Improving accuracy of LiDAR-derived digital terrain models for saltmarsh management
Accurate digital elevation models of saltmarshes are crucial for both conservation and management goals. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is increasingly used for topographic surveys due to the ability to acquire high resolution data over spatially-extensive areas. This capability is ideally suit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of coastal conservation 2017-02, Vol.21 (1), p.209-222 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 222 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 209 |
container_title | Journal of coastal conservation |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Fernandez-Nunez, M. Burningham, H. Zujar, J. Ojeda |
description | Accurate digital elevation models of saltmarshes are crucial for both conservation and management goals. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is increasingly used for topographic surveys due to the ability to acquire high resolution data over spatially-extensive areas. This capability is ideally suited to saltmarsh environments, which are often vast, inaccessible systems where topographic variations can be very subtle. Derivation of surface (DSMs) (ground elevation plus vegetation) versus terrain (bare ground elevation) models (DTMs) relies on the ability of the LiDAR sensor to accurately record multiple returns. In saltmarshes however, the dense stands of low (< 1 m) vegetation commonly found precludes the acquisition of more than one return, and the resulting DTM is not different to the DSM. Establishing the offset between ground and vegetation surface in order to correct the LiDAR-derived DTM can be challenging due to the spatial variability in saltmarsh habitats. Here we show the development and application of a habitat-specific correction factor (HSCF) for the Odiel Saltmarshes using a combination of habitat object-based classification (82% overall accuracy) and ground control surveys that reduces the DTM error to within that associated with the LiDAR sensor (average error 0.1 m). We also show that the true accuracy of supplied (unmodified) DTMs can be >0.5 m in saltmarshes dominated by dense vegetation such as Spartina densiflora. In particular, global projections of sea-level rise across the next 80 years (0.18-0.59 m) significantly overlaps this accuracy margin, implying that assessments and modelling of sea-level impacts in saltmarsh systems will likely be erroneous if based on Lidar-derived DTMs. Erroneous assumptions and conclusions can result if the real accuracy of DTMs (bare ground) on vegetated saltmarshes is not considered, and the consequences of the propagation of this misinformation through to management decisions should not be over-looked. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11852-016-0492-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893902397</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45046634</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45046634</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-c9faa10b88bd55759f527858e2a40b93a4d4a79d801efece786aa30437eb687b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1LHEEQxQcxkNXkD8hBaMjFSyfVX9PdRzEmERYENeemZqZmnWU-1u5Zwf_eXkaC5CA5VR1-7xWvXlF8EfBNANjvSQhnJAdRctBecnlUrISzmlunxXHeNQAHZeBjcZLSFkAaZ9SquLsednF66sYNw7reR6yf2dSydffj4pY3FLsnaljTbboZezZTjNiNbJga6hNrp8gS9vOAMT2wAUfc0EDj_Kn40GKf6PPrPC3-_Ly6v_zN1ze_ri8v1rzW2s689i2igMq5qjHGGt8aaZ1xJFFD5RXqRqP1jQNBLdVkXYmoQCtLVelspU6L88U3J3jcU5rD0KWa-h5HmvYpCOeVB6m8_Q_UOV868CKjX_9Bt9M-jjnIgZLKeu9UpsRC1XFKKVIbdrHLj3gOAsKhkbA0EnIj4dBIkFkjF03K7Lih-Mb5HdHZItqmeYp_r2gDuiyVVi_m75ba</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1882379983</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving accuracy of LiDAR-derived digital terrain models for saltmarsh management</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Fernandez-Nunez, M. ; Burningham, H. ; Zujar, J. Ojeda</creator><creatorcontrib>Fernandez-Nunez, M. ; Burningham, H. ; Zujar, J. Ojeda</creatorcontrib><description>Accurate digital elevation models of saltmarshes are crucial for both conservation and management goals. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is increasingly used for topographic surveys due to the ability to acquire high resolution data over spatially-extensive areas. This capability is ideally suited to saltmarsh environments, which are often vast, inaccessible systems where topographic variations can be very subtle. Derivation of surface (DSMs) (ground elevation plus vegetation) versus terrain (bare ground elevation) models (DTMs) relies on the ability of the LiDAR sensor to accurately record multiple returns. In saltmarshes however, the dense stands of low (< 1 m) vegetation commonly found precludes the acquisition of more than one return, and the resulting DTM is not different to the DSM. Establishing the offset between ground and vegetation surface in order to correct the LiDAR-derived DTM can be challenging due to the spatial variability in saltmarsh habitats. Here we show the development and application of a habitat-specific correction factor (HSCF) for the Odiel Saltmarshes using a combination of habitat object-based classification (82% overall accuracy) and ground control surveys that reduces the DTM error to within that associated with the LiDAR sensor (average error 0.1 m). We also show that the true accuracy of supplied (unmodified) DTMs can be >0.5 m in saltmarshes dominated by dense vegetation such as Spartina densiflora. In particular, global projections of sea-level rise across the next 80 years (0.18-0.59 m) significantly overlaps this accuracy margin, implying that assessments and modelling of sea-level impacts in saltmarsh systems will likely be erroneous if based on Lidar-derived DTMs. Erroneous assumptions and conclusions can result if the real accuracy of DTMs (bare ground) on vegetated saltmarshes is not considered, and the consequences of the propagation of this misinformation through to management decisions should not be over-looked.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1400-0350</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-7841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11852-016-0492-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Aquatic plants ; Coastal Sciences ; Conservation ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Elevation ; Error detection ; Geography ; Grounds ; Habitats ; Lidar ; Management ; Mapping ; Marine ; Nature Conservation ; Oceanography ; Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry ; Salt marshes ; Sea level ; Spartina densiflora ; Technology ; Topographic surveys ; Vegetation ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Journal of coastal conservation, 2017-02, Vol.21 (1), p.209-222</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>Journal of Coastal Conservation is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-c9faa10b88bd55759f527858e2a40b93a4d4a79d801efece786aa30437eb687b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-c9faa10b88bd55759f527858e2a40b93a4d4a79d801efece786aa30437eb687b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45046634$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45046634$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fernandez-Nunez, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burningham, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zujar, J. Ojeda</creatorcontrib><title>Improving accuracy of LiDAR-derived digital terrain models for saltmarsh management</title><title>Journal of coastal conservation</title><addtitle>J Coast Conserv</addtitle><description>Accurate digital elevation models of saltmarshes are crucial for both conservation and management goals. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is increasingly used for topographic surveys due to the ability to acquire high resolution data over spatially-extensive areas. This capability is ideally suited to saltmarsh environments, which are often vast, inaccessible systems where topographic variations can be very subtle. Derivation of surface (DSMs) (ground elevation plus vegetation) versus terrain (bare ground elevation) models (DTMs) relies on the ability of the LiDAR sensor to accurately record multiple returns. In saltmarshes however, the dense stands of low (< 1 m) vegetation commonly found precludes the acquisition of more than one return, and the resulting DTM is not different to the DSM. Establishing the offset between ground and vegetation surface in order to correct the LiDAR-derived DTM can be challenging due to the spatial variability in saltmarsh habitats. Here we show the development and application of a habitat-specific correction factor (HSCF) for the Odiel Saltmarshes using a combination of habitat object-based classification (82% overall accuracy) and ground control surveys that reduces the DTM error to within that associated with the LiDAR sensor (average error 0.1 m). We also show that the true accuracy of supplied (unmodified) DTMs can be >0.5 m in saltmarshes dominated by dense vegetation such as Spartina densiflora. In particular, global projections of sea-level rise across the next 80 years (0.18-0.59 m) significantly overlaps this accuracy margin, implying that assessments and modelling of sea-level impacts in saltmarsh systems will likely be erroneous if based on Lidar-derived DTMs. Erroneous assumptions and conclusions can result if the real accuracy of DTMs (bare ground) on vegetated saltmarshes is not considered, and the consequences of the propagation of this misinformation through to management decisions should not be over-looked.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Coastal Sciences</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Error detection</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Grounds</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Lidar</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry</subject><subject>Salt marshes</subject><subject>Sea level</subject><subject>Spartina densiflora</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Topographic surveys</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>1400-0350</issn><issn>1874-7841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1LHEEQxQcxkNXkD8hBaMjFSyfVX9PdRzEmERYENeemZqZmnWU-1u5Zwf_eXkaC5CA5VR1-7xWvXlF8EfBNANjvSQhnJAdRctBecnlUrISzmlunxXHeNQAHZeBjcZLSFkAaZ9SquLsednF66sYNw7reR6yf2dSydffj4pY3FLsnaljTbboZezZTjNiNbJga6hNrp8gS9vOAMT2wAUfc0EDj_Kn40GKf6PPrPC3-_Ly6v_zN1ze_ri8v1rzW2s689i2igMq5qjHGGt8aaZ1xJFFD5RXqRqP1jQNBLdVkXYmoQCtLVelspU6L88U3J3jcU5rD0KWa-h5HmvYpCOeVB6m8_Q_UOV868CKjX_9Bt9M-jjnIgZLKeu9UpsRC1XFKKVIbdrHLj3gOAsKhkbA0EnIj4dBIkFkjF03K7Lih-Mb5HdHZItqmeYp_r2gDuiyVVi_m75ba</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Fernandez-Nunez, M.</creator><creator>Burningham, H.</creator><creator>Zujar, J. Ojeda</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Improving accuracy of LiDAR-derived digital terrain models for saltmarsh management</title><author>Fernandez-Nunez, M. ; Burningham, H. ; Zujar, J. Ojeda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-c9faa10b88bd55759f527858e2a40b93a4d4a79d801efece786aa30437eb687b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Coastal Sciences</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Error detection</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Grounds</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Lidar</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry</topic><topic>Salt marshes</topic><topic>Sea level</topic><topic>Spartina densiflora</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Topographic surveys</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fernandez-Nunez, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burningham, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zujar, J. Ojeda</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of coastal conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fernandez-Nunez, M.</au><au>Burningham, H.</au><au>Zujar, J. Ojeda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving accuracy of LiDAR-derived digital terrain models for saltmarsh management</atitle><jtitle>Journal of coastal conservation</jtitle><stitle>J Coast Conserv</stitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>222</epage><pages>209-222</pages><issn>1400-0350</issn><eissn>1874-7841</eissn><abstract>Accurate digital elevation models of saltmarshes are crucial for both conservation and management goals. Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is increasingly used for topographic surveys due to the ability to acquire high resolution data over spatially-extensive areas. This capability is ideally suited to saltmarsh environments, which are often vast, inaccessible systems where topographic variations can be very subtle. Derivation of surface (DSMs) (ground elevation plus vegetation) versus terrain (bare ground elevation) models (DTMs) relies on the ability of the LiDAR sensor to accurately record multiple returns. In saltmarshes however, the dense stands of low (< 1 m) vegetation commonly found precludes the acquisition of more than one return, and the resulting DTM is not different to the DSM. Establishing the offset between ground and vegetation surface in order to correct the LiDAR-derived DTM can be challenging due to the spatial variability in saltmarsh habitats. Here we show the development and application of a habitat-specific correction factor (HSCF) for the Odiel Saltmarshes using a combination of habitat object-based classification (82% overall accuracy) and ground control surveys that reduces the DTM error to within that associated with the LiDAR sensor (average error 0.1 m). We also show that the true accuracy of supplied (unmodified) DTMs can be >0.5 m in saltmarshes dominated by dense vegetation such as Spartina densiflora. In particular, global projections of sea-level rise across the next 80 years (0.18-0.59 m) significantly overlaps this accuracy margin, implying that assessments and modelling of sea-level impacts in saltmarsh systems will likely be erroneous if based on Lidar-derived DTMs. Erroneous assumptions and conclusions can result if the real accuracy of DTMs (bare ground) on vegetated saltmarshes is not considered, and the consequences of the propagation of this misinformation through to management decisions should not be over-looked.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11852-016-0492-2</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1400-0350 |
ispartof | Journal of coastal conservation, 2017-02, Vol.21 (1), p.209-222 |
issn | 1400-0350 1874-7841 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893902397 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Accuracy Aquatic plants Coastal Sciences Conservation Earth and Environmental Science Elevation Error detection Geography Grounds Habitats Lidar Management Mapping Marine Nature Conservation Oceanography Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry Salt marshes Sea level Spartina densiflora Technology Topographic surveys Vegetation Wetlands |
title | Improving accuracy of LiDAR-derived digital terrain models for saltmarsh management |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T21%3A07%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20accuracy%20of%20LiDAR-derived%20digital%20terrain%20models%20for%20saltmarsh%20management&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20coastal%20conservation&rft.au=Fernandez-Nunez,%20M.&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=222&rft.pages=209-222&rft.issn=1400-0350&rft.eissn=1874-7841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11852-016-0492-2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45046634%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1882379983&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45046634&rfr_iscdi=true |