Reshaping structural hysteresis response with semi-active viscous damping
Semi-active control devices offer significant promise for their ability to add supplemental damping and reduce seismic structural responses in an easily controllable manner, and can be used to modify or reshape overall structural hysteretic response. This study uses a spectral analysis of semi-activ...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of earthquake engineering 2017-04, Vol.15 (4), p.1789-1806 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1806 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 1789 |
| container_title | Bulletin of earthquake engineering |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Hazaveh, N. K. Rodgers, G. W. Chase, J. G. Pampanin, S. |
| description | Semi-active control devices offer significant promise for their ability to add supplemental damping and reduce seismic structural responses in an easily controllable manner, and can be used to modify or reshape overall structural hysteretic response. This study uses a spectral analysis of semi-active viscous dampers to compare the impact of three methods of re-shaping structural hysteretic dynamics that resist: motion in all 4 quadrants (1–4), motion away from equilibrium (1–3) and motion towards equilibrium (2–4). Performance is assessed by evaluating reduction factors (RFs) from an uncontrolled structure for maximum displacement (S
d
) total base-shear (F
b
), and maximum acceleration (S
a
) which assess performance in mitigating response damage, a risk of foundation damage and contents damage respectively. Spectra are created using 20 design level earthquakes from the medium suite of the SAC project with equal probability of occurrence and structural periods of T = 0.1–0.5 s. The RF spectra results are presented as median (50th) and 5th, 25th, 75th, and 95th percentile RF to define the distribution and change in risk across the 20 events. Statistical summaries of the results indicate that a 2–4 control method reduces the median value of Sd, Fb and Sa by approximately 10–40%, over all periods up to 5.0 s. These results are consistent over the 5–95th percentile range of all responses for a given period. The other control laws (1–3, 1–4) reduce S
d
as much or more, but at a cost of increased base-shear (F
b
) in comparison to the uncontrolled state. Overall, the reduction in terms of both displacement and base-shear demand is only available with the semi-active 2–4 control method. Finally, analytical expressions for the median displacement reduction factor are presented and compared to current Eurocode standards for comparison. These results indicate the robustness of simple semi-active viscous dampers could be better managed to mitigate response to the structure, foundation and risk. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10518-016-0036-z |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893899221</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1881749436</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-bcfba3cbf19f8f01c7f80c849415ac1c3b7941d56499de32ec0de2d998a10fa93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8FL16imaZtkqMsfiwIgih4C2ma7nbpl5l2ZffXm3U9iCB4mZnD8868w0vIObArYExcI7AUJGWQUcZ4RrcHZAKp4BSSNDv8mhkVGbwdkxPEFWNxKhSbkPmzw6Xpq3YR4eBHO4ze1NFyg4PzDiuMQu27Fl30UQ3LCF1TUWOHau2idYW2GzEqTLPTn5Kj0tTozr77lLze3b7MHujj0_18dvNILZfxQHNb5obbvARVypKBFaVkViYqgdRYsDwXYSzSLFGqcDx2lhUuLpSSBlhpFJ-Sy_3e3nfvo8NBN8GIq2vTumBHg1RcKhXH8A9UggiXeRbQi1_oqht9Gx4JlEg5jwFEoGBPWd8helfq3leN8RsNTO9y0PscdMhB73LQ26CJ9xoMbLtw_sfmP0WfQIWMGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1875332117</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reshaping structural hysteresis response with semi-active viscous damping</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Hazaveh, N. K. ; Rodgers, G. W. ; Chase, J. G. ; Pampanin, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hazaveh, N. K. ; Rodgers, G. W. ; Chase, J. G. ; Pampanin, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Semi-active control devices offer significant promise for their ability to add supplemental damping and reduce seismic structural responses in an easily controllable manner, and can be used to modify or reshape overall structural hysteretic response. This study uses a spectral analysis of semi-active viscous dampers to compare the impact of three methods of re-shaping structural hysteretic dynamics that resist: motion in all 4 quadrants (1–4), motion away from equilibrium (1–3) and motion towards equilibrium (2–4). Performance is assessed by evaluating reduction factors (RFs) from an uncontrolled structure for maximum displacement (S
d
) total base-shear (F
b
), and maximum acceleration (S
a
) which assess performance in mitigating response damage, a risk of foundation damage and contents damage respectively. Spectra are created using 20 design level earthquakes from the medium suite of the SAC project with equal probability of occurrence and structural periods of T = 0.1–0.5 s. The RF spectra results are presented as median (50th) and 5th, 25th, 75th, and 95th percentile RF to define the distribution and change in risk across the 20 events. Statistical summaries of the results indicate that a 2–4 control method reduces the median value of Sd, Fb and Sa by approximately 10–40%, over all periods up to 5.0 s. These results are consistent over the 5–95th percentile range of all responses for a given period. The other control laws (1–3, 1–4) reduce S
d
as much or more, but at a cost of increased base-shear (F
b
) in comparison to the uncontrolled state. Overall, the reduction in terms of both displacement and base-shear demand is only available with the semi-active 2–4 control method. Finally, analytical expressions for the median displacement reduction factor are presented and compared to current Eurocode standards for comparison. These results indicate the robustness of simple semi-active viscous dampers could be better managed to mitigate response to the structure, foundation and risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1570-761X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10518-016-0036-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Building codes ; Building foundations ; Civil Engineering ; Control systems ; Damage assessment ; Displacement ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquakes ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Hydrogeology ; Hysteresis ; Original Research Paper ; Performance assessment ; Reduction ; Risk ; Seismic activity ; Seismic engineering ; Shear strain ; Spectra ; Spectral analysis ; Structural damage ; Structural Geology</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2017-04, Vol.15 (4), p.1789-1806</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><rights>Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-bcfba3cbf19f8f01c7f80c849415ac1c3b7941d56499de32ec0de2d998a10fa93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-bcfba3cbf19f8f01c7f80c849415ac1c3b7941d56499de32ec0de2d998a10fa93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5058-0205</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-016-0036-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10518-016-0036-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hazaveh, N. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodgers, G. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chase, J. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pampanin, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Reshaping structural hysteresis response with semi-active viscous damping</title><title>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</title><addtitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</addtitle><description>Semi-active control devices offer significant promise for their ability to add supplemental damping and reduce seismic structural responses in an easily controllable manner, and can be used to modify or reshape overall structural hysteretic response. This study uses a spectral analysis of semi-active viscous dampers to compare the impact of three methods of re-shaping structural hysteretic dynamics that resist: motion in all 4 quadrants (1–4), motion away from equilibrium (1–3) and motion towards equilibrium (2–4). Performance is assessed by evaluating reduction factors (RFs) from an uncontrolled structure for maximum displacement (S
d
) total base-shear (F
b
), and maximum acceleration (S
a
) which assess performance in mitigating response damage, a risk of foundation damage and contents damage respectively. Spectra are created using 20 design level earthquakes from the medium suite of the SAC project with equal probability of occurrence and structural periods of T = 0.1–0.5 s. The RF spectra results are presented as median (50th) and 5th, 25th, 75th, and 95th percentile RF to define the distribution and change in risk across the 20 events. Statistical summaries of the results indicate that a 2–4 control method reduces the median value of Sd, Fb and Sa by approximately 10–40%, over all periods up to 5.0 s. These results are consistent over the 5–95th percentile range of all responses for a given period. The other control laws (1–3, 1–4) reduce S
d
as much or more, but at a cost of increased base-shear (F
b
) in comparison to the uncontrolled state. Overall, the reduction in terms of both displacement and base-shear demand is only available with the semi-active 2–4 control method. Finally, analytical expressions for the median displacement reduction factor are presented and compared to current Eurocode standards for comparison. These results indicate the robustness of simple semi-active viscous dampers could be better managed to mitigate response to the structure, foundation and risk.</description><subject>Building codes</subject><subject>Building foundations</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Control systems</subject><subject>Damage assessment</subject><subject>Displacement</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hysteresis</subject><subject>Original Research Paper</subject><subject>Performance assessment</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Shear strain</subject><subject>Spectra</subject><subject>Spectral analysis</subject><subject>Structural damage</subject><subject>Structural Geology</subject><issn>1570-761X</issn><issn>1573-1456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8FL16imaZtkqMsfiwIgih4C2ma7nbpl5l2ZffXm3U9iCB4mZnD8868w0vIObArYExcI7AUJGWQUcZ4RrcHZAKp4BSSNDv8mhkVGbwdkxPEFWNxKhSbkPmzw6Xpq3YR4eBHO4ze1NFyg4PzDiuMQu27Fl30UQ3LCF1TUWOHau2idYW2GzEqTLPTn5Kj0tTozr77lLze3b7MHujj0_18dvNILZfxQHNb5obbvARVypKBFaVkViYqgdRYsDwXYSzSLFGqcDx2lhUuLpSSBlhpFJ-Sy_3e3nfvo8NBN8GIq2vTumBHg1RcKhXH8A9UggiXeRbQi1_oqht9Gx4JlEg5jwFEoGBPWd8helfq3leN8RsNTO9y0PscdMhB73LQ26CJ9xoMbLtw_sfmP0WfQIWMGw</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Hazaveh, N. K.</creator><creator>Rodgers, G. W.</creator><creator>Chase, J. G.</creator><creator>Pampanin, S.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5058-0205</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Reshaping structural hysteresis response with semi-active viscous damping</title><author>Hazaveh, N. K. ; Rodgers, G. W. ; Chase, J. G. ; Pampanin, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-bcfba3cbf19f8f01c7f80c849415ac1c3b7941d56499de32ec0de2d998a10fa93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Building codes</topic><topic>Building foundations</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Control systems</topic><topic>Damage assessment</topic><topic>Displacement</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hysteresis</topic><topic>Original Research Paper</topic><topic>Performance assessment</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Shear strain</topic><topic>Spectra</topic><topic>Spectral analysis</topic><topic>Structural damage</topic><topic>Structural Geology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hazaveh, N. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodgers, G. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chase, J. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pampanin, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hazaveh, N. K.</au><au>Rodgers, G. W.</au><au>Chase, J. G.</au><au>Pampanin, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reshaping structural hysteresis response with semi-active viscous damping</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle><stitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</stitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1789</spage><epage>1806</epage><pages>1789-1806</pages><issn>1570-761X</issn><eissn>1573-1456</eissn><abstract>Semi-active control devices offer significant promise for their ability to add supplemental damping and reduce seismic structural responses in an easily controllable manner, and can be used to modify or reshape overall structural hysteretic response. This study uses a spectral analysis of semi-active viscous dampers to compare the impact of three methods of re-shaping structural hysteretic dynamics that resist: motion in all 4 quadrants (1–4), motion away from equilibrium (1–3) and motion towards equilibrium (2–4). Performance is assessed by evaluating reduction factors (RFs) from an uncontrolled structure for maximum displacement (S
d
) total base-shear (F
b
), and maximum acceleration (S
a
) which assess performance in mitigating response damage, a risk of foundation damage and contents damage respectively. Spectra are created using 20 design level earthquakes from the medium suite of the SAC project with equal probability of occurrence and structural periods of T = 0.1–0.5 s. The RF spectra results are presented as median (50th) and 5th, 25th, 75th, and 95th percentile RF to define the distribution and change in risk across the 20 events. Statistical summaries of the results indicate that a 2–4 control method reduces the median value of Sd, Fb and Sa by approximately 10–40%, over all periods up to 5.0 s. These results are consistent over the 5–95th percentile range of all responses for a given period. The other control laws (1–3, 1–4) reduce S
d
as much or more, but at a cost of increased base-shear (F
b
) in comparison to the uncontrolled state. Overall, the reduction in terms of both displacement and base-shear demand is only available with the semi-active 2–4 control method. Finally, analytical expressions for the median displacement reduction factor are presented and compared to current Eurocode standards for comparison. These results indicate the robustness of simple semi-active viscous dampers could be better managed to mitigate response to the structure, foundation and risk.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10518-016-0036-z</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5058-0205</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1570-761X |
| ispartof | Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2017-04, Vol.15 (4), p.1789-1806 |
| issn | 1570-761X 1573-1456 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893899221 |
| source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Building codes Building foundations Civil Engineering Control systems Damage assessment Displacement Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Earthquake damage Earthquakes Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Geophysics/Geodesy Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Hydrogeology Hysteresis Original Research Paper Performance assessment Reduction Risk Seismic activity Seismic engineering Shear strain Spectra Spectral analysis Structural damage Structural Geology |
| title | Reshaping structural hysteresis response with semi-active viscous damping |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T14%3A07%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reshaping%20structural%20hysteresis%20response%20with%20semi-active%20viscous%20damping&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20earthquake%20engineering&rft.au=Hazaveh,%20N.%20K.&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1789&rft.epage=1806&rft.pages=1789-1806&rft.issn=1570-761X&rft.eissn=1573-1456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10518-016-0036-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1881749436%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1875332117&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |