Repair vs replacement of direct composite restorations: a survey of teaching and operative techniques in Oceania

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the teaching and operative techniques for the repair and/or replacement of direct resin-based composite restorations (DCRs) in dental schools in Oceania. Methods A 14-item questionnaire was mailed to the heads of operative dentistry in 16 dental schools in Oceania (Au...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dentistry 2017-04, Vol.59, p.62-67
Hauptverfasser: Brunton, Paul. A, Ghazali, Amna, Tarif, Zahidah H, Loch, Carolina, Lynch, Christopher, Wilson, Nairn, Blum, Igor R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 67
container_issue
container_start_page 62
container_title Journal of dentistry
container_volume 59
creator Brunton, Paul. A
Ghazali, Amna
Tarif, Zahidah H
Loch, Carolina
Lynch, Christopher
Wilson, Nairn
Blum, Igor R
description Abstract Objectives To evaluate the teaching and operative techniques for the repair and/or replacement of direct resin-based composite restorations (DCRs) in dental schools in Oceania. Methods A 14-item questionnaire was mailed to the heads of operative dentistry in 16 dental schools in Oceania (Australia, New Zealand, Fiji and Papua New Guinea). The survey asked whether the repair of DCRs was taught within the curriculum; the rationale behind the teaching; how techniques were taught, indications for repair, operative techniques, materials used, patient acceptability, expected longevity and recall systems. Results All 16 schools participated in the study. Thirteen (81%) reported the teaching of composite repairs as an alternative to replacement. Most schools taught the theoretical and practical aspects of repair at a clinical level only. All 13 schools (100%) agreed on tooth substance preservation being the main reason for teaching repair. The main indications for repair were marginal defects (100%), followed by secondary caries (69%). All 13 schools that performed repairs reported high patient acceptability, and considered it a definitive measure. Only three schools (23%) claimed to have a recall system in place following repair of DCRs. Most respondents either did not know or did not answer when asked about the longevity of DCRs. Conclusions Repair of DCRs seems to be a viable alternative to replacement, which is actively taught within Oceania. Advantages include it being minimally invasive, preserving tooth structure, and time and money saving. However, standardised guidelines need to be developed and further clinical long-term studies need to be carried out. Clinical significance The decision between replacing or repairing a defective composite restoration tends to be based on what clinicians have been taught, tempered by experience and judgement. This study investigated the current status of teaching and operative techniques of repair of direct composite restorations in dental schools in Oceania.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893904177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0300571217300386</els_id><sourcerecordid>1893904177</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-b04d43dcbd9e16d00a19545bdd68817a229e99b3d4cbb498d9cd80fdbafb89083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkluL1TAUhYsozpnRXyBIwBdfWnfSWyIoyDBeYGDAC_gW0mTXSW2TTtIeOP_e1DMqzIvzlJB8a-3srJ1lzygUFGjzaigGg24pGNC2AFYAhQfZjvJW5LRtvj_MdlAC5HVL2Ul2GuMAABUw8Tg7YZyVDDjbZfNnnJUNZB9JwHlUGqfkSXxPjA2oF6L9NPtoF0z3cfFBLda7-JooEtewx8OGLqj0tXU_iHKG-Bk3aI_pWF87e7NiJNaRK43KWfUke9SrMeLT2_Us-_b-4uv5x_zy6sOn83eXua6BL3kHlalKozsjkDYGQFFRV3VnTMM5bRVjAoXoSlPprqsEN0IbDr3pVN9xAbw8y14efefgtycscrJR4zgqh36NknJRCqho294DTRXrkgO7B9qymjNom4S-uIMOfg0u9bxRnNfAapGo8kjp4GMM2Ms52EmFg6Qgt5jlIH_HLLeYJTCZYk6q57feazeh-av5k2sC3hwBTF-8txhk1BadxmOq0nj7nwJv7-j1aJ3VavyJB4z_OpExCeSXbdK2QaNt2pS8KX8BW1TO8Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1878850259</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Repair vs replacement of direct composite restorations: a survey of teaching and operative techniques in Oceania</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Brunton, Paul. A ; Ghazali, Amna ; Tarif, Zahidah H ; Loch, Carolina ; Lynch, Christopher ; Wilson, Nairn ; Blum, Igor R</creator><creatorcontrib>Brunton, Paul. A ; Ghazali, Amna ; Tarif, Zahidah H ; Loch, Carolina ; Lynch, Christopher ; Wilson, Nairn ; Blum, Igor R</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives To evaluate the teaching and operative techniques for the repair and/or replacement of direct resin-based composite restorations (DCRs) in dental schools in Oceania. Methods A 14-item questionnaire was mailed to the heads of operative dentistry in 16 dental schools in Oceania (Australia, New Zealand, Fiji and Papua New Guinea). The survey asked whether the repair of DCRs was taught within the curriculum; the rationale behind the teaching; how techniques were taught, indications for repair, operative techniques, materials used, patient acceptability, expected longevity and recall systems. Results All 16 schools participated in the study. Thirteen (81%) reported the teaching of composite repairs as an alternative to replacement. Most schools taught the theoretical and practical aspects of repair at a clinical level only. All 13 schools (100%) agreed on tooth substance preservation being the main reason for teaching repair. The main indications for repair were marginal defects (100%), followed by secondary caries (69%). All 13 schools that performed repairs reported high patient acceptability, and considered it a definitive measure. Only three schools (23%) claimed to have a recall system in place following repair of DCRs. Most respondents either did not know or did not answer when asked about the longevity of DCRs. Conclusions Repair of DCRs seems to be a viable alternative to replacement, which is actively taught within Oceania. Advantages include it being minimally invasive, preserving tooth structure, and time and money saving. However, standardised guidelines need to be developed and further clinical long-term studies need to be carried out. Clinical significance The decision between replacing or repairing a defective composite restoration tends to be based on what clinicians have been taught, tempered by experience and judgement. This study investigated the current status of teaching and operative techniques of repair of direct composite restorations in dental schools in Oceania.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-5712</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-176X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28232082</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Australia ; Composite materials ; Composite Resins - chemistry ; Curricula ; Curriculum ; Dental Bonding ; Dental Caries ; Dental materials ; Dental Materials - chemistry ; Dental Restoration Failure ; Dental Restoration Repair - methods ; Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods ; Dental schools ; Dentistry ; Dentistry, Operative - education ; Education, Dental ; Humans ; New Zealand ; Oceania ; Patients ; Questionnaires ; Recall ; Repair ; Restoration ; Restorative dentistry ; Retreatment ; Schools, Dental - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teaching ; Teeth ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Journal of dentistry, 2017-04, Vol.59, p.62-67</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Apr 01, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-b04d43dcbd9e16d00a19545bdd68817a229e99b3d4cbb498d9cd80fdbafb89083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-b04d43dcbd9e16d00a19545bdd68817a229e99b3d4cbb498d9cd80fdbafb89083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571217300386$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28232082$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brunton, Paul. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghazali, Amna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarif, Zahidah H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loch, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Nairn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blum, Igor R</creatorcontrib><title>Repair vs replacement of direct composite restorations: a survey of teaching and operative techniques in Oceania</title><title>Journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives To evaluate the teaching and operative techniques for the repair and/or replacement of direct resin-based composite restorations (DCRs) in dental schools in Oceania. Methods A 14-item questionnaire was mailed to the heads of operative dentistry in 16 dental schools in Oceania (Australia, New Zealand, Fiji and Papua New Guinea). The survey asked whether the repair of DCRs was taught within the curriculum; the rationale behind the teaching; how techniques were taught, indications for repair, operative techniques, materials used, patient acceptability, expected longevity and recall systems. Results All 16 schools participated in the study. Thirteen (81%) reported the teaching of composite repairs as an alternative to replacement. Most schools taught the theoretical and practical aspects of repair at a clinical level only. All 13 schools (100%) agreed on tooth substance preservation being the main reason for teaching repair. The main indications for repair were marginal defects (100%), followed by secondary caries (69%). All 13 schools that performed repairs reported high patient acceptability, and considered it a definitive measure. Only three schools (23%) claimed to have a recall system in place following repair of DCRs. Most respondents either did not know or did not answer when asked about the longevity of DCRs. Conclusions Repair of DCRs seems to be a viable alternative to replacement, which is actively taught within Oceania. Advantages include it being minimally invasive, preserving tooth structure, and time and money saving. However, standardised guidelines need to be developed and further clinical long-term studies need to be carried out. Clinical significance The decision between replacing or repairing a defective composite restoration tends to be based on what clinicians have been taught, tempered by experience and judgement. This study investigated the current status of teaching and operative techniques of repair of direct composite restorations in dental schools in Oceania.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Dental Bonding</subject><subject>Dental Caries</subject><subject>Dental materials</subject><subject>Dental Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Restoration Failure</subject><subject>Dental Restoration Repair - methods</subject><subject>Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods</subject><subject>Dental schools</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dentistry, Operative - education</subject><subject>Education, Dental</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Oceania</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Repair</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Restorative dentistry</subject><subject>Retreatment</subject><subject>Schools, Dental - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0300-5712</issn><issn>1879-176X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkluL1TAUhYsozpnRXyBIwBdfWnfSWyIoyDBeYGDAC_gW0mTXSW2TTtIeOP_e1DMqzIvzlJB8a-3srJ1lzygUFGjzaigGg24pGNC2AFYAhQfZjvJW5LRtvj_MdlAC5HVL2Ul2GuMAABUw8Tg7YZyVDDjbZfNnnJUNZB9JwHlUGqfkSXxPjA2oF6L9NPtoF0z3cfFBLda7-JooEtewx8OGLqj0tXU_iHKG-Bk3aI_pWF87e7NiJNaRK43KWfUke9SrMeLT2_Us-_b-4uv5x_zy6sOn83eXua6BL3kHlalKozsjkDYGQFFRV3VnTMM5bRVjAoXoSlPprqsEN0IbDr3pVN9xAbw8y14efefgtycscrJR4zgqh36NknJRCqho294DTRXrkgO7B9qymjNom4S-uIMOfg0u9bxRnNfAapGo8kjp4GMM2Ms52EmFg6Qgt5jlIH_HLLeYJTCZYk6q57feazeh-av5k2sC3hwBTF-8txhk1BadxmOq0nj7nwJv7-j1aJ3VavyJB4z_OpExCeSXbdK2QaNt2pS8KX8BW1TO8Q</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Brunton, Paul. A</creator><creator>Ghazali, Amna</creator><creator>Tarif, Zahidah H</creator><creator>Loch, Carolina</creator><creator>Lynch, Christopher</creator><creator>Wilson, Nairn</creator><creator>Blum, Igor R</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Repair vs replacement of direct composite restorations: a survey of teaching and operative techniques in Oceania</title><author>Brunton, Paul. A ; Ghazali, Amna ; Tarif, Zahidah H ; Loch, Carolina ; Lynch, Christopher ; Wilson, Nairn ; Blum, Igor R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-b04d43dcbd9e16d00a19545bdd68817a229e99b3d4cbb498d9cd80fdbafb89083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Dental Bonding</topic><topic>Dental Caries</topic><topic>Dental materials</topic><topic>Dental Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Restoration Failure</topic><topic>Dental Restoration Repair - methods</topic><topic>Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods</topic><topic>Dental schools</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dentistry, Operative - education</topic><topic>Education, Dental</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Oceania</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Repair</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Restorative dentistry</topic><topic>Retreatment</topic><topic>Schools, Dental - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brunton, Paul. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghazali, Amna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarif, Zahidah H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loch, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Nairn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blum, Igor R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brunton, Paul. A</au><au>Ghazali, Amna</au><au>Tarif, Zahidah H</au><au>Loch, Carolina</au><au>Lynch, Christopher</au><au>Wilson, Nairn</au><au>Blum, Igor R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Repair vs replacement of direct composite restorations: a survey of teaching and operative techniques in Oceania</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>59</volume><spage>62</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>62-67</pages><issn>0300-5712</issn><eissn>1879-176X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives To evaluate the teaching and operative techniques for the repair and/or replacement of direct resin-based composite restorations (DCRs) in dental schools in Oceania. Methods A 14-item questionnaire was mailed to the heads of operative dentistry in 16 dental schools in Oceania (Australia, New Zealand, Fiji and Papua New Guinea). The survey asked whether the repair of DCRs was taught within the curriculum; the rationale behind the teaching; how techniques were taught, indications for repair, operative techniques, materials used, patient acceptability, expected longevity and recall systems. Results All 16 schools participated in the study. Thirteen (81%) reported the teaching of composite repairs as an alternative to replacement. Most schools taught the theoretical and practical aspects of repair at a clinical level only. All 13 schools (100%) agreed on tooth substance preservation being the main reason for teaching repair. The main indications for repair were marginal defects (100%), followed by secondary caries (69%). All 13 schools that performed repairs reported high patient acceptability, and considered it a definitive measure. Only three schools (23%) claimed to have a recall system in place following repair of DCRs. Most respondents either did not know or did not answer when asked about the longevity of DCRs. Conclusions Repair of DCRs seems to be a viable alternative to replacement, which is actively taught within Oceania. Advantages include it being minimally invasive, preserving tooth structure, and time and money saving. However, standardised guidelines need to be developed and further clinical long-term studies need to be carried out. Clinical significance The decision between replacing or repairing a defective composite restoration tends to be based on what clinicians have been taught, tempered by experience and judgement. This study investigated the current status of teaching and operative techniques of repair of direct composite restorations in dental schools in Oceania.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28232082</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.010</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-5712
ispartof Journal of dentistry, 2017-04, Vol.59, p.62-67
issn 0300-5712
1879-176X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893904177
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Australia
Composite materials
Composite Resins - chemistry
Curricula
Curriculum
Dental Bonding
Dental Caries
Dental materials
Dental Materials - chemistry
Dental Restoration Failure
Dental Restoration Repair - methods
Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods
Dental schools
Dentistry
Dentistry, Operative - education
Education, Dental
Humans
New Zealand
Oceania
Patients
Questionnaires
Recall
Repair
Restoration
Restorative dentistry
Retreatment
Schools, Dental - statistics & numerical data
Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Teaching
Teeth
Trends
title Repair vs replacement of direct composite restorations: a survey of teaching and operative techniques in Oceania
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T12%3A57%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Repair%20vs%20replacement%20of%20direct%20composite%20restorations:%20a%20survey%20of%20teaching%20and%20operative%20techniques%20in%20Oceania&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Brunton,%20Paul.%20A&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=59&rft.spage=62&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=62-67&rft.issn=0300-5712&rft.eissn=1879-176X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1893904177%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1878850259&rft_id=info:pmid/28232082&rft_els_id=S0300571217300386&rfr_iscdi=true