Syncope in Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation

Syncope prognosis varies widely: 1 year mortality may range from 0% in the case of vasovagal events up to 30% in the presence of heart disease. To assess the outcomes and prognosis of patients with implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) and indication of primary prevention and compare patients pres...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Israel Medical Association journal 2017-01, Vol.19 (1), p.15-18
Hauptverfasser: Goldenberg, Gustavo, Bental, Tamir, Kadmon, Udi, Zabarsky, Ronit, Kusnick, Jairo, Barsheshet, Alon, Golovchiner, Gregory, Strasberg, Boris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 18
container_issue 1
container_start_page 15
container_title The Israel Medical Association journal
container_volume 19
creator Goldenberg, Gustavo
Bental, Tamir
Kadmon, Udi
Zabarsky, Ronit
Kusnick, Jairo
Barsheshet, Alon
Golovchiner, Gregory
Strasberg, Boris
description Syncope prognosis varies widely: 1 year mortality may range from 0% in the case of vasovagal events up to 30% in the presence of heart disease. To assess the outcomes and prognosis of patients with implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) and indication of primary prevention and compare patients presenting with or without prior syncope. We reviewed the charts of 75 patients who underwent ICD implantation with the indication of primary prevention and history of syncope and compared them to a control group of 80 patients without prior syncope. We assessed the number of ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), shock, anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP), and death in each group during the follow-up. Mean follow-up was 893 days (810-976, 95% confidence interval) (no difference between groups). Patients with prior syncope had a higher ejection fraction (EF) (35.5 ± 12.6 vs. 31.4 ± 8.76, P = 0.02), more episodes of VT (21.3% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.001) and VF (8% vs. 0%, P = 0.01) and also received more electric shocks (18.7% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.004) and ATP (17.3% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.031). There were no differences in inappropriate shocks (6.7% vs. 5%, P = 0.74), in cardiovascular mortality (cumulative 5 year estimate 29.9% vs. 32.2% P = 0.97) and any death (cumulative 5 year estimate 38.1% vs. 48.9% P = 0.18) during the follow-up. Syncopal patients before ICD implantation seem to have more episodes of VT/VF and shock or ATP. No mortality differences were observed.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893967707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1893967707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-80c177892568f8e87575d9e2bafde0c3e656196bc1da9373740fad40fa59cc6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtPwzAQhH0A0VL4CyhHLpHsuH4dUXhVqgQIOEeOvZaMEifYTqX-e1K15TJzmG9Xu3OBloRxVhIs5QJdp_SDccUYVldoUck1E3OwRB-f-2CGEQofivfoex33s8MOQvZDKDb92OmQddtBUeto_bCDmCEWj-B8G33X6TzEf-wwc4Mune4S3J58hb6fn77q13L79rKpH7blWBGSS4kNEUKqinHpJEjBBLMKqlY7C9hQ4IwTxVtDrFZUULHGTtuDMGUMd3SF7o97xzj8TpBy0_tkYL4owDClhkhFFRcCixm9O6FT24NtxuOjzbkG-geU51lT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1893967707</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Syncope in Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Goldenberg, Gustavo ; Bental, Tamir ; Kadmon, Udi ; Zabarsky, Ronit ; Kusnick, Jairo ; Barsheshet, Alon ; Golovchiner, Gregory ; Strasberg, Boris</creator><creatorcontrib>Goldenberg, Gustavo ; Bental, Tamir ; Kadmon, Udi ; Zabarsky, Ronit ; Kusnick, Jairo ; Barsheshet, Alon ; Golovchiner, Gregory ; Strasberg, Boris</creatorcontrib><description>Syncope prognosis varies widely: 1 year mortality may range from 0% in the case of vasovagal events up to 30% in the presence of heart disease. To assess the outcomes and prognosis of patients with implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) and indication of primary prevention and compare patients presenting with or without prior syncope. We reviewed the charts of 75 patients who underwent ICD implantation with the indication of primary prevention and history of syncope and compared them to a control group of 80 patients without prior syncope. We assessed the number of ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), shock, anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP), and death in each group during the follow-up. Mean follow-up was 893 days (810-976, 95% confidence interval) (no difference between groups). Patients with prior syncope had a higher ejection fraction (EF) (35.5 ± 12.6 vs. 31.4 ± 8.76, P = 0.02), more episodes of VT (21.3% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.001) and VF (8% vs. 0%, P = 0.01) and also received more electric shocks (18.7% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.004) and ATP (17.3% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.031). There were no differences in inappropriate shocks (6.7% vs. 5%, P = 0.74), in cardiovascular mortality (cumulative 5 year estimate 29.9% vs. 32.2% P = 0.97) and any death (cumulative 5 year estimate 38.1% vs. 48.9% P = 0.18) during the follow-up. Syncopal patients before ICD implantation seem to have more episodes of VT/VF and shock or ATP. No mortality differences were observed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1565-1088</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28457108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Israel</publisher><subject>Aged ; Case-Control Studies ; Death, Sudden, Cardiac - prevention &amp; control ; Defibrillators, Implantable ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Primary Prevention ; Retrospective Studies ; Stroke Volume ; Syncope - complications ; Syncope - prevention &amp; control ; Tachycardia, Ventricular - complications ; Ventricular Fibrillation - complications</subject><ispartof>The Israel Medical Association journal, 2017-01, Vol.19 (1), p.15-18</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28457108$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goldenberg, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bental, Tamir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadmon, Udi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zabarsky, Ronit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusnick, Jairo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barsheshet, Alon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golovchiner, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strasberg, Boris</creatorcontrib><title>Syncope in Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation</title><title>The Israel Medical Association journal</title><addtitle>Isr Med Assoc J</addtitle><description>Syncope prognosis varies widely: 1 year mortality may range from 0% in the case of vasovagal events up to 30% in the presence of heart disease. To assess the outcomes and prognosis of patients with implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) and indication of primary prevention and compare patients presenting with or without prior syncope. We reviewed the charts of 75 patients who underwent ICD implantation with the indication of primary prevention and history of syncope and compared them to a control group of 80 patients without prior syncope. We assessed the number of ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), shock, anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP), and death in each group during the follow-up. Mean follow-up was 893 days (810-976, 95% confidence interval) (no difference between groups). Patients with prior syncope had a higher ejection fraction (EF) (35.5 ± 12.6 vs. 31.4 ± 8.76, P = 0.02), more episodes of VT (21.3% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.001) and VF (8% vs. 0%, P = 0.01) and also received more electric shocks (18.7% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.004) and ATP (17.3% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.031). There were no differences in inappropriate shocks (6.7% vs. 5%, P = 0.74), in cardiovascular mortality (cumulative 5 year estimate 29.9% vs. 32.2% P = 0.97) and any death (cumulative 5 year estimate 38.1% vs. 48.9% P = 0.18) during the follow-up. Syncopal patients before ICD implantation seem to have more episodes of VT/VF and shock or ATP. No mortality differences were observed.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Death, Sudden, Cardiac - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Defibrillators, Implantable</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Primary Prevention</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stroke Volume</subject><subject>Syncope - complications</subject><subject>Syncope - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Ventricular - complications</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - complications</subject><issn>1565-1088</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtPwzAQhH0A0VL4CyhHLpHsuH4dUXhVqgQIOEeOvZaMEifYTqX-e1K15TJzmG9Xu3OBloRxVhIs5QJdp_SDccUYVldoUck1E3OwRB-f-2CGEQofivfoex33s8MOQvZDKDb92OmQddtBUeto_bCDmCEWj-B8G33X6TzEf-wwc4Mune4S3J58hb6fn77q13L79rKpH7blWBGSS4kNEUKqinHpJEjBBLMKqlY7C9hQ4IwTxVtDrFZUULHGTtuDMGUMd3SF7o97xzj8TpBy0_tkYL4owDClhkhFFRcCixm9O6FT24NtxuOjzbkG-geU51lT</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Goldenberg, Gustavo</creator><creator>Bental, Tamir</creator><creator>Kadmon, Udi</creator><creator>Zabarsky, Ronit</creator><creator>Kusnick, Jairo</creator><creator>Barsheshet, Alon</creator><creator>Golovchiner, Gregory</creator><creator>Strasberg, Boris</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Syncope in Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation</title><author>Goldenberg, Gustavo ; Bental, Tamir ; Kadmon, Udi ; Zabarsky, Ronit ; Kusnick, Jairo ; Barsheshet, Alon ; Golovchiner, Gregory ; Strasberg, Boris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-80c177892568f8e87575d9e2bafde0c3e656196bc1da9373740fad40fa59cc6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Death, Sudden, Cardiac - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Defibrillators, Implantable</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Primary Prevention</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stroke Volume</topic><topic>Syncope - complications</topic><topic>Syncope - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Ventricular - complications</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - complications</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldenberg, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bental, Tamir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadmon, Udi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zabarsky, Ronit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusnick, Jairo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barsheshet, Alon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golovchiner, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strasberg, Boris</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Israel Medical Association journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldenberg, Gustavo</au><au>Bental, Tamir</au><au>Kadmon, Udi</au><au>Zabarsky, Ronit</au><au>Kusnick, Jairo</au><au>Barsheshet, Alon</au><au>Golovchiner, Gregory</au><au>Strasberg, Boris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Syncope in Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation</atitle><jtitle>The Israel Medical Association journal</jtitle><addtitle>Isr Med Assoc J</addtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>15-18</pages><issn>1565-1088</issn><abstract>Syncope prognosis varies widely: 1 year mortality may range from 0% in the case of vasovagal events up to 30% in the presence of heart disease. To assess the outcomes and prognosis of patients with implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) and indication of primary prevention and compare patients presenting with or without prior syncope. We reviewed the charts of 75 patients who underwent ICD implantation with the indication of primary prevention and history of syncope and compared them to a control group of 80 patients without prior syncope. We assessed the number of ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), shock, anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP), and death in each group during the follow-up. Mean follow-up was 893 days (810-976, 95% confidence interval) (no difference between groups). Patients with prior syncope had a higher ejection fraction (EF) (35.5 ± 12.6 vs. 31.4 ± 8.76, P = 0.02), more episodes of VT (21.3% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.001) and VF (8% vs. 0%, P = 0.01) and also received more electric shocks (18.7% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.004) and ATP (17.3% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.031). There were no differences in inappropriate shocks (6.7% vs. 5%, P = 0.74), in cardiovascular mortality (cumulative 5 year estimate 29.9% vs. 32.2% P = 0.97) and any death (cumulative 5 year estimate 38.1% vs. 48.9% P = 0.18) during the follow-up. Syncopal patients before ICD implantation seem to have more episodes of VT/VF and shock or ATP. No mortality differences were observed.</abstract><cop>Israel</cop><pmid>28457108</pmid><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1565-1088
ispartof The Israel Medical Association journal, 2017-01, Vol.19 (1), p.15-18
issn 1565-1088
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893967707
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Aged
Case-Control Studies
Death, Sudden, Cardiac - prevention & control
Defibrillators, Implantable
Female
Humans
Male
Primary Prevention
Retrospective Studies
Stroke Volume
Syncope - complications
Syncope - prevention & control
Tachycardia, Ventricular - complications
Ventricular Fibrillation - complications
title Syncope in Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T19%3A51%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Syncope%20in%20Primary%20Prevention%20Implantable%20Cardioverter%20Defibrillator%20Implantation&rft.jtitle=The%20Israel%20Medical%20Association%20journal&rft.au=Goldenberg,%20Gustavo&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=15-18&rft.issn=1565-1088&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1893967707%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1893967707&rft_id=info:pmid/28457108&rfr_iscdi=true