Improving accuracy of LiDAR-derived digital terrain models for saltmarsh management

Accurate digital elevation models of saltmarshes are crucial for both conservation and management goals. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is increasingly used for topographic surveys due to the ability to acquire high resolution data over spatially-extensive areas. This capability is ideally suit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of coastal conservation 2017-02, Vol.21 (1), p.209-222
Hauptverfasser: Fernandez-Nunez, M., Burningham, H., Zujar, J. Ojeda
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 222
container_issue 1
container_start_page 209
container_title Journal of coastal conservation
container_volume 21
creator Fernandez-Nunez, M.
Burningham, H.
Zujar, J. Ojeda
description Accurate digital elevation models of saltmarshes are crucial for both conservation and management goals. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is increasingly used for topographic surveys due to the ability to acquire high resolution data over spatially-extensive areas. This capability is ideally suited to saltmarsh environments, which are often vast, inaccessible systems where topographic variations can be very subtle. Derivation of surface (DSMs) (ground elevation plus vegetation) versus terrain (bare ground elevation) models (DTMs) relies on the ability of the LiDAR sensor to accurately record multiple returns. In saltmarshes however, the dense stands of low (< 1 m) vegetation commonly found precludes the acquisition of more than one return, and the resulting DTM is not different to the DSM. Establishing the offset between ground and vegetation surface in order to correct the LiDAR-derived DTM can be challenging due to the spatial variability in saltmarsh habitats. Here we show the development and application of a habitat-specific correction factor (HSCF) for the Odiel Saltmarshes using a combination of habitat object-based classification (82% overall accuracy) and ground control surveys that reduces the DTM error to within that associated with the LiDAR sensor (average error 0.1 m). We also show that the true accuracy of supplied (unmodified) DTMs can be >0.5 m in saltmarshes dominated by dense vegetation such as Spartina densiflora. In particular, global projections of sea-level rise across the next 80 years (0.18-0.59 m) significantly overlaps this accuracy margin, implying that assessments and modelling of sea-level impacts in saltmarsh systems will likely be erroneous if based on Lidar-derived DTMs. Erroneous assumptions and conclusions can result if the real accuracy of DTMs (bare ground) on vegetated saltmarshes is not considered, and the consequences of the propagation of this misinformation through to management decisions should not be over-looked.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11852-016-0492-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893902397</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45046634</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45046634</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-c9faa10b88bd55759f527858e2a40b93a4d4a79d801efece786aa30437eb687b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1LHEEQxQcxkNXkD8hBaMjFSyfVX9PdRzEmERYENeemZqZmnWU-1u5Zwf_eXkaC5CA5VR1-7xWvXlF8EfBNANjvSQhnJAdRctBecnlUrISzmlunxXHeNQAHZeBjcZLSFkAaZ9SquLsednF66sYNw7reR6yf2dSydffj4pY3FLsnaljTbboZezZTjNiNbJga6hNrp8gS9vOAMT2wAUfc0EDj_Kn40GKf6PPrPC3-_Ly6v_zN1ze_ri8v1rzW2s689i2igMq5qjHGGt8aaZ1xJFFD5RXqRqP1jQNBLdVkXYmoQCtLVelspU6L88U3J3jcU5rD0KWa-h5HmvYpCOeVB6m8_Q_UOV868CKjX_9Bt9M-jjnIgZLKeu9UpsRC1XFKKVIbdrHLj3gOAsKhkbA0EnIj4dBIkFkjF03K7Lih-Mb5HdHZItqmeYp_r2gDuiyVVi_m75ba</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1882379983</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving accuracy of LiDAR-derived digital terrain models for saltmarsh management</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Fernandez-Nunez, M. ; Burningham, H. ; Zujar, J. Ojeda</creator><creatorcontrib>Fernandez-Nunez, M. ; Burningham, H. ; Zujar, J. Ojeda</creatorcontrib><description>Accurate digital elevation models of saltmarshes are crucial for both conservation and management goals. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is increasingly used for topographic surveys due to the ability to acquire high resolution data over spatially-extensive areas. This capability is ideally suited to saltmarsh environments, which are often vast, inaccessible systems where topographic variations can be very subtle. Derivation of surface (DSMs) (ground elevation plus vegetation) versus terrain (bare ground elevation) models (DTMs) relies on the ability of the LiDAR sensor to accurately record multiple returns. In saltmarshes however, the dense stands of low (&lt; 1 m) vegetation commonly found precludes the acquisition of more than one return, and the resulting DTM is not different to the DSM. Establishing the offset between ground and vegetation surface in order to correct the LiDAR-derived DTM can be challenging due to the spatial variability in saltmarsh habitats. Here we show the development and application of a habitat-specific correction factor (HSCF) for the Odiel Saltmarshes using a combination of habitat object-based classification (82% overall accuracy) and ground control surveys that reduces the DTM error to within that associated with the LiDAR sensor (average error 0.1 m). We also show that the true accuracy of supplied (unmodified) DTMs can be &gt;0.5 m in saltmarshes dominated by dense vegetation such as Spartina densiflora. In particular, global projections of sea-level rise across the next 80 years (0.18-0.59 m) significantly overlaps this accuracy margin, implying that assessments and modelling of sea-level impacts in saltmarsh systems will likely be erroneous if based on Lidar-derived DTMs. Erroneous assumptions and conclusions can result if the real accuracy of DTMs (bare ground) on vegetated saltmarshes is not considered, and the consequences of the propagation of this misinformation through to management decisions should not be over-looked.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1400-0350</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-7841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11852-016-0492-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Aquatic plants ; Coastal Sciences ; Conservation ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Elevation ; Error detection ; Geography ; Grounds ; Habitats ; Lidar ; Management ; Mapping ; Marine ; Nature Conservation ; Oceanography ; Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry ; Salt marshes ; Sea level ; Spartina densiflora ; Technology ; Topographic surveys ; Vegetation ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Journal of coastal conservation, 2017-02, Vol.21 (1), p.209-222</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>Journal of Coastal Conservation is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-c9faa10b88bd55759f527858e2a40b93a4d4a79d801efece786aa30437eb687b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-c9faa10b88bd55759f527858e2a40b93a4d4a79d801efece786aa30437eb687b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45046634$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45046634$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fernandez-Nunez, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burningham, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zujar, J. Ojeda</creatorcontrib><title>Improving accuracy of LiDAR-derived digital terrain models for saltmarsh management</title><title>Journal of coastal conservation</title><addtitle>J Coast Conserv</addtitle><description>Accurate digital elevation models of saltmarshes are crucial for both conservation and management goals. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is increasingly used for topographic surveys due to the ability to acquire high resolution data over spatially-extensive areas. This capability is ideally suited to saltmarsh environments, which are often vast, inaccessible systems where topographic variations can be very subtle. Derivation of surface (DSMs) (ground elevation plus vegetation) versus terrain (bare ground elevation) models (DTMs) relies on the ability of the LiDAR sensor to accurately record multiple returns. In saltmarshes however, the dense stands of low (&lt; 1 m) vegetation commonly found precludes the acquisition of more than one return, and the resulting DTM is not different to the DSM. Establishing the offset between ground and vegetation surface in order to correct the LiDAR-derived DTM can be challenging due to the spatial variability in saltmarsh habitats. Here we show the development and application of a habitat-specific correction factor (HSCF) for the Odiel Saltmarshes using a combination of habitat object-based classification (82% overall accuracy) and ground control surveys that reduces the DTM error to within that associated with the LiDAR sensor (average error 0.1 m). We also show that the true accuracy of supplied (unmodified) DTMs can be &gt;0.5 m in saltmarshes dominated by dense vegetation such as Spartina densiflora. In particular, global projections of sea-level rise across the next 80 years (0.18-0.59 m) significantly overlaps this accuracy margin, implying that assessments and modelling of sea-level impacts in saltmarsh systems will likely be erroneous if based on Lidar-derived DTMs. Erroneous assumptions and conclusions can result if the real accuracy of DTMs (bare ground) on vegetated saltmarshes is not considered, and the consequences of the propagation of this misinformation through to management decisions should not be over-looked.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Coastal Sciences</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Error detection</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Grounds</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Lidar</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry</subject><subject>Salt marshes</subject><subject>Sea level</subject><subject>Spartina densiflora</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Topographic surveys</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>1400-0350</issn><issn>1874-7841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1LHEEQxQcxkNXkD8hBaMjFSyfVX9PdRzEmERYENeemZqZmnWU-1u5Zwf_eXkaC5CA5VR1-7xWvXlF8EfBNANjvSQhnJAdRctBecnlUrISzmlunxXHeNQAHZeBjcZLSFkAaZ9SquLsednF66sYNw7reR6yf2dSydffj4pY3FLsnaljTbboZezZTjNiNbJga6hNrp8gS9vOAMT2wAUfc0EDj_Kn40GKf6PPrPC3-_Ly6v_zN1ze_ri8v1rzW2s689i2igMq5qjHGGt8aaZ1xJFFD5RXqRqP1jQNBLdVkXYmoQCtLVelspU6L88U3J3jcU5rD0KWa-h5HmvYpCOeVB6m8_Q_UOV868CKjX_9Bt9M-jjnIgZLKeu9UpsRC1XFKKVIbdrHLj3gOAsKhkbA0EnIj4dBIkFkjF03K7Lih-Mb5HdHZItqmeYp_r2gDuiyVVi_m75ba</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Fernandez-Nunez, M.</creator><creator>Burningham, H.</creator><creator>Zujar, J. Ojeda</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Improving accuracy of LiDAR-derived digital terrain models for saltmarsh management</title><author>Fernandez-Nunez, M. ; Burningham, H. ; Zujar, J. Ojeda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-c9faa10b88bd55759f527858e2a40b93a4d4a79d801efece786aa30437eb687b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Coastal Sciences</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Error detection</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Grounds</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Lidar</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry</topic><topic>Salt marshes</topic><topic>Sea level</topic><topic>Spartina densiflora</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Topographic surveys</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fernandez-Nunez, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burningham, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zujar, J. Ojeda</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of coastal conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fernandez-Nunez, M.</au><au>Burningham, H.</au><au>Zujar, J. Ojeda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving accuracy of LiDAR-derived digital terrain models for saltmarsh management</atitle><jtitle>Journal of coastal conservation</jtitle><stitle>J Coast Conserv</stitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>222</epage><pages>209-222</pages><issn>1400-0350</issn><eissn>1874-7841</eissn><abstract>Accurate digital elevation models of saltmarshes are crucial for both conservation and management goals. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is increasingly used for topographic surveys due to the ability to acquire high resolution data over spatially-extensive areas. This capability is ideally suited to saltmarsh environments, which are often vast, inaccessible systems where topographic variations can be very subtle. Derivation of surface (DSMs) (ground elevation plus vegetation) versus terrain (bare ground elevation) models (DTMs) relies on the ability of the LiDAR sensor to accurately record multiple returns. In saltmarshes however, the dense stands of low (&lt; 1 m) vegetation commonly found precludes the acquisition of more than one return, and the resulting DTM is not different to the DSM. Establishing the offset between ground and vegetation surface in order to correct the LiDAR-derived DTM can be challenging due to the spatial variability in saltmarsh habitats. Here we show the development and application of a habitat-specific correction factor (HSCF) for the Odiel Saltmarshes using a combination of habitat object-based classification (82% overall accuracy) and ground control surveys that reduces the DTM error to within that associated with the LiDAR sensor (average error 0.1 m). We also show that the true accuracy of supplied (unmodified) DTMs can be &gt;0.5 m in saltmarshes dominated by dense vegetation such as Spartina densiflora. In particular, global projections of sea-level rise across the next 80 years (0.18-0.59 m) significantly overlaps this accuracy margin, implying that assessments and modelling of sea-level impacts in saltmarsh systems will likely be erroneous if based on Lidar-derived DTMs. Erroneous assumptions and conclusions can result if the real accuracy of DTMs (bare ground) on vegetated saltmarshes is not considered, and the consequences of the propagation of this misinformation through to management decisions should not be over-looked.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11852-016-0492-2</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1400-0350
ispartof Journal of coastal conservation, 2017-02, Vol.21 (1), p.209-222
issn 1400-0350
1874-7841
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893902397
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Accuracy
Aquatic plants
Coastal Sciences
Conservation
Earth and Environmental Science
Elevation
Error detection
Geography
Grounds
Habitats
Lidar
Management
Mapping
Marine
Nature Conservation
Oceanography
Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry
Salt marshes
Sea level
Spartina densiflora
Technology
Topographic surveys
Vegetation
Wetlands
title Improving accuracy of LiDAR-derived digital terrain models for saltmarsh management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T21%3A07%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20accuracy%20of%20LiDAR-derived%20digital%20terrain%20models%20for%20saltmarsh%20management&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20coastal%20conservation&rft.au=Fernandez-Nunez,%20M.&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=222&rft.pages=209-222&rft.issn=1400-0350&rft.eissn=1874-7841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11852-016-0492-2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45046634%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1882379983&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45046634&rfr_iscdi=true