Defining the Pubic Symphysis Angle with Respect to the Coronal Plane – Clinical and Biomechanical Considerations
Abstract Background Fixation strength of constructs placed across the pubic symphysis after injury is dependent on screw length, maximisation of which requires knowledge of the bony anatomy. The aim of this study was to describe the ideal angle of drilling to achieve maximal safe screw placement wit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Injury 2017-07, Vol.48 (7), p.1714-1716 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1716 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1714 |
container_title | Injury |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Link, B.-C Ha, N.B Solomon, B.L Rickman, M |
description | Abstract Background Fixation strength of constructs placed across the pubic symphysis after injury is dependent on screw length, maximisation of which requires knowledge of the bony anatomy. The aim of this study was to describe the ideal angle of drilling to achieve maximal safe screw placement within the pubic body. Furthermore, the influences of age and gender on the skeletal topography were investigated. Methods Three hundred CT scans of patients without pelvic injury were analysed to record the angle of the pubic body (APB) with respect to the coronal plane, and the depth of the pubic body (DPB) in the sagittal plane. Results Mean APB and DPB were 54.69° and 55.35 mm, respectively. Females had a significantly higher mean APB than males (57.29° vs. 52.41°; p < 0.001), whereas males had a significant larger mean DPB (59.13 mm vs. 51.03 mm; p < 0.001). Age had no effect on the mean APB. Mean width of the pubic body at the base was 9.38 mm. Conclusion The anatomy of this region is reliable in terms of angles and sizes; a drill angle of 55 degrees with respect to the operating table will allow maximal screw length, which should be in the region of 55 mm. The mean width of the pubic body should allow for placement of a 3.5 or 4.5 mm diameter screw. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.056 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1894915089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S002013831730284X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1894915089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-24160f3e477e9894b305d4e62f52226c3754ec9b87f9a6b055f9a9323989aab73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc-O1DAMxiMEYoeFN0AoRy4tTtI27QVpKX-llVixIHGL0tTdSek0s0kL6o134A15ElI6cODCyZb182f7MyGPGaQMWPGsT-3Yz35JOTCZQpZCXtwhO1bKKgFeyLtkB8AhYaIUZ-RBCD1EEIS4T854mRU5QL4j_iV2drTjDZ32SK_mxhp6vRyO-yXYQC_GmwHpNzvt6QcMRzQTndxvsnbejXqgV4Mekf78_oPWQ9QxsaTHlr6w7oBmr7dK7cZgW_R6sjF7SO51egj46BTPyafXrz7Wb5PL92_e1ReXicmYnBKesQI6gZmUWJVV1gjI2wwL3uWc88IImWdoqqaUXaWLBvI8xkpwEWGtGynOydNN9-jd7YxhUgcbDA7rxm4OikXRiuVQVhHNNtR4F4LHTh29PWi_KAZqdVv1anNbrW4ryFR0O7Y9OU2YmwO2f5v-2BuB5xuA8c6vFr0KxuJosLU-mqlaZ_834V8Bc7L5Cy4Yejf7-IV4iwpcgbpeP74-nEkBcYvP4hfNeahY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1894915089</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Defining the Pubic Symphysis Angle with Respect to the Coronal Plane – Clinical and Biomechanical Considerations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Link, B.-C ; Ha, N.B ; Solomon, B.L ; Rickman, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Link, B.-C ; Ha, N.B ; Solomon, B.L ; Rickman, M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Fixation strength of constructs placed across the pubic symphysis after injury is dependent on screw length, maximisation of which requires knowledge of the bony anatomy. The aim of this study was to describe the ideal angle of drilling to achieve maximal safe screw placement within the pubic body. Furthermore, the influences of age and gender on the skeletal topography were investigated. Methods Three hundred CT scans of patients without pelvic injury were analysed to record the angle of the pubic body (APB) with respect to the coronal plane, and the depth of the pubic body (DPB) in the sagittal plane. Results Mean APB and DPB were 54.69° and 55.35 mm, respectively. Females had a significantly higher mean APB than males (57.29° vs. 52.41°; p < 0.001), whereas males had a significant larger mean DPB (59.13 mm vs. 51.03 mm; p < 0.001). Age had no effect on the mean APB. Mean width of the pubic body at the base was 9.38 mm. Conclusion The anatomy of this region is reliable in terms of angles and sizes; a drill angle of 55 degrees with respect to the operating table will allow maximal screw length, which should be in the region of 55 mm. The mean width of the pubic body should allow for placement of a 3.5 or 4.5 mm diameter screw.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.056</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28465005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone Plates ; Bone Screws ; Female ; Fixation strength ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Models, Anatomic ; Orthopedics ; Osteoysnthesis ; Pelvis - anatomy & histology ; Pubic symphysis ; Pubic Symphysis - anatomy & histology ; Pubic Symphysis - surgery ; Screw length ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Injury, 2017-07, Vol.48 (7), p.1714-1716</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-24160f3e477e9894b305d4e62f52226c3754ec9b87f9a6b055f9a9323989aab73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-24160f3e477e9894b305d4e62f52226c3754ec9b87f9a6b055f9a9323989aab73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.056$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28465005$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Link, B.-C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ha, N.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomon, B.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rickman, M</creatorcontrib><title>Defining the Pubic Symphysis Angle with Respect to the Coronal Plane – Clinical and Biomechanical Considerations</title><title>Injury</title><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Fixation strength of constructs placed across the pubic symphysis after injury is dependent on screw length, maximisation of which requires knowledge of the bony anatomy. The aim of this study was to describe the ideal angle of drilling to achieve maximal safe screw placement within the pubic body. Furthermore, the influences of age and gender on the skeletal topography were investigated. Methods Three hundred CT scans of patients without pelvic injury were analysed to record the angle of the pubic body (APB) with respect to the coronal plane, and the depth of the pubic body (DPB) in the sagittal plane. Results Mean APB and DPB were 54.69° and 55.35 mm, respectively. Females had a significantly higher mean APB than males (57.29° vs. 52.41°; p < 0.001), whereas males had a significant larger mean DPB (59.13 mm vs. 51.03 mm; p < 0.001). Age had no effect on the mean APB. Mean width of the pubic body at the base was 9.38 mm. Conclusion The anatomy of this region is reliable in terms of angles and sizes; a drill angle of 55 degrees with respect to the operating table will allow maximal screw length, which should be in the region of 55 mm. The mean width of the pubic body should allow for placement of a 3.5 or 4.5 mm diameter screw.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fixation strength</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Anatomic</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Osteoysnthesis</subject><subject>Pelvis - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Pubic symphysis</subject><subject>Pubic Symphysis - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Pubic Symphysis - surgery</subject><subject>Screw length</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0020-1383</issn><issn>1879-0267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc-O1DAMxiMEYoeFN0AoRy4tTtI27QVpKX-llVixIHGL0tTdSek0s0kL6o134A15ElI6cODCyZb182f7MyGPGaQMWPGsT-3Yz35JOTCZQpZCXtwhO1bKKgFeyLtkB8AhYaIUZ-RBCD1EEIS4T854mRU5QL4j_iV2drTjDZ32SK_mxhp6vRyO-yXYQC_GmwHpNzvt6QcMRzQTndxvsnbejXqgV4Mekf78_oPWQ9QxsaTHlr6w7oBmr7dK7cZgW_R6sjF7SO51egj46BTPyafXrz7Wb5PL92_e1ReXicmYnBKesQI6gZmUWJVV1gjI2wwL3uWc88IImWdoqqaUXaWLBvI8xkpwEWGtGynOydNN9-jd7YxhUgcbDA7rxm4OikXRiuVQVhHNNtR4F4LHTh29PWi_KAZqdVv1anNbrW4ryFR0O7Y9OU2YmwO2f5v-2BuB5xuA8c6vFr0KxuJosLU-mqlaZ_834V8Bc7L5Cy4Yejf7-IV4iwpcgbpeP74-nEkBcYvP4hfNeahY</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Link, B.-C</creator><creator>Ha, N.B</creator><creator>Solomon, B.L</creator><creator>Rickman, M</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Defining the Pubic Symphysis Angle with Respect to the Coronal Plane – Clinical and Biomechanical Considerations</title><author>Link, B.-C ; Ha, N.B ; Solomon, B.L ; Rickman, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-24160f3e477e9894b305d4e62f52226c3754ec9b87f9a6b055f9a9323989aab73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fixation strength</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Anatomic</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Osteoysnthesis</topic><topic>Pelvis - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Pubic symphysis</topic><topic>Pubic Symphysis - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Pubic Symphysis - surgery</topic><topic>Screw length</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Link, B.-C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ha, N.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomon, B.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rickman, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Injury</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Link, B.-C</au><au>Ha, N.B</au><au>Solomon, B.L</au><au>Rickman, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Defining the Pubic Symphysis Angle with Respect to the Coronal Plane – Clinical and Biomechanical Considerations</atitle><jtitle>Injury</jtitle><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1714</spage><epage>1716</epage><pages>1714-1716</pages><issn>0020-1383</issn><eissn>1879-0267</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Fixation strength of constructs placed across the pubic symphysis after injury is dependent on screw length, maximisation of which requires knowledge of the bony anatomy. The aim of this study was to describe the ideal angle of drilling to achieve maximal safe screw placement within the pubic body. Furthermore, the influences of age and gender on the skeletal topography were investigated. Methods Three hundred CT scans of patients without pelvic injury were analysed to record the angle of the pubic body (APB) with respect to the coronal plane, and the depth of the pubic body (DPB) in the sagittal plane. Results Mean APB and DPB were 54.69° and 55.35 mm, respectively. Females had a significantly higher mean APB than males (57.29° vs. 52.41°; p < 0.001), whereas males had a significant larger mean DPB (59.13 mm vs. 51.03 mm; p < 0.001). Age had no effect on the mean APB. Mean width of the pubic body at the base was 9.38 mm. Conclusion The anatomy of this region is reliable in terms of angles and sizes; a drill angle of 55 degrees with respect to the operating table will allow maximal screw length, which should be in the region of 55 mm. The mean width of the pubic body should allow for placement of a 3.5 or 4.5 mm diameter screw.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28465005</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.056</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-1383 |
ispartof | Injury, 2017-07, Vol.48 (7), p.1714-1716 |
issn | 0020-1383 1879-0267 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1894915089 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Bone Plates Bone Screws Female Fixation strength Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation Humans Male Middle Aged Models, Anatomic Orthopedics Osteoysnthesis Pelvis - anatomy & histology Pubic symphysis Pubic Symphysis - anatomy & histology Pubic Symphysis - surgery Screw length Young Adult |
title | Defining the Pubic Symphysis Angle with Respect to the Coronal Plane – Clinical and Biomechanical Considerations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T18%3A51%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Defining%20the%20Pubic%20Symphysis%20Angle%20with%20Respect%20to%20the%20Coronal%20Plane%20%E2%80%93%20Clinical%20and%20Biomechanical%20Considerations&rft.jtitle=Injury&rft.au=Link,%20B.-C&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1714&rft.epage=1716&rft.pages=1714-1716&rft.issn=0020-1383&rft.eissn=1879-0267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.056&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1894915089%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1894915089&rft_id=info:pmid/28465005&rft_els_id=S002013831730284X&rfr_iscdi=true |