Investigation of the sensitivity of turbulent closures and coupling of hybrid RANS‐LES models for predicting flow fields with separation and reattachment

Summary Hybrid models have found widespread applications for simulation of wall‐bounded flows at high Reynolds numbers. Typically, these models employ Reynolds‐averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and large eddy simulation (LES) in the near‐body and off‐body regions, respectively. A number of coupling stra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal for numerical methods in fluids 2017-04, Vol.83 (12), p.917-939
Hauptverfasser: Kumar, G., Lakshmanan, S. K., Gopalan, H., De, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 939
container_issue 12
container_start_page 917
container_title International journal for numerical methods in fluids
container_volume 83
creator Kumar, G.
Lakshmanan, S. K.
Gopalan, H.
De, A.
description Summary Hybrid models have found widespread applications for simulation of wall‐bounded flows at high Reynolds numbers. Typically, these models employ Reynolds‐averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and large eddy simulation (LES) in the near‐body and off‐body regions, respectively. A number of coupling strategies between the RANS and LES regions have been proposed, tested, and applied in the literature with varying degree of success. Linear eddy‐viscosity models (LEVM) are often used for the closure of turbulent stress tensor in RANS and LES regions. LEVM incorrectly predicts the anisotropy of Reynolds normal stress at the RANS‐LES interface region. To overcome this issue, use of non‐linear eddy‐viscosity models (NLEVM) have started receiving attention. In this study, a generic non‐linear blended modeling framework for performing hybrid simulations is proposed. Flow over the periodic hills is used as the test case for model evaluation. This case is chosen due to complex flow physics with simplified geometry. Analysis of the simulations suggests that the non‐linear hybrid models show a better performance than linear hybrid models. It is also observed that the non‐linear closures are less sensitive to the RANS‐LES coupling and grid resolution. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. In this study, a generic non‐linear blended modeling framework for performing hybrid RANS‐LES simulations is proposed and flow over the periodic hills is used as the test case for model evaluation. Analysis of the simulations suggests that the non‐linear closures are less sensitive to the RANS‐LES coupling method and grid resolution. Also, good agreement has been found for flow statistics compared with the existing experimental data for simulations performed using NSST‐Blended at higher Reynolds number.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/fld.4334
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893899091</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1881762566</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-2d9a15611ca4dcd891de2ef722bd6a29d7df1b4adc5e0a7f2bd94b404902a4d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkd1qFTEUhYNY8NgKPkLAG2-m5m9-cllqawuHFqxeD5lkpyclZzImmR7OnY_gvW_XJzHTIwiC4NWGzbfXYq-F0FtKTikh7IP15lRwLl6gFSWyrQhv-Eu0IqylFSOSvkKvU3oghEjW8RX6eT0-QsruXmUXRhwszhvACcbksnt0ef-8muMwexgz1j6kOULCajRYh3nybrxfkM1-iM7gz2c3d0_ff6wv7vA2GPAJ2xDxFME4nRfU-rDD1oE3Ce9c3hSrScWD-aIZQeWs9GZb3E7QkVU-wZvf8xh9vbz4cn5VrW8_XZ-frSvNaykqZqSidUOpVsJo00lqgIFtGRtMo5g0rbF0EMroGohqbVlLMQgiJGHlgvJj9P6gO8XwbS5p9FuXNHivRghz6mkneSdlCe8_0I62DaubpqDv_kIfwhzH8kih2kY0NWf8j6COIaUItp-i26q47ynpl0L7Umi_FFrQ6oDunIf9P7n-cv3xmf8FOBClMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1876465323</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation of the sensitivity of turbulent closures and coupling of hybrid RANS‐LES models for predicting flow fields with separation and reattachment</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Kumar, G. ; Lakshmanan, S. K. ; Gopalan, H. ; De, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumar, G. ; Lakshmanan, S. K. ; Gopalan, H. ; De, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Hybrid models have found widespread applications for simulation of wall‐bounded flows at high Reynolds numbers. Typically, these models employ Reynolds‐averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and large eddy simulation (LES) in the near‐body and off‐body regions, respectively. A number of coupling strategies between the RANS and LES regions have been proposed, tested, and applied in the literature with varying degree of success. Linear eddy‐viscosity models (LEVM) are often used for the closure of turbulent stress tensor in RANS and LES regions. LEVM incorrectly predicts the anisotropy of Reynolds normal stress at the RANS‐LES interface region. To overcome this issue, use of non‐linear eddy‐viscosity models (NLEVM) have started receiving attention. In this study, a generic non‐linear blended modeling framework for performing hybrid simulations is proposed. Flow over the periodic hills is used as the test case for model evaluation. This case is chosen due to complex flow physics with simplified geometry. Analysis of the simulations suggests that the non‐linear hybrid models show a better performance than linear hybrid models. It is also observed that the non‐linear closures are less sensitive to the RANS‐LES coupling and grid resolution. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. In this study, a generic non‐linear blended modeling framework for performing hybrid RANS‐LES simulations is proposed and flow over the periodic hills is used as the test case for model evaluation. Analysis of the simulations suggests that the non‐linear closures are less sensitive to the RANS‐LES coupling method and grid resolution. Also, good agreement has been found for flow statistics compared with the existing experimental data for simulations performed using NSST‐Blended at higher Reynolds number.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0271-2091</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0363</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/fld.4334</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJNFDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Closures ; Computer simulation ; Fluid flow ; hybrid RANS‐LES models ; Large eddy simulation ; LES ; Mathematical models ; Nonlinearity ; non‐linear models ; periodic hill ; RANS ; Turbulence ; Turbulent flow</subject><ispartof>International journal for numerical methods in fluids, 2017-04, Vol.83 (12), p.917-939</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-2d9a15611ca4dcd891de2ef722bd6a29d7df1b4adc5e0a7f2bd94b404902a4d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-2d9a15611ca4dcd891de2ef722bd6a29d7df1b4adc5e0a7f2bd94b404902a4d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Ffld.4334$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Ffld.4334$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumar, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakshmanan, S. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gopalan, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation of the sensitivity of turbulent closures and coupling of hybrid RANS‐LES models for predicting flow fields with separation and reattachment</title><title>International journal for numerical methods in fluids</title><description>Summary Hybrid models have found widespread applications for simulation of wall‐bounded flows at high Reynolds numbers. Typically, these models employ Reynolds‐averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and large eddy simulation (LES) in the near‐body and off‐body regions, respectively. A number of coupling strategies between the RANS and LES regions have been proposed, tested, and applied in the literature with varying degree of success. Linear eddy‐viscosity models (LEVM) are often used for the closure of turbulent stress tensor in RANS and LES regions. LEVM incorrectly predicts the anisotropy of Reynolds normal stress at the RANS‐LES interface region. To overcome this issue, use of non‐linear eddy‐viscosity models (NLEVM) have started receiving attention. In this study, a generic non‐linear blended modeling framework for performing hybrid simulations is proposed. Flow over the periodic hills is used as the test case for model evaluation. This case is chosen due to complex flow physics with simplified geometry. Analysis of the simulations suggests that the non‐linear hybrid models show a better performance than linear hybrid models. It is also observed that the non‐linear closures are less sensitive to the RANS‐LES coupling and grid resolution. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. In this study, a generic non‐linear blended modeling framework for performing hybrid RANS‐LES simulations is proposed and flow over the periodic hills is used as the test case for model evaluation. Analysis of the simulations suggests that the non‐linear closures are less sensitive to the RANS‐LES coupling method and grid resolution. Also, good agreement has been found for flow statistics compared with the existing experimental data for simulations performed using NSST‐Blended at higher Reynolds number.</description><subject>Closures</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>hybrid RANS‐LES models</subject><subject>Large eddy simulation</subject><subject>LES</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>non‐linear models</subject><subject>periodic hill</subject><subject>RANS</subject><subject>Turbulence</subject><subject>Turbulent flow</subject><issn>0271-2091</issn><issn>1097-0363</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkd1qFTEUhYNY8NgKPkLAG2-m5m9-cllqawuHFqxeD5lkpyclZzImmR7OnY_gvW_XJzHTIwiC4NWGzbfXYq-F0FtKTikh7IP15lRwLl6gFSWyrQhv-Eu0IqylFSOSvkKvU3oghEjW8RX6eT0-QsruXmUXRhwszhvACcbksnt0ef-8muMwexgz1j6kOULCajRYh3nybrxfkM1-iM7gz2c3d0_ff6wv7vA2GPAJ2xDxFME4nRfU-rDD1oE3Ce9c3hSrScWD-aIZQeWs9GZb3E7QkVU-wZvf8xh9vbz4cn5VrW8_XZ-frSvNaykqZqSidUOpVsJo00lqgIFtGRtMo5g0rbF0EMroGohqbVlLMQgiJGHlgvJj9P6gO8XwbS5p9FuXNHivRghz6mkneSdlCe8_0I62DaubpqDv_kIfwhzH8kih2kY0NWf8j6COIaUItp-i26q47ynpl0L7Umi_FFrQ6oDunIf9P7n-cv3xmf8FOBClMQ</recordid><startdate>20170430</startdate><enddate>20170430</enddate><creator>Kumar, G.</creator><creator>Lakshmanan, S. K.</creator><creator>Gopalan, H.</creator><creator>De, A.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170430</creationdate><title>Investigation of the sensitivity of turbulent closures and coupling of hybrid RANS‐LES models for predicting flow fields with separation and reattachment</title><author>Kumar, G. ; Lakshmanan, S. K. ; Gopalan, H. ; De, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-2d9a15611ca4dcd891de2ef722bd6a29d7df1b4adc5e0a7f2bd94b404902a4d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Closures</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>hybrid RANS‐LES models</topic><topic>Large eddy simulation</topic><topic>LES</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>non‐linear models</topic><topic>periodic hill</topic><topic>RANS</topic><topic>Turbulence</topic><topic>Turbulent flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumar, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakshmanan, S. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gopalan, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal for numerical methods in fluids</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumar, G.</au><au>Lakshmanan, S. K.</au><au>Gopalan, H.</au><au>De, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigation of the sensitivity of turbulent closures and coupling of hybrid RANS‐LES models for predicting flow fields with separation and reattachment</atitle><jtitle>International journal for numerical methods in fluids</jtitle><date>2017-04-30</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>917</spage><epage>939</epage><pages>917-939</pages><issn>0271-2091</issn><eissn>1097-0363</eissn><coden>IJNFDW</coden><abstract>Summary Hybrid models have found widespread applications for simulation of wall‐bounded flows at high Reynolds numbers. Typically, these models employ Reynolds‐averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and large eddy simulation (LES) in the near‐body and off‐body regions, respectively. A number of coupling strategies between the RANS and LES regions have been proposed, tested, and applied in the literature with varying degree of success. Linear eddy‐viscosity models (LEVM) are often used for the closure of turbulent stress tensor in RANS and LES regions. LEVM incorrectly predicts the anisotropy of Reynolds normal stress at the RANS‐LES interface region. To overcome this issue, use of non‐linear eddy‐viscosity models (NLEVM) have started receiving attention. In this study, a generic non‐linear blended modeling framework for performing hybrid simulations is proposed. Flow over the periodic hills is used as the test case for model evaluation. This case is chosen due to complex flow physics with simplified geometry. Analysis of the simulations suggests that the non‐linear hybrid models show a better performance than linear hybrid models. It is also observed that the non‐linear closures are less sensitive to the RANS‐LES coupling and grid resolution. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. In this study, a generic non‐linear blended modeling framework for performing hybrid RANS‐LES simulations is proposed and flow over the periodic hills is used as the test case for model evaluation. Analysis of the simulations suggests that the non‐linear closures are less sensitive to the RANS‐LES coupling method and grid resolution. Also, good agreement has been found for flow statistics compared with the existing experimental data for simulations performed using NSST‐Blended at higher Reynolds number.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/fld.4334</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0271-2091
ispartof International journal for numerical methods in fluids, 2017-04, Vol.83 (12), p.917-939
issn 0271-2091
1097-0363
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893899091
source Wiley Online Library
subjects Closures
Computer simulation
Fluid flow
hybrid RANS‐LES models
Large eddy simulation
LES
Mathematical models
Nonlinearity
non‐linear models
periodic hill
RANS
Turbulence
Turbulent flow
title Investigation of the sensitivity of turbulent closures and coupling of hybrid RANS‐LES models for predicting flow fields with separation and reattachment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T13%3A19%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20of%20the%20sensitivity%20of%20turbulent%20closures%20and%20coupling%20of%20hybrid%20RANS%E2%80%90LES%20models%20for%20predicting%20flow%20fields%20with%20separation%20and%20reattachment&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20for%20numerical%20methods%20in%20fluids&rft.au=Kumar,%20G.&rft.date=2017-04-30&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=917&rft.epage=939&rft.pages=917-939&rft.issn=0271-2091&rft.eissn=1097-0363&rft.coden=IJNFDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/fld.4334&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1881762566%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1876465323&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true