Corneal Surgery in the Flying Eye Hospital: Characteristics and Visual Outcome

Abstract Objective The Flying Eye Hospital (FEH) of ORBIS International is a capacity-building platform that trains ophthalmologists throughout the developing world on-board a fully functional eye hospital based in an airplane and in the local hospitals of developing countries. Corneal blindness (CB...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of ophthalmology 2017-04, Vol.52 (2), p.161-165
Hauptverfasser: Hussain Farooqui, Javed, DNB, Sharifi, Emile, MD, Gomaa, Ahmed, MSc, PhD, FRCS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 165
container_issue 2
container_start_page 161
container_title Canadian journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 52
creator Hussain Farooqui, Javed, DNB
Sharifi, Emile, MD
Gomaa, Ahmed, MSc, PhD, FRCS
description Abstract Objective The Flying Eye Hospital (FEH) of ORBIS International is a capacity-building platform that trains ophthalmologists throughout the developing world on-board a fully functional eye hospital based in an airplane and in the local hospitals of developing countries. Corneal blindness (CB) is the second leading cause of blindness in most developing countries. Treatment of existing global CB requires effective eye banking and surgeons trained in corneal transplant. ORBIS International has programs that addressed both those needs. This study reports the clinical outcome of all keratoplasty training programs of the FEH from January 2010 to December 2014. Methods Surveys were sent to all local ophthalmologists trained on FEH to perform keratoplasty in the relevant time period. The survey included patient demographics, procedure performed, indications for surgery, postoperative steroid regiment, and visual acuity (VA). Results Keratoplasty was undertaken in 87 eyes as follows: penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in 66 (75.9% of our population), deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in 6 (6.9%), Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) in 14 (16.1%), and Boston keratoprosthesis (KP) in 1 (1.1%). Corneal clouding was the indication in 83 (95.4%) of patients. Forty-seven (54%) patients returned for long-term care with the mean follow-up (FU) of 32.0 months (range 6–60 months). Thirteen (27.7%) were not using any steroids at last the FU. Eleven (23.4%) patients had signs of graft rejection. Best-corrected VA in meters and feet, respectively, was 6/6 to 6/18 (20/20 to 20/60) in 12 (25.5%) patients, 6/18 to 6/60 (20/60 to 20/200) in 19 (40.4%) patients, 6/60 to 3/60 (20/200 to 20/400) in 4 (8.5%) patients, and less than 3/60 (20/400) in 12 (25.5%) patients. Conclusion Clinical outcomes delivered by FEH keratoplasty training are acceptable compared to results in the developing world and to some reports of training programs in the developed world, though our study is limited by its retrospective nature and the poor rate of FU.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.11.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893967797</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0008418216300047</els_id><sourcerecordid>1893967797</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-220c5376b940369d21d645fdbe29d822b927302eb3c13963559ea70a3f405e623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFO3DAQhi3UCraUF-CAfOwlqcdO7ARVSGgFBQmVAy1Xy3FmwSEbL3ZSKW9fR0t74NCLZw7_90v-hpBTYDkwkF-7vLOdz3nac4CcMX5AVqCgzISQ7ANZMcaqrICKH5FPMXaMCaEKeUiOeFWUKj0r8mPtw4Cmpw9TeMIwUzfQ8RnpdT-74YlezUhvfNy50fTndP1sgrEjBhdHZyM1Q0sfXZwSfj-N1m_xM_m4MX3Ek7d5TH5dX_1c32R3999v15d3mS0AxoxzZkuhZFMXTMi65dDKoty0DfK6rThvaq4E49gIC6KWoixrNIoZsSlYiZKLY_Jl37sL_nXCOOqtixb73gzop6ihqhOnVK1SlO-jNvgYA270LritCbMGphePutOLR7141AA6eUzQ2Vv_1Gyx_Yf8FZcC3_YBTL_87TDoaB0OFlsX0I669e7__RfvcNu7wVnTv-CMsfNTGJI_DTpyzfTDcsnlkCBFWgsl_gBhKpbW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1893967797</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Corneal Surgery in the Flying Eye Hospital: Characteristics and Visual Outcome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hussain Farooqui, Javed, DNB ; Sharifi, Emile, MD ; Gomaa, Ahmed, MSc, PhD, FRCS</creator><creatorcontrib>Hussain Farooqui, Javed, DNB ; Sharifi, Emile, MD ; Gomaa, Ahmed, MSc, PhD, FRCS</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective The Flying Eye Hospital (FEH) of ORBIS International is a capacity-building platform that trains ophthalmologists throughout the developing world on-board a fully functional eye hospital based in an airplane and in the local hospitals of developing countries. Corneal blindness (CB) is the second leading cause of blindness in most developing countries. Treatment of existing global CB requires effective eye banking and surgeons trained in corneal transplant. ORBIS International has programs that addressed both those needs. This study reports the clinical outcome of all keratoplasty training programs of the FEH from January 2010 to December 2014. Methods Surveys were sent to all local ophthalmologists trained on FEH to perform keratoplasty in the relevant time period. The survey included patient demographics, procedure performed, indications for surgery, postoperative steroid regiment, and visual acuity (VA). Results Keratoplasty was undertaken in 87 eyes as follows: penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in 66 (75.9% of our population), deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in 6 (6.9%), Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) in 14 (16.1%), and Boston keratoprosthesis (KP) in 1 (1.1%). Corneal clouding was the indication in 83 (95.4%) of patients. Forty-seven (54%) patients returned for long-term care with the mean follow-up (FU) of 32.0 months (range 6–60 months). Thirteen (27.7%) were not using any steroids at last the FU. Eleven (23.4%) patients had signs of graft rejection. Best-corrected VA in meters and feet, respectively, was 6/6 to 6/18 (20/20 to 20/60) in 12 (25.5%) patients, 6/18 to 6/60 (20/60 to 20/200) in 19 (40.4%) patients, 6/60 to 3/60 (20/200 to 20/400) in 4 (8.5%) patients, and less than 3/60 (20/400) in 12 (25.5%) patients. Conclusion Clinical outcomes delivered by FEH keratoplasty training are acceptable compared to results in the developing world and to some reports of training programs in the developed world, though our study is limited by its retrospective nature and the poor rate of FU.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-4182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1715-3360</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.11.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28457284</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Child ; Corneal Diseases - surgery ; Education, Medical, Graduate - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; International Cooperation ; Keratoplasty, Penetrating - education ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Ophthalmology ; Ophthalmology - education ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of ophthalmology, 2017-04, Vol.52 (2), p.161-165</ispartof><rights>Canadian Ophthalmological Society</rights><rights>2017 Canadian Ophthalmological Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Canadian Ophthalmological Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-220c5376b940369d21d645fdbe29d822b927302eb3c13963559ea70a3f405e623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-220c5376b940369d21d645fdbe29d822b927302eb3c13963559ea70a3f405e623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0008418216300047$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28457284$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hussain Farooqui, Javed, DNB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharifi, Emile, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomaa, Ahmed, MSc, PhD, FRCS</creatorcontrib><title>Corneal Surgery in the Flying Eye Hospital: Characteristics and Visual Outcome</title><title>Canadian journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Can J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective The Flying Eye Hospital (FEH) of ORBIS International is a capacity-building platform that trains ophthalmologists throughout the developing world on-board a fully functional eye hospital based in an airplane and in the local hospitals of developing countries. Corneal blindness (CB) is the second leading cause of blindness in most developing countries. Treatment of existing global CB requires effective eye banking and surgeons trained in corneal transplant. ORBIS International has programs that addressed both those needs. This study reports the clinical outcome of all keratoplasty training programs of the FEH from January 2010 to December 2014. Methods Surveys were sent to all local ophthalmologists trained on FEH to perform keratoplasty in the relevant time period. The survey included patient demographics, procedure performed, indications for surgery, postoperative steroid regiment, and visual acuity (VA). Results Keratoplasty was undertaken in 87 eyes as follows: penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in 66 (75.9% of our population), deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in 6 (6.9%), Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) in 14 (16.1%), and Boston keratoprosthesis (KP) in 1 (1.1%). Corneal clouding was the indication in 83 (95.4%) of patients. Forty-seven (54%) patients returned for long-term care with the mean follow-up (FU) of 32.0 months (range 6–60 months). Thirteen (27.7%) were not using any steroids at last the FU. Eleven (23.4%) patients had signs of graft rejection. Best-corrected VA in meters and feet, respectively, was 6/6 to 6/18 (20/20 to 20/60) in 12 (25.5%) patients, 6/18 to 6/60 (20/60 to 20/200) in 19 (40.4%) patients, 6/60 to 3/60 (20/200 to 20/400) in 4 (8.5%) patients, and less than 3/60 (20/400) in 12 (25.5%) patients. Conclusion Clinical outcomes delivered by FEH keratoplasty training are acceptable compared to results in the developing world and to some reports of training programs in the developed world, though our study is limited by its retrospective nature and the poor rate of FU.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Corneal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Graduate - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Keratoplasty, Penetrating - education</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Ophthalmology - education</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0008-4182</issn><issn>1715-3360</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFO3DAQhi3UCraUF-CAfOwlqcdO7ARVSGgFBQmVAy1Xy3FmwSEbL3ZSKW9fR0t74NCLZw7_90v-hpBTYDkwkF-7vLOdz3nac4CcMX5AVqCgzISQ7ANZMcaqrICKH5FPMXaMCaEKeUiOeFWUKj0r8mPtw4Cmpw9TeMIwUzfQ8RnpdT-74YlezUhvfNy50fTndP1sgrEjBhdHZyM1Q0sfXZwSfj-N1m_xM_m4MX3Ek7d5TH5dX_1c32R3999v15d3mS0AxoxzZkuhZFMXTMi65dDKoty0DfK6rThvaq4E49gIC6KWoixrNIoZsSlYiZKLY_Jl37sL_nXCOOqtixb73gzop6ihqhOnVK1SlO-jNvgYA270LritCbMGphePutOLR7141AA6eUzQ2Vv_1Gyx_Yf8FZcC3_YBTL_87TDoaB0OFlsX0I669e7__RfvcNu7wVnTv-CMsfNTGJI_DTpyzfTDcsnlkCBFWgsl_gBhKpbW</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Hussain Farooqui, Javed, DNB</creator><creator>Sharifi, Emile, MD</creator><creator>Gomaa, Ahmed, MSc, PhD, FRCS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Corneal Surgery in the Flying Eye Hospital: Characteristics and Visual Outcome</title><author>Hussain Farooqui, Javed, DNB ; Sharifi, Emile, MD ; Gomaa, Ahmed, MSc, PhD, FRCS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-220c5376b940369d21d645fdbe29d822b927302eb3c13963559ea70a3f405e623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Corneal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Graduate - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Keratoplasty, Penetrating - education</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Ophthalmology - education</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hussain Farooqui, Javed, DNB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharifi, Emile, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomaa, Ahmed, MSc, PhD, FRCS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hussain Farooqui, Javed, DNB</au><au>Sharifi, Emile, MD</au><au>Gomaa, Ahmed, MSc, PhD, FRCS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Corneal Surgery in the Flying Eye Hospital: Characteristics and Visual Outcome</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>161-165</pages><issn>0008-4182</issn><eissn>1715-3360</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective The Flying Eye Hospital (FEH) of ORBIS International is a capacity-building platform that trains ophthalmologists throughout the developing world on-board a fully functional eye hospital based in an airplane and in the local hospitals of developing countries. Corneal blindness (CB) is the second leading cause of blindness in most developing countries. Treatment of existing global CB requires effective eye banking and surgeons trained in corneal transplant. ORBIS International has programs that addressed both those needs. This study reports the clinical outcome of all keratoplasty training programs of the FEH from January 2010 to December 2014. Methods Surveys were sent to all local ophthalmologists trained on FEH to perform keratoplasty in the relevant time period. The survey included patient demographics, procedure performed, indications for surgery, postoperative steroid regiment, and visual acuity (VA). Results Keratoplasty was undertaken in 87 eyes as follows: penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in 66 (75.9% of our population), deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in 6 (6.9%), Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) in 14 (16.1%), and Boston keratoprosthesis (KP) in 1 (1.1%). Corneal clouding was the indication in 83 (95.4%) of patients. Forty-seven (54%) patients returned for long-term care with the mean follow-up (FU) of 32.0 months (range 6–60 months). Thirteen (27.7%) were not using any steroids at last the FU. Eleven (23.4%) patients had signs of graft rejection. Best-corrected VA in meters and feet, respectively, was 6/6 to 6/18 (20/20 to 20/60) in 12 (25.5%) patients, 6/18 to 6/60 (20/60 to 20/200) in 19 (40.4%) patients, 6/60 to 3/60 (20/200 to 20/400) in 4 (8.5%) patients, and less than 3/60 (20/400) in 12 (25.5%) patients. Conclusion Clinical outcomes delivered by FEH keratoplasty training are acceptable compared to results in the developing world and to some reports of training programs in the developed world, though our study is limited by its retrospective nature and the poor rate of FU.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28457284</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.11.002</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-4182
ispartof Canadian journal of ophthalmology, 2017-04, Vol.52 (2), p.161-165
issn 0008-4182
1715-3360
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893967797
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Child
Corneal Diseases - surgery
Education, Medical, Graduate - methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Internal Medicine
International Cooperation
Keratoplasty, Penetrating - education
Male
Middle Aged
Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology - education
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
Young Adult
title Corneal Surgery in the Flying Eye Hospital: Characteristics and Visual Outcome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T19%3A14%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Corneal%20Surgery%20in%20the%20Flying%20Eye%20Hospital:%20Characteristics%20and%20Visual%20Outcome&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Hussain%20Farooqui,%20Javed,%20DNB&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=161-165&rft.issn=0008-4182&rft.eissn=1715-3360&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.11.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1893967797%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1893967797&rft_id=info:pmid/28457284&rft_els_id=S0008418216300047&rfr_iscdi=true