A comparison of schools: teacher knowledge of explicit code-based reading instruction
One-hundred-fourteen kindergarten through third-grade teachers from seven different schools were surveyed using The Survey of Preparedness and Knowledge of Language Structure Related to Teaching Reading to Struggling Students . The purpose was to compare their definitions and application knowledge o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Reading & writing 2017-04, Vol.30 (4), p.653-690 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 690 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 653 |
container_title | Reading & writing |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Cohen, Rebecca A. Mather, Nancy Schneider, Deborah A. White, Jennifer M. |
description | One-hundred-fourteen kindergarten through third-grade teachers from seven different schools were surveyed using
The Survey of Preparedness and Knowledge of Language Structure Related to Teaching Reading to Struggling Students
. The purpose was to compare their definitions and application knowledge of language structure, phonics, and other code-based concepts, as well as their perceptions of their own knowledge as operationalized in a scale designed to measure participants’ confidence in their responses. Participants were divided into groups based on their districts’ use or non-use of a scripted, code-based reading program. The code-based reading program group comprised 60 teacher participants, and the no code-based reading program group comprised 54 participants. Multivariate analysis of covariance revealed no significant differences between groups in definitions or application knowledge, once demographic differences were accounted for. Analyses of covariance revealed no significant differences in perceptions of knowledge after accounting for relevant covariates. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated the variance contribution of condition and demographic variables to obtained knowledge to be non-significant, and partial correlation analyses showed only weak, often non-significant correlations between perceived knowledge and obtained knowledge. Overall poor survey performance indicated that the majority of teachers in both conditions did not possess the necessary code-based reading knowledge or application skills to effectively teach struggling readers. The results of this study suggest that the use of a scripted, code-based reading program does not guarantee mastery of language structure, phonics, and other code-based concepts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11145-016-9694-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1895970796</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1133681</ericid><sourcerecordid>4320834451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-4d5b768e1fdcad0d393501af5b36a2beed179f02abcaf1cb6528d0e00c85704c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFO3DAQhi1EJba0D9ADUqReejHMxHEcc0OIFhASl3K2HHuyGLLxYmdF-_b1KqiqKnGaw__9M6OPsS8IpwigzjIiNpIDtly3uuFwwFYoleCgQR6yFei65o1S6oh9zPkJAOquESv2cFG5uNnaFHKcqjhU2T3GOObzaibrHilVz1N8HcmvaZ_Sr-0YXJhLyRPvbSZfJbI-TOsqTHlOOzeHOH1iHwY7Zvr8No_Zw_ern5fX_O7-x83lxR13QuHMGy971XaEg3fWgxdaSEA7yF60tu6JPCo9QG17Zwd0fSvrzgMBuE4qaJw4Zt-WvdsUX3aUZ7MJ2dE42oniLhvstNQKlG4L-vU_9Cnu0lS-K1TxIlA0daFwoVyKOScazDaFjU2_DYLZizaLaFNEm71oA6VzsnQoBfeXv7pFFKLtsOT1kueSTWtK_1x-d-kfDgKKUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877731342</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of schools: teacher knowledge of explicit code-based reading instruction</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Cohen, Rebecca A. ; Mather, Nancy ; Schneider, Deborah A. ; White, Jennifer M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Rebecca A. ; Mather, Nancy ; Schneider, Deborah A. ; White, Jennifer M.</creatorcontrib><description>One-hundred-fourteen kindergarten through third-grade teachers from seven different schools were surveyed using
The Survey of Preparedness and Knowledge of Language Structure Related to Teaching Reading to Struggling Students
. The purpose was to compare their definitions and application knowledge of language structure, phonics, and other code-based concepts, as well as their perceptions of their own knowledge as operationalized in a scale designed to measure participants’ confidence in their responses. Participants were divided into groups based on their districts’ use or non-use of a scripted, code-based reading program. The code-based reading program group comprised 60 teacher participants, and the no code-based reading program group comprised 54 participants. Multivariate analysis of covariance revealed no significant differences between groups in definitions or application knowledge, once demographic differences were accounted for. Analyses of covariance revealed no significant differences in perceptions of knowledge after accounting for relevant covariates. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated the variance contribution of condition and demographic variables to obtained knowledge to be non-significant, and partial correlation analyses showed only weak, often non-significant correlations between perceived knowledge and obtained knowledge. Overall poor survey performance indicated that the majority of teachers in both conditions did not possess the necessary code-based reading knowledge or application skills to effectively teach struggling readers. The results of this study suggest that the use of a scripted, code-based reading program does not guarantee mastery of language structure, phonics, and other code-based concepts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0922-4777</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11145-016-9694-0</identifier><identifier>CODEN: REWRE8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Child Development ; Child Health ; Comparative Analysis ; Correlation ; Decoding (Reading) ; Education ; Educational Change ; Effectiveness ; Elementary School Teachers ; Grade 1 ; Grade 2 ; Grade 3 ; Kindergarten ; Knowledge ; Knowledge Level ; Language and Literature ; Linguistics ; Literacy ; Multiple Regression Analysis ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neurology ; Phonics ; Polls & surveys ; Preschool Teachers ; Psycholinguistics ; Reading Difficulties ; Reading Instruction ; Reading Programs ; Reading Skills ; Social Sciences ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Teacher Characteristics ; Teacher Surveys ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>Reading & writing, 2017-04, Vol.30 (4), p.653-690</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><rights>Reading and Writing is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-4d5b768e1fdcad0d393501af5b36a2beed179f02abcaf1cb6528d0e00c85704c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-4d5b768e1fdcad0d393501af5b36a2beed179f02abcaf1cb6528d0e00c85704c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11145-016-9694-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11145-016-9694-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1133681$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Rebecca A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mather, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Deborah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Jennifer M.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of schools: teacher knowledge of explicit code-based reading instruction</title><title>Reading & writing</title><addtitle>Read Writ</addtitle><description>One-hundred-fourteen kindergarten through third-grade teachers from seven different schools were surveyed using
The Survey of Preparedness and Knowledge of Language Structure Related to Teaching Reading to Struggling Students
. The purpose was to compare their definitions and application knowledge of language structure, phonics, and other code-based concepts, as well as their perceptions of their own knowledge as operationalized in a scale designed to measure participants’ confidence in their responses. Participants were divided into groups based on their districts’ use or non-use of a scripted, code-based reading program. The code-based reading program group comprised 60 teacher participants, and the no code-based reading program group comprised 54 participants. Multivariate analysis of covariance revealed no significant differences between groups in definitions or application knowledge, once demographic differences were accounted for. Analyses of covariance revealed no significant differences in perceptions of knowledge after accounting for relevant covariates. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated the variance contribution of condition and demographic variables to obtained knowledge to be non-significant, and partial correlation analyses showed only weak, often non-significant correlations between perceived knowledge and obtained knowledge. Overall poor survey performance indicated that the majority of teachers in both conditions did not possess the necessary code-based reading knowledge or application skills to effectively teach struggling readers. The results of this study suggest that the use of a scripted, code-based reading program does not guarantee mastery of language structure, phonics, and other code-based concepts.</description><subject>Child Development</subject><subject>Child Health</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Decoding (Reading)</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Elementary School Teachers</subject><subject>Grade 1</subject><subject>Grade 2</subject><subject>Grade 3</subject><subject>Kindergarten</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Language and Literature</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Phonics</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Preschool Teachers</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Reading Difficulties</subject><subject>Reading Instruction</subject><subject>Reading Programs</subject><subject>Reading Skills</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teacher Characteristics</subject><subject>Teacher Surveys</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>0922-4777</issn><issn>1573-0905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFO3DAQhi1EJba0D9ADUqReejHMxHEcc0OIFhASl3K2HHuyGLLxYmdF-_b1KqiqKnGaw__9M6OPsS8IpwigzjIiNpIDtly3uuFwwFYoleCgQR6yFei65o1S6oh9zPkJAOquESv2cFG5uNnaFHKcqjhU2T3GOObzaibrHilVz1N8HcmvaZ_Sr-0YXJhLyRPvbSZfJbI-TOsqTHlOOzeHOH1iHwY7Zvr8No_Zw_ern5fX_O7-x83lxR13QuHMGy971XaEg3fWgxdaSEA7yF60tu6JPCo9QG17Zwd0fSvrzgMBuE4qaJw4Zt-WvdsUX3aUZ7MJ2dE42oniLhvstNQKlG4L-vU_9Cnu0lS-K1TxIlA0daFwoVyKOScazDaFjU2_DYLZizaLaFNEm71oA6VzsnQoBfeXv7pFFKLtsOT1kueSTWtK_1x-d-kfDgKKUw</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Cohen, Rebecca A.</creator><creator>Mather, Nancy</creator><creator>Schneider, Deborah A.</creator><creator>White, Jennifer M.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>A comparison of schools: teacher knowledge of explicit code-based reading instruction</title><author>Cohen, Rebecca A. ; Mather, Nancy ; Schneider, Deborah A. ; White, Jennifer M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-4d5b768e1fdcad0d393501af5b36a2beed179f02abcaf1cb6528d0e00c85704c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Child Development</topic><topic>Child Health</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Decoding (Reading)</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Elementary School Teachers</topic><topic>Grade 1</topic><topic>Grade 2</topic><topic>Grade 3</topic><topic>Kindergarten</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Language and Literature</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Multiple Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Phonics</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Preschool Teachers</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Reading Difficulties</topic><topic>Reading Instruction</topic><topic>Reading Programs</topic><topic>Reading Skills</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teacher Characteristics</topic><topic>Teacher Surveys</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Rebecca A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mather, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Deborah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Jennifer M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Reading & writing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohen, Rebecca A.</au><au>Mather, Nancy</au><au>Schneider, Deborah A.</au><au>White, Jennifer M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1133681</ericid><atitle>A comparison of schools: teacher knowledge of explicit code-based reading instruction</atitle><jtitle>Reading & writing</jtitle><stitle>Read Writ</stitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>653</spage><epage>690</epage><pages>653-690</pages><issn>0922-4777</issn><eissn>1573-0905</eissn><coden>REWRE8</coden><abstract>One-hundred-fourteen kindergarten through third-grade teachers from seven different schools were surveyed using
The Survey of Preparedness and Knowledge of Language Structure Related to Teaching Reading to Struggling Students
. The purpose was to compare their definitions and application knowledge of language structure, phonics, and other code-based concepts, as well as their perceptions of their own knowledge as operationalized in a scale designed to measure participants’ confidence in their responses. Participants were divided into groups based on their districts’ use or non-use of a scripted, code-based reading program. The code-based reading program group comprised 60 teacher participants, and the no code-based reading program group comprised 54 participants. Multivariate analysis of covariance revealed no significant differences between groups in definitions or application knowledge, once demographic differences were accounted for. Analyses of covariance revealed no significant differences in perceptions of knowledge after accounting for relevant covariates. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated the variance contribution of condition and demographic variables to obtained knowledge to be non-significant, and partial correlation analyses showed only weak, often non-significant correlations between perceived knowledge and obtained knowledge. Overall poor survey performance indicated that the majority of teachers in both conditions did not possess the necessary code-based reading knowledge or application skills to effectively teach struggling readers. The results of this study suggest that the use of a scripted, code-based reading program does not guarantee mastery of language structure, phonics, and other code-based concepts.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11145-016-9694-0</doi><tpages>38</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0922-4777 |
ispartof | Reading & writing, 2017-04, Vol.30 (4), p.653-690 |
issn | 0922-4777 1573-0905 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1895970796 |
source | EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Child Development Child Health Comparative Analysis Correlation Decoding (Reading) Education Educational Change Effectiveness Elementary School Teachers Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Kindergarten Knowledge Knowledge Level Language and Literature Linguistics Literacy Multiple Regression Analysis Multivariate Analysis Neurology Phonics Polls & surveys Preschool Teachers Psycholinguistics Reading Difficulties Reading Instruction Reading Programs Reading Skills Social Sciences Statistical analysis Studies Teacher Characteristics Teacher Surveys Teachers Teaching Methods |
title | A comparison of schools: teacher knowledge of explicit code-based reading instruction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A38%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20schools:%20teacher%20knowledge%20of%20explicit%20code-based%20reading%20instruction&rft.jtitle=Reading%20&%20writing&rft.au=Cohen,%20Rebecca%20A.&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=653&rft.epage=690&rft.pages=653-690&rft.issn=0922-4777&rft.eissn=1573-0905&rft.coden=REWRE8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11145-016-9694-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4320834451%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877731342&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1133681&rfr_iscdi=true |