Cut slope stability assessment along ghat road section of Kolli hills, India

In the present study, cut slope stability assessment along ghat road section of Kolli hills was carried out by using various geotechnical parameters of rock and soil slope sections and structural kinematics of major discontinuities is presented. The rock slope (RS) stability assessment was carried o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Natural hazards (Dordrecht) 2017-04, Vol.86 (3), p.1081-1104
Hauptverfasser: Anbazhagan, S., Ramesh, V., Saranaathan, S. E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1104
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1081
container_title Natural hazards (Dordrecht)
container_volume 86
creator Anbazhagan, S.
Ramesh, V.
Saranaathan, S. E.
description In the present study, cut slope stability assessment along ghat road section of Kolli hills was carried out by using various geotechnical parameters of rock and soil slope sections and structural kinematics of major discontinuities is presented. The rock slope (RS) stability assessment was carried out using Rock Mass Rating basic (RMR basic ) and Slope Mass Rating (SMR) classification systems. The type of failure and their Factor of Safety (FOS) for individual RS was calculated using Hoek and Bray method. In the case of soil slopes (SS), the FOS was calculated using Circular Failure Chart (CFC) and Limit Equilibrium (LE) methods. The input data for the slope stability analyses were collected through extensive field work followed by stereonet plotting and laboratory test. There are six rock slope sections, and five soil slope sections were taken into consideration for the cut slope stability analyses. The area depicts class II (RS-1, 2, & 6) and class III (RS-3, 4, & 5) of RMR classes. The SMR result depicts for RS-1, RS-2, and RS-6 are 64.40, 60.02, and 60.70, respectively, and falls in class II stable condition. The SMR values of RS-3 and RS-5 were 44.33 and 57, respectively, and come under the class III partially stable condition. The RS-4 with SMR value of 17.33 falls under the class I completely unstable condition. The FOS of planar failure case indicates that RS-3 (FOS = 0.22) is more unstable, while all other sections are having greater than 1 FOS. The calculated FOS values using CFC method reveals that the FOS is very close to 1 for all the SS sections that fall under completely saturated condition which indicates that these slope sections may fail during heavy rainfall. In LE method, the sections SS-3 and SS-4 are unsafe under partially and completely saturated (natural slope) condition. In average slope condition, all the SS sections are unsafe under partially or completely saturated conditions. The facets 2, 3, 4, and 5 required mitigation measures, to improve the stability of slopes. Site-specific mitigation measures were suggested for partially or completely unstable rock and soil cut slopes.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11069-016-2731-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893901632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1893901632</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-d23a8983bcb8896bd0b1a5d023ad8215cfbf0c569782b6e248af61108aba4f463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwFvAiwdXJ8luNnuU4p9iwYuCt5DsZtuUdFN3dg_99qbUgwiCp4Hh9-bx5hFyyeCWAZR3yBjIKgMmM14KlsERmbCiFBmoHI7JBCqelgI-TskZ4hqAMcmrCVnMxoFiiFtHcTDWBz_sqEF0iBvXDdSE2C3pcmUG2kfTUHT14GNHY0tfYgiernwIeEPnXePNOTlpTUB38T2n5P3x4W32nC1en-az-0VWC8WHrOHCqEoJW1ulKmkbsMwUDaR1ozgr6ta2UBeyKhW30vFcmVamfMpYk7e5FFNyfbi77ePn6HDQG4-1C8F0Lo6omapElV4h-D9QxcqCc5kn9OoXuo5j36UgiSoLqUpZ7L3Zgar7iNi7Vm97vzH9TjPQ-yr0oQqd_PW-Cg1Jww8aTGy3dP2Py3-KvgCIbIod</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1875687656</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cut slope stability assessment along ghat road section of Kolli hills, India</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Anbazhagan, S. ; Ramesh, V. ; Saranaathan, S. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Anbazhagan, S. ; Ramesh, V. ; Saranaathan, S. E.</creatorcontrib><description>In the present study, cut slope stability assessment along ghat road section of Kolli hills was carried out by using various geotechnical parameters of rock and soil slope sections and structural kinematics of major discontinuities is presented. The rock slope (RS) stability assessment was carried out using Rock Mass Rating basic (RMR basic ) and Slope Mass Rating (SMR) classification systems. The type of failure and their Factor of Safety (FOS) for individual RS was calculated using Hoek and Bray method. In the case of soil slopes (SS), the FOS was calculated using Circular Failure Chart (CFC) and Limit Equilibrium (LE) methods. The input data for the slope stability analyses were collected through extensive field work followed by stereonet plotting and laboratory test. There are six rock slope sections, and five soil slope sections were taken into consideration for the cut slope stability analyses. The area depicts class II (RS-1, 2, &amp; 6) and class III (RS-3, 4, &amp; 5) of RMR classes. The SMR result depicts for RS-1, RS-2, and RS-6 are 64.40, 60.02, and 60.70, respectively, and falls in class II stable condition. The SMR values of RS-3 and RS-5 were 44.33 and 57, respectively, and come under the class III partially stable condition. The RS-4 with SMR value of 17.33 falls under the class I completely unstable condition. The FOS of planar failure case indicates that RS-3 (FOS = 0.22) is more unstable, while all other sections are having greater than 1 FOS. The calculated FOS values using CFC method reveals that the FOS is very close to 1 for all the SS sections that fall under completely saturated condition which indicates that these slope sections may fail during heavy rainfall. In LE method, the sections SS-3 and SS-4 are unsafe under partially and completely saturated (natural slope) condition. In average slope condition, all the SS sections are unsafe under partially or completely saturated conditions. The facets 2, 3, 4, and 5 required mitigation measures, to improve the stability of slopes. Site-specific mitigation measures were suggested for partially or completely unstable rock and soil cut slopes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-030X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2731-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Civil Engineering ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Environmental Management ; Failure ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Hills ; Hydrogeology ; Laboratory tests ; Landslides &amp; mudslides ; Mathematical analysis ; Natural Hazards ; Natural slope ; Original Paper ; Risk assessment ; Roads ; Roads &amp; highways ; Rock ; Rocks ; Slope stability ; Slopes ; Soil stability ; Stability analysis</subject><ispartof>Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2017-04, Vol.86 (3), p.1081-1104</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><rights>Natural Hazards is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-d23a8983bcb8896bd0b1a5d023ad8215cfbf0c569782b6e248af61108aba4f463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-d23a8983bcb8896bd0b1a5d023ad8215cfbf0c569782b6e248af61108aba4f463</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3521-8889</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11069-016-2731-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-016-2731-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anbazhagan, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramesh, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saranaathan, S. E.</creatorcontrib><title>Cut slope stability assessment along ghat road section of Kolli hills, India</title><title>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Nat Hazards</addtitle><description>In the present study, cut slope stability assessment along ghat road section of Kolli hills was carried out by using various geotechnical parameters of rock and soil slope sections and structural kinematics of major discontinuities is presented. The rock slope (RS) stability assessment was carried out using Rock Mass Rating basic (RMR basic ) and Slope Mass Rating (SMR) classification systems. The type of failure and their Factor of Safety (FOS) for individual RS was calculated using Hoek and Bray method. In the case of soil slopes (SS), the FOS was calculated using Circular Failure Chart (CFC) and Limit Equilibrium (LE) methods. The input data for the slope stability analyses were collected through extensive field work followed by stereonet plotting and laboratory test. There are six rock slope sections, and five soil slope sections were taken into consideration for the cut slope stability analyses. The area depicts class II (RS-1, 2, &amp; 6) and class III (RS-3, 4, &amp; 5) of RMR classes. The SMR result depicts for RS-1, RS-2, and RS-6 are 64.40, 60.02, and 60.70, respectively, and falls in class II stable condition. The SMR values of RS-3 and RS-5 were 44.33 and 57, respectively, and come under the class III partially stable condition. The RS-4 with SMR value of 17.33 falls under the class I completely unstable condition. The FOS of planar failure case indicates that RS-3 (FOS = 0.22) is more unstable, while all other sections are having greater than 1 FOS. The calculated FOS values using CFC method reveals that the FOS is very close to 1 for all the SS sections that fall under completely saturated condition which indicates that these slope sections may fail during heavy rainfall. In LE method, the sections SS-3 and SS-4 are unsafe under partially and completely saturated (natural slope) condition. In average slope condition, all the SS sections are unsafe under partially or completely saturated conditions. The facets 2, 3, 4, and 5 required mitigation measures, to improve the stability of slopes. Site-specific mitigation measures were suggested for partially or completely unstable rock and soil cut slopes.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hills</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Laboratory tests</subject><subject>Landslides &amp; mudslides</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Natural slope</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Roads</subject><subject>Roads &amp; highways</subject><subject>Rock</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Slope stability</subject><subject>Slopes</subject><subject>Soil stability</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><issn>0921-030X</issn><issn>1573-0840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwFvAiwdXJ8luNnuU4p9iwYuCt5DsZtuUdFN3dg_99qbUgwiCp4Hh9-bx5hFyyeCWAZR3yBjIKgMmM14KlsERmbCiFBmoHI7JBCqelgI-TskZ4hqAMcmrCVnMxoFiiFtHcTDWBz_sqEF0iBvXDdSE2C3pcmUG2kfTUHT14GNHY0tfYgiernwIeEPnXePNOTlpTUB38T2n5P3x4W32nC1en-az-0VWC8WHrOHCqEoJW1ulKmkbsMwUDaR1ozgr6ta2UBeyKhW30vFcmVamfMpYk7e5FFNyfbi77ePn6HDQG4-1C8F0Lo6omapElV4h-D9QxcqCc5kn9OoXuo5j36UgiSoLqUpZ7L3Zgar7iNi7Vm97vzH9TjPQ-yr0oQqd_PW-Cg1Jww8aTGy3dP2Py3-KvgCIbIod</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Anbazhagan, S.</creator><creator>Ramesh, V.</creator><creator>Saranaathan, S. E.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3521-8889</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Cut slope stability assessment along ghat road section of Kolli hills, India</title><author>Anbazhagan, S. ; Ramesh, V. ; Saranaathan, S. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-d23a8983bcb8896bd0b1a5d023ad8215cfbf0c569782b6e248af61108aba4f463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hills</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Laboratory tests</topic><topic>Landslides &amp; mudslides</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Natural slope</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Roads</topic><topic>Roads &amp; highways</topic><topic>Rock</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Slope stability</topic><topic>Slopes</topic><topic>Soil stability</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anbazhagan, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramesh, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saranaathan, S. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anbazhagan, S.</au><au>Ramesh, V.</au><au>Saranaathan, S. E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cut slope stability assessment along ghat road section of Kolli hills, India</atitle><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Nat Hazards</stitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1081</spage><epage>1104</epage><pages>1081-1104</pages><issn>0921-030X</issn><eissn>1573-0840</eissn><abstract>In the present study, cut slope stability assessment along ghat road section of Kolli hills was carried out by using various geotechnical parameters of rock and soil slope sections and structural kinematics of major discontinuities is presented. The rock slope (RS) stability assessment was carried out using Rock Mass Rating basic (RMR basic ) and Slope Mass Rating (SMR) classification systems. The type of failure and their Factor of Safety (FOS) for individual RS was calculated using Hoek and Bray method. In the case of soil slopes (SS), the FOS was calculated using Circular Failure Chart (CFC) and Limit Equilibrium (LE) methods. The input data for the slope stability analyses were collected through extensive field work followed by stereonet plotting and laboratory test. There are six rock slope sections, and five soil slope sections were taken into consideration for the cut slope stability analyses. The area depicts class II (RS-1, 2, &amp; 6) and class III (RS-3, 4, &amp; 5) of RMR classes. The SMR result depicts for RS-1, RS-2, and RS-6 are 64.40, 60.02, and 60.70, respectively, and falls in class II stable condition. The SMR values of RS-3 and RS-5 were 44.33 and 57, respectively, and come under the class III partially stable condition. The RS-4 with SMR value of 17.33 falls under the class I completely unstable condition. The FOS of planar failure case indicates that RS-3 (FOS = 0.22) is more unstable, while all other sections are having greater than 1 FOS. The calculated FOS values using CFC method reveals that the FOS is very close to 1 for all the SS sections that fall under completely saturated condition which indicates that these slope sections may fail during heavy rainfall. In LE method, the sections SS-3 and SS-4 are unsafe under partially and completely saturated (natural slope) condition. In average slope condition, all the SS sections are unsafe under partially or completely saturated conditions. The facets 2, 3, 4, and 5 required mitigation measures, to improve the stability of slopes. Site-specific mitigation measures were suggested for partially or completely unstable rock and soil cut slopes.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11069-016-2731-0</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3521-8889</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-030X
ispartof Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2017-04, Vol.86 (3), p.1081-1104
issn 0921-030X
1573-0840
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893901632
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Assessments
Civil Engineering
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Environmental Management
Failure
Geophysics/Geodesy
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Hills
Hydrogeology
Laboratory tests
Landslides & mudslides
Mathematical analysis
Natural Hazards
Natural slope
Original Paper
Risk assessment
Roads
Roads & highways
Rock
Rocks
Slope stability
Slopes
Soil stability
Stability analysis
title Cut slope stability assessment along ghat road section of Kolli hills, India
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T03%3A29%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cut%20slope%20stability%20assessment%20along%20ghat%20road%20section%20of%20Kolli%20hills,%20India&rft.jtitle=Natural%20hazards%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Anbazhagan,%20S.&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1081&rft.epage=1104&rft.pages=1081-1104&rft.issn=0921-030X&rft.eissn=1573-0840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11069-016-2731-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1893901632%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1875687656&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true