Evaluation of sampling locations in pregnant women and newborns for the detection of colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria
Up to now, little has been known about the prevalence and clinical relevance of colonisation of asymptomatic pregnant women with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) or extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli . In this t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases 2017-10, Vol.36 (10), p.1819-1826 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1826 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1819 |
container_title | European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Zamfir, M. Adler, A. C. Kolb, S. Dammeyer, A. Nasri, L. Schomacher, L. Karlin, B. Franitza, M. Hörmansdorfer, S. Tuschak, C. Valenza, G. Ochmann, U. Herr, C. |
description | Up to now, little has been known about the prevalence and clinical relevance of colonisation of asymptomatic pregnant women with methicillin-susceptible
Staphylococcus aureus
(MSSA), methicillin-resistant
S. aureus
(MRSA) or extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing
Escherichia coli
. In this two-centre cross-sectional study, we evaluated the performance and importance of screening at different times and different locations for colonisation in pregnant women and newborns. Between October 2013 and December 2015, four samples were collected from pregnant women, two from newborns at birth and three from 3-day-old newborns. Samples were screened on culturing media and were confirmed with molecular methods. MSSA was used as a surrogate for MRSA, as the two share most microbiologic characteristics and colonisation patterns. Of 763 pregnant women, 14.5% (111) were colonised with MSSA, 0.4% (3) with MRSA and 2.6% (20) with ESBL-producing
E. coli
. Of 658 newborns, 0.9% (10) were colonised with MSSA at birth and 13.1% (70) at 3 days old, 0.5% (3) were colonised with MRSA and 2.6% (17) with ESBL-producing
E. coli
. Nasal sampling identified 91.0% of MSSA-colonised pregnant women and 60.0% of newborns. In newborns, nasal and umbilical sampling at 3 days after birth discovered 84.0% of colonised cases. For ESBL-producing
E. coli
, the perianal region was positive in all colonised pregnant women and in 88.2% of colonised newborns. Combining nasal and perianal swabs is optimal when screening for antibiotic-resistant bacteria in pregnant women. Nasal, perianal and umbilical sample collection from 3-day-old newborns significantly increased the sensitivity compared to screening immediately after birth. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10096-017-2997-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1896041391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1939423505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-c05f811ff61fba4a3260961f9f2bac5c2b24f7720e326c854b36ded7a625a4b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1vFSEUhonR2NvqD3BjSNy4QfmaYViapn4kTdzomjDM4ZZmBq7AeNN9f7hcpzXGxA0knOd9gLwIvWL0HaNUvS9t1T2hTBGutSLdE7RjUnRECiWeoh3VQhKtuDhD56Xc0pYZlHqOzvgglWRK79D91U87r7aGFHHyuNjlMIe4x3Nyvw8LDhEfMuyjjRUf0wIR2zjhCMcx5Tb2KeN6A3iCCu5R49KcYiib9hjqTcvUMIZUgyMZSij1pButq5CDfYGeeTsXePmwX6DvH6--XX4m118_fbn8cE2cULwSRzs_MOZ9z_xopRW8b99nXnveTJ3jI5deKU6hTdzQyVH0E0zK9ryzcqTiAr3dvIecfqxQqllCcTDPNkJai2GD7qlkQrOGvvkHvU1rju11hmmhJRcd7RrFNsrlVEoGbw45LDbfGUbNqSKzVWRaReZUkTllXj-Y13GB6U_isZMG8A0obRT3kP-6-r_WXyyAnpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1939423505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of sampling locations in pregnant women and newborns for the detection of colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Zamfir, M. ; Adler, A. C. ; Kolb, S. ; Dammeyer, A. ; Nasri, L. ; Schomacher, L. ; Karlin, B. ; Franitza, M. ; Hörmansdorfer, S. ; Tuschak, C. ; Valenza, G. ; Ochmann, U. ; Herr, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zamfir, M. ; Adler, A. C. ; Kolb, S. ; Dammeyer, A. ; Nasri, L. ; Schomacher, L. ; Karlin, B. ; Franitza, M. ; Hörmansdorfer, S. ; Tuschak, C. ; Valenza, G. ; Ochmann, U. ; Herr, C.</creatorcontrib><description>Up to now, little has been known about the prevalence and clinical relevance of colonisation of asymptomatic pregnant women with methicillin-susceptible
Staphylococcus aureus
(MSSA), methicillin-resistant
S. aureus
(MRSA) or extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing
Escherichia coli
. In this two-centre cross-sectional study, we evaluated the performance and importance of screening at different times and different locations for colonisation in pregnant women and newborns. Between October 2013 and December 2015, four samples were collected from pregnant women, two from newborns at birth and three from 3-day-old newborns. Samples were screened on culturing media and were confirmed with molecular methods. MSSA was used as a surrogate for MRSA, as the two share most microbiologic characteristics and colonisation patterns. Of 763 pregnant women, 14.5% (111) were colonised with MSSA, 0.4% (3) with MRSA and 2.6% (20) with ESBL-producing
E. coli
. Of 658 newborns, 0.9% (10) were colonised with MSSA at birth and 13.1% (70) at 3 days old, 0.5% (3) were colonised with MRSA and 2.6% (17) with ESBL-producing
E. coli
. Nasal sampling identified 91.0% of MSSA-colonised pregnant women and 60.0% of newborns. In newborns, nasal and umbilical sampling at 3 days after birth discovered 84.0% of colonised cases. For ESBL-producing
E. coli
, the perianal region was positive in all colonised pregnant women and in 88.2% of colonised newborns. Combining nasal and perianal swabs is optimal when screening for antibiotic-resistant bacteria in pregnant women. Nasal, perianal and umbilical sample collection from 3-day-old newborns significantly increased the sensitivity compared to screening immediately after birth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0934-9723</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-4373</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10096-017-2997-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28474179</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Antibiotic resistance ; Antibiotics ; Bacteria ; Bacterial Infections - diagnosis ; Bacterial Infections - epidemiology ; Bacterial Infections - microbiology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Birth ; Carrier State - diagnosis ; Carrier State - epidemiology ; Carrier State - microbiology ; Childbirth & labor ; Colonization ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Drug resistance ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; E coli ; Escherichia coli - drug effects ; Escherichia coli - isolation & purification ; Female ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Medical Microbiology ; Methicillin ; Neonates ; Original Article ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious ; Sampling ; Screening ; Specimen Handling - methods ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects ; Staphylococcus aureus - isolation & purification ; Staphylococcus infections ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases, 2017-10, Vol.36 (10), p.1819-1826</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017</rights><rights>European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-c05f811ff61fba4a3260961f9f2bac5c2b24f7720e326c854b36ded7a625a4b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-c05f811ff61fba4a3260961f9f2bac5c2b24f7720e326c854b36ded7a625a4b03</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7440-492X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10096-017-2997-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10096-017-2997-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28474179$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zamfir, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adler, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolb, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dammeyer, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasri, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schomacher, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlin, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franitza, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hörmansdorfer, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuschak, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valenza, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochmann, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herr, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of sampling locations in pregnant women and newborns for the detection of colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria</title><title>European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><description>Up to now, little has been known about the prevalence and clinical relevance of colonisation of asymptomatic pregnant women with methicillin-susceptible
Staphylococcus aureus
(MSSA), methicillin-resistant
S. aureus
(MRSA) or extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing
Escherichia coli
. In this two-centre cross-sectional study, we evaluated the performance and importance of screening at different times and different locations for colonisation in pregnant women and newborns. Between October 2013 and December 2015, four samples were collected from pregnant women, two from newborns at birth and three from 3-day-old newborns. Samples were screened on culturing media and were confirmed with molecular methods. MSSA was used as a surrogate for MRSA, as the two share most microbiologic characteristics and colonisation patterns. Of 763 pregnant women, 14.5% (111) were colonised with MSSA, 0.4% (3) with MRSA and 2.6% (20) with ESBL-producing
E. coli
. Of 658 newborns, 0.9% (10) were colonised with MSSA at birth and 13.1% (70) at 3 days old, 0.5% (3) were colonised with MRSA and 2.6% (17) with ESBL-producing
E. coli
. Nasal sampling identified 91.0% of MSSA-colonised pregnant women and 60.0% of newborns. In newborns, nasal and umbilical sampling at 3 days after birth discovered 84.0% of colonised cases. For ESBL-producing
E. coli
, the perianal region was positive in all colonised pregnant women and in 88.2% of colonised newborns. Combining nasal and perianal swabs is optimal when screening for antibiotic-resistant bacteria in pregnant women. Nasal, perianal and umbilical sample collection from 3-day-old newborns significantly increased the sensitivity compared to screening immediately after birth.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibiotic resistance</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Birth</subject><subject>Carrier State - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carrier State - epidemiology</subject><subject>Carrier State - microbiology</subject><subject>Childbirth & labor</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - drug effects</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Microbiology</subject><subject>Methicillin</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Specimen Handling - methods</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Staphylococcus infections</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0934-9723</issn><issn>1435-4373</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1vFSEUhonR2NvqD3BjSNy4QfmaYViapn4kTdzomjDM4ZZmBq7AeNN9f7hcpzXGxA0knOd9gLwIvWL0HaNUvS9t1T2hTBGutSLdE7RjUnRECiWeoh3VQhKtuDhD56Xc0pYZlHqOzvgglWRK79D91U87r7aGFHHyuNjlMIe4x3Nyvw8LDhEfMuyjjRUf0wIR2zjhCMcx5Tb2KeN6A3iCCu5R49KcYiib9hjqTcvUMIZUgyMZSij1pButq5CDfYGeeTsXePmwX6DvH6--XX4m118_fbn8cE2cULwSRzs_MOZ9z_xopRW8b99nXnveTJ3jI5deKU6hTdzQyVH0E0zK9ryzcqTiAr3dvIecfqxQqllCcTDPNkJai2GD7qlkQrOGvvkHvU1rju11hmmhJRcd7RrFNsrlVEoGbw45LDbfGUbNqSKzVWRaReZUkTllXj-Y13GB6U_isZMG8A0obRT3kP-6-r_WXyyAnpA</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Zamfir, M.</creator><creator>Adler, A. C.</creator><creator>Kolb, S.</creator><creator>Dammeyer, A.</creator><creator>Nasri, L.</creator><creator>Schomacher, L.</creator><creator>Karlin, B.</creator><creator>Franitza, M.</creator><creator>Hörmansdorfer, S.</creator><creator>Tuschak, C.</creator><creator>Valenza, G.</creator><creator>Ochmann, U.</creator><creator>Herr, C.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7440-492X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Evaluation of sampling locations in pregnant women and newborns for the detection of colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria</title><author>Zamfir, M. ; Adler, A. C. ; Kolb, S. ; Dammeyer, A. ; Nasri, L. ; Schomacher, L. ; Karlin, B. ; Franitza, M. ; Hörmansdorfer, S. ; Tuschak, C. ; Valenza, G. ; Ochmann, U. ; Herr, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-c05f811ff61fba4a3260961f9f2bac5c2b24f7720e326c854b36ded7a625a4b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibiotic resistance</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Birth</topic><topic>Carrier State - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carrier State - epidemiology</topic><topic>Carrier State - microbiology</topic><topic>Childbirth & labor</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - drug effects</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Microbiology</topic><topic>Methicillin</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Specimen Handling - methods</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Staphylococcus infections</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zamfir, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adler, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolb, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dammeyer, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasri, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schomacher, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlin, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franitza, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hörmansdorfer, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuschak, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valenza, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochmann, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herr, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zamfir, M.</au><au>Adler, A. C.</au><au>Kolb, S.</au><au>Dammeyer, A.</au><au>Nasri, L.</au><au>Schomacher, L.</au><au>Karlin, B.</au><au>Franitza, M.</au><au>Hörmansdorfer, S.</au><au>Tuschak, C.</au><au>Valenza, G.</au><au>Ochmann, U.</au><au>Herr, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of sampling locations in pregnant women and newborns for the detection of colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria</atitle><jtitle>European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1819</spage><epage>1826</epage><pages>1819-1826</pages><issn>0934-9723</issn><eissn>1435-4373</eissn><abstract>Up to now, little has been known about the prevalence and clinical relevance of colonisation of asymptomatic pregnant women with methicillin-susceptible
Staphylococcus aureus
(MSSA), methicillin-resistant
S. aureus
(MRSA) or extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing
Escherichia coli
. In this two-centre cross-sectional study, we evaluated the performance and importance of screening at different times and different locations for colonisation in pregnant women and newborns. Between October 2013 and December 2015, four samples were collected from pregnant women, two from newborns at birth and three from 3-day-old newborns. Samples were screened on culturing media and were confirmed with molecular methods. MSSA was used as a surrogate for MRSA, as the two share most microbiologic characteristics and colonisation patterns. Of 763 pregnant women, 14.5% (111) were colonised with MSSA, 0.4% (3) with MRSA and 2.6% (20) with ESBL-producing
E. coli
. Of 658 newborns, 0.9% (10) were colonised with MSSA at birth and 13.1% (70) at 3 days old, 0.5% (3) were colonised with MRSA and 2.6% (17) with ESBL-producing
E. coli
. Nasal sampling identified 91.0% of MSSA-colonised pregnant women and 60.0% of newborns. In newborns, nasal and umbilical sampling at 3 days after birth discovered 84.0% of colonised cases. For ESBL-producing
E. coli
, the perianal region was positive in all colonised pregnant women and in 88.2% of colonised newborns. Combining nasal and perianal swabs is optimal when screening for antibiotic-resistant bacteria in pregnant women. Nasal, perianal and umbilical sample collection from 3-day-old newborns significantly increased the sensitivity compared to screening immediately after birth.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>28474179</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10096-017-2997-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7440-492X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0934-9723 |
ispartof | European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases, 2017-10, Vol.36 (10), p.1819-1826 |
issn | 0934-9723 1435-4373 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1896041391 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Antibiotic resistance Antibiotics Bacteria Bacterial Infections - diagnosis Bacterial Infections - epidemiology Bacterial Infections - microbiology Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Birth Carrier State - diagnosis Carrier State - epidemiology Carrier State - microbiology Childbirth & labor Colonization Cross-Sectional Studies Drug resistance Drug Resistance, Bacterial E coli Escherichia coli - drug effects Escherichia coli - isolation & purification Female Humans Infant, Newborn Internal Medicine Male Medical Microbiology Methicillin Neonates Original Article Pregnancy Pregnancy Complications, Infectious Sampling Screening Specimen Handling - methods Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects Staphylococcus aureus - isolation & purification Staphylococcus infections Surveys and Questionnaires Young Adult |
title | Evaluation of sampling locations in pregnant women and newborns for the detection of colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A59%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20sampling%20locations%20in%20pregnant%20women%20and%20newborns%20for%20the%20detection%20of%20colonisation%20with%20antibiotic-resistant%20bacteria&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology%20&%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Zamfir,%20M.&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1819&rft.epage=1826&rft.pages=1819-1826&rft.issn=0934-9723&rft.eissn=1435-4373&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10096-017-2997-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1939423505%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1939423505&rft_id=info:pmid/28474179&rfr_iscdi=true |