Ontogenetic constraints on foraminiferal test construction

Developmental processes represent one of the main constraints on the generation of adult form. Determining how constructional and energetic demands operate throughout growth is es­sential to understanding fundamental growth rules and trade‐offs that define the framework within which new species orig...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Evolution & development 2017-05, Vol.19 (3), p.157-168
Hauptverfasser: Caromel, Aude G. M., Schmidt, Daniela N., Rayfield, Emily J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 168
container_issue 3
container_start_page 157
container_title Evolution & development
container_volume 19
creator Caromel, Aude G. M.
Schmidt, Daniela N.
Rayfield, Emily J.
description Developmental processes represent one of the main constraints on the generation of adult form. Determining how constructional and energetic demands operate throughout growth is es­sential to understanding fundamental growth rules and trade‐offs that define the framework within which new species originate. In organisms producing spiral shells, coiling patterns can inform on the constructional constraints acting throughout development that dictated the diversification of forms within a group. Here, we use Synchrotron radiation X‐Ray tomographic microscopy (SRXTM) reconstructions of eight planktic foraminifera repre­sentative of the major morphotypic groups to determine disparity of coiling patterns by measuring Raupian parameters. The results show that foraminifera are a morphologically highly conservative group, exploiting a limited range of poten­tial coiling patterns. Very similar coiling patterns during early ontogeny, regardless of species, point toward strong constraints in early ontogeny and to common develop­mental processes acting across all morphogroups. Dispersion and lateral displacement of taxa in morphospace are limited to the adult stage. Accretion with low translation down the coiling axis in juveniles may maximize lateral growth and metabolic efficiency in light of costly calcification. Increased translation in the adult stages allows growth to accommo­date new chamber shapes, mediated by changes in aperture location and the site of accretion over ontogeny. These constructional constraints, and the accretion of a small number of discrete chambers, limit the potential for novel forms within the foraminifera compared to other groups of coiling organisms and may explain the repeated evolution of similar morphotypes throughout the evolutionary history of the group.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ede.12224
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1894518971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1894518971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3834-1c1981d5ffb7f34ee174e216d9fab17f7beec24c0a2cbda6335fe02ea5ffa7043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EoqUw8AdQRhhCfY7TpGyolA-pUheQulmOc0ZGiV3sRKj_HtMUNm64u-G5R6eXkEugtxBrijXeAmOMH5Ex5CxPgbPN8X6nac5hMyJnIXxQCgVn81MyYiWfZbxgY3K3tp17R4udUYlyNnReGtuFxNlEOy9bY41GL5ukw9AdiF51xtlzcqJlE_DiMCfk7XH5unhOV-unl8X9KpVZmfEUFMxLqHOtq0JnHDE-gQxm9VzLCgpdVIiKcUUlU1UtZ1mWa6QMZbyQBeXZhFwP3q13n338QrQmKGwaadH1QUA553lsBUT0ZkCVdyF41GLrTSv9TgAVP1GJGJXYRxXZq4O2r1qs_8jfbCIwHYAv0-Duf5NYPiwH5Te8b3P0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1894518971</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ontogenetic constraints on foraminiferal test construction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Caromel, Aude G. M. ; Schmidt, Daniela N. ; Rayfield, Emily J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Caromel, Aude G. M. ; Schmidt, Daniela N. ; Rayfield, Emily J.</creatorcontrib><description>Developmental processes represent one of the main constraints on the generation of adult form. Determining how constructional and energetic demands operate throughout growth is es­sential to understanding fundamental growth rules and trade‐offs that define the framework within which new species originate. In organisms producing spiral shells, coiling patterns can inform on the constructional constraints acting throughout development that dictated the diversification of forms within a group. Here, we use Synchrotron radiation X‐Ray tomographic microscopy (SRXTM) reconstructions of eight planktic foraminifera repre­sentative of the major morphotypic groups to determine disparity of coiling patterns by measuring Raupian parameters. The results show that foraminifera are a morphologically highly conservative group, exploiting a limited range of poten­tial coiling patterns. Very similar coiling patterns during early ontogeny, regardless of species, point toward strong constraints in early ontogeny and to common develop­mental processes acting across all morphogroups. Dispersion and lateral displacement of taxa in morphospace are limited to the adult stage. Accretion with low translation down the coiling axis in juveniles may maximize lateral growth and metabolic efficiency in light of costly calcification. Increased translation in the adult stages allows growth to accommo­date new chamber shapes, mediated by changes in aperture location and the site of accretion over ontogeny. These constructional constraints, and the accretion of a small number of discrete chambers, limit the potential for novel forms within the foraminifera compared to other groups of coiling organisms and may explain the repeated evolution of similar morphotypes throughout the evolutionary history of the group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-142X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ede.12224</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28463472</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Biological Evolution ; Biometry ; Foraminifera - classification ; Foraminifera - cytology ; Foraminifera - genetics ; Microscopy - methods ; Phylogeny</subject><ispartof>Evolution &amp; development, 2017-05, Vol.19 (3), p.157-168</ispartof><rights>2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3834-1c1981d5ffb7f34ee174e216d9fab17f7beec24c0a2cbda6335fe02ea5ffa7043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3834-1c1981d5ffb7f34ee174e216d9fab17f7beec24c0a2cbda6335fe02ea5ffa7043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fede.12224$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fede.12224$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28463472$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Caromel, Aude G. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Daniela N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rayfield, Emily J.</creatorcontrib><title>Ontogenetic constraints on foraminiferal test construction</title><title>Evolution &amp; development</title><addtitle>Evol Dev</addtitle><description>Developmental processes represent one of the main constraints on the generation of adult form. Determining how constructional and energetic demands operate throughout growth is es­sential to understanding fundamental growth rules and trade‐offs that define the framework within which new species originate. In organisms producing spiral shells, coiling patterns can inform on the constructional constraints acting throughout development that dictated the diversification of forms within a group. Here, we use Synchrotron radiation X‐Ray tomographic microscopy (SRXTM) reconstructions of eight planktic foraminifera repre­sentative of the major morphotypic groups to determine disparity of coiling patterns by measuring Raupian parameters. The results show that foraminifera are a morphologically highly conservative group, exploiting a limited range of poten­tial coiling patterns. Very similar coiling patterns during early ontogeny, regardless of species, point toward strong constraints in early ontogeny and to common develop­mental processes acting across all morphogroups. Dispersion and lateral displacement of taxa in morphospace are limited to the adult stage. Accretion with low translation down the coiling axis in juveniles may maximize lateral growth and metabolic efficiency in light of costly calcification. Increased translation in the adult stages allows growth to accommo­date new chamber shapes, mediated by changes in aperture location and the site of accretion over ontogeny. These constructional constraints, and the accretion of a small number of discrete chambers, limit the potential for novel forms within the foraminifera compared to other groups of coiling organisms and may explain the repeated evolution of similar morphotypes throughout the evolutionary history of the group.</description><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Biometry</subject><subject>Foraminifera - classification</subject><subject>Foraminifera - cytology</subject><subject>Foraminifera - genetics</subject><subject>Microscopy - methods</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><issn>1520-541X</issn><issn>1525-142X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EoqUw8AdQRhhCfY7TpGyolA-pUheQulmOc0ZGiV3sRKj_HtMUNm64u-G5R6eXkEugtxBrijXeAmOMH5Ex5CxPgbPN8X6nac5hMyJnIXxQCgVn81MyYiWfZbxgY3K3tp17R4udUYlyNnReGtuFxNlEOy9bY41GL5ukw9AdiF51xtlzcqJlE_DiMCfk7XH5unhOV-unl8X9KpVZmfEUFMxLqHOtq0JnHDE-gQxm9VzLCgpdVIiKcUUlU1UtZ1mWa6QMZbyQBeXZhFwP3q13n338QrQmKGwaadH1QUA553lsBUT0ZkCVdyF41GLrTSv9TgAVP1GJGJXYRxXZq4O2r1qs_8jfbCIwHYAv0-Duf5NYPiwH5Te8b3P0</recordid><startdate>201705</startdate><enddate>201705</enddate><creator>Caromel, Aude G. M.</creator><creator>Schmidt, Daniela N.</creator><creator>Rayfield, Emily J.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201705</creationdate><title>Ontogenetic constraints on foraminiferal test construction</title><author>Caromel, Aude G. M. ; Schmidt, Daniela N. ; Rayfield, Emily J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3834-1c1981d5ffb7f34ee174e216d9fab17f7beec24c0a2cbda6335fe02ea5ffa7043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Biometry</topic><topic>Foraminifera - classification</topic><topic>Foraminifera - cytology</topic><topic>Foraminifera - genetics</topic><topic>Microscopy - methods</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caromel, Aude G. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Daniela N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rayfield, Emily J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Evolution &amp; development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caromel, Aude G. M.</au><au>Schmidt, Daniela N.</au><au>Rayfield, Emily J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ontogenetic constraints on foraminiferal test construction</atitle><jtitle>Evolution &amp; development</jtitle><addtitle>Evol Dev</addtitle><date>2017-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>168</epage><pages>157-168</pages><issn>1520-541X</issn><eissn>1525-142X</eissn><abstract>Developmental processes represent one of the main constraints on the generation of adult form. Determining how constructional and energetic demands operate throughout growth is es­sential to understanding fundamental growth rules and trade‐offs that define the framework within which new species originate. In organisms producing spiral shells, coiling patterns can inform on the constructional constraints acting throughout development that dictated the diversification of forms within a group. Here, we use Synchrotron radiation X‐Ray tomographic microscopy (SRXTM) reconstructions of eight planktic foraminifera repre­sentative of the major morphotypic groups to determine disparity of coiling patterns by measuring Raupian parameters. The results show that foraminifera are a morphologically highly conservative group, exploiting a limited range of poten­tial coiling patterns. Very similar coiling patterns during early ontogeny, regardless of species, point toward strong constraints in early ontogeny and to common develop­mental processes acting across all morphogroups. Dispersion and lateral displacement of taxa in morphospace are limited to the adult stage. Accretion with low translation down the coiling axis in juveniles may maximize lateral growth and metabolic efficiency in light of costly calcification. Increased translation in the adult stages allows growth to accommo­date new chamber shapes, mediated by changes in aperture location and the site of accretion over ontogeny. These constructional constraints, and the accretion of a small number of discrete chambers, limit the potential for novel forms within the foraminifera compared to other groups of coiling organisms and may explain the repeated evolution of similar morphotypes throughout the evolutionary history of the group.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>28463472</pmid><doi>10.1111/ede.12224</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1520-541X
ispartof Evolution & development, 2017-05, Vol.19 (3), p.157-168
issn 1520-541X
1525-142X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1894518971
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Biological Evolution
Biometry
Foraminifera - classification
Foraminifera - cytology
Foraminifera - genetics
Microscopy - methods
Phylogeny
title Ontogenetic constraints on foraminiferal test construction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T08%3A40%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ontogenetic%20constraints%20on%20foraminiferal%20test%20construction&rft.jtitle=Evolution%20&%20development&rft.au=Caromel,%20Aude%20G.%20M.&rft.date=2017-05&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=168&rft.pages=157-168&rft.issn=1520-541X&rft.eissn=1525-142X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ede.12224&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1894518971%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1894518971&rft_id=info:pmid/28463472&rfr_iscdi=true