Defining the Pubic Symphysis Angle with Respect to the Coronal Plane – Clinical and Biomechanical Considerations

Abstract Background Fixation strength of constructs placed across the pubic symphysis after injury is dependent on screw length, maximisation of which requires knowledge of the bony anatomy. The aim of this study was to describe the ideal angle of drilling to achieve maximal safe screw placement wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Injury 2017-07, Vol.48 (7), p.1714-1716
Hauptverfasser: Link, B.-C, Ha, N.B, Solomon, B.L, Rickman, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1716
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1714
container_title Injury
container_volume 48
creator Link, B.-C
Ha, N.B
Solomon, B.L
Rickman, M
description Abstract Background Fixation strength of constructs placed across the pubic symphysis after injury is dependent on screw length, maximisation of which requires knowledge of the bony anatomy. The aim of this study was to describe the ideal angle of drilling to achieve maximal safe screw placement within the pubic body. Furthermore, the influences of age and gender on the skeletal topography were investigated. Methods Three hundred CT scans of patients without pelvic injury were analysed to record the angle of the pubic body (APB) with respect to the coronal plane, and the depth of the pubic body (DPB) in the sagittal plane. Results Mean APB and DPB were 54.69° and 55.35 mm, respectively. Females had a significantly higher mean APB than males (57.29° vs. 52.41°; p < 0.001), whereas males had a significant larger mean DPB (59.13 mm vs. 51.03 mm; p < 0.001). Age had no effect on the mean APB. Mean width of the pubic body at the base was 9.38 mm. Conclusion The anatomy of this region is reliable in terms of angles and sizes; a drill angle of 55 degrees with respect to the operating table will allow maximal screw length, which should be in the region of 55 mm. The mean width of the pubic body should allow for placement of a 3.5 or 4.5 mm diameter screw.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.056
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1894915089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S002013831730284X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1894915089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-24160f3e477e9894b305d4e62f52226c3754ec9b87f9a6b055f9a9323989aab73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc-O1DAMxiMEYoeFN0AoRy4tTtI27QVpKX-llVixIHGL0tTdSek0s0kL6o134A15ElI6cODCyZb182f7MyGPGaQMWPGsT-3Yz35JOTCZQpZCXtwhO1bKKgFeyLtkB8AhYaIUZ-RBCD1EEIS4T854mRU5QL4j_iV2drTjDZ32SK_mxhp6vRyO-yXYQC_GmwHpNzvt6QcMRzQTndxvsnbejXqgV4Mekf78_oPWQ9QxsaTHlr6w7oBmr7dK7cZgW_R6sjF7SO51egj46BTPyafXrz7Wb5PL92_e1ReXicmYnBKesQI6gZmUWJVV1gjI2wwL3uWc88IImWdoqqaUXaWLBvI8xkpwEWGtGynOydNN9-jd7YxhUgcbDA7rxm4OikXRiuVQVhHNNtR4F4LHTh29PWi_KAZqdVv1anNbrW4ryFR0O7Y9OU2YmwO2f5v-2BuB5xuA8c6vFr0KxuJosLU-mqlaZ_834V8Bc7L5Cy4Yejf7-IV4iwpcgbpeP74-nEkBcYvP4hfNeahY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1894915089</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Defining the Pubic Symphysis Angle with Respect to the Coronal Plane – Clinical and Biomechanical Considerations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Link, B.-C ; Ha, N.B ; Solomon, B.L ; Rickman, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Link, B.-C ; Ha, N.B ; Solomon, B.L ; Rickman, M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Fixation strength of constructs placed across the pubic symphysis after injury is dependent on screw length, maximisation of which requires knowledge of the bony anatomy. The aim of this study was to describe the ideal angle of drilling to achieve maximal safe screw placement within the pubic body. Furthermore, the influences of age and gender on the skeletal topography were investigated. Methods Three hundred CT scans of patients without pelvic injury were analysed to record the angle of the pubic body (APB) with respect to the coronal plane, and the depth of the pubic body (DPB) in the sagittal plane. Results Mean APB and DPB were 54.69° and 55.35 mm, respectively. Females had a significantly higher mean APB than males (57.29° vs. 52.41°; p &lt; 0.001), whereas males had a significant larger mean DPB (59.13 mm vs. 51.03 mm; p &lt; 0.001). Age had no effect on the mean APB. Mean width of the pubic body at the base was 9.38 mm. Conclusion The anatomy of this region is reliable in terms of angles and sizes; a drill angle of 55 degrees with respect to the operating table will allow maximal screw length, which should be in the region of 55 mm. The mean width of the pubic body should allow for placement of a 3.5 or 4.5 mm diameter screw.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.056</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28465005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone Plates ; Bone Screws ; Female ; Fixation strength ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Models, Anatomic ; Orthopedics ; Osteoysnthesis ; Pelvis - anatomy &amp; histology ; Pubic symphysis ; Pubic Symphysis - anatomy &amp; histology ; Pubic Symphysis - surgery ; Screw length ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Injury, 2017-07, Vol.48 (7), p.1714-1716</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-24160f3e477e9894b305d4e62f52226c3754ec9b87f9a6b055f9a9323989aab73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-24160f3e477e9894b305d4e62f52226c3754ec9b87f9a6b055f9a9323989aab73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.056$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28465005$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Link, B.-C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ha, N.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomon, B.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rickman, M</creatorcontrib><title>Defining the Pubic Symphysis Angle with Respect to the Coronal Plane – Clinical and Biomechanical Considerations</title><title>Injury</title><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Fixation strength of constructs placed across the pubic symphysis after injury is dependent on screw length, maximisation of which requires knowledge of the bony anatomy. The aim of this study was to describe the ideal angle of drilling to achieve maximal safe screw placement within the pubic body. Furthermore, the influences of age and gender on the skeletal topography were investigated. Methods Three hundred CT scans of patients without pelvic injury were analysed to record the angle of the pubic body (APB) with respect to the coronal plane, and the depth of the pubic body (DPB) in the sagittal plane. Results Mean APB and DPB were 54.69° and 55.35 mm, respectively. Females had a significantly higher mean APB than males (57.29° vs. 52.41°; p &lt; 0.001), whereas males had a significant larger mean DPB (59.13 mm vs. 51.03 mm; p &lt; 0.001). Age had no effect on the mean APB. Mean width of the pubic body at the base was 9.38 mm. Conclusion The anatomy of this region is reliable in terms of angles and sizes; a drill angle of 55 degrees with respect to the operating table will allow maximal screw length, which should be in the region of 55 mm. The mean width of the pubic body should allow for placement of a 3.5 or 4.5 mm diameter screw.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fixation strength</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Anatomic</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Osteoysnthesis</subject><subject>Pelvis - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Pubic symphysis</subject><subject>Pubic Symphysis - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Pubic Symphysis - surgery</subject><subject>Screw length</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0020-1383</issn><issn>1879-0267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc-O1DAMxiMEYoeFN0AoRy4tTtI27QVpKX-llVixIHGL0tTdSek0s0kL6o134A15ElI6cODCyZb182f7MyGPGaQMWPGsT-3Yz35JOTCZQpZCXtwhO1bKKgFeyLtkB8AhYaIUZ-RBCD1EEIS4T854mRU5QL4j_iV2drTjDZ32SK_mxhp6vRyO-yXYQC_GmwHpNzvt6QcMRzQTndxvsnbejXqgV4Mekf78_oPWQ9QxsaTHlr6w7oBmr7dK7cZgW_R6sjF7SO51egj46BTPyafXrz7Wb5PL92_e1ReXicmYnBKesQI6gZmUWJVV1gjI2wwL3uWc88IImWdoqqaUXaWLBvI8xkpwEWGtGynOydNN9-jd7YxhUgcbDA7rxm4OikXRiuVQVhHNNtR4F4LHTh29PWi_KAZqdVv1anNbrW4ryFR0O7Y9OU2YmwO2f5v-2BuB5xuA8c6vFr0KxuJosLU-mqlaZ_834V8Bc7L5Cy4Yejf7-IV4iwpcgbpeP74-nEkBcYvP4hfNeahY</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Link, B.-C</creator><creator>Ha, N.B</creator><creator>Solomon, B.L</creator><creator>Rickman, M</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Defining the Pubic Symphysis Angle with Respect to the Coronal Plane – Clinical and Biomechanical Considerations</title><author>Link, B.-C ; Ha, N.B ; Solomon, B.L ; Rickman, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-24160f3e477e9894b305d4e62f52226c3754ec9b87f9a6b055f9a9323989aab73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fixation strength</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Anatomic</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Osteoysnthesis</topic><topic>Pelvis - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Pubic symphysis</topic><topic>Pubic Symphysis - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Pubic Symphysis - surgery</topic><topic>Screw length</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Link, B.-C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ha, N.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomon, B.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rickman, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Injury</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Link, B.-C</au><au>Ha, N.B</au><au>Solomon, B.L</au><au>Rickman, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Defining the Pubic Symphysis Angle with Respect to the Coronal Plane – Clinical and Biomechanical Considerations</atitle><jtitle>Injury</jtitle><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1714</spage><epage>1716</epage><pages>1714-1716</pages><issn>0020-1383</issn><eissn>1879-0267</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Fixation strength of constructs placed across the pubic symphysis after injury is dependent on screw length, maximisation of which requires knowledge of the bony anatomy. The aim of this study was to describe the ideal angle of drilling to achieve maximal safe screw placement within the pubic body. Furthermore, the influences of age and gender on the skeletal topography were investigated. Methods Three hundred CT scans of patients without pelvic injury were analysed to record the angle of the pubic body (APB) with respect to the coronal plane, and the depth of the pubic body (DPB) in the sagittal plane. Results Mean APB and DPB were 54.69° and 55.35 mm, respectively. Females had a significantly higher mean APB than males (57.29° vs. 52.41°; p &lt; 0.001), whereas males had a significant larger mean DPB (59.13 mm vs. 51.03 mm; p &lt; 0.001). Age had no effect on the mean APB. Mean width of the pubic body at the base was 9.38 mm. Conclusion The anatomy of this region is reliable in terms of angles and sizes; a drill angle of 55 degrees with respect to the operating table will allow maximal screw length, which should be in the region of 55 mm. The mean width of the pubic body should allow for placement of a 3.5 or 4.5 mm diameter screw.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28465005</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.056</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-1383
ispartof Injury, 2017-07, Vol.48 (7), p.1714-1716
issn 0020-1383
1879-0267
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1894915089
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bone Plates
Bone Screws
Female
Fixation strength
Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Anatomic
Orthopedics
Osteoysnthesis
Pelvis - anatomy & histology
Pubic symphysis
Pubic Symphysis - anatomy & histology
Pubic Symphysis - surgery
Screw length
Young Adult
title Defining the Pubic Symphysis Angle with Respect to the Coronal Plane – Clinical and Biomechanical Considerations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T18%3A51%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Defining%20the%20Pubic%20Symphysis%20Angle%20with%20Respect%20to%20the%20Coronal%20Plane%20%E2%80%93%20Clinical%20and%20Biomechanical%20Considerations&rft.jtitle=Injury&rft.au=Link,%20B.-C&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1714&rft.epage=1716&rft.pages=1714-1716&rft.issn=0020-1383&rft.eissn=1879-0267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.056&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1894915089%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1894915089&rft_id=info:pmid/28465005&rft_els_id=S002013831730284X&rfr_iscdi=true