Within-Plant Distribution and Dynamics of Thrips Species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Cotton

A 2-yr study in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) was conducted to determine the abundance and species composition of thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on different plant parts throughout the season in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia. Plant parts sampled included seedlings...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of economic entomology 2017-08, Vol.110 (4), p.1563-1575
Hauptverfasser: Reay-Jones, Francis P. F, Greene, Jeremy K, Herbert, D. Ames, Jacobson, Alana L, Kennedy, George G, Reisig, Dominic D, Roberts, Phillip M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1575
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1563
container_title Journal of economic entomology
container_volume 110
creator Reay-Jones, Francis P. F
Greene, Jeremy K
Herbert, D. Ames
Jacobson, Alana L
Kennedy, George G
Reisig, Dominic D
Roberts, Phillip M
description A 2-yr study in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) was conducted to determine the abundance and species composition of thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on different plant parts throughout the season in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia. Plant parts sampled included seedlings, terminals with two expanded leaves, leaves from the upper, middle, and lower sections of the canopy, white flowers, and medium-sized bolls. Adult thrips were significantly more abundant on seedlings and flowers in 2014, and on flowers followed by seedlings and leaves from the middle canopy in 2015. Immature thrips were significantly more abundant on seedlings, followed by flowers in 2014, and on seedlings followed by leaves from the lower canopy and flowers in 2015. Across locations and plant parts, thrips consisted of Frankliniella tritici (Fitch) (46.8%), Frankliniella fusca Hinds (23.5%), Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (17.1%), Neohydatothrips variabilis (Beach) (7.4%), Thrips tabaci (Lindeman) (1.8%), and other species (3.4%). Frankliniella fusca represented 86.7% of all thrips on seedlings, while F. tritici was more abundant on terminals (51.6%), squares (57.5%), and flowers (75.1%). Across all leaf positions, F. fusca was the most abundant species (28.8%), followed by F. tritici (19.2%), N. variabilis (18.8%), F. occidentalis (12.9%), and T. tabaci (5.2%), as well as other species (15.0%). As neonicotinoid insecticides remain a primary tool to manage seedling infestations of F. fusca, our data indicate that mid- to late-season applications of neonicotinoid insecticides targeting other insect pests will intensify selection pressure for resistance on F. fusca, the primary pest of seedling cotton.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jee/tox131
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1896039588</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jee/tox131</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1896039588</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-8599ee37f25dfa49c88d7914710c5a942d69068df824d7e3d6207c591d6f25d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtKAzEUBuAgiq3VjQ8gARGqMDaXuSTupPUGBQUruhCGzCRDU9pkTDJg394pU1246Oos8uXnnB-AU4yuMeJ0tFBqFOw3pngP9DGnLCIcf-yDPkKERCjmtAeOvF8ghFOC0SHoERZnSYZZH3y-6zDXJnpZChPgRPvgdNEEbQ0URsLJ2oiVLj20FZzNna49fK1VqZWHw9l87YWxdVBO3HSvWgp1CbWBYxuCNcfgoBJLr062cwDe7u9m48do-vzwNL6dRgXNWIhYwrlSNKtIIisR85IxmXEcZxiVieAxkSlHKZMVI7HMFJUpQVmZcCzTzRdKB2DY5dbOfjXKh3ylfamW7U3KNj7HjKeI8oSxlp7_owvbONNul2POkpRxRjfqqlOls947VeW10yvh1jlG-abzvO087zpv8dk2silWSv7R35JbcNEB29S7g7ZnFNpao3bRH5RQlsY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1985689838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Within-Plant Distribution and Dynamics of Thrips Species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Cotton</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Reay-Jones, Francis P. F ; Greene, Jeremy K ; Herbert, D. Ames ; Jacobson, Alana L ; Kennedy, George G ; Reisig, Dominic D ; Roberts, Phillip M</creator><creatorcontrib>Reay-Jones, Francis P. F ; Greene, Jeremy K ; Herbert, D. Ames ; Jacobson, Alana L ; Kennedy, George G ; Reisig, Dominic D ; Roberts, Phillip M</creatorcontrib><description>A 2-yr study in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) was conducted to determine the abundance and species composition of thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on different plant parts throughout the season in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia. Plant parts sampled included seedlings, terminals with two expanded leaves, leaves from the upper, middle, and lower sections of the canopy, white flowers, and medium-sized bolls. Adult thrips were significantly more abundant on seedlings and flowers in 2014, and on flowers followed by seedlings and leaves from the middle canopy in 2015. Immature thrips were significantly more abundant on seedlings, followed by flowers in 2014, and on seedlings followed by leaves from the lower canopy and flowers in 2015. Across locations and plant parts, thrips consisted of Frankliniella tritici (Fitch) (46.8%), Frankliniella fusca Hinds (23.5%), Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (17.1%), Neohydatothrips variabilis (Beach) (7.4%), Thrips tabaci (Lindeman) (1.8%), and other species (3.4%). Frankliniella fusca represented 86.7% of all thrips on seedlings, while F. tritici was more abundant on terminals (51.6%), squares (57.5%), and flowers (75.1%). Across all leaf positions, F. fusca was the most abundant species (28.8%), followed by F. tritici (19.2%), N. variabilis (18.8%), F. occidentalis (12.9%), and T. tabaci (5.2%), as well as other species (15.0%). As neonicotinoid insecticides remain a primary tool to manage seedling infestations of F. fusca, our data indicate that mid- to late-season applications of neonicotinoid insecticides targeting other insect pests will intensify selection pressure for resistance on F. fusca, the primary pest of seedling cotton.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jee/tox131</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28475718</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Agrochemicals ; Animal Distribution ; Animals ; Biota ; Canopies ; Cotton ; FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS ; Flowers ; Frankliniella fusca ; Frankliniella occidentalis ; Frankliniella tritici ; Gossypium - growth &amp; development ; Gossypium hirsutum ; Herbivores ; Insecticide resistance ; Insecticides ; Leaves ; Neohydatothrips variabilis ; Neonicotinoid insecticides ; Pests ; Plants ; Population Dynamics ; sampling ; Seedlings ; Southeastern United States ; Species composition ; Thripidae ; Thrips tabaci ; Thysanoptera ; Thysanoptera - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 2017-08, Vol.110 (4), p.1563-1575</ispartof><rights>The Authors 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><rights>The Authors 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2017</rights><rights>The Authors 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Aug 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-8599ee37f25dfa49c88d7914710c5a942d69068df824d7e3d6207c591d6f25d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-8599ee37f25dfa49c88d7914710c5a942d69068df824d7e3d6207c591d6f25d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28475718$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reay-Jones, Francis P. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Jeremy K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbert, D. Ames</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobson, Alana L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, George G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reisig, Dominic D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Phillip M</creatorcontrib><title>Within-Plant Distribution and Dynamics of Thrips Species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Cotton</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><description>A 2-yr study in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) was conducted to determine the abundance and species composition of thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on different plant parts throughout the season in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia. Plant parts sampled included seedlings, terminals with two expanded leaves, leaves from the upper, middle, and lower sections of the canopy, white flowers, and medium-sized bolls. Adult thrips were significantly more abundant on seedlings and flowers in 2014, and on flowers followed by seedlings and leaves from the middle canopy in 2015. Immature thrips were significantly more abundant on seedlings, followed by flowers in 2014, and on seedlings followed by leaves from the lower canopy and flowers in 2015. Across locations and plant parts, thrips consisted of Frankliniella tritici (Fitch) (46.8%), Frankliniella fusca Hinds (23.5%), Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (17.1%), Neohydatothrips variabilis (Beach) (7.4%), Thrips tabaci (Lindeman) (1.8%), and other species (3.4%). Frankliniella fusca represented 86.7% of all thrips on seedlings, while F. tritici was more abundant on terminals (51.6%), squares (57.5%), and flowers (75.1%). Across all leaf positions, F. fusca was the most abundant species (28.8%), followed by F. tritici (19.2%), N. variabilis (18.8%), F. occidentalis (12.9%), and T. tabaci (5.2%), as well as other species (15.0%). As neonicotinoid insecticides remain a primary tool to manage seedling infestations of F. fusca, our data indicate that mid- to late-season applications of neonicotinoid insecticides targeting other insect pests will intensify selection pressure for resistance on F. fusca, the primary pest of seedling cotton.</description><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>Animal Distribution</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Frankliniella fusca</subject><subject>Frankliniella occidentalis</subject><subject>Frankliniella tritici</subject><subject>Gossypium - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Gossypium hirsutum</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Insecticide resistance</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Neohydatothrips variabilis</subject><subject>Neonicotinoid insecticides</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>sampling</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>Southeastern United States</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Thripidae</subject><subject>Thrips tabaci</subject><subject>Thysanoptera</subject><subject>Thysanoptera - physiology</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp90MtKAzEUBuAgiq3VjQ8gARGqMDaXuSTupPUGBQUruhCGzCRDU9pkTDJg394pU1246Oos8uXnnB-AU4yuMeJ0tFBqFOw3pngP9DGnLCIcf-yDPkKERCjmtAeOvF8ghFOC0SHoERZnSYZZH3y-6zDXJnpZChPgRPvgdNEEbQ0URsLJ2oiVLj20FZzNna49fK1VqZWHw9l87YWxdVBO3HSvWgp1CbWBYxuCNcfgoBJLr062cwDe7u9m48do-vzwNL6dRgXNWIhYwrlSNKtIIisR85IxmXEcZxiVieAxkSlHKZMVI7HMFJUpQVmZcCzTzRdKB2DY5dbOfjXKh3ylfamW7U3KNj7HjKeI8oSxlp7_owvbONNul2POkpRxRjfqqlOls947VeW10yvh1jlG-abzvO087zpv8dk2silWSv7R35JbcNEB29S7g7ZnFNpao3bRH5RQlsY</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Reay-Jones, Francis P. F</creator><creator>Greene, Jeremy K</creator><creator>Herbert, D. Ames</creator><creator>Jacobson, Alana L</creator><creator>Kennedy, George G</creator><creator>Reisig, Dominic D</creator><creator>Roberts, Phillip M</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Within-Plant Distribution and Dynamics of Thrips Species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Cotton</title><author>Reay-Jones, Francis P. F ; Greene, Jeremy K ; Herbert, D. Ames ; Jacobson, Alana L ; Kennedy, George G ; Reisig, Dominic D ; Roberts, Phillip M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-8599ee37f25dfa49c88d7914710c5a942d69068df824d7e3d6207c591d6f25d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>Animal Distribution</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Frankliniella fusca</topic><topic>Frankliniella occidentalis</topic><topic>Frankliniella tritici</topic><topic>Gossypium - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Gossypium hirsutum</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Insecticide resistance</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Neohydatothrips variabilis</topic><topic>Neonicotinoid insecticides</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>sampling</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>Southeastern United States</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Thripidae</topic><topic>Thrips tabaci</topic><topic>Thysanoptera</topic><topic>Thysanoptera - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reay-Jones, Francis P. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Jeremy K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbert, D. Ames</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobson, Alana L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, George G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reisig, Dominic D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Phillip M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reay-Jones, Francis P. F</au><au>Greene, Jeremy K</au><au>Herbert, D. Ames</au><au>Jacobson, Alana L</au><au>Kennedy, George G</au><au>Reisig, Dominic D</au><au>Roberts, Phillip M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Within-Plant Distribution and Dynamics of Thrips Species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Cotton</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1563</spage><epage>1575</epage><pages>1563-1575</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><abstract>A 2-yr study in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) was conducted to determine the abundance and species composition of thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on different plant parts throughout the season in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia. Plant parts sampled included seedlings, terminals with two expanded leaves, leaves from the upper, middle, and lower sections of the canopy, white flowers, and medium-sized bolls. Adult thrips were significantly more abundant on seedlings and flowers in 2014, and on flowers followed by seedlings and leaves from the middle canopy in 2015. Immature thrips were significantly more abundant on seedlings, followed by flowers in 2014, and on seedlings followed by leaves from the lower canopy and flowers in 2015. Across locations and plant parts, thrips consisted of Frankliniella tritici (Fitch) (46.8%), Frankliniella fusca Hinds (23.5%), Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (17.1%), Neohydatothrips variabilis (Beach) (7.4%), Thrips tabaci (Lindeman) (1.8%), and other species (3.4%). Frankliniella fusca represented 86.7% of all thrips on seedlings, while F. tritici was more abundant on terminals (51.6%), squares (57.5%), and flowers (75.1%). Across all leaf positions, F. fusca was the most abundant species (28.8%), followed by F. tritici (19.2%), N. variabilis (18.8%), F. occidentalis (12.9%), and T. tabaci (5.2%), as well as other species (15.0%). As neonicotinoid insecticides remain a primary tool to manage seedling infestations of F. fusca, our data indicate that mid- to late-season applications of neonicotinoid insecticides targeting other insect pests will intensify selection pressure for resistance on F. fusca, the primary pest of seedling cotton.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>28475718</pmid><doi>10.1093/jee/tox131</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0493
ispartof Journal of economic entomology, 2017-08, Vol.110 (4), p.1563-1575
issn 0022-0493
1938-291X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1896039588
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Agrochemicals
Animal Distribution
Animals
Biota
Canopies
Cotton
FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS
Flowers
Frankliniella fusca
Frankliniella occidentalis
Frankliniella tritici
Gossypium - growth & development
Gossypium hirsutum
Herbivores
Insecticide resistance
Insecticides
Leaves
Neohydatothrips variabilis
Neonicotinoid insecticides
Pests
Plants
Population Dynamics
sampling
Seedlings
Southeastern United States
Species composition
Thripidae
Thrips tabaci
Thysanoptera
Thysanoptera - physiology
title Within-Plant Distribution and Dynamics of Thrips Species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Cotton
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T05%3A02%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Within-Plant%20Distribution%20and%20Dynamics%20of%20Thrips%20Species%20(Thysanoptera:%20Thripidae)%20in%20Cotton&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Reay-Jones,%20Francis%20P.%20F&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1563&rft.epage=1575&rft.pages=1563-1575&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jee/tox131&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1896039588%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1985689838&rft_id=info:pmid/28475718&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jee/tox131&rfr_iscdi=true