microbiology</topic><topic>Methicillin</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Specimen Handling - methods</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Staphylococcus infections</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zamfir, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adler, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolb, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dammeyer, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasri, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schomacher, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlin, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franitza, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hörmansdorfer, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuschak, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valenza, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochmann, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herr, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of clinical microbiology &amp; infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zamfir, M.</au><au>Adler, A. C.</au><au>Kolb, S.</au><au>Dammeyer, A.</au><au>Nasri, L.</au><au>Schomacher, L.</au><au>Karlin, B.</au><au>Franitza, M.</au><au>Hörmansdorfer, S.</au><au>Tuschak, C.</au><au>Valenza, G.</au><au>Ochmann, U.</au><au>Herr, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of sampling locations in pregnant women and newborns for the detection of colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria</atitle><jtitle>European journal of clinical microbiology &amp; infectious diseases</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1819</spage><epage>1826</epage><pages>1819-1826</pages><issn>0934-9723</issn><eissn>1435-4373</eissn><abstract>Up to now, little has been known about the prevalence and clinical relevance of colonisation of asymptomatic pregnant women with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) or extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli . In this two-centre cross-sectional study, we evaluated the performance and importance of screening at different times and different locations for colonisation in pregnant women and newborns. Between October 2013 and December 2015, four samples were collected from pregnant women, two from newborns at birth and three from 3-day-old newborns. Samples were screened on culturing media and were confirmed with molecular methods. MSSA was used as a surrogate for MRSA, as the two share most microbiologic characteristics and colonisation patterns. Of 763 pregnant women, 14.5% (111) were colonised with MSSA, 0.4% (3) with MRSA and 2.6% (20) with ESBL-producing E. coli . Of 658 newborns, 0.9% (10) were colonised with MSSA at birth and 13.1% (70) at 3 days old, 0.5% (3) were colonised with MRSA and 2.6% (17) with ESBL-producing E. coli . Nasal sampling identified 91.0% of MSSA-colonised pregnant women and 60.0% of newborns. In newborns, nasal and umbilical sampling at 3 days after birth discovered 84.0% of colonised cases. For ESBL-producing E. coli , the perianal region was positive in all colonised pregnant women and in 88.2% of colonised newborns. Combining nasal and perianal swabs is optimal when screening for antibiotic-resistant bacteria in pregnant women. Nasal, perianal and umbilical sample collection from 3-day-old newborns significantly increased the sensitivity compared to screening immediately after birth.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28474179</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10096-017-2997-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7440-492X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0934-9723
ispartof European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases, 2017-10, Vol.36 (10), p.1819-1826
issn 0934-9723
1435-4373
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1896041391
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Antibiotic resistance
Antibiotics
Bacteria
Bacterial Infections - diagnosis
Bacterial Infections - epidemiology
Bacterial Infections - microbiology
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Birth
Carrier State - diagnosis
Carrier State - epidemiology
Carrier State - microbiology
Childbirth & labor
Colonization
Cross-Sectional Studies
Drug resistance
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
E coli
Escherichia coli - drug effects
Escherichia coli - isolation & purification
Female
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Internal Medicine
Male
Medical Microbiology
Methicillin
Neonates
Original Article
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious
Sampling
Screening
Specimen Handling - methods
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects
Staphylococcus aureus - isolation & purification
Staphylococcus infections
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult
title Evaluation of sampling locations in pregnant women and newborns for the detection of colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A59%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20sampling%20locations%20in%20pregnant%20women%20and%20newborns%20for%20the%20detection%20of%20colonisation%20with%20antibiotic-resistant%20bacteria&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology%20&%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Zamfir,%20M.&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1819&rft.epage=1826&rft.pages=1819-1826&rft.issn=0934-9723&rft.eissn=1435-4373&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10096-017-2997-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1939423505%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1939423505&rft_id=info:pmid/28474179&rfr_iscdi=true